Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND: Recurrent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are observed in approximately 4% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and have been linked with increased transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Ivosidenib (AG-120), an oral, potent, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 protein (mIDH1), is a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 MDS. Through inhibition of mIDH1, ivosidenib suppresses the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to clinical responses via differentiation of malignant cells. AIM: To report safety and efficacy data from patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MDS enrolled in the first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02074839). METHODS: This ongoing study is evaluating the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Trial enrollment was completed on 08May2017. In dose escalation, patients received single-agent ivosidenib orally once daily (QD) or twice daily in 28-day cycles. The MTD was not reached and 500 mg QD was selected as the dose to be tested in expansion. Expansion Arm 3 enrolled patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies, including MDS. The overall response rate (ORR) for MDS was defined as complete remission (CR) + partial remission + marrow CR. Exploratory biomarker assessments included baseline co-occurring mutations (next-generation sequencing panel for hematologic malignancies) and mIDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BEAMing Digital PCR; lower limit of detection for mIDH1, 0.02-0.04%). Here, we present safety and efficacy data for patients with MDS in expansion Arm 3 and in dose escalation whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. RESULTS: In all, 258 patients (78 in dose escalation, 180 in expansion) received ivosidenib, including 12 patients with MDS (9 from expansion and 3 from escalation) whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. Baseline characteristics for these 12 patients were: 9 men/3 women; median age, 72.5 years (range, 52-78) and 42% were ≥75 years of age; median number of prior therapies, 1 (range, 1-3). As of 10Nov2017, 7 of 12 (58.3%) patients remained on treatment and 5 (41.7%) had discontinued (one for allogeneic stem cell transplantation). The median duration of exposure to ivosidenib was 11.0 months (range, 3.3-31.1). The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of the 12 patients were back pain (n=4, 33.3%) and anemia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, pruritus, and rash (n=3, 25.0% each). The majority of these AEs were grade 1-2 and reported as unrelated to treatment. No AEs led to permanent discontinuation of treatment. IDH differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS) was observed in 2 of 12 (16.7%) patients; the events were grade 1 and 2, respectively. Of the 12 patients with MDS receiving ivosidenib 500 mg QD, 5 achieved CR (41.7%; 95% CI 15.2%, 72.3%) and 6 achieved marrow CR (50.0%), resulting in an ORR of 91.7% (95% CI 61.5%, 99.8%). The median durations of CR and overall response were not estimable at the time of the data cutoff. The percentages of patients who remained in CR and response at 12 months were 60.0% and 61.4%, respectively. Among 5 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, 4 became transfusion independent for at least 56 days on treatment. Baseline co-occurring mutations and changes in mIDH1 VAF levels on ivosidenib therapy will be presented. CONCLUSION: In patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS, ivosidenib monotherapy was well tolerated and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence. These findings support the role of ivosidenib as an effective, oral, targeted treatment for patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS. Disclosures DiNardo: Karyopharm: Other: Advisory role; Medimmune: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. de Botton:Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stein:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Foran:Agios: Research Funding; Xencor, Inc.: Research Funding. Stone:AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Ono: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Amgen: Consultancy. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kapsalis:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Attar:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Relapse of malignancy and lethal graft versus host disease (GVHD) are the principal causes of failure of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Recently we have shown that at seven days after HCT an algorithm using two serum biomarkers (ST2 and REG3α) can predict severe GVHD (Hartwell et al. JCI Insight 2017). We determined whether serial testing (in the first month following HCT) of patients with low probability biomarkers would improve the predictive accuracy of the algorithm and identify patients with different risks of relapse and lethal GVHD. Patients who received an HCT at 18 centers in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) for hematologic malignancy and who supplied three blood samples were divided into a training set and validation set with equal numbers of lethal GVHD events, which was defined as death from GVHD or infection during treatment for GVHD. Patients in the training set (n=702) underwent HCT from January 1, 2006 until June 30, 2015, whereas patients in the validation set (n=906) underwent HCT from July 1, 2015 to May 1, 2017. Serum samples were analyzed using the previously published algorithm of two biomarkers up to three times (day 7, day 14, day 28 or GVHD onset, if onset occurred within the first 28 days). The algorithm generates a predicted probability of lethal GVHD between 0 and 1 for each patient. Patients were categorized as either low probability (LP) or high probability (HP) for lethal GVHD. HP thresholds of 0.20 and 0.16 were used to classify patients with and without GVHD symptoms, respectively (once categorized as HP, patients remained in that category and were not retested). All results were similar between training and validation sets, and we present here the validation set results. Serial testing identified 28% of patients as HP with a three-fold greater cumulative incidence of lethal GVHD at one year (13% vs 4%, p<0.001, Figure 1). Relapse rates were the same in both probability groups, and thus LP patients experienced significantly better relapse free survival (RFS) (69% vs 53%, p<0.001). As expected, significantly fewer LP patients experienced severe GVHD at onset (as measured by Minnesota risk), maximum grade III/IV GVHD, or steroid resistant GVHD by day 180 after HCT (Figure 2, p<0.001 for all three parameters). To measure the accuracy of prediction, at each timepoint we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves; the AUC increased significantly with each subsequent evaluation, from 0.59 at one timepoint (dotted line) to 0.74 at the third timepoint (solid line) (p<0.001), with a final sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 74% (Figure 3A). Early development of GVHD (by day 28) is a risk factor for lethal GVHD. Therefore, we next plotted RFS (dashed line), relapse (solid line), and lethal GVHD (dotted line) rates in patients who developed GVHD by day 28. 25% of patients with GVHD were categorized as HP and had a cumulative incidence of lethal GVHD more than four times higher (28%) than that of relapse (6%); however the risks were reversed for the 75% of patients who were LP, where relapse (15%) occurred twice as often as lethal GVHD (7%) (Figure 3B). In patients who did not develop GVHD in the first month, this reversal of risks was even more dramatic. Approximately half (53%) of the entire validation cohort did not develop GVHD by day 28 and was LP at all three evaluations. These patients had an exceptionally low risk of lethal GVHD and thus they relapsed (25%) much more often than they died from GVHD (3%). When malignancies were classified according to risk for relapse by the disease risk index (DRI) (Figure 3C), the probability of relapse was three fold higher than lethal GVHD in malignancies with a low DRI (12%), six fold higher for intermediate DRI (20%), and eleven fold higher for high/very high DRI (33%). We conclude that a serial monitoring strategy using GVHD biomarkers for one month after HCT is able to identify two groups of patients with very different risks of lethal GVHD and relapse. For these patients, the intensity of immunosuppression after day 28 could be tailored according to the probabilities of developing lethal GVHD and relapse in the context of clinical trials. Disclosures Aziz: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: Research Funding. Ayuk:Therakos (Mallinckrodt): Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Chen:REGiMMUNE: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Merli:Neovii Biotech: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria. Roesler:Sanofi: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Amgen: Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Immunomedics: Equity Ownership; Biogen: Equity Ownership; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kitko:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Qayed:Novartis: Consultancy. Wölfl:Bristol-myers Squibb: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Equity Ownership; Taheda: Equity Ownership; Juno: Equity Ownership; Neovii: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Mielke:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; DGHO: Speakers Bureau; EHA: Speakers Bureau; Kiadis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Wudhikarn:Takeda Oncology: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Nakamura:Celgene: Honoraria; Molmed: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Pulsipher:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Reshef:Pfizer: Consultancy; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Levine:Therakos: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bluebird: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kamada: Research Funding; Viracor: Patents & Royalties. Ferrara:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Xenikos: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Kamada: Consultancy, Research Funding; Viracor: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Abstract 467 Background: While donor-recipient disparity at HLA loci is associated with greater risk for severe acute graft vs. host disease (GVHD) and inferior survival after unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the impact of amino acid substitution (AAS) at peptide binding pockets of the HLA molecule is incompletely understood. Methods: Adult and pediatric patients who received myeloablative or reduced intensity/non-myeloablative first unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for AML, ALL, CML or MDS between 1988 and 2009 were included. Donors and patients were fully high resolution matched for HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 (8/8) or had single mismatch (7/8) at one HLA class I locus. Among 7/8 donor-recipient pairs, cases were categorized based on the presence or absence of the AAS of interest at positions 9, 77, 99, 116, or 156 of the class I molecule. In multivariable analysis accounting for patient, disease, and transplantation variables, we studied the independent impact of AAS at these residues on risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, treatment-related mortality, primary malignancy relapse, and overall survival. We compared 7/8 donor-recipient pairs with AAS of interest to 7/8 pairs without these AAS in the primary analyses. Additionally, we performed this analysis restricted to each HLA class I locus. Results: Donor-recipient pairs were 8/8 matched (n=5282), 7/8 with AAS of interest (n=1713), or 7/8 without AAS of interest (n=318). In multivariable analysis, AAS at position 116 was associated with increased risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR 1.21, 1.04–1.42, p=0.0165). No other significant association was detected between AAS studied and clinical outcomes. In multivariable analysis restricted to each class I HLA locus, we detected the following: Among 7/8 matched pairs with mismatch at HLA-C, AAS at position 116 was associated with increased risk for severe acute GVHD (HR 1.42, 1.13–1.79, p=0.0031) and inferior OS (HR 1.2, 1.01–1.41, p=0.0343). AAS at position 99 was associated with increased TRM (HR 1.37, 1.11–1.69, p=0.0037). Of 7/8 pairs with mismatch at HLA-B, AAS at position 9 was associated with increased chronic GVHD (HR 2.19, 1.31–3.66, p=0.0029). Specific amino acid substitution pairs with frequency > 30 were tested for association with HCT outcomes. None met the significance level of 0.00125, pre-specified for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: These results support the concept that AAS at key peptide-binding residues in the HLA class I molecule are associated with increased risk for severe acute GVHD and lower survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2838 The combination of novel agents and chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has led to a significant increase in both overall and complete response rates for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). There is, however, significant clinical heterogeneity in the overall effectiveness of CIT. Specifically, some patients are long-term responders who experience durable clinical remission while others, even though responding well initially, have less durable remissions. It is unclear if this heterogeneity is a reflection of an incomplete cytotoxic effect or whether certain leukemia sub-populations (i.e. subclones) are resistant to the effects of CIT. Comprehensive analysis of tumor cells has provided, in some malignancies, evidence of extraordinary genomic complexity and intraclonal genetic diversity. Conversely, little is known of the genetic architecture of the leukemic clone in CLL patients and the extent to which CLL tumor cells differentiate genetically at the subclonal level. In order to gain insight into the genetic architecture and clonal evolution underlying disease progression/relapse, we performed a sequential, longitudinal whole genome analysis by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in 22 CLL cases with evidence of clinical progression and/or clinical relapse post therapy. These patients received standard purine analogue, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR) for progressive disease. For the purposes of this study, we classified samples as; time point 1 (TP1) collected >6 months before starting first-line CIT for disease progression; time point 2 (TP2) consisting of tumor samples at the time of initial progression requiring treatment; and time point 3 (TP3) consisting of tumor samples collected >6 months after initial treatment but prior to subsequent treatments. Overall, aCGH assay was performed in 54 samples from 22 cases (2 to 4 time points analyzed per patient): 6 cases were analyzed at TP1 and TP2, 8 at TP2 and TP3, 2 at TP1 and TP3, and the remaining 6 cases were analyzed at TP1, TP2 and TP3. In cases showing genetic changes between time points, FISH analyses were performed in 32 additional samples to assess intra-clonal diversity and provide a quantification of the clone size. There was a small increase in genomic complexity in later time points with a mean of 4 (median 4, range 0–12) CNAs detected at the first time point for each patient, increasing to a mean of 5.3 (median 4.5, range 0–21) CNAs at the last time point analyzed. Diverse patterns of changes in genetic architecture were observed. The simplest change in genetic architectures was the linear sequence, found in 2 cases (9%) and characterized by the maintenance of the initial abnormalities and the subsequent acquisition of additional CNAs in the same subclone. The pattern of changes in genetic architecture in another 4 patients (18%) demonstrated marked heterogeneity including multiple genetic subclones evolving either in succession or in parallel. In all 4 cases with multiple subclones, a marked shift in the dominant subclone was observed at the time of disease relapse, with the minor subclones at TP1 and TP2 becoming the dominant subclones at TP3. In addition, the subclonal evolution continued following secondary therapies, and in all 4 cases the emerging subclone showed resistance to multiple treatments. This argues strongly in favor of subclones with specific genetic structures becoming dominant with the selective evolutionary pressure imposed by therapy. In summary, this sequential genetic study reveals that CLL leukemic B cells exhibit an unanticipated level of heterogeneity including a variable number of genetically distinct subclones, which display dynamic behavior in disease progression. The characterization of this intraclonal architecture is of critical importance to better understand the mechanisms of disease progression and relapse as well as to ultimately inform us of individualized treatment strategies. Disclosures: Fonseca: Consulting :Genzyme, Medtronic, BMS, Amgen, Otsuka, Celgene, Intellikine, Lilly Research Support: Cylene, Onyz, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 806FN2 POEMS syndrome is defined by the presence of peripheral neuropathy (P), monoclonal plasma cell disorder (M), organomegaly (O), endocrinopathy (E) and skin changes (S). The majority of patients have sclerotic bone lesions, although the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Increased circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is another feature of the disease. However, there is almost no information on the role of other angiogenic molecules in POEMS biology. The aim of the study was to evaluate bone metabolism and angiogenic cytokines in POEMS and compare the results with multiple myeloma (MM) and osteosclerotic patients of other etiology. We retrospectively studied 61 POEMS patients (40M/21F, median age 52 years) who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2010 and were treated and followed in Mayo Clinic Rochester (MN, USA), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris (France) and in Alexandra Hospital, Athens (Greece). We evaluated the following indices of bone remodeling and angiogenesis in all patients at diagnosis and in 22 of them one month after front-line treatment: i) osteoclast regulators [sRANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG)]; ii) osteoblast inhibitor dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1); iii) bone resorption marker CTX; iv) bone formation markers [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) and osteocalcin]; and v) angiogenic cytokines [VEGF, angiogenin (ang), angiopoietin (angp)-1 and -2]. These molecules were also measured in 60 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients (34M/26F, median age: 54 years) and 44 healthy controls. Bone markers were also evaluated in 24 patients with HbS/beta-thalassemia (10M/14F, median age: 43 years) who presented with osteosclerosis, defined as osteosclerotic bone lesions in plain radiography and high T-score of lumbar spine DXA (median: +3.6, range: +2 to +7.9). All POEMS patients presented with P and M, while 90% had E, 83% had S, 61% had O and 32% had papilloedema. One or more documented sclerotic bone lesions in plain X-rays were observed in 78% of patients (diffuse lesions in 44%), while 43% of patients had also an osteolytic component. Seven patients had Castleman disease. At diagnosis, compared to controls, POEMS patients had increased levels of bALP (mean ± SD: 48.3 ± 22.9 IU/L vs. 21.6 ± 8.2 IU/L; p<0.001), CTX (0.97 ± 0.94 ng/ml vs. 0.33 ± 0.24 ng/ml; p<0.001), Dkk-1 (p<0.001), sRANKL (p<0.001) and sRANKL/OPG ratio (p<0.001). Patients with diffuse osteosclerosis had increased levels of Dkk-1 compared to others (p = 0.05), suggesting a balance effect to increased formation activity. Patients with POEMS had increased levels of bALP and decreased levels of CTX compared to MM patients (p<0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively), while they had increased levels of CTX and sRANKL/OPG ratio compared to HbS/beta-thal patients (p = 0.001 for both comparisons). There were no other differences regarding bone markers among studied groups. Regarding angiogenic cytokines, at diagnosis, POEMS patients had elevated VEGF (1232 ± 565 pg/ml vs. 195 ± 211 pg/ml; p<0.001), ang (266 ± 82 ng/ml vs. 190 ± 45; p<0.001) and angp-2 (3.5 ± 2.2 ng/ml vs. 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/ml; p<0.001) and decreased angp-1 (p =0.05) and angp-1/angp-2 ratio (reflects increased angiogenic capacity; 9.1 ± 8.8 vs. 44.8 ± 76.1; p<0.001) compared to normal controls. We found no strong correlations between the levels of VEGF, ang and angps. When compared to MM patients, POEMS patients had increased circulating VEGF (p = 0.001) without any difference regarding the other angiogenic cytokines. Response to therapy was accompanied by a dramatic reduction of VEGF only (551 ± 541 pg/ml compared to baseline 1800 ± 1510 pg/ml; p = 0.003). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that high levels of angiopoietin-2 (≥ 2.3 ng/ml) and high bALP (≥ 38 IU/l) each have a 95% specificity for patients with POEMS syndrome. These results suggest that patients with POEMS syndrome have high bone turnover with increased bone formation as compared to healthy subjects, to MM patients, who have reduced bone formation, and to osteosclerotic HbS/beta-thal patients, who have diminished bone resorption. Importantly, our analysis supports the use of angp-2, bALP along with VEGF as minor criteria for the diagnosis of POEMS. Successful treatment reduced VEGF, which seems to be a suitable marker for the follow-up of POEMS patients. Furthermore the imbalance of angp-1/angp-2 pathway may indicate possible targets for the development of novel agents against POEMS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2807 CCDC26 is a retinoic acid-dependent modulator of myeloid cell differentiation and death (Yin W et al. Oncogene 2006 :25 :3735). CCDC26 maps to chromosome 8q24.21 and germline polymorphisms in the gene have been associated with low-grade gliomas (Jenkins RB et al. Cancer Genetics 2011;204 :13), which in turn have recently been shown to frequently express IDH1 mutations (Parsons D et al, Science 2008;321 :1807). More recently, we have discovered that CCDC26 SNP associations in gliomas are primarily restricted to patients with IDH1 mutations (Jenkins et al. unpublished observations). We therefore hypothesized that germline CCDC26 SNPS might be associated with patients with myeloid malignancies that harbor IDH1 mutations (Mardis et al. NEJM 2009;361 :1058). Seventy-two IDH -mutated patients with chronic or blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia (most constituting post-MPN events) were identified: 18 IDH1 R132, one IDH2 R172 and 53 IDH2 R140. These 72 patients and a control group of 153 IDH unmutated cases with myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic neoplasms (total n =225) were genotyped for CCDC26 risk alleles associated with IDH -mutated gliomas: rs10464870, rs891835 and rs4295627. The respective minor allele frequencies (MAF) were significantly different between IDH1 (11%, 8% and 6%) and IDH2 (30%, 27% and 24%) mutated cases (p=0.037, 0.040 and 0.021; OR 3.4, 3.7 and 6.1 with 95% CI of 1.1–10.5, 1.1–13.0 and 1.3–28.9) as well as between IDH- wild type (24%, 24% and 21%) and IDH1 -mutated (11%, 8% and 6%) cases (p=0.10, 0.043 and 0.035; OR 0.42, 0.29 and 0.21 with 95% CI of 0.15–1.19, 0.09–0.96 and 0.05–0.90). The MAF values in our IDH -unmutated cases were similar to that of population-based controls. However, the direction of SNP associations in IDH1 -mutated myeloid malignancies were opposite of those seen in IDH1 -mutated gliomas. Our observations suggest a differential effect of CCDC26 genetic polymorphisms in IDH1 -mutated myeloid malignancies compared to either their IDH2 R140-mutated or IDH1 -mutated gliomas. Such differences in genomic context might contribute to hitherto seen differences in prognostic impact between IDH2 R140 vs. IDH1 R132 vs. IDH2 R172, in AML (Green CL et al. Blood Published online before print May 19, 2011, doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322479). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: In B-CLL, the observation of interphase cells with hemizygous D13S319 deletion at 13q14 (13q-x1) as a sole anomaly in blood is widely considered a favorable prognosis. The observation of cells with 11q-, +12 or 17p- has been associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Over the past 1.5 yrs, 16.2% (174/1,076) of patients (pts) referred for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for B-CLL in our clinical practice had a clone with homozygous D13S319 deletion (13q-x2), but the prognostic significance of this observation is poorly understood. Moreover, 39.3% (142/361) of pts with unfavorable FISH anomalies have 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 and the clinical significance of this observation is also unknown. Thus, we investigated pts with 13q- (with or without other chromosome anomalies) to establish the relative clinical significance of 13q- in B-CLL. Methods: We studied 333 pts with B-CLL sampled between 9/1999 and 6/2004 who had FISH performed on interphase nuclei from blood. The FISH probe set was designed to detect 6q-, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, and translocations involving IgH at 14q32. We classified pts into four groups: 13q-x1 only (group 1), 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 only (group 2), 13q-x2 only (group 3) and 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 plus other FISH anomalies (group 4). FISH groups were compared with gender, age, Rai stage, treatment status, time to treatment, CD38 and IgVH mutation. Results: Of the 333 pts, 171 (51.3%) had a 13q-: 71 were in group 1, 25 in group 2, 26 in group 3 and 49 in group 4. %CD38+ differed significantly across FISH groups; in pairwise analyses, the proportion of pts with >30% CD38+ was significantly greater for pts in group 4 vs. group 3 (p=0.0015) although no significant differences were observed for group 3 vs. group 1 or vs. group 2. Pts in group 3 were not significantly different from other FISH groups for Rai stage, IgVH mutation or gender. The median percentage of abnormal nuclei for pts with group 1 was 54.5% vs. 79.5% for pts in group 4 (p<0.0001). The median percent abnormal nuclei for pts in groups 3 and 2 was 72.5% and 68.5%, respectively. Median % abnormal nuclei for group 3 was not significantly different than the other FISH groups. Treatment status was available on 147 pts, where the proportion of pts who had treatment in each group was as follows: group 1, 15/66; group 2, 2/22; group 3, 4/21; and group 4, 9/38. Due to limited sample size and heavy censoring, any analysis on time to treatment is preliminary; however, these early analyses suggest group 4 pts have a lower median time to treatment (9 yrs) compared to groups 3 and 1 (12.3 and 13 yrs, respectively). Conclusions: This study has generated new information about the 13q- anomaly in B-CLL. First, known prognostic markers for B-CLL pts with 13q-x2 are not significantly different than for pts with 13q-x1 or 13q-x1/13q-x2. Second, 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 occurring with other unfavorable FISH anomalies have an unfavorable prognosis; i.e. potential benefits of 13q- are trumped when it is observed with unfavorable FISH anomalies. Thus, patients with any form of 13q- alone may have indolent disease while patients with 13q- and unfavorable FISH anomalies should be considered to be in a more aggressive phase.

Abstract The most common recognized cytogenetic change in B-CLL is a deletion involving band 13q14.3. Dewald found a heterozygous or homozygous 13q– in 92% of CLL patient samples using the FISH probe D13S319 that hybridizes to 13q14.3 (BJH 121:287, 2003). This contrasts with the usually normal conventional chromosome analysis (CCA) results partly because CLL cells divide infrequently but also because the 13q– is often visualized only by FISH (Stockero, Ca Genet Cytogenet 166:152, 2006). Mayr recently showed that CpG stimulation can reveal a chromosomally abnormal CLL clone in metaphase cells (Blood 107:742, 2006). The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of microdeletion and visible 13q deletion in CLL using interphase FISH and CCA after CpG culture on the same peripheral blood specimens. METHOD: We compared the chromosome 13 results by interphase FISH (fresh uncultured cells) and by a 20 metaphase CCA from 5–day CpG cultures. Our unselected CLL cohort (n=40) represented a typical and relatively high risk population: median age 61 (range 36–75), 48% CD38–positive, 62% ZAP–70 positive, and 48% IgVH unmutated. In addition 70% were previously treated for progressive disease, with all Rai stages represented. CpG RESULTS: By CCA of 40 patients, CpG stimulation revealed a clonal (multiple abnormal cells) or nonclonal (one abnormal cell) abnormal karyotype in 32 (80%) and a normal karyotype in 8 of the 40 patients (20%). Among the 32 abnormal cases, each chromosome 13 pair appeared normal in 17 and was abnormal in 15 (one was monosomy 13, 8 were 13q–, and 6 had a 13q translocation). CpG did not reveal a homozygous 13q abnormality in any patient. In total, CpG revealed a 13q abnormality in 15 of 40 (38%) patients (8 had multiple abnormal metaphases and 7 had only one abnormal metaphase). FISH RESULTS: By interphase FISH, 29 of 40 (73%) patients had a 13q–. The deletion was heterozygous in 18 patients, homozygous in 7, and mixed homo– and heterozygous in 4. Of the 18 with a heterozygous 13q loss by FISH, CpG revealed an abnormal 13 in only 8. Of the 11 patients with homozygous or mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– by FISH, CpG revealed a heterozygous 13q abnormality in only 6. Of the 8 patients with a normal CpG karyotype, by FISH 5 had a 13q– in one or both 13s. Of the 9 patients with heterozygous 13q loss by CpG, the FISH result was 13q– in 4 and homozygous or mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– in 5. Of the 6 with a chromosome 13 translocation by CpG, FISH revealed heterozygous 13q– in 4, mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– in one, and in one case the 13q FISH result was within normal limits. In this latter case, CpG stimulation followed by metaphase FISH analysis confirmed that the apparently balanced translocation harbored a microdeletion 13q. Interphase FISH analysis confirmed the presence of a clonal deletion 13q in all 7 of the patients with a CpG metaphase result of a non-clonal (one metaphase cell) 13q abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CpG induces CLL metaphases in cell culture and reveals many chromosome abnormalities that cannot be identified by interphase FISH, cytogenetic evaluation of CLL by CpG alone significantly underestimates the incidence of 13q deletions. When a 20-cell analysis after CpG stimulation reveals a 13q abnromality in only one (apparently nonclonal) metaphase cell, concurrent interphase FISH analysis often confirms clonality for the 13q defect.

Background and Purpose: Bolus infusion (BI) of recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) is effective for the treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis in congenital hemophilia A or B patients with FVIII or IX inhibitors. In principle, continuous infusion (CI) of rFVIIa could maintain the hemostatic effect at a steady state while avoiding the peaks and troughs of repetitive BI. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa CI with rFVIIa BI in major surgery in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. Methods: A 10-day, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted in hemophilia A or B patients (age > 5 yr) with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX who underwent elective major surgery. Patients received rFVIIa as an initial bolus dose of 90 μg/kg followed by intermittent i.v. bolus (90 μg/kg) or i.v. continuous (50 μg/kg/hr) infusion. BI was administered every 2 hours during surgery and through Day 5, then every 4 hours for Days 6 to 10. CI was administered at 50 μg/kg/hr through Day 5 and at 25 μg/kg/hr Days 6 to10. A third control group of 10 non-inhibitor hemophilia A or B patients who underwent similar surgery and were treated with FVIII or FIX (based on current standard of care and physician’s choice) was assessed to compare adverse event and coagulation profiles. Safety was assessed throughout the study periods. Efficacy was defined as having no treatment failures during the given time and was evaluated at 48 hours, 5 days, and 10 days postoperatively. Treatment was considered ineffective in patients who received more than 2 additional doses of rFVIIa beyond the protocol-defined doses during a 24 hour period. Patients who received alternative hemostatic therapy following the permitted two additional doses of rFVIIa were considered treatment failures. Results: Twenty-four patients (12 CI arm, 12 BI arm) underwent 9 major types of surgeries. Knee (n=11) and hip (n=3) replacements were the most common surgeries. Recombinant FVIIa efficacy in major surgeries was 92% (11 CI, 11 BI) at 48 hours; 83% (10 CI) and 92% (11 BI) at Day 5; 83% (10 CI) and 75% (9 BI) at Day 10. Sixty-six rescue doses (rFVIIa, 90 μg/kg) were administered in the CI group (54 in one patient), and 7 in 3 patients in the BI group. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the CI treatment group (239; 141 in one patient) compared to the BI group (89 AEs); 64 AEs occurred in the control group. Eight patients (3 CI, 4 BI, 1 control) experienced 10 serious adverse events (SAEs). SAEs occurred most frequently in the BI treatment group (3 CI, 6 BI, 1 control). The types of SAEs were equally distributed among the three groups. There were no serious thromboembolic events reported during the study. Conclusions: This summary of 24 major surgeries indicates that rFVIIa is effective as prophylactic therapy for major surgery in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors. The numbers of patients were too small to distinguish efficacy rates between the two groups. The safety profile for patients treated with rFVIIa (BI or CI) was similar to the profile for non-inhibitor patients treated with other factors. Presented on behalf of the NovoSeven in Surgery Study Investigators.