Citations

Abstract Background Preparing tumor board patient summaries is time intensive. Large-language-model based systems may automate summarization but require real-world evaluation prior to clinical use. We performed an exploratory retrospective evaluation of the Microsoft Healthcare Agent Orchestrator (HAO), deployed in a Mayo Clinic–controlled staged environment, to generate tumor board–style patient summaries from retrospective Electronic Health Record (EHR) notes. Methods HAO generated summaries for breast, hepatobiliary, and neuro-oncology tumor board cases using up to the most recent 1,000 clinical notes. Clinician reviewers evaluated outputs via REDCap surveys across perceived factuality, completeness, clarity/conciseness, temporal cohesion, comparative performance, safety, and clinical utility (0–4 Likert scale). Reviewers were permitted to query the HAO chat interface to address missing details. Automated factuality was assessed using TBFact (bidirectional entailment), reporting precision and recall against available reference summaries. Results Among 57 survey responses from 5 different physicians, mean scores exceeded 2.8 across domains, with medians of 3 for most axes. In an exploratory comparison, oncology fellows required less time to review HAO-generated summaries than to manually generate patient summaries (mean difference 13.57 minutes per patient, p<0.001), although this difference may be influenced by prior familiarity with the same cases; 96% of survey responses indicated that HAO would save time. TBFact evaluations showed higher recall than precision across domains, consistent with broad capture of reference content alongside additional content that was not present in gold-standard summaries. Attribution was viewed favorably but showed issues with primary-source specificity and link reliability. Conclusions In a controlled Mayo environment, HAO demonstrated moderate performance and was associated with reduced review time for tumor board preparation. These findings are promising but preliminary and do not establish clinical safety, noninferiority to manual review, or readiness for routine clinical use. Limitations, including verbosity, specialty-specific content gaps, and inconsistent attribution, highlight the need for iterative refinement and further evaluation. Graphical Abstract Created using ChatGPT

Abstract Genome-resolved virome analysis remains inaccessible for many samples, including those with clinical relevance, because viral nucleic acid recovered after enrichment is often too scarce to support de novo genome assembly. As a result, many analyses are limited to sparse read-level detection, which cannot recover divergent viruses, resolve strains, or interpret gene-level variation. Here, we developed Low Biomass Viral Sequencing (LBV-Seq), a workflow that couples low-input viral sample handling with modified primary template-directed amplification and short- or long-read sequencing to enable de novo reconstruction of DNA and RNA viral genomes from sub-femtogram to nanogram inputs. LBV-Seq reproducibly captures the same relative community composition, amplifies diverse viruses, and achieved broad genome coverage across nearly all targets regardless of viral genome structure, Baltimore class, abundance, or input mass. Short-read assemblies recovered near-complete genomes from femtogram-scale inputs. Long-read sequencing provided orthogonal support for genome structure, with PacBio HiFi reads spanning large portions of viral genomes and, in some cases, complete small viral genomes. Applied to virus-enriched human duodenal biopsy eluates, LBV-Seq provided proof-of-feasibility for recovering both bacteriophage and eukaryotic viral genomes from low-input biopsy-derived material. In the eluates tested, LBV-Seq recovered co-occurring Alphatorquevirus and Betatorquevirus genomes estimated to be present at roughly 10 copies/µL and at viral masses below 0.1 fg/µL. LBV-Seq enables genome-resolved virome analysis in samples previously limited to detection-based viromics, supporting viral discovery and strain-resolved analyses in settings where viral mass is low, including viruses enriched from human tissue biopsies.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts sustained during American football have been associated with neuropathological changes such as white matter shear injuries. However, the impact of specific factors, such as age of first exposure and cumulative head impact burden, on white matter integrity remains unclear. This study investigated in vivo white matter microstructural changes using diffusion tensor imaging and tract-based spatial statistics in 165 male former American football players (mean age 57.3 years, range 45–74) and 52 unexposed asymptomatic male controls (mean age 59.4 years, range 45–74) in the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Compared to controls, former football players exhibited significantly higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in 1.97% of the white matter skeleton (1552 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.587) and higher tissue-corrected FA (FAt) in 1.48% of the white matter skeleton (1004 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.616). No significant differences were observed for mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, or free water between football players and controls. Among football players, there were no significant differences in the white matter microstructure between players diagnosed with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and those without the diagnosis. Lower FA was significantly associated with older age (P &lt; 0.00001) and an earlier age of first exposure to tackle football (P &lt; 0.01), while lower FAt was associated with greater cumulative head impact burden, specifically higher linear acceleration (P &lt; 0.04) and rotational force (P &lt; 0.02). This study highlights the influential role of exposure factors on white matter microstructure in former American football players, as well as the utility of diffusion tensor imaging to aid in characterizing the long-term effects of repetitive head impacts in contact sport athletes.

TPS1147 Background: Due to dramatic improvements in neoadjuvant and adjuvant HER2-directed therapy (tx), most patients (pts) with early HER2+ breast cancer are cured. As a result, over half of pts newly diagnosed with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) now present with de novo stage IV disease. Anti-HER2 tx has also significantly extended survival for pts with HER2+ MBC, with a subgroup of exceptional responders alive many years (yrs) after diagnosis. However, the paradigm for HER2+ MBC remains non-curative, and pts receive tx indefinitely with significant toxicities and costs. The SAPPHO study is investigating whether an intensification approach of sequential, non-cross resistant anti-HER2 tx followed by tx discontinuation is associated with long-term disease control in pts with HER2+ MBC. Methods: SAPPHO is an open-label, phase II, single-arm trial testing a sequential regimen of non-cross resistant, HER2-targeted tx with curative intent in pts with de novo HER2+ MBC. Eligible pts must have biopsy-proven, de novo MBC with high HER2 expression (3+ by immunohistochemistry). Pts with brain metastases are eligible upon receipt of local tx. Treatment consists of an induction regimen (trastuzumab-pertuzumab-taxane [THP] x 4 cycles, followed by trastuzumab deruxtecan [TDXd] x 6 cycles, followed by trastuzumab emtansine [TDM1]-tucatinib x 4 cycles), followed by a maintenance regimen (HP-tucatinib for 1 yr). Given results from DESTINY-Breast09, the sequence of TDXd-P x 6 cycles followed by THP x 4 followed by TDM1-tucatinib x 4 can be chosen as alternative induction tx per investigator and patient choice. Pts who remain progression-free after completing maintenance will stop all anti-HER2 tx. Endocrine tx will be continued for pts with hormone receptor+/HER2+ tumors. Tumor specimens from breast and a metastatic site are collected at baseline and the end of induction. Serial plasma samples for ctDNA analysis are collected at baseline, during treatment, and during follow-up. The primary endpoint is the probability of being progression-free and off anti-HER2 tx 4 yrs from the start of induction. With a sample size of 72 pts, the study is designed to have 91% power to reject the null hypothesis that the probability of being off anti-HER2 tx and progression-free is less than 24%, with an alternative hypothesis of 40%. Key secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall response rate by modified RECIST 1.1 after induction, and safety. Correlative endpoints include the relationship between ctDNA dynamics and outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes will be analyzed, including quality of life, illness intrusiveness, financial toxicity, anxiety, distress about cancer progression, perception of benefit and risk of progression. SAPPHO began enrollment in Q3 2024, and the study is open at 4 US sites within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (NCT05721248). Clinical trial information: NCT05721248 .

e14017 Background: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is well established in the setting of one to four brain metastases (BM), offering effective control with reduced neurocognitive toxicity compared with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, for patients with five or more BM, the optimal radiation strategy remains uncertain, and comparative outcome data are limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) between SRS and WBRT in patients with ≥ 5 BM. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify comparative studies of SRS versus WBRT in patients with ≥5 brain metastases. Retrospective and prospective studies reporting median OS with available cohort sizes were included. Comparative survival was summarized using pooled ratios of median survival within a random-effects meta-analytic framework. Results: Five comparative studies were included, comprising 226 patients treated with SRS and 261 treated with WBRT, including both retrospective and prospective cohorts. Sample-size–weighted summary (with reported medians) showed median OS was 8.1 months with SRS and 7.7 months with WBRT. Pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in OS between treatment strategies (ratio of median survival, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73–1.46; p = 0.81). Conclusions: Among patients with ≥5 BM, SRS and WBRT were associated with comparable OS. These data suggest that OS alone may not guide treatment choice in this population, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection. As focal therapies are increasingly incorporated into clinical practice for patients with higher intracranial disease burden, prospective, multi-institutional randomized clinical trials are needed to better define optimal management strategies. Summary of included studies reporting median overall survival (OS). Study Study Design SRS (n) WBRT (n) Median OS in SRS cohort (months) Median OS in WBRT cohort (months) Kim et al., 2009 Retrospective 29 39 5.6 7.2 Mizuno et al., 2019 Retrospective 24 20 7.3 7 .2 Li et al., 2020 Prospective, randomized 35 34 7.8 8.9 Bodensohn et al., 2023 Prospective, non-randomized 40 70 10.4 6.5 Aizer et al., 2025 Prospective, randomized 98 98 8.3 8.5

e14016 Background: Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is utilized following resection of brain metastases (BM), however use is limited by target delineation uncertainty and an increased risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Preoperative SRS allows for precise targeting and is being increasingly utilized in treatment paradigms of resectable BM. Reported outcomes across studies are promising and there are several phase 3 trials which are underway. Therefore, we pooled multiple studies and conducted a meta-analysis to estimate 1-year local control (LC), LMD incidence, and overall survival (OS) following single-fraction preoperative SRS for resectable BM. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies of single-fraction preoperative SRS for resectable BM. For each cohort, data for 1-year LC, 1-year LMD, and 1-year OS, along with corresponding sample sizes, were extracted. A proportion-based meta-analysis was performed to derive pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with between-study heterogeneity quantified using I². Results: Ten studies published between 2016 and 2025, including both prospective trials and retrospective cohorts, met the inclusion criteria. There were 617 patients treated with single-fraction preoperative SRS. The median age was 60.8 years (range 58-65 years), and the median prescribed dose was 15.8 Gy (range 14.5-17.0 Gy). The pooled 1-year LC rate was 81.9% (95% CI, 76.9-85.9; I² = 43.4%). The pooled 1-year incidence of LMD was 4.6% (95% CI, 2.8-7.4; I² = 0%), and the pooled 1-year OS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 55.5-64.8; I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses showed stable pooled estimates, with no single study driving the results. Conclusions: Single-fraction preoperative SRS is associated with low rates of LMD and acceptable LC and OS. In the context of historically reported postoperative SRS outcomes, these results suggest that preoperative SRS represents a promising strategy in selected patients. Randomized trials are needed to define the comparative role and optimal patient selection for preoperative SRS, with ongoing studies (NCT05341739, NCT03741673) expected to clarify its role in the management of resectable BM. Study characteristics and reported outcomes of single-fraction preoperative SRS for BM. Study Study design Number of patients Median age (years) Median dose (Gy) 1-year LTC (%) 1-year LMD (%) 1 year OS (%) Agarwal, 2024 Trial 47 59 NR NR 4.8 NR Higazy, 2025 Trial 35 61 17 82 2.86 NR Li, 2022 Retrospective 24 64 NR 87.6 NR NR Mallela, 2024 Retrospective 26 64.5 NR 77.2 NR NR Murphy, 2024 Trial 35 63 NR 76.6 NR 59 Patel, 2018 Retrospective 12 57.5 NR 49.1 10 74.1 Patel, 2016 Retrospective 66 58.2 14.5 84.1 3.2 NR Prabhu, 2025 Retrospective 124 NR 17 87.2 1.7 64.5 Prabhu, 2025 Retrospective 183 NR 15 86.4 7.3 58.1 Prabhu, 2020 Retrospective 65 NR NR 77.1 4.2 56.3

e13677 Background: The development of AI led to the emergence of tools such as AIS, which have been increasingly adopted in medicine. However, formal evaluation of barriers and clinical care gaps in HemOnc is limited, particularly regarding treatment plan complexities and toxicity documentation. Methods: Structured investigator-developed surveys about AIS availability, adoption, benefits, and challenges were developed on Qualtrics and approved by the IRB. HemOnc faculty physicians (FP), advanced practice providers (APP), and trainees (HOT) were surveyed between 11/14/25-1/16/26. Surveys were distributed in the USA via email, social media (on X), and ASCO myConnection. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: 132 participants responded to the survey: 55 FP (42%), 14 APP (11%), and 63 HOT (48%). 80% of them reported having AIS at their institutions, and 54% of those reported using these tools in their clinical practice. Among FP and APP, 72% practiced in academic settings, 14% in community, and 13% in hybrid centers. Among those not using AIS, identified barriers were issues with note formatting (56%), lack of training (25%), and concerns that the note content is incorrect or inadequate (25%). 60% are willing to use AIS if note formatting matched their preference, and 42% would try it if contents better reflected the patient encounter. Table 1 details the proportion of encounters using AIS, the portion of documentation it was used for, and the perceived challenges with these tools. Among AIS users, the average satisfaction score was 5.3 on a 7 point scale, corresponding to participants being somewhat satisfied. Participants agreed slightly that AIS had reduced their feeling of work-related burnout, with an average score of 3.6 on a 5 point scale. Overall, participants felt neutral about how well-suited AIS are for HemOnc, with an average score of 4.0 on a 7 point scale. Conclusions: Despite AIS being widely available, 46% of the surveyed HemOnc workforce do not use them in clinical practice. Those who do reported decreased time spent on documentation outside work hours and a slight reduction in the feeling of burnout. Formatting issues and record integration remain barriers, with substantial concerns about AIS not adequately describing HemOnc treatment plans. To bridge the last mile of integration into HemOnc, partnership between AIS developers and the clinical workforce is essential to meet clinical needs, while prioritizing patient safety and data privacy. FP + APP % HOT % Patient encounters where AIS is used 62 44 Used AIS for the subjective portion of note 68 96 Used AIS for the assessment/plan portions of note 40 25 AIS decreased the time on clinical documentation outside work hours 96 93 AIS note formatting needs improvement 68 57 Issues integrating AIS and outside records 46 71 AIS note contents about the plan are suboptimal 32 61

635 Background: Prospective data on efficacy, quality of life, and treatment-related toxicities in older adults with breast cancer are limited. The ATOP trial (NCT03587740) evaluated T-DM1 in older adults and demonstrated favorable 5-year invasive disease-free survival. Here, we report patient-reported adverse events (AEs) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) findings from ATOP. Methods: ATOP was a single-arm, phase II, multicenter study of adjuvant T-DM1 for those aged 60 with stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer. Protocol therapy included postoperative administration of T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg) every 21 days for one year (17 cycles). PRO-CTCAE (assessing specific symptoms) and EQ-5D (a measure of HRQOL) surveys were administered electronically or on paper at baseline (pre-treatment), on Day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at a single 6–12-month post-treatment time point. Participants who responded to the baseline and at least one follow-up survey were included in the PRO analysis. EQ-5D changes from baseline were assessed using general linear mixed models. Summary statistics were used to assess PRO-CTCAE scores to evaluate which symptoms developed between baseline and 1 subsequent survey(s) and their severity. Results: Among the 111 patients enrolled on ATOP (median age=71, range 60-88 years), 98 responded to the baseline survey and 1 subsequent survey(s). 1435 surveys were returned that included at least one PRO-CTCAE response, and 1661 surveys were returned that included EQ-5D. The Table displays the % of participants who reported PRO-CTCAE symptoms that worsened from baseline to any severity level (scores >0) or to a severe level (scores ≥3). More than 60% of survey respondents reported new or increased dry mouth, fatigue, muscle aches, decreased appetite, nausea, pain, and/or numbness/tingling at some point during or after treatment, but these were usually not severe. EQ-5D scores did not change significantly from baseline at any time point. Conclusions: In this adjuvant trial for patients aged >60, participation rates for PRO data collection were high. Reassuringly, global HRQOL was not impacted by T-DM1, and though frequently reported, the vast majority of patient-reported symptoms were mild. Future analyses of this trial will focus on duration and predictors (clinical and biomarker-based) of severe AEs, agreement between patient-reported and clinician-reported AEs, and whether sharing PRO reports with clinicians impacted clinician-reported AE grades. Clinical trial information: NCT03587740 . Most common new or worsening symptoms reported via PRO-CTCAE in ATOP (n=95). Symptom % with score >0 n (%) with score 3+ Dry mouth 79% 26% Fatigue 71% 29% Muscle aches 69% 20% Decreased appetite 69% 12% Nausea 67% 6% Pain 66% 21% Numbness/tingling 65% 9% Blurry vision 60% 4% Mouth or throat sores 60% 5%

603 Background: Accurate prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative therapy for HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer can help triage patients to immediate surgery vs additional preoperative therapy. Pre-surgery (i.e., after neoadjuvant therapy) imaging studies may help estimate the likelihood of pCR. In EA1181, patients (pts) with stage II-IIIA HER2+ breast cancer received four cycles of preoperative taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP×4). Pre-surgery imaging was required, though the specific imaging modality was not mandated. Here, we report the accuracy of pre-surgery breast MRI to predict pCR (ypT0/Tis, ypN0). Methods: Among 2,141 pts treated with THPx4, 1,378 had pre-surgery breast MRI and were representative of the overall cohort, although T3 tumors were more common (16% vs 9%). MRI reports were available for 1,351 pts; all reports were centrally reviewed and classified as radiologic complete response (rCR; no residual tumor enhancement and normalization of lymph nodes, if applicable) or radiologic residual disease (rRD). Reports with indeterminate radiologic response were independently reviewed by two study radiologists blinded to pathology outcomes. Among pts with rCR who had pathologic residual disease (pRD), we also assessed the extent of residual disease by residual cancer burden (RCB) score. Among pts with rRD who had a pCR, we determined the proportion who only had residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Results: See Table. Conclusions: After neoadjuvant therapy, preoperative MRI accurately predicted pCR in 86% of patients with HER2+/ER− disease and may help identify patients who can proceed directly to surgery. MRI is insufficient to predict pCR for pts with HER2+/ER+ disease, as only 55% with complete response on MRI had a pCR at surgery. A pre-surgery MRI that indicated residual disease was accurate in 80% of pts with HER2+/ER+ disease, but in only 45% of pts with HER2+/ER- cancer. Accurately predicting residual disease after THPx4 allows for consideration of additional therapy that may increase the chance of pCR. Combining imaging like MRI with other biomarkers, such as tissue-based markers or circulating tumor DNA, may improve prediction of pCR and facilitate personalization of treatment decisions in HER2+ breast cancer. All pts with pre-surgery MRI (n=1351)pCR rate overall in this cohort = 47% MRI result Pathology pCR pRD rCR 70.6% (341/483) 29.4%(142/483) 78% had RCB1 rRD 34%(295/868) 21% of 295 had DCIS only 66.01% (573/868) ER- (n=589)*Overall pCR rate in ER- subset = 68% MRI result Pathology pCR pRD rCR 86.1% (205/238) 13.9% (33/238) 85% had RCB1 rRD 55.3% (194/351) 19% of 194 had only DCIS 44.7% (157/351) ER+ (n= 762)*Overall pCR rate in ER+ subset = 31% MRI result Pathology pCR pRD rCR 55.5% (136/245) 44.5% (109/245) 76% had RCB1 rRD 19.5% (101/517) 26% of 101 had only DCIS 80.5% (416/517)