Citations

Data from the records of patients who underwent 2223 carotid endarterectomies at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 1972, and December 31, 1985, were abstracted to compare the effects of isoflurane, enflurane, and halothane on the critical cerebral blood flow (CBF) (i.e., the CBF below which the majority of patients develop EEG ischemic changes within 3 min of carotid occlusion), the incidence of EEG ischemic changes, and the neurologic outcome. In a total of 2196 of these procedures, the patient received one of the three volatile anesthetics and, in 2010 of these, both the EEG and the CBF were monitored. Chronologically, halothane was the primary agent from 1972–1974; enflurane progressively replaced halothane during 1975–1981; and isoflurane was used almost exclusively since 1982. This analysis confirmed a previous study that the critical CBF during isoflurane anesthesia (703 procedures) was approximately 10 ml ± 100 g−1 • min−1, as contrasted to that of approximately 20 ml ± 100 g−1 • min−1 during halothane anesthesia (467 procedures). This analysis also established that the critical CBF during enflurane anesthesia (840 procedures) was approximately 15 ml ± 100 g−1 • min−1. The incidence of EEG ischemic changes was significantly less (P < 0.001) during isoflurane anesthesia (18%) than during either enflurane (26%) or halothane (25%) anesthesia. This difference occurred despite the fact that the preoperative risk status was greater in the patients given isoflurane. There was no difference in neurologic outcome between the three anesthetics, and none was expected, since all patients with EEG changes were immediately shunted, if possible. The authors conclude that relative to halothane and enflurane, isoflurane does offer a degree of cerebral protection for transient incomplete regional cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE—The degree to which chronic glycemic exposure (CGE) (fasting plasma glucose [FPG], HbA1c [A1C], duration of diabetes, age at onset of diabetes, or combinations of these) is associated with or predicts the severity of microvessel complications is unsettled. Specifically, we test whether combinations of components correlate and predict complications better than individual components. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Correlations and predictions of CGE and complications were assessed in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study, a population-based, cross-sectional, and longitudinal epidemiologic survey of 504 patients with diabetes followed for up to 20 years. RESULTS—In multivariate analysis, A1C and duration of diabetes (and to a lesser degree age at onset of diabetes but not FPG) were the main significant CGE risk covariates for complications. A derived glycemic exposure index (GEi) correlated with and predicted complications better than did individual components. Composite or staged measures of polyneuropathy provided higher correlations and better predictions than did dichotomous measures of whether polyneuropathy was present or not. Generally, the mean GEi was significantly higher with increasing stages of severity of complications. CONCLUSIONS—A combination of A1C, duration of diabetes, and age at onset of diabetes (a mathematical index, GEi) correlates significantly with complications and predicts later complications better than single components of CGE. Serial measures of A1C improved the correlations and predictions. For polyneuropathy, continuous or staged measurements performed better than dichotomous judgments. Even with intensive assessment of CGE and complications over long times, only about one-third of the variability of the severity of complications is explained, emphasizing the role of other putative risk covariates.