Citations

2011 Background: Radiation therapy forms the mainstay of management for patients with brain metastases. Published randomized trials have found improved quality of life with stereotactic radiation (SRS/SRT) over whole brain radiation (WBRT) in patients with ≤ 4 brain metastases; comparative trials in patients with >4 brain metastases are lacking. In addition, prior randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of hippocampal avoidance WBRT (HA-WBRT) over traditional WBRT, but no study has compared SRS/SRT to HA-WBRT. Accordingly, we conducted a multicenter, phase 3 randomized trial comparing SRS/SRT to HA-WBRT in patients with 5-20 brain metastases. Methods: Eligible patients were age 18-80 with 5-20 brain metastases secondary to a solid primary other than small cell lung cancer, were naïve to prior brain-directed radiation, and lacked leptomeningeal disease. The primary endpoint was the average of patient-reported symptom severity and interference over the first six months post-baseline relative to baseline, using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module, a validated instrument assessing 22 symptoms and 6 interference measures integral to quality of life, each scored 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology/interference in function. The target effect size was a symptom severity of 0.70, corresponding to 50% of the observed difference between patients with a good (90-100) versus poor (≤80) Karnofsky performance status; with 80% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 196 patients were required. Results: Between 4/2017-5/2024, 196 patients enrolled, 98 in each arm. The median number of brain metastases was 14 (IQR 11-18); 25% of patients underwent prior neurosurgical resection. Baseline mean MDASI-BT symptom severity scores were 2.2 (SRS/SRT arm) and 1.9 (HA-WBRT arm), p=0.20; respective interference scores were 3.5 and 3.2 (p=0.40). The average of weighted post-baseline severity and interference scores relative to baseline indicated lower symptomatology/inference in the SRS/SRT arm, meeting the primary endpoint of the study (difference between SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT: -1.06, p<0.001). Averaged post-baseline symptom severity scores minus baseline were -0.03 and 0.59 in the SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT arms, respectively (difference -0.62, with lower symptom severity in the SRS/SRT arm, p<0.001); respective interference estimates were -0.62 and 0.89 (difference -1.50, with lower interference in the SRS/SRT arm, p<0.001). Median survival was 8.3 and 8.5 months in the SRS/SRT and HA-WBRT arms, respectively (p=0.30). Conclusions: This phase 3 randomized trial indicates that patients with 5-20 brain metastases experience fewer symptoms and less interference in function after SRS/SRT as opposed to HA-WBRT, without compromise of survival, supporting SRS/SRT as the standard of care in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03075072 .

Abstract Objective Unlocking clinical information embedded in clinical notes has been hindered to a significant degree by domain-specific and context-sensitive language. Identification of note sections and structural document elements has been shown to improve information extraction and dependent downstream clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks and applications. This study investigates the viability of a dynamic example selection prompting method to section classification using lightweight, open-source large language models (LLMs) as a practical solution for real-world healthcare clinical NLP systems. Materials and Methods We develop a dynamic few-shot prompting approach to classifying sections where section samples are first embedded using a transformer-based model and deposited in a vector store. During inference, the embedded samples with the most similar contextual embeddings to a given input section text are retrieved from the vector store and inserted into the LLM prompt. We evaluate this technique on two datasets comprising two section schemas, including varying levels of context. We compare the performance to baseline zero-shot and randomly selected few-shot scenarios. Results The dynamic few-shot prompting experiments yielded the highest F1 scores in each of the classification tasks and datasets for all seven of the LLMs included in the evaluation, averaging a macro F1 increase of 39.3% and 21.1% in our primary section classification task over the zero-shot and static few-shot baselines, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion Our results showcase substantial performance improvements imparted by dynamically selecting examples for few-shot LLM prompting, and further improvement by including section context, demonstrating compelling potential for clinical applications.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more. PURPOSE To develop a clinical practice guideline and recommendations for symptom management of patients with well-differentiated grade 1 to grade 3 metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop a clinical practice guideline by reviewing the literature for relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies to develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS The literature review identified eight guidelines, 19 systematic reviews, and three RCTs that informed the development of guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations are included for carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease and carcinoid crisis, and functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor syndromes. Recommendations are provided for surgical management, liver-directed therapy, and systemic therapy options, as well as palliative care. Limited guidance is provided for sequencing of interventions. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Abstract Purpose: Recent advances have seen the development of targeted therapeutics against the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/RAS/MAPK pathway, which, when aberrantly activated, drives the malignant transformation of many cancer indications. However, the efficacy of inhibitors targeting single molecules is dampened by pathway feedback activation and acquired drug resistance. We seek to evaluate the application of JAB-3312 (sitneprotafib), a potent inhibitor of SHP2, in RTK/RAS/MAPK pathway–targeted combination therapies. Furthermore, SHP2 plays a vital role in PD-1–mediated immunosuppression. The rational combination of JAB-3312 with PD-1 blocking therapies is also explored. Experimental Design: Biochemical and cellular assays were applied to evaluate the potency of JAB-3312 in SHP2 inhibition. Tumor cell lines and cell line– and patient-derived xenografts were used to test different combinations of JAB-3312 with KRASG12C, MEK, EGFR, and PD-1 inhibitors. Results: JAB-3312 produced potent in vitro inhibition of SHP2 activity and downstream ERK phosphorylation, with IC50 values of 1.44 nmol/L and 0.68 to 4.84 nmol/L, respectively. When used in combination, JAB-3312 significantly increased the antitumor activity of the KRASG12C inhibitor glecirasib in naïve and resistant models. The combination of JAB-3312 with MEK inhibitors significantly delayed RTK signaling reactivation and enhanced tumor growth inhibition in KRAS-mutated cancer models. The JAB-3312–osimertinib combination exhibited great efficacy in osimertinib-resistant non–small cell lung cancer models. Additionally, JAB-3312 enhanced the efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapies by promoting an antitumor microenvironment. Representative cases of patients who responded to the combination therapies from two ongoing clinical trials (NCT05288205 and NCT04720976) were reported. Conclusions: JAB-3312 in combination with RTK/RAS/MAPK or PD-1 blockade therapies is a promising strategy that warrants further clinical investigation.

Abstract Tumor cells develop various strategies to evade immune surveillance, one of which involves altering the metabolic state of the tumor microenvironment. In response to metabolic stress in the tumor microenvironment, several tumor-infiltrating immune subsets upregulate CD36 to take up lipids. This leads to impaired antitumor immunity, as intratumoral regulatory T cells exhibit increased survival and suppressive activity, whereas CD8+ T cells become more susceptible to ferroptosis and exhaustion. In this study, we develop a humanized anti-CD36 IgG4 antibody, PLT012, against the lipid-binding domain of CD36 with excellent safety and favorable pharmacokinetic features in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. PLT012 alone or in combination with PD-L1 blockade or standard-of-care immunotherapy results in robust antitumor immunity in both immunotherapy-sensitive and -resistant hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Notably, PLT012 also reprograms the immune landscape of human HCC ex vivo. Our findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that PLT012 reprograms antitumor immunity in HCC, positioning it as a first-in-class immunotherapy targeting CD36. Significance: Despite the success of cancer immunotherapies, like immune checkpoint inhibitors, many patients still fail to demonstrate significant responses because of metabolic constraints in tumors. PLT012 rejuvenates antitumor immunity by targeting metabolic pathways to reprogram the immune landscape of liver cancer and liver metastasis, with potential to influence future HCC immunotherapy.

Abstract Background Instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) should generate high-quality evidence. Reliable PRO evidence is essential to policymakers, in conjunction with outcomes such as survival and radiological response, to understand the net clinical benefit of antitumor treatments. This study aimed to establish the content validity of 215 identified PRO measures used in patients with brain tumors. Methods A survey (n = 148 items) was developed reflecting aspects of the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Patients with brain tumors, their proxies, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were asked to rate each survey item on relevance. An item was considered a relevant issue if ≥25% of the patients or proxies or ≥50% of the HCPs considered that item to be an issue. Next, all items in the identified PRO measures were linked to ICF and relevant items in the survey, and the percentage of content coverage was calculated. Results In total, 114 patients, 71 proxies, and 65 HCPs from different countries completed the survey. Fifty-six of 148 (37.8%) items in the survey were considered relevant. The most important aspects mentioned by both patients and proxies were difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, multitasking, and handling stress. Depending on the definition, between 35% and 49% of PRO measures were considered to have sufficient content validity (≥80% coverage). Conclusion The content validity was insufficient in more than half of the identified PRO measures, particularly multidimensional measures. Future research should investigate whether different approaches to PRO assessment better meet the needs of all stakeholders.

ABSTRACT Contezolid has activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common cause of orthopedic infection. In a rat model of foreign body osteomyelitis, 1.3 log 10 cfu/g bone and 0.5 log 10 cfu/k-wire reduction in MRSA was found in tibiae ( P = 0.0186) and K-wires, respectively, of contezolid-treated compared to untreated rats. No MRSA was recovered from animals receiving rifampin alone or in combination with contezolid or vancomycin. There was no emergence of resistance to contezolid, vancomycin, or rifampin.

Abstract Background: Effective treatments (Tx) are needed for MTAP-del cancers (10-15% of all cancers). BMS-986504 (formerly MRTX1719) is a potential first-in-class MTA-cooperative protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor that selectively binds to the PRMT5-MTA complex, a synthetic lethal target in MTAP-del but not MTAP-wild-type cells. In the first-in-human phase 1/2 CA240-0007 study, BMS-986504 was well tolerated and showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts across multiple advanced solid tumors with homozygous MTAP-del. Here, we report results of exploratory PD analyses of PRMT5 inhibition with BMS-986504 in CA240-0007. Methods: Pts with advanced, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with homozygous MTAP-del received BMS-986504 (50 to 800 mg) in 3-wk cycles. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and intron retention are known PD BMs of PRMT5 inhibition. Therefore, PD effects of BMS-986504 were assessed via changes in plasma and tumor SDMA levels (mass spec and IHC), intron retention, and gene expression (RNASeq) based on samples collected at baseline (BL) and cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Additional analyses correlating efficacy outcomes with PD results and select mutations at BL were performed in clinically evaluable pts as of 19-SEP-24. Results: Robust PD modulation of the PRMT5 pathway was observed with BMS-986504. Among pts with matched samples (n = 63), median plasma SDMA levels were reduced by 56% from BL (122.6 ng/mL) to C2D1 (53.8 ng/mL). There were dose-dependent reductions in median plasma SDMA with the greatest reductions at 400 mg QD (59.7% [n = 20]), 400 mg BID (61.9% [n = 9]) and 600 mg QD (59.1% [n = 14]). These PD effects were corroborated in the tumor. Median tumor SDMA levels decreased from an HScore of 285 at BL to 0 at C2D1. Consistent with the SDMA decreases, increased intron retention was observed in 9/11 pts with matched samples. BMS-986504 led to downregulation of several gene pathways including DNA repair and mitotic spindle formation, and MYC and E2F targets, as assessed by RNASeq. There was no significant change in expression of MAT2A, PRMT5, or other PRMT genes, suggesting a lack of compensation for PRMT5 inhibition through these genes. Responses were observed with BMS-986504 across EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 mutation subgroups. Additional correlative analyses among BMs and efficacy outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: BMS-986504 demonstrated robust PD effects across multiple doses and solid tumors which is consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. There was a trend of increasing plasma SDMA reduction across doses, with the greatest reductions observed at 400 mg QD and above. Together these results support further investigation of BMS-986504 at 400 mg QD and higher doses as a potential first-in-class synthetic lethal Tx option in pts with advanced solid tumors with MTAP-del. Citation Format: Jordi Rodón, Tyler Simpson, Ben George, Pasi A. Jänne, Kathryn C. Arbour, Konstantinos Leventakos, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Melissa L. Johnson, Alexander I. Spira, Cesar A. Perez, Hani M. Babiker, Richard Zuniga, Candace L. Haddox, Tapsi Kumar, Yidi Qin, Wen-Chi Chou, Peter Olson, Kenna Anderes, Alice Wozniak, Curtis Chin, Ming Lei, Jason T. Henry. Pharmacodynamic (PD) and exploratory biomarker (BM) analysis of the PRMT5 inhibitor BMS-986504 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with homozygous MTAP deletion (MTAP-del) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT079.

ImportanceUnderstanding the global barriers to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) care is crucial in addressing disparities in access to care, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveTo characterize barriers to comprehensive otolaryngology care across World Bank income groups.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing an online cross-sectional survey that was administered by the Global OHNS Initiative via international and national professional societies, personal contacts, and social media, this study captured the perceptions of otolaryngologists regarding barriers to OHNS care at the levels of the country, health sector, clinician, and patient. Participants included otolaryngologists from the 194 World Health Organization member states and Taiwan. Eligibility criteria included a medical degree and specialized training in managing conditions of the ear, nose, and throat. The nonresponse rate was not recorded. The data collection period spanned from October 2022 to June 2023.ExposuresExposures included World Bank income group classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were Likert scale responses regarding frequency of barriers to OHNS care. The a priori hypothesis was that LMICs would report more frequent barriers to OHNS care.ResultsThe study involved 146 otolaryngologists (47 female individuals [32%]), with 69 (47%) from high-income countries and 77 (53%) from LMICs. Male individuals represented 45 high-income country respondents (65%) and 54 LMIC respondents (70%). Barriers were reported across income groups at all levels of the health system, with a higher frequency in LMICs. Several barriers were reported to be more substantial in LMICs, such as the national volume and distribution of otolaryngologists, financial compensation for clinicians, and patient stigma, and others were common across income settings, such as the availability of operating rooms and inflexible working hours. Common concerns included national and health sector barriers: OHNS workforce, referral networks, government support; clinician barriers: excessive clinician workloads, understaffing, poor administration support; patient barriers: distance to health care facilities, financial burdens such as medical costs and foregone wages, stigma, and health literacy.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that there are barriers to otolaryngology care globally that affected all levels of the health care system. This work may inform prioritization of otolaryngology within research and policy, and it emphasizes the need for effective strategies to expand access to otolaryngology care, particularly in lower-income settings.