Citations

Abstract Alpha-tubulin 4A encoding gene (TUBA4A) has been associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, based on identification of likely pathogenic variants in patients from distinct amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia cohorts. By screening a multicentric French cohort of 448 unrelated probands presenting with cerebellar ataxia, we identified ultra-rare TUBA4A missense variants, all being absent from public databases and predicted pathogenic by multiple in silico tools. In addition, gene burden analyses in the 100 000 Genomes project (100KGP) showed enrichment of TUBA4A rare variants in the inherited ataxia group compared to controls [odds ratio: 57.0847 (10.2−576.7); P = 4.02 ×10−7]. Taken together, we report 12 patients presenting with spasticity and/or cerebellar ataxia and harbouring a predicted pathogenic TUBA4A missense mutation, including five confirmed de novo cases and a mutation previously reported in a large family presenting with spastic ataxia. Cultured fibroblasts from three patients harbouring distinct TUBA4A missense showed significant alterations in microtubule organization and dynamics, providing insight of TUBA4A variants pathogenicity. Our data confirm the identification of a hereditary spastic ataxia disease gene with variable age of onset, expanding the clinical spectrum of TUBA4A associated phenotypes.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include common genetic variants and potentially heavy alcohol consumption. We assessed if genetic variants modify the association between heavy alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) by heavy alcohol consumption (more than three drinks per day) for pancreatic cancer in European ancestry populations from genome-wide association studies. Our analysis included 3,707 cases and 4,167 controls from case–control studies and 1,098 cases and 1,162 controls from cohort studies. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. Results: A potential novel region of association on 10p11.22, lead SNP rs7898449 (interaction P value (Pinteraction) = 5.1 × 10−8 in the meta-analysis; Pinteraction = 2.1 × 10−9 in the case–control studies; Pinteraction = 0.91 in the cohort studies), was identified. An SNP correlated with this lead SNP is an expression quantitative trait locus for the neuropilin 1 gene. Of the 17 genomic regions with genome-wide significant evidence of association with pancreatic cancer in prior studies, we observed suggestive evidence that heavy alcohol consumption modified the association for one SNP near LINC00673, rs11655237 on 17q25.1 (Pinteraction = 0.004). Conclusions: We identified a novel genomic region that may be associated with pancreatic cancer risk in conjunction with heavy alcohol consumption located near an expression quantitative trait locus for neuropilin 1, a protein that plays an important role in the development and progression of pancreatic cancer. Impact: This work can provide insights into the etiology of pancreatic cancer, particularly in heavy drinkers.

Abstract Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of central α2-adrenergic mechanisms on arterial baroreflex control of sympathetic and cardiovagal outflow in healthy humans. R-R interval (ECG), blood pressure (brachial arterial catheter), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; peroneal microneurography) were measured in eight healthy participants (5 females; 28±7 years). Sympathetic action potentials (AP) were extracted from the filtered MSNA neurogram (continuous wavelet transform) during a 5-minute baseline (BSL) and an intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion consisting of a loading dose (LD; 10 minutes at 0.225 μg/kg/hr) and a maintenance dose (MD; ~0.15 μg/kg/hr). Sympathetic AP baroreflex threshold gain was measured as the slope of the linear relationship between AP discharge probability and diastolic blood pressure. The linear relationship between R-R interval and systolic blood pressure (sequence technique) quantified cardiovagal baroreflex gain. Mixed-effects analyses and post-hoc t-tests were performed. Data are reported as mean ± SD. Dexmedetomidine reset the baroreflex threshold operating points for all sympathetic AP clusters downwards to lower firing probabilities (cluster 4; BSL: 20±6, LD: 13±8, MD: 6±5%, both p<0.01 vs. BSL) and leftwards to lower diastolic pressures (BSL: 72±9, LD: 69±8, MD: 65±10 mmHg, both p<0.01 vs. BSL). Dexmedetomidine reduced baroreflex threshold gain for the subpopulation of medium-sized sympathetic APs (cluster 4; BSL: -6.5±2.0, LD: -2.6±1.6, MD: -2.0±0.7 %/mmHg, both p<0.01 vs. BSL). Dexmedetomidine did not affect baroreflex threshold gain of small (cluster 1; BSL: -1.9±1.1, LD: -1.3±1.6, MD: -1.1±0.8 %/mmHg, both P>0.88 vs. BSL) or large AP clusters (cluster 9; BSL: -0.8±0.4, LD: -0.8±1.0, MD: -0.2±0.7 %/mmHg, both P>0.98 vs. BSL). Dexmedetomidine reset the cardiovagal baroreflex to lower systolic pressures but did not affect R-R interval (BSL: 1035±261, LD: 1025±308, MD: 1005±292ms, Main effect P=0.45) or gain (BSL: 24±11, LD: 30±20, MD: 26±25 ms/mmHg, Main effect P=0.63). These findings suggest that central α2-adrenergic mechanisms differentially affect arterial baroreflex control of sympathetic and cardiovagal outflow in humans by minimally affecting cardiovagal baroreflex gain but strongly affecting the baroreflex gain for the subpopulation of medium-sized sympathetic APs. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Introduction: Severe menopausal hot flash symptoms are linked to the development of cardiovascular disease. Exaggerated blood pressure responses to exercise are also associated with an increased risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if females with more severe hot flash symptoms exhibit greater blood pressure responses to exercise compared to those with minimal menopausal hot flashes. We aimed to determine if there is a difference in the pressor response to isometric exercise between females with severe hot flash symptoms compared to females with no/low hot flash symptoms. We hypothesized that there will be exaggerated blood pressure responses to isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) and post-exercise ischemia (PEI) in females who have severe menopausal hot flashes compared to females with no/low hot flashes. Methods: We studied 19 female participants (age: 51±5yrs) with no history of cardiovascular disease or hypertension. The Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) was used to assess the hot flash symptom severity and to group the participants into no/low (no-or-mild on MRS) or high (moderate-or-severe on MRS) hot flash symptom groups. Continuous blood pressure (BP) was measured via photoplethysmography and calibrated relative to a brachial arm cuff pressure. After 2 minutes of quiet rest, participants performed 2 minutes of IHG at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 2 minutes of PEI on the exercising arm to isolate the metaboreflex. The severity groups were compared via independent samples t-tests. Results: There were 13 females in the no/low group and 6 females in the high group. Baseline heart rate (HR, no/low: 60±11 vs high: 58±8bpm), systolic (SBP, no/low:129±18 vs high: 120±14mmHg), diastolic (DBP, no/low: 72±12 vs high: 63±7mmHg) and mean BP (MBP, no/low: 91±11 vs high 82±9mmHg) were not different between groups. There were no differences in the pressor responses to IHG between groups (HR: no/low: Δ6±5 vs high: 5±4bpm, p=0.425; SBP: no/low: Δ9±5 vs high: 11±6mmHg, p=0.408; DBP: no/low: Δ5±3 vs high: 7±4mmHg, p=0.182; MBP: no/low: Δ6±3 vs high: 8±4mmHg, p=0.253). There was also no difference in the pressor response to PEI between groups (HR: no/low: Δ6±6 vs high: 4±2bpm, p=0.554; SBP: no/low: Δ11±6 vs high: 16±9mmHg, p=0.191; DBP: no/low: Δ5±3 vs high: 8±6mmHg, p=0.298; MBP: no/low: Δ7±4 vs high: 11±7mmHg, p=0.280). Conclusion: The current data show no differences in the blood pressure responses to IHG or PEI between females with different menopausal hot flash symptom severities. This suggests that pressor responses to an IHG exercise and the metaboreflex may not be notable contributors to the increased cardiovascular risk in females with severe menopausal hot flashes. NIH: K01 HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR000135, UL1 TR002377; AHA: 898649. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Menopausal females who experience frequent hot flashes (episodes of increased body temperature and sweating) have a greater risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease than females without hot flashes. Individuals with exaggerated blood pressure (BP) responses to cold stress have a higher risk of hypertension than those with lower responses. It is unknown if females who experience hot flashes have exaggerated pressor responses to cold stress, indicating their greater risk of hypertension. The aim of this study was to determine the pressor responses to cold stress in females who experience hot flashes and those who do not. An additional goal was to understand the relation between daily hot flash frequency and pressor responses. We hypothesized that females with hot flashes would have exaggerated pressor responses to cold stress compared to females without hot flashes. We also hypothesized that pressor responses would be positively correlated to daily hot flash frequency. We recruited 17 females, ages 45-60 years, without hypertension or cardiovascular disease, who did and did not have hot flashes. They reported hot flash frequency in a 3-day written diary. On the study day, continuous BP (finger photoplethysmography, calibrated to brachial cuff BP) and heart rate (HR; 3-lead ECG) were recorded while the participant rested during a 2-minute baseline period, then subsequently had an ice-water pack placed on their forehead for 3 minutes. The changes in mean BP (MBP) and HR are calculated as the change in MBP or HR during the cold pressor test minus the average MBP or HR during baseline. Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test and Pearson correlation. Twelve females reported hot flashes (age: 51±4 years; average number of hot flashes: 3 per day) and five did not (age: 49±5 years). These groups did not differ in age, body mass index, resting MBP, or resting HR (p>0.05 for all). The change in MBP from baseline to the cold pressor test did not differ between females with and without hot flashes (Δ17±10 vs. Δ19±14 mmHg, respectively; p=0.860). The change in HR with the cold pressor test also did not differ between females who did and did not report hot flashes (Δ10±6 vs. Δ12±8 mmHg, respectively; p=0.647). In females with hot flashes, the number of hot flashes reported per day (range: 1-12 per day) was not correlated with the change in MBP (p=0.824) or HR (p=0.460) during the cold pressor test. These current data show that menopausal females who experience hot flashes do not exhibit exaggerated BP or HR responses to cold stress in comparison to females who do not experience hot flashes. In addition, BP and HR responses are not correlated with daily hot flash frequency. There are likely other vascular mechanisms that place menopausal females with hot flashes at an increased risk for hypertension. In addition, incorporating information on the age at which hot flashes began, as well as hot flash severity, might help us to further understand cardiovascular risk in this population. AHA 898649, NIH T32 DK07352, K01 HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR002377. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) causes acute coronary syndrome or sudden cardiac death due to a separation of arterial wall layers. The majority of patients with SCAD are females (>80%) with few to no traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Though the physiological mechanisms that predispose to SCAD are unknown, common triggers for SCAD events include sympathoexcitatory stimuli, such as mental and emotional stress. Additionally, studies report high prevalence of depression and anxiety among patients with SCAD. Our study aimed to investigate cardiovascular responses to mental stress in patients with SCAD. We hypothesized that patients with SCAD would have exaggerated cardiovascular responses to mental stress compared to healthy controls. Methods: Four female patients with SCAD were age-, and BMI-matched with 4 healthy females. Participants underwent 2 minutes of baseline quiet rest, a 5-minute Stroop Color Word Test to induce mental stress, followed by 2 minutes of recovery. Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP, finger photoplethysmography) and heart rate (HR, 3-lead ECG) were recorded. Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to measure forearm blood flow (FBF). Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean BP×100. Data are presented as change from baseline (Δmean±SD). Group data were compared using independent samples t-tests. Results: Resting hemodynamic parameters (Systolic [SBP], Diastolic [DBP], and Mean BP [MBP], Pulse pressure [PP], and HR) and FVC were similar between groups. Patients with SCAD had greater increases in DBP (Δ12±5 vs. Δ1±5 mmHg, p=0.02) and PP (Δ5±3 vs. Δ-7±8 mmHg, p=0.04) during the last minute of mental stress test compared to controls. Although, there were no differences in the changes of SBP (Δ17±7 vs. Δ-1±13 mmHg, p=0.05), MBP (Δ13±6 vs. Δ3±8 mmHg, p=0.08), HR (Δ8±0 vs. Δ10±2 bpm, p=0.12), or FVC (Δ1.5±1.2 vs. Δ1.8±1.3 ml/min/100 mmHg, p=0.80) between groups. During the last minute of recovery, there were no differences in hemodynamic parameters (SBP: Δ6±9 vs. Δ-4±10 mmHg, p=0.23; DBP: Δ2±7 vs. Δ-3±2 mmHg, p=0.22; MBP: Δ3±7 vs. Δ-3±5 mmHg, p=0.22; PP: Δ4±5 vs. Δ-1±8 mmHg, p= 0.35; HR: Δ-1±3 vs. Δ0±3 bpm, p=0.64), or FVC (Δ1.3±1.7 vs. Δ0.5±0.3 ml/min/100 mmHg, p= 0.35) between groups. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that patients with SCAD have greater increases in DBP and PP in response to mental stress compared to healthy controls. These exaggerated pressor responses might have implications for the pathophysiology of SCAD. NIH K23 HL155506, T32 DK07352, K01 HL148144, UL1 TR0022377, and AHA 898649. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) causes acute coronary syndrome via the sudden separation between the coronary arterial wall layers and/or hematoma. The SCAD patient population is >80% female who typically have few or no traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors (e.g., obesity, hypertension). Risk of a recurrent SCAD is reported as high as 19% at 3 years after an initial SCAD. Mechanisms underlying SCAD (re)occurrence are unknown. Common triggers for SCAD include sympathoexcitatory stimuli, including heavy exercise and intense Valsalva-like activities. This study tested the hypothesis that SCAD patients exhibit greater neurocardiovascular responses (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, muscle sympathetic nerve activity) to isometric handgrip and post-exercise ischemia compared to healthy females. Methods: Eight females with a history of SCAD (age: 56±6 yrs, BMI: 28±4 kg/m2) and 6 age- and BMI-matched healthy female controls (CON, age: 55±8 yrs, BMI: 26±5 kg/m2) participated. Continuous blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) and heart rate (3-lead ECG) were measured during rest (1 minute), isometric handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (2 minutes), and post-exercise ischemia at 220 mmHg (2 minutes) to isolate the skeletal muscle metaboreflex. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, peroneal microneurography) was measured in a subset of participants (5 SCAD/4 CON). Data are presented as an absolute change from rest (mean±SD). Two-way independent t-tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Resting mean blood pressure (SCAD: 96±8 vs CON: 91±9 mmHg, p=0.354), heart rate (SCAD: 56±11 vs CON: 59±10 bpm, p=0.666), and MSNA (SCAD: 50±19 vs CON: 43±32 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.697) were not different between groups. Relative to healthy controls, SCAD patients elicited greater increases in mean blood pressure during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ9±3 vs CON: Δ4±4 mmHg, p=0.034) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ7±4 vs CON: Δ3±3 mmHg, p=0.046). There were no group differences regarding heart rate responses during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ4±4 bpm, p=0.359) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ2±3 bpm, p=0.861). Responses in MSNA during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ12±8 vs CON: Δ9±8 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.536) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ11±2 vs CON: Δ13±10 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.713) also were not different between groups. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that compared to healthy females, female patients who experienced a SCAD exhibit greater pressor, but not chronotropic or sympathetic, responses to isometric handgrip and post-exercise ischemia. Exaggerated pressor responses to these perturbations may be a potential risk factor for SCAD (re)occurrence. NIH K23 HL155506, NIH T32 DK07352, NIH K01 HL148144, NIH UL1 TR0022377, and AHA 898649. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Background: Females who experience menopausal hot flashes ([MHF]; episodes of sudden warmth and sweating) have greater risk of developing hypertension than females without MHF. MHF symptom severity and frequency are positively associated with hypertension. Considering that augmented arterial stiffness contributes to hypertension, this work aimed to investigate the relations between MHF severity and frequency with arterial stiffness. We hypothesized that females with moderate to severe MHF symptoms would exhibit greater arterial stiffness compared to females without MHF symptoms. Further, we hypothesized that there would be a positive relation between MHF frequency and arterial stiffness. Methods: Twenty-five females (51±5 [SD] years) with no history of hypertension or cardiovascular disease participated. The Menopausal Rating Scale was used to categorize participants by symptom severity (None MHF: n=7, Mild MHF: n=9, Moderate/Severe MHF: n=9). Participants self-reported MHF frequency over three consecutive days in real time using a hot flash diary (4±5 MHF/day, Range: 0-16). After 15 minutes of supine rest, brachial cuff blood pressures (sphygmomanometer) and heart rate (electrocardiogram) were recorded. Arterial stiffness was measured as pulse wave velocity ([PWV]; SphygmoCor®). PWV was measured using a carotid tonometer simultaneously with a leg cuff to capture blood pressure waveforms at the carotid and femoral sites. Aortic systolic pressure, aortic diastolic pressure, and augmentation index (AIx) were measured via pulse wave analysis ([PWA]; SphygmoCor®) using a brachial cuff. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Spearman Rho (ρ). Results: Age, body mass index, resting mean blood pressure, and resting heart rate were not different among MHF severity groups (P>0.05 for all). PWV was not different among severity groups (None: 6.2±0.67 vs. Mild: 6.4±1.0 vs. Moderate/Severe: 6.6±1.0 cm/s, P=0.72). MHF frequency did not correlate with PWV (P=0.42). Aortic systolic pressure (None: 110±6 vs. Mild: 114±5 vs. Moderate/Severe: 112±11 mmHg, P=0.66), aortic diastolic pressure (None: 76±9 vs. Mild: 77±6 vs. Moderate/Severe: 76±10 mmHg, P=0.93), and AIx (None: 31.9±9.0 vs. Mild: 38.7±11.1 vs. Moderate/Severe: 30.4±7.4 %, P=0.16) were not different among severity groups. MHF frequency did not correlate with metrics of PWA (Systolic: P=0.61; Diastolic: P=0.89, AIx: P=0.42). Conclusion: Arterial stiffness and metrics of PWA were not different among females with varying MHF symptom severity. MHF frequency was also not correlated with aortic stiffness and metrics of PWA. Other mechanisms of vascular function (e.g., autonomic function, vasodilation, and/or vasoconstriction) should be investigated to determine potential contributors of hypertension risk in females with MHF. AHA 898649, NIH T32 DK07352, K01 HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR002377. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.