Citations

INTRODUCTION: Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with and without add-back therapy, was evaluated in premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB; greater than 80 mL/month menstrual blood loss [MBL]) associated with uterine fibroids (UF). METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6 months of treatment in 2 cohorts, with four arms/cohort: elagolix alone as 300 mg twice daily in cohort 1 (C1) and 600 mg once daily in cohort 2, and in both cohorts, placebo, elagolix with add-back therapy of estradiol (E2)/norethindrone acetate (NETA), low dose 0.5 mg E2/0.1 mg NETA (LDA), or standard dose 1.0 mg E2/0.5 mg NETA (SDA). The primary endpoint was the percentage of women with less than 80 mL MBL assessed by the alkaline-hematin-method and at least 50% reduction in MBL from baseline to the last 28 days of treatment. Adverse events (AE), changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. RESULTS: In C1, 259 women were randomized and treated; 80% completed treatment. C1 responses for the primary endpoint were 92% in elagolix alone, 85% elagolix+LDA, 79% elagolix+SDA, and 27% placebo (all p < .001 vs. placebo). Add-back therapy attenuated hot flushes and lumbar spine BMD decreases in a dose-dependent manner; there were no statistically significant differences in BMD between elagolix+SDA and placebo at month 6. All elagolix treatments were associated with improved QoL. Results were similar in C2. CONCLUSION: Elagolix with or without add-back significantly reduced MBL in UF-associated HMB. Hot flushes and BMD decreases were reduced by add-back in a dose-dependent manner.

Background— The incidence and cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is debated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy often reported as the most common cause. Methods and Results— A database of all National Collegiate Athletic Association deaths (2003–2013) was developed. Additional information and autopsy reports were obtained when possible. Cause of death was adjudicated by an expert panel. There were 4 242 519 athlete-years (AY) and 514 total student athlete deaths. Accidents were the most common cause of death (257, 50%, 1:16 508 AY) followed by medical causes (147, 29%, 1:28 861 AY). The most common medical cause of death was SCD (79, 15%, 1:53 703 AY). Males were at higher risk than females 1:37 790 AY versus 1:121 593 AY (incidence rate ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–5.5; P <0.00001), and black athletes were at higher risk than white athletes 1:21491 AY versus 1:68 354 AY (incidence rate ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–5.2; P <0.00001). The incidence of SCD in Division 1 male basketball athletes was 1:5200 AY. The most common findings at autopsy were autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death in 16 (25%), and definitive evidence for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was seen in 5 (8%). Media reports identified more deaths in higher divisions (87%, 61%, and 44%), whereas the percentages from the internal database did not vary (87%, 83%, and 89%). Insurance claims identified only 11% of SCDs. Conclusions— The rate of SCD in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes is high, with males, black athletes, and basketball players at substantially higher risk. The most common finding at autopsy is autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death. Media reports are more likely to capture high-profile deaths, and insurance claims are not a reliable method for case identification.

Context Additional reviews of diagnostic surgical and cytology cases have been shown to detect diagnostic discrepancies. Objective To develop, through a systematic review of the literature, recommendations for the review of pathology cases to detect or prevent interpretive diagnostic errors. Design The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center in association with the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the role of case reviews in surgical pathology and cytology. A literature search was conducted to gather data on the review of cases in surgical pathology and cytology. Results The panel drafted 5 recommendations, with strong agreement from open comment period participants ranging from 87% to 93%. The recommendations are: (1) anatomic pathologists should develop procedures for the review of selected pathology cases to detect disagreements and potential interpretive errors; (2) anatomic pathologists should perform case reviews in a timely manner to avoid having a negative impact on patient care; (3) anatomic pathologists should have documented case review procedures that are relevant to their practice setting; (4) anatomic pathologists should continuously monitor and document the results of case reviews; and (5) if pathology case reviews show poor agreement within a defined case type, anatomic pathologists should take steps to improve agreement. Conclusions Evidence exists that case reviews detect errors; therefore, the expert panel recommends that anatomic pathologists develop procedures for the review of pathology cases to detect disagreements and potential interpretive errors, in order to improve the quality of patient care.

Background— The pathogenesis of sudden cardiac death in college athletes has not been defined by systematic case identification. Methods and Results— A total of 45 cases of sudden cardiac death were identified in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes from 2004 to 2008 based on an internal reporting system and review of media reports. Autopsy reports were reviewed and adjudicated by a multidisciplinary panel. Cause of death could be reasonably determined in 36 cases; 3 athletes had no autopsy, 5 autopsy reports could not be obtained, and 1 autopsy had insufficient information to determine cause of death. The most common finding at death was a structurally normal heart or autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death (11, 31%), followed by coronary artery abnormalities (5, 14%), dilated cardiomyopathy (3, 8%), myocarditis related (3, 8%), aortic dissection (3, 8%), and idiopathic left ventricular hypertrophy/possible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; 3, 8%). There was 1 case each (3%) of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, long QT syndrome, commotio cordis, and Kawasaki disease. There was 1 case of death in a sickle cell positive athlete who also had left ventricular hypertrophy. The adjudicated diagnosis agreed with the official pathology report in only 59% of cases. Conclusions— Unexplained death with a structurally normal heart is the most common finding after suspected sudden cardiac death in NCAA athletes. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is infrequently seen, and conclusions in autopsy reports may not accurately reflect the pathological findings. Standardized protocols for cardiovascular autopsies in athletes are needed, including postmortem genetic testing, particularly in autopsy-negative cases.

Abstract Labral repair has become an essential technique in the arthroscopic surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement. Several clinical studies suggest that labral repair results in superior patient outcomes in comparison to labral debridement alone. The repair procedure requires accurate evaluation of labral tissue quality, precise placement of sutures and anchors, and careful re‐tensioning of the labrum. We present our preferred technique for labral repair. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.