Citations

Abstract Background SGI-110 is second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing longer half-life and more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. SGI-110 differentiated pharmacokinetic profile resulted in potent hypomethylation and clinical responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients in the phase 1 trial (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Methods In a randomized Phase 2 study, relapsed/refractory AML, or elderly treatment naïve AML patients who were not suitable for induction chemotherapy (poor major organ function; poor cytogenetics; or secondary AML) were randomized to one of two SQ doses – the biologically effective dose (BED) of 60 mg/m2 QDx5 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is the overall remission rate (CR, CRi, and CRp) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2003. Safety findings based on adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic data on Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element (LINE-1) DNA methylation (an index of global DNA methylation) activity were also assessed and reported. Results As of June 30, 2013, sixty-seven patients (50 relapsed/refractory AML, 17 treatment naïve elderly AML) were treated and had a minimum follow up of 3 months. Patients were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 dose (32 patients) or 90 mg/m2 dose (35 patients). The median age was 66 years (range, 22–84), 69% were male, and ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was reported in 11/47/9 patients respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 0–10). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 dose groups. The primary endpoint of overall remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed in 17/67 patients (25% with 95% CI, 16–37%). There were 8 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (16% with 95% CI, 7-29%); and 9 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 17 treatment-naïve elderly AML patients (53% with 95% CI, 28-77%). Five patients (4 relapsed/refractory, and one treatment-naïve elderly AML) subsequently received a stem cell transplant. There was no difference in the complete remission rate between 60 and 90 mg/m2 doses (8 remissions in 32 patients at 60 mg/m2, and 9 remissions in 35 patients at 90 mg/m2). LINE-1 DNA methylation data before and after treatment was available in 50 (75%) patients enrolled. LINE-1 demethylation ≥ 10% post treatment was observed in 83% and 78% in the 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The median maximum LINE-1 demethylation for responders is 25% as compared to 19% for non-responders. The most common adverse events (AEs) regardless of relationship to SGI-110 ≥ Grade 3 include febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia. The 90 mg/m2 dose showed a greater frequency of Grade 3/4 related AEs ≥ 10% (anemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) compared to the 60 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a new HMA which is well tolerated and clinically active in the treatment of AML. Complete remissions and potent demethylation of ≥10% were equally observed at the 2 dose groups of 60 and 90 mg/m2. These data support further phase 3 investigation of this agent in the treatment of AML. Preliminary overall remission rate of 53% in treatment-naïve elderly AML seems to compare favorably with previous results reported for HMA treatment but this needs to be confirmed in a larger number of patients and randomized studies. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kropf:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Savona:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ervin:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Daver:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Borthakur:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wierda:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Brandwein:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Odenike:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Dimitrov:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1415 Poster Board I-438 Introduction: Critical laboratory values (CVs) are those that indicate the patient is in danger of death unless corrective action is initiated immediately. CVs are an important feature of laboratory practice parameters, standards of regulatory agencies (including the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals), and national and institutional quality improvement studies. However, there has been no research into CVs in coagulation laboratories. Our objectives were to determine: 1) The current policies on CVs in specialized coagulation laboratories 2) Current patterns of practice for reporting CVs for coagulation parameters; and 3) If there is any consensus, based on practice, on CVs for coagulation tests. Methods: A web-based survey on CVs was distributed to members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association in February 2009. Results: 38 laboratories participated. 97% had CVs for coagulation tests in place. 85% of laboratories used local opinion or consensus to set their CV policies, likely reflecting a lack of published data. 9% of laboratories were unsure where their CVs came from. CV reporting practices were fairly uniform. 97% of surveyed laboratories authorized technologists to report CVs, and only a minority (<40%) involved senior technologists or laboratory physicians in reporting. CV policies at almost all sites (97%) authorized the patient's nurse or MD, or the ordering MD to receive CV results. Medical students, clerical staff, or uninvolved staff nurses were rarely authorized to receive CVs (3%, 13%, and 37%, respectively). Policies in all participating laboratories required documentation of CV communication. Telephone was the primary method of communication, with 39% of sites used electronic broadcast or forced print as an adjunct. Inconsistency was noted in strategies to handle repeat CVs on the same patient, ranging from reporting all CVs, to reporting worsening CVs, to not reporting CVs on certain patient populations (e.g. critical FVIII:C levels in known hemophiliacs). After-hours communication of CVs on outpatients and referred clients was identified as challenging. All sites first attempted to telephone the patient's on-call MD, and if unsuccessful, sent a report by facsimile, contacted the Laboratory Chief of Service, or delayed reporting until the next day. When laboratories were asked about their CV values, over 80% had CVs for the INR (mean > 5, range > 2 - 6), aPTT (mean > 100 sec, range > 45 - 150 sec) and fibrinogen level (mean < 90 mg/dL, range < 50 - 100 mg/dL). Fewer laboratories (< 25%) had CVs for less commonly performed coagulation tests, including anti-Xa levels, factor and inhibitor assays, and thrombophilia testing. These CVs were more heterogeneous. Conclusion: This survey identified several potential areas for improvement in the way specialized coagulation laboratories handle CVs. Consensus data would assist laboratories in standardizing their policies, and establishing benchmarks for CV reporting and policy review. It would also ensure that a laboratory's CVs are in line with those of its peers, and are clinically relevant. The workload associated with CVs for coagulation assays is unknown, and it is possible that some of the current reporting strategies lead to inefficiencies and delays (e.g. reporting CVs for tests that are not truly life threatening; lack of established policies for after-hours handling of CVs when an on-call physician cannot be reached). Our study identifies an important need for further evaluation and standardization of CVs for coagulation tests. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background SGI-110 is a second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine. The compound is delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable subcutaneous (SQ) injection which allows longer half-life and more extended DAC exposure than DAC intravenous infusion. This pharmacokinetic profile offers the potential for improved biological and clinical activity and safety over currently available HMAs (Kantarjian et al. ASH, 2012). Methods A randomized Phase 1-2 first-in-human PK/PD-guided, dose-escalation study was conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS or AML. Patients were initially randomized to one of two SQ regimens - Dailyx5 or Weeklyx3, for 28-day courses. Subsequently, a Twice Weeklyx3 regimen (Monday, Thursday) was added for evaluation based on emerging LINE-1 demethylation data from the Weeklyx3 regimen. Results 93 patients (74 AML, 19 MDS) were treated in the dose escalation phase: 44, 34, and 15 patients were treated in the Dailyx5, Weeklyx3, and the Twice Weeklyx3 regimens, respectively. Across the three regimens, median age was 70 years (range, 29–86), 68% male, and 87% had ECOG PS of 0-1. The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 1–9) and 68% of patients had prior HMA treatment (59% AML, and 100% MDS). Of the 74 AML patients treated, 31 (42%) had secondary AML including antecedent MDS. Patients received a median of 2 courses of SGI-110 (range, 1-20). LINE-1 demethylation data at the 2 highest dose levels which were well tolerated and evaluated for all 3 regimens (60 and 90 mg/m2) are shown in the figure below. The Dailyx5 regimen demonstrated the most potent average LINE-1 demethylation, while the Twice Weeklyx3 achieved the most prolonged LINE-1 demethylation. The least potent demethylation was seen with the Weeklyx3 regimen. There was no additional demethylation at the 90 mg/m2 dose compared to 60 mg/m2in all 3 regimens. Responses were reported according to the IWG Criteria 2006 (MDS)/2003 (AML). Complete remissions were observed in 5 AML patients (2CRs, 1CRp, and 2CRi). Clinical responses (2 mCR and 3 HI-E, 1 HI-N, 1 HI-P) were observed in 6 MDS patients, all of whom had been previously treated with HMA. All AML responses and both mCR in MDS patients achieved ≥10% LINE-1 demethylation. Safety is reported based on Adverse Events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria. Across regimens, the Twice Weeklyx3 demonstrated an increased number of related AEs compared to the other regimens. The most commonly reported related AEs ≥ 10% in the Dailyx5 regimen (injection site pain, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue), Weeklyx3 regimen (injection site pain and diarrhea), and Twice Weeklyx3 regimen (injection site pain, injection site reaction, fatigue, dizziness, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia). Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a potent HMA using all 3 regimens evaluated. The most potent hypomethylation was achieved with Dailyx5 dosing and the most prolonged hypomethylation was achieved using the Twice Weeklyx3 regimen. All 3 regimens were well tolerated. Clinical responses were observed in heavily pretreated patients, including those with prior HMA exposure. These results support the ongoing Phase 2 expansion study investigating the Dailyx5 dosing schedule in patients with MDS and AML who are either HMA treatment naïve or previously treated with HMAs. Disclosures: Roboz: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ritchie:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Larson:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Schimmer:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Mesa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Blum:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Kantarjian:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract Malignant B-cells characteristically home to the bone marrow and lymph nodes. However, the mechanisms by which cells are recruited into and mobilized from the bone marrow/lymph nodes into the peripheral blood are not well understood. Chemokines such as SDF-1 and it receptor CXCR4 play a central role for lymphocyte trafficking and homing. Downstream activation of the PI3K pathway by chemokines has been implicated in the migration of many cell types. We recently demonstrated that CXCR4 expression correlates significantly with disease progression in CLL. Patients with Rai stage 4 had a higher expression of CXCR4 when compared to patients with Rai stage 0. The expression of CXCR4 was not found on CLL B cells resident within the lymph nodes implying that there may have been downregulation of CXCR4. In this study, we explore the molecular mechanisms involved in homing and migration of B-CLL cells in response to CXCR4 and investigated the role of the PI3K pathway in migration of CLL cells in response to SDF-1. Boyden chamber in vitro migration assays were used with primary CLL peripheral blood cells and the MEK1 CLL cell line. In addition, we expressed fluorescent YFP-CXCR4 in the cells and used confocal microscopy to visualize changes in the subcellular location of the fluorescent CXCR4 before and after SDF-1 stimulation. Inhibitors of the PI3K pathway such as the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (10uM, one hour pretreatment) and the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin (200nM overnight) were used. SDF-1 induced a dose dependent migration of primary CLL cells and MEK1 cells, indicating functional CXCR4 receptors. MEK 1 cells transfected with YFP-CXCR4 demonstrated surface localization on the cells. 3-Dimensional and continuous live imaging after SDF-1 stimulation for 30 minutes demonstrated alterations in the CXCR4-YFP leading to its capping and internalization subcellularly. Pretreatment of the cells with PI3K pathway inhibitors led to inhibition of migration with LY294002 but not with rapamycin. Confocal microscopy demonstrated abrogation of subcellular localization in the presence of LY294002 but not with rapamycin with the addition of SDF-1. These results demonstrate that CLL cells express functional CXCR4 receptora and that the PI3K pathway is essential for SDF-1 dependent CLL migration. In addition, we demonstrate that the CXCR4 receptor is internalized in response to SDF-1 stimulation indicating that CLL cells downregulate the CXCR4 receptor once they home to the bone marrow or lymph nodes where there is abundant SDF-1 in the microenvironment. This leads to the confinement of the cells in the microenvironment preventing further migration of the cells outside of the bone marrow/lymph nodes. Supported in part by CA97274

Abstract Malignant plasma cells characteristically home to the bone marrow (BM). However, the mechanisms by which cells are recruited into and mobilized from the bone marrow into the peripheral blood (PB) are not well understood. In this study, we explore the molecular mechanisms involved in homing and migration of plasma cells in response to CXCR4 and investigated the role of the PI3K pathway in migration of MM cells in response to SDF-1. CXCR4 surface expression was determined by FACS analysis (PE CXCR4, Pharmingen) using samples from bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and primary systemic amyloidosis (AL). All results were expressed as percent expression in gated CD38+ and CD45+ cells. Boyden chamber in vitro migration assays were performed using Kas6/1MM cells. In addition, live confocal microscopy was used to visualize changes in the subcellular location of YFP-fluorescent CXCR4 before and after SDF-1 stimulation. Cells were pretreated with 10mM LY294002 or 200nM rapamycin to assess the effect of inhibition of PI3K or mTOR on CXCR4 subcellular localization. Immunoblotting was performed to confirm inhibition of the PI3K pathway. Comparisons between groups was performed using Mann-Whitney testing. The median CXCR4 expression is described in table 1. There was a significant difference between expression of BM CXCR4 in MM and MGUS (p=0.02). SDF-1 induced dose dependent migration of Kas 6/1 cells indicating a functional CXCR4 receptor. MM cells transfected with YFP-CXCR4 demonstrated surface localization on the cells. 3-Dimensional and continuous live imaging after SDF-1 stimulation for 30 minutes demonstrated alterations in the CXCR4-YFP leading to its capping, internalization subcellularly, and production of pseudopodia in response to SDF-1. This process was abrogated with pretreatment with LY294002 and rapamycin. These data demonstrate for the first time that the surface expression of CXCR4 is markedly elevated in the peripheral blood as compared to the bone marrow. Once in the bone marrow, and with the presence of excess SDF-1, the receptor becomes internalized and downregulated. In contrast to MM, CXCR4 expression on plasma cells in the bone marrow of normal and MGUS patients was higher. In addition, we demonstrate that the process of CXCR4 subcellular localization is abrogated by the administration of PI3K inhibitors LY294002 and rapamycin. These data suggest that CXCR4 expression is required for MM cells to circulate, and that downregulation occurs in the BM leading to immobilization of the cells. Future clinical trials using CXCR4 inhibitors, or inhibitors of PI3K and mTOR to prevent the homing and migration of MM cells into the bone marrow may be explored. This was supported in part by CAP50 CA97274. CXCR4 expression N=45 Median CXCR4% expression of total plasma cells Range MM BM (n=23) 27 4.3–90.1 MM PB (n=5) 91 60–95.5 MGUS BM (n=6) 65 41–78.6 AL BM (n=7) 46 17.5–71.6 Normal BM (n=4) 59 6.3–69.5 Kas6/1 cell line 100 -

Abstract BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive leukemia with 5-year overall survival of 20-25%. The major reason for treatment failure in AML is resistance to chemotherapy. Thus, there is an urgent need for identification of novel therapeutic agents for AML. Neoplastic cells, including AML, have dysfunctional redox regulation that results in increased reactive oxygen species (ROS). Accumulation of ROS leads to oxidation of free and incorporated nucleotides, leading to DNA damage and cell death. MTH1 is a nudix family hydrolase that sanitizes the oxidized nucleotide pool to prevent incorporation of these damaged bases in the DNA. MTH1 is thought to be non-essential for normal cells but crucial for neoplastic cells in order to avoid incorporation of oxidized dNTPs into DNA, thereby evading DNA damage and cell death. Whether MTH1 inhibitors have any activity against AML is not known. METHODS: Neoplastic myeloid cell lines HL-60, HEL, K562, KG1A, ML1, MV-4-11, SET2, and U937 were treated with varying concentrations of TH588 for a total of 48 hours. In experiments using the pan-caspase inhibitor Q-VD-OPh (Qvd), cells were pre-treated with 5µM Qvd for 1 hour followed by TH588. Cells were washed and stained with annexin, propidium iodide (PI), or MitoTracker (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) for flow cytometry. To evaluate the potential impact of MTH1 inhibition on chemorefractory AML, HL-60/VCR cells were treated with vehicle control or TH588 in culture medium with or without vincristine (1µg/ml). Percentage apoptosis was calculated by normalizing to vehicle only control. With IRB approval, bone marrow aspirate samples were obtained from patients with untreated AML or healthy controls. Mononuclear cells were analyzed using colony-forming unit (CFU) assays. The total number of erythroid (CFU-E) and myeloid (CFU-G, CFU-GM) colonies containing ≥50 cells were read on day 14 and reported as percentage colonies compared to vehicle control. RESULTS: TH588 induced dose-dependent cell death in each of the neoplastic cell lines tested except HEL. In particular, treatment with TH588 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the number of cells undergoing apoptosis as indicated by annexin V and/or PI staining (IC50 3.1-21.3µM, Figure 1). Pre-treatment with Qvd significantly inhibited TH588-induced cell death in all the cell lines studied except KG1A and SET2, suggesting a caspase-dependent mechanism of cell death. In further studies, cells treated with TH588 exhibited decreased MitoTracker staining; and Qvd pretreatment increased the number of MitoTrackerLow cells at the same time apoptotic cells decreased, suggesting that mitochondrial damage is upstream of caspase activation in TH588-induced apoptosis. Treatment with TH588 not only induced apoptosis in HL-60/VCR cells, but also facilitated further apoptosis in cells co-treated with vincristine and TH588 (Figure 2). Treatment with TH588 also diminished colony formation in a primary AML sample (IC50 6µM, Figure 3). Analysis of additional primary AML samples is ongoing. DISCUSSION: Our results show that the MTH1 inhibitor TH588 induces apoptosis in most neoplastic myeloid cells. MTH1 causes mitochondrial damage that, in turn, leads to caspase-dependent apoptosis in these cells. In HL-60/VCR cells representing chemorefractory phenotype, TH588 induces apoptosis as a single agent and resensitizes cells to vincristine. Moreover, TH588 significantly diminished colony formation in primary AML ex vivo. Further preclinical and possible clinical study of this class of agent appears warranted. Figure 1. Induction of cell death by MTH1 inhibitor TH588 in neoplastic myeloid cell lines. Figure 1. Induction of cell death by MTH1 inhibitor TH588 in neoplastic myeloid cell lines. Figure 2. TH588 induces apoptosis in HL-60/VCR cells and resensitizes cells to vincristine. Figure 2. TH588 induces apoptosis in HL-60/VCR cells and resensitizes cells to vincristine. Figure 3. TH588 significantly diminished colony formation in primary AML ex vivo indose-dependent manner. Figure 3. TH588 significantly diminished colony formation in primary AML ex vivo indose-dependent manner. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: In addition to NBEAL2, a single dominant-negative mutation in the GFIB1 gene has been associated with grey platelet syndrome but no association has been mentioned with dense granule deficiency. Here we describe a child with thrombocytopenia, alpha-delta granule deficiency, and a homozygous missense mutation in GFIB1. Case Report:The patient is an 8y/o Hispanic male born to non-consanguineous parents. Prenatal and birth history were unremarkable. No family history of blood disorders or pediatric malignancies. The boy has 2 healthy older siblings, no dysmorphic features, and normal skin pigmentation and eye findings. Renal function and hearing are normal. At 3mo he was noted to have multiple spontaneous petechiae along with an isolated thrombocytopenia of 46K/uL. At 10 months, a bone marrow evaluation showed increased megakaryocytes suggestive of ITP. By 3years of age, he received three treatments of IVIG without an adequate response. His platelet counts have generally ranged between 30-50K/uL. With acute illnesses, they drop to 15-20K/uL. His bleeding symptoms have primarily been spontaneous bruising and petechiae as well as prolonged epistaxis. His symptoms have been generally controlled with anti-fibrinolytic agents alone. Platelet transfusions have been reserved for surgical procedures or significant bleeding symptoms. Further evaluations over the past 5 years have included peripheral smears, showing atypical large hypo-granular platelets, and two additional bone marrow aspirates, showing megakaryocytic hyperplasia with numerous osteoclast-like forms and occasional small mono-lobated megakaryocytes and evident emperipolesis. Anti-nuclear antibody testing and platelet direct and indirect antibody testing were negative. Platelet electron microscopy showed that platelets virtually contained no dense granules (0.05 dense granules/platelet, 200 platelets) and about 30-40% of the platelets had markedly decreased alpha granules. Some platelets had complex canalicular networks and membrane vacuoles. These features are consistent with an alpha-delta platelet storage-pool deficiency. A myeloid malignancy mutation panel, performed using next generation sequencing, detected no variants of known significance. Gene sequencing for MHY9-related disorders as well as DNA breakage analysis for Fanconi's anemia were negative. However, DNA sequencing of the patient's sample revealed a homozygous missense mutation (c923 T>C; p.Leu308Pro) in the GFIB1gene; each parent carried one copy of this change. Conclusion: GFIB1, mapped to chromosome 9q34.13, encodes a transcriptional repressor that is important for megakaryopoiesis. It has been reported in patients with gray platelet syndrome; an inherited platelet disorder associated with thrombocytopenia and decreased alpha granules. This case points to an association of biallelic GFIB1 mutations with alpha-delta granule deficiency. This case underscores the importance of platelet esoteric testing and molecular analysis in the diagnosis of hereditary platelet disorders. As a targetable mutation in the future, this could revolutionize the early diagnosis and treatment of this rare platelet disorder. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase that regulates proliferation and apoptosis, has been extensively evaluated as a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies. Rapamycin analogues, which partially inhibit mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), showed limited anti-tumor activity due to feedback mechanisms involving mTORC2 and incomplete inhibition of mTORC1. Thus, attention has turned to agents targeting both mTOR complexes by binding the mTOR kinase domain. The purpose of this study was to delineate the mechanisms of mTOR dual inhibitor induced apoptosis in human neoplastic lymphoid cells in vitro. MTS assays and propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry for subdiploid populations demonstrated that OSI-027 and MLN0128 inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in a wide range of lymphoid cell lines including Jurkat, Nalm-6, Molt-4, and SeAX. Raptor and Rictor knockdown in Jurkat and Nalm-6 increased cell death, suggesting both mTOR complexes play a role in apoptosis. 4EBP1 phosphorylation was inhibited by mTOR dual inhibitors, but not by rapamycin. Expression of 4EBP1 T37A/T46A and 4EBP1 T37A/T46A/S65A/T70A, which mimic dephosphorylated 4EBP1, increased Puma mRNA and protein levels as well as apoptosis. Moreover, 4EBP1 knockdown abrogated mTOR dual inhibitor induced Puma upregulation and cell death, further supporting the role of 4EBP1 dephosphorylation in mTORC1 dependent apoptosis. In accord with the known dependence of c-Myc translation on the eIF4E/eIF4G complex, we also observed c-Myc downregulation after treatment with OSI-027, MLN0128 and 4EGI-1, but not rapamycin. Puma induction mirrored c-Myc downregulation under a variety of conditions, including expression of nonphosphorylatable 4EBP1 in parental Jurkat cells or wt 4EBP1 in 4EBP1 deficient cells. Furthermore, c-Myc knockdown induced Puma mRNA and protein as well as increased apoptosis. Collectively, these results support a model in which mTORC1 inhibition, acting through 4EBP1, induces Puma upregulation and apoptosis through c-Myc downregulation. In order to assess the parallel mTORC2-dependent Bim-mediated apoptotic mechanism, we utilized reporter assays and RNAseq experiments. OSI-027-induced Bim promoter activity decreased markedly when the nucleotides -29 to -18 were removed, suggesting that this response element is critical for OSI-027-induced promoter activation. In silico analysis identified eight transcription factors, including SP1, Egr-1, and Myb, that potentially bind this 12-bp region. In RNAseq experiments, we detected a 9-fold increase in Egr-1. Egr-1 upregulation was confirmed by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting after dual inhibitors treatment or Rictor knockdown. Moreover, dominant negative Egr-1 or Egr-1 knockdown diminished dual inhibitor-induced Bim promoter activation and Bim upregulation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that OSI-027 enhances binding of Egr-1 to a region of the Bim promoter including bp -29 to -18, further confirming that Egr-1 functions as a direct transcriptional activator for Bim upon mTOR dual inhibitor treatment. NFκB is a known transcription factor for Egr-1 and we observed increased p65 in the nucleus and increased NFκB transcriptional activity after dual inhibitor treatment. Overexpression of S32A/S36A IκB impaired the ability of dual inhibitors to induce NFκB transcriptional activation, Egr-1 mRNA and protein, Bim promoter activation and Bim mRNA and protein upregulation. Collectively, these results suggest that mTORC2 inhibition induces Bim upregulation and apoptosis through NFκB and Egr-1 transactivation. When fresh clinical ALL isolates were exposed to OSI-027 or MLN0128 ex vivo, inhibition of 4EBP1 phosphorylation along with upregulation of Egr-1 and Bim and/or c-Myc downregulation accompanied by Puma induction occurred, indicating that the pathways identified in ALL cell lines can also potentially be engaged in clinical ALLs. These observations not only provide new insight into the survival roles of mTOR in lymphoid malignancies, but also identify alterations that potentially modulate the action of mTOR dual inhibitors. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction: Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a novel next-generation HMA administered as a small volume subcutaneous (SC) injection which results in extended decitabine exposure. Phase 2 studies have been conducted in TN-AML patients who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy using two different doses and schedules of guadecitabine. We report here a comparative efficacy and safety analysis of the 5-day and 10-day regimens. Methods: TN-AML patients who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy based on age (≥ 65 y), poor performance status (PS 2), comorbidities, or poor risk cytogenetics were enrolled in 2 separate treatment cohorts in the Phase 2 study. In the first cohort, patients were randomized (1:1) to either 60 mg/m2/d or 90 mg/m2/d on Days 1-5 (5-day regimen). In the second cohort, patients were treated with 60 mg/m2/d on Days 1-5 and Days 8-12 (10-day regimen) for up to 4 cycles, followed by 60 mg/m2/d Days 1-5 in subsequent cycles. Cycles were scheduled every 28 days for both regimes with dose reductions/delays allowed based on response and tolerability. Patients remained on treatment as long as they continued to benefit with no unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the composite Complete Response (CRc): Complete Response (CR) + CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) + CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) using modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (Cheson et al, 2003). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: There was no difference in efficacy or safety between 60 and 90 mg/m2/d on the 5-day regimen (Yee et al, European Hematology Association meeting 2014, S647), so data are reported here for the two doses combined on the 5-day cohort. There were 51 patients treated in the 5-day regimen cohort and 52 treated with the 10-day regimen. There was no statistically significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 regimens; median age 77.9 vs. 77.3 years ; male 59% vs. 65%; PS 2 or higher 35% vs. 40%; median BM blasts 40.0% vs. 49.5%; poor risk cytogenetics 46% vs. 43% for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively. Follow up of the 10-day cohort patients was shorter as it started after completion of enrolment of the 5-day cohort. The median follow up was 25.7 and 12.4 months and median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-26) and 3 (range 1-13) for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint, CRc, between the 2 regimens (p=0.43). CRc was achieved in 29/51 patients (57%) on the 5-day regimen (19 CR, 3 CRp, and 7 CRi) and in 25/52 patients (48%) on the 10-day regimen (16 CR, 5 CRp, and 4 CRi). Median OS was 10.5 and 8.7 months for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively (p=0.89). The 30, 60, and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were not statistically significant between the two cohorts: 5.9%, 15.7%, and 21.6% on the 5-day regimen and 1.9%, 17.3%, and 28.8% on the 10-day regimen. The most common Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of relationship to guadecitabine were: febrile neutropenia 59% vs. 60%, thrombocytopenia 47% vs. 38%, neutropenia 39% vs. 33%, anemia 27% vs. 19%, pneumonia 24% vs. 27%; and sepsis 12% vs. 19%, for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts respectively, none of which was statistically significant. Fifteen patients remain on treatment (5 from the 5-day cohort and 10 from the 10-day cohort). Conclusions: Guadecitabine is clinically active with a good safety profile in TN-AML patients not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. Unlike in relapsed/refractory AML, where the 10-day regimen of guadecitabine showed a trend toward improved efficacy (Roboz et al, Annals of Oncology 25 Supplement 4, 2014), there was no significant difference in either efficacy or safety between the 5-day and 10-day regimens in newly diagnosed AML patients. Guadecitabine 60 mg/m2/d SC Days 1-5 is currently being investigated in an 800-patient multicenter randomized phase 3 study in TN-AML patients unfit to receive intensive chemotherapy (ASTRAL-1 Phase 3 clinical trial: ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT02348489). Disclosures Kropf: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. O'Connell:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griffiths:Astex: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Rizzieri:Teva: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau. Stock:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savona:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenblat:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Berdeja:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Wilson:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Lowder:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Janssen: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: SGI-110 is a second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume SC injection that yields longer half-life and more extended DAC exposure than DAC IV infusion. A phase 1 clinical trial of SGI-110 demonstrated a differentiated pharmacokinetic profile from DAC IV, potent hypomethylation, and clinical responses in previously treated patients with MDS and AML (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Phase 1 established 60 mg/m2 QDx5 as the biologically effective dose (BED), and 90 mg/m2QDx5 as the Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in MDS patients given in 28-day cycles. Phase 2 is conducted to evaluate dose response between the BED and MTD in MDS patients. Methods: Int, or HR MDS, and CMML patients who were either treatment-naïve or previously treated were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 or 90 mg/m2QDx5 every 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated by the clinical responses of CR, PR, marrow CR (mCR), and Hematological Improvement (HI) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2006 as well as transfusion-independence. Adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic biological activity as measured by Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element LINE-1 (an index of global DNA methylation) were also assessed. Patients are being followed for overall survival. Results: The study completed target enrolment with 102 patients: 53 who were refractory or have relapsed on prior treatment, and 49 previously untreated. Fifty three patients were randomized to 60 mg/m2 and 49 patients to 90 mg/m2 QDx5 with a median follow up of 8.2 months (range 1-21). Most baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms with no significant differences in median age (71.7 vs. 72.5 y); male gender (70 vs. 61%); ECOG PS 2 (15 vs. 12%); HR MDS (28 vs. 37%); transfusion-dependence (57 vs. 55%), median baseline Hb (9.25 vs. 9.3 g/dL); platelets count (42.5 vs. 45 x109/L), and neutrophils count (1.19 vs. 1.16 x109/L) for the 60 and 90 mg/m2 QDx5 respectively. However, there were 15 CMML patients (28%) randomized to 60 mg/m2 vs. only 7 CMML patients (14%) randomized to 90 mg/m2(p=0.097). All but 2 patients in the previously treated group received one or more HMA. At the time of the data cutoff, 38 of 102 patients (37%) were still on treatment. Median number of treatment cycles was 4 for previously treated patients, and 5 for the treatment naïve group (range 1-22 cycles). CR+mCR were observed in 10/53 (19%), and 11/49 (22%) in the 60 and 90 mg/m2 arms respectively (p=0.8). CR was observed in 7/49 treatment naïve patients (14%) while CR+mCR were observed in 11/53 previously treated patients (21%) with no significant differences between 60 and 90 mg/m2 arms. Transfusion independence for at least 8 weeks was reported in 32% and 24% for platelets and RBCs respectively with no difference between the 2 treatment arms. Treatment naïve patients benefited from higher rate of transfusion-independence (58% and 46% for platelets and RBCs respectively). Potent demethylation was achieved in both treatment arms with a mean LINE-1 DNA demethylation of 27.3 and 30.5% for 60 and 90 mg/m2 respectively (p=0.12). Overall incidence of Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of relationship to treatment was reported in 81 vs. 88% for 60 and 90 mg/m2 treatment arms respectively (p=0.42).There was a slightly higher but non-significant difference in Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (51 vs 38%) and pneumonia (20 vs. 13%) for the 90 mg/m2 arm compared to 60 mg/m2. Early 8-week any-cause mortality occurred in 3/102 patients treated (3%), 2 at 60 and 1 at 90 mg/m2. Follow up for survival is still ongoing. Conclusions: SC SGI-110 is a well-tolerated novel HMA with biological and clinical activity in the treatment of Int and HR MDS, and CMML patients with particularly promising activity in patients previously treated with azacitidine or decitabine. Clinical responses, transfusion independence, DNA demethylation as assessed by LINE-1, and Safety did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment doses. Disclosures Tibes: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosenblat:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy.