Citations

Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a disease characterized by genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Correct classification of genetic variation is critical for clinical interpretation. Herein, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) pose a dilemma in clinical practice, limiting physicians’ decision making and causing anguish to patients and family members. Furthermore, with increasing knowledge and changing guidelines, continuous reassessment is crucial to maintain usefulness in practice. This study sought to assess contemporary variant classification in a large cohort of patients with HCM. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients with HCM seen at Mayo Clinic and all patients with a variant in one of 8 genes with strong disease association for HCM were included. Genetic test reports were obtained from electronic health records along with their original variant classification assigned by either a commercial or research laboratory. Reassessment of variant pathogenicity was performed using the 2015 ACMG guideline criteria. Population frequency was obtained using Gnomad. Co-segregation presence or absence was determined by family history and co-segregation studies. Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) was used as computational evidence of genetic deleterious effects for single nucleotide variants. Results: Between 2003 to 2019, a total of 1,782 patients underwent laboratory or commercial HCM genetic testing. Of these, 787 (44%) had positive genetic test with a variant at least 1 of the 8 genes. The original pathogenic classification was obtained for 754 patients. Of those, 430 (57%) variants where within the gene MYBPC3, 244 (32%) within MYH7 and 80 (11%) within either ACTC1, MYL2, MYL3, TINNI3, TNNT2 or TPM1. Overall, 222 patients (29%) originally had one or more variants classified as a VUS. Upon reassessment, 120 (54%) were reclassified as either pathogenic (33%), likely pathogenic (58%), benign (5%) or likely benign (3%). Conclusion: Periodic reassessment for HCM genetic variants, especially VUS, is critical for adequate patient care and management. Cascade screening could decrease patients’ uncertainty regarding their prognosis and management.

Introduction: Calmodulin (CaM)-mediated long QT syndrome (CaM-LQTS) is a genetic arrhythmia disorder characterized by a high prevalence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias occurring very early in life, frequent T-wave alternans, markedly prolonged QT intervals (QTc > 600 ms), and intermittent 2:1 AV block. Three distinct genes ( CALM1 , CALM2 , and CALM3 ) all encode for the identical CaM protein. Conventional LQTS pharmacotherapies fail to adequately protect against potentially lethal cardiac events in patients with CaM-LQTS. Here, we developed a CALM1 “ suppression-replacement (SupRep)” gene therapy with the goal of rescuing the prolonged cardiac action potential duration (APD) and increased Ca 2+ amplitude (ΔF/F0) in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) from a patient with CALM1 -mediated LQTS. Methods: Custom designed CALM1 -targeting shRNAs were tested for knockdown efficiency using TSA201 cells and RT-qPCR. A dual-component SupRep CALM1 gene therapy was created by cloning into a single construct a custom-designed CALM1 shRNA that produces knockdown (suppression) and a “shRNA-immune” (shIMM) CALM1 cDNA (replacement). Patient-specific CALM1-F142L iPSC-CMs were generated from a patient with severe LQTS (QTc = 515 ms). FluoVolt voltage-sensing dye was used to measure the APD at 90% repolarization (APD 90 ). Calcium transient amplitude was measured using Fluo-4 indicator. Results: Overall, 6 unique candidate CALM1 -targeting shRNAs were tested for knockdown efficiency in a transient transfection CALM1 over-expression TSA201 cell system. One candidate shRNA had an 80% knockdown efficiency of CALM1. Following transfection with CALM1 -SupRep gene therapy, the APD 90 was significantly decreased in F142L iPSC-CMs compared to untreated cells (F142L: 665 ± 9 ms [n=40] vs F142L + SupRep: 353 ± 9 ms [n=20], p<0.0001). Ca 2+ amplitude was significantly decreased following SupRep transfection when compared to untreated cells (0.99 ± 0.04 vs 0.8 ± 0.06, p=0.02). Conclusions: Here, we provide the first proof-of-principle SupRep gene therapy for CALM1-mediated LQTS. CALM1 -SupRep gene therapy shortened significantly the pathologically prolonged APD 90 in CALM1 -F142L patient-derived iPSC-CMs.

Background: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a genetic heart disease affecting about 1 in 2000 persons. Around 40% of patients with LQTS can have a nondiagnostic, normal QTc at rest. The treadmill exercise stress test (TEST) can help unmask patients with concealed LQTS with a characteristic maladaptive, paradoxical increase in QTc ( 460 ms) during the recovery phase. In fact, the recovery phase QTc value has been added to the latest diagnostic score for LQTS. Objective: To characterize the TEST-derived QTc profile of untreated patients with LQTS and determine its diagnostic and prognostic utility. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on TEST data derived from 249 patients with LQTS (129 LQT1, 64 LQT2 and 56 LQT3) untreated at the time of their TEST compared with 236 controls. The Bazett’s corrected QTc was calculated at rest (sitting, supine, and standing), during exercise at 1 min, 3 mins, and peak exercise, and during recovery phase at 1, 3 and 5 mins. Results: The mean resting QTc was significantly higher in LQTS patients (457 ± 30 ms) compared to controls (420 ± 24 ms; p<0.0001) as well as at every stage during the TEST (p<0.001). For LQT1 patients, highest QTc was observed at peak exercise (mean 496 ± 38 ms) and during the third minute of recovery phase (mean 500 ± 40 ms). In contrast, LQT2 patients showed the lowest QTc (mean 452 ± 48 ms) during peak exercise but the greatest QTc latency (QTc at 5 min - QTc at 1 min recovery; mean QTc latency 33 ± 77 ms; p=0.005) compared to controls. For LQT3, the mean QTc was greatest at rest compared to controls (p<0.001), and there was no difference during exercise and recovery phases. Among 162 LQT1 and LQT2 patients that presented with concealed LQTS, 119 (73%) showed a maladaptive QT response. ROC analysis showed that in patients with LQT1, a maladaptive QTc > 523 ms at 3 min of recovery was highly predictive of breakthrough cardiac events (AUC 0.84; sensitivity 100%, specificity 72%); no such association was identified for LQT2 or 3. Conclusions: This comprehensive characterization of the QTc response before, during, and after a TEST in the largest untreated cohort of patients with LQTS provides important genotype-specific characteristics and can be used as a predictor for potential LQT1-triggered cardiac events after diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy. Approximately 40-50% of HCM is caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins of the cardiac sarcomere. Patients with sarcomeric HCM have earlier expression and more severe disease progression. Herein, we evaluated the proteomic differences between patients with sarcomeric HCM and genotype negative HCM. Methods: Mass-spectrometry was performed on cardiac tissue from genotyped patients with HCM obtained after surgical myectomy, followed by differential proteomics (log2fc ≥

Introduction: Pathogenic loss-of-function variants in the RBM20 -encoded RNA-binding motif 20 splicing regulator cause a severe form of arrhythmogenic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Erroneous splicing of TTN -encoded titin contributes to the pathogenesis of RBM20 -mediated disease. However, studies exploring the clinical course of RBM20 -mediated arrhythmogenic DCM alone or in comparison to TTN -mediated DCM, the most common familial cause of DCM, are lacking. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Genetic Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Registry (n=391) was used to identify all patients with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in either RBM20 or TTN . For the purposes of this study, a ventricular arrhythmia (VA) event was defined as sudden cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, or an appropriate ICD shock and an advanced heart failure (AHF) event was defined as ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation. Results: Overall, 40 patients with a P/LP variant in RBM20 (50% female) and 70 patients with a P/LP variant in TTN (43% female) were identified. The prevalence of a cardiac phenotype in patients with RBM20- and TTN -mediated disease was 88% and 83%, respectively. RBM20 patients were more likely to have a family history of sudden cardiac arrest (78% vs 34%; p < 0.0001) and cardiomyopathy (90% vs 61%; p=0.001). No difference in rate of ICD implantation (35% versus 33%) was observed. Interestingly, the prevalence of AHF events (10% vs 6%; p=0.5) and VA events (28% vs 24%; p=0.7) was similar between RBM20 - and TTN -positive patients. However, RBM20 patients were younger than TTN patients at the time of their event (37 ± 18 years vs 50 ± 17; p=0.0004). Time-to-event analysis showed RBM20 patients had an earlier time to AHF event (p=0.05) and time to VA event (p=0.03) than TTN patients. The mean age for AHF events was 25 years for RBM20 patients (N=4) and 47 years for TTN patients (N=4). The mean age for VA events was 29 years for RBM20 patients (N=10) and 42 years for TTN patients (N=14). Conclusions: RBM20 -mediated arrhythmogenic DCM represents a highly penetrant genetic heart disease with potentially life-threatening VAs and end stage heart failure manifestations occurring at a significantly younger age in comparison to TTN -mediated DCM.

Background: Sex hormones influence the arrhythmogenic risk for various genetic heart diseases (GHDs) including long QT syndrome (LQTS), Brugada syndrome (BrS), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). Although exogenous hormones are used frequently in transgender medicine for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), the effect of such treatments on sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in transgender patients with a GHD is unknown. Objective: To describe the prevalence and spectrum of transgender patients with GHD and to evaluate the impact of GAHT on the treatment and outcomes of their underlying GHD. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients seen and evaluated in Mayo Clinic’s Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic from January 1999-2022 to identify transgender patients. Clinical notes were reviewed for sex, gender identity, GAHT, and details of their GHD, therapy, and outcomes. Results: Among 1990 patients with a GHD, we found 7 patients (0.35%) who self-identify as a gender different from their chromosomal sex (transgender). Specifically, there were 4 patients who identified as transgender women (XY males at birth) and 3 as transgender men (XX females at birth). Five of seven patients (71%) have used forms of GAHT, with 2 patients on estradiol and 3 patients on testosterone. GHDs identified include LQT1 (2 transgender women), LQT3 (1 transgender man), LQT3/BrS overlap syndrome (1 transgender woman), genotype negative LQTS (1 transgender man), CPVT (1 transgender woman), and IVF (1 transgender man). Guideline-directed GHD therapy was optimized, not altered nor escalated, for all patients and no patients were advised against initiating GAHT due to perceived interactions. One of seven patients (transgender man with IVF) experienced a breakthrough cardiac event (BCE) while on GAHT, while the other 6 patients have had no BCEs. Conclusion: Although less than 0.5% of patients seen over 20+ years self-identified as transgender, their holistic care must include a careful discussion of the possible cardiac risks associated with GAHT. Additional studies are needed to determine the potential pro-arrhythmic risk of GAHT.

Introduction: Myocardial inflammation likely contributes to the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), a clinically and genetically heterogenous disorder characterized by ventricular dysfunction and potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Due to phenotypic overlap, some patients with genetic ACM may have been evaluated for an underlying inflammatory cardiomyopathy, namely cardiac sarcoidosis. However, the cardiac fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) findings in ACM patients have not been assessed systematically. Methods: All genotype-positive patients in the Mayo Clinic ACM registry who received a cardiac FDG PET were included in this study. The cardiac FDG PET scan consisted of a resting myocardial perfusion scan with N13-ammonia as well as a F18-FDG scan after a high-fat diet to suppress physiologic FDG uptake. Pertinent demographic, genetic, imaging, and outcome data were extracted from the medical record. Results: Collectively, 12 (75% female) genotype-positive ACM patients received a cardiac PET FDG scan as part of their clinical evaluation (median age at scan 45.3 years [IQR 38.9-62.1]). Amongst these patients, pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in LMNA (n=7), DSP (n=3), FLNC (n=1), and PLN (n=1). Of note, 6/12 (50%) had abnormal myocardial FDG uptake, including diffuse (entire myocardium) uptake in 2/6 (33%), focal (1-2 segments) uptake in 2/6 (33%) and patchy (3+ segments) in 2/6 (33%). Median myocardial standardized uptake value ratio was 2.1 (IQR 1.5-2.6). Interestingly, LMNA -positive patients accounted for 3 out of 6 (50%) positive studies (diffuse uptake in 2 and focal uptake in 1). Conclusion: Myocardial FDG uptake is common in genetic ACM patients undergoing cardiac FDG PET. This finding further supports the role of myocardial inflammation in genetic ACM and demonstrates the ability of cardiac FDG PET to readily detect this phenomenon. Further investigation is needed to determine (i) the role of cardiac FDG PET in the evaluation of genetic ACM, (ii) if FDG uptake in genetic ACM has prognostic value and (iii) whether the attenuation of myocardial inflammation with immunosuppressive agents can impact the clinical course of inflammatory genetic ACMs.

Introduction: Multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions (MEPPC), the most recent addition to the spectrum of SCN5A -mediated cardiac channelopathies, is characterized by frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) originating from the Purkinje system, atrial arrhythmias, and a predilection for PVC-mediated dilated cardiomyopathy. Hypothesis: To investigate the electrophysiology phenotype of MEPPC in a novel, patient-specific, re-engineered cardiomyocyte model. Methods: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) were generated from a 27-year-old male with a history of frequent, multifocal PVCs and atrial tachycardia, positive for a putative MEPPC-causative SCN5A variant (p.Q419P). A CRISPR-Cas9 Q419P variant-corrected isogenic control (IC) was created to establish the normalized electrophysiology recordings for that MEPPC model. The standard whole-cell patch clamp technique was used to measure Q419P-SCN5A- and IC-derived NaV1.5 sodium currents using voltage clamp configuration. In addition, action potential duration (APD) of the iPSC-CMs were measured using FluoVolt optical voltage-sensing dye. Results: Analysis of the current-voltage relationship revealed that neither peak sodium current densities nor late inward sodium current were impacted by Q419P-SCN5A. However, Q419P-SCN5A significantly right-shifted the V 1/2 in inactivation by 8.3 mV from -81.1±1.7 mV (IC, n=5) to -72.8±0.2 mV (Q419P-SCN5A, n=6, p<0.05 vs. IC) and left-shifted the V 1/2 in activation by -4.1 mV from -39.5±0.3 mV (IC, n=5) to -43.6±0.9 mV (Q419P-SCN5A, n=6, p<0.05 vs. IC) leading to a larger hyperpolarized window current. Optical APD90 measurement revealed no difference between the Q419P-containing (476 ± 23 ms) and the IC (474 ± 46 ms, p=0.867) cardiomyocytes. Conclusions: This is the first in-vitro disease model of MEPPC using patient-specific, re-engineered heart cells. Consistent with the findings in the non-cardiac HEK cell system, this MEPPC-causative variant contributes to increased window current in cardiomyocytes without affecting the cardiac APD. This novel cardiac cell model for MEPPC may facilitate new insights into the pathobiology of MEPPC and enable the testing of novel therapies for it.

Background: Highly caffeinated energy drinks (HCEDs) can trigger life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in individuals with and without an underlying genetic predisposition. Though the mechanism(s) responsible for these events remain unclear, it has been postulated that high caffeine may alter heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac contractility, and cardiac repolarization in a manner that is pro-arrhythmic. Objective: To describe our experience regarding sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) events occurring in proximity to HCED consumption in patients with underling genetic heart diseases. Methods: All SCA survivors referred to the Mayo Clinic Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic for clinical and/or molecular evaluation were reviewed to identify those with a history of HCED consumption prior to their event. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, documented HCED consumption, and temporal relationship of HCED consumption to SCA were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Among 144 SCA survivors with a structurally normal heart, 8 (6 females; mean age at event 28 ± 8 years) experienced an unexplained SCA associated temporally with HCED consumption. Of these, 5 (63%) had either long QT syndrome (n=3) or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n=2). The remaining 3 were diagnosed with unexplained SCA/idiopathic ventricular fibrillation after a comprehensive evaluation. Three patients (37%) were habitual HCED consumers while 5 (63%) imbibed for the first time with consumption ranging from several hours to a few minutes before the SCA. Seven patients (88%) required a rescue shock (average 2 ± 2 shocks/patient) while 1 was manually resuscitated. Upon follow-up, 6 (75%) were dismissed with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, 1 (13%) on pharmacologic therapy, and 1 (13%) underwent denervation surgery. All SCA survivors have quit drinking HCEDs and have been event-free since. Conclusion: Overall, 8/144 (5.6%) of SCA survivors evaluated in our program experienced a SCA in proximity to consuming a HCED. Although larger cohort studies are needed to elucidate the precise mechanism for HCED-triggered/associated SCA and quantify its precise pro-arrhythmic risk, it seems prudent to sound an early warning.

Background: The estimated prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) globally is about 5%. For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), ADHD-directed stimulant therapy is relatively contraindicated. However, previous studies have shown that use of these treatments is safe for patients with long QT syndrome, a similar genetic heart disease. Whether this is the same for patients with CPVT remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate ADHD-directed treatment, outcome, and frequency of CPVT-triggered events in patients with CPVT and concomitant ADHD. Methods: A retrospective electronic medical record review of 216 patients with CPVT evaluated in Mayo Clinic’s Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic was performed to determine the prevalence of concomitant ADHD and the incidence of CPVT-triggered events in these patients. Results: Overall, 14 patients (6%) were diagnosed with CPVT and concomitant ADHD (6 female, average age 19 ± 3 years). At the time of first evaluation, ADHD-directed stimulant therapy was stopped or advised against in 8/14 patients (57%). It was (re)started in 11 patients (79%) following comprehensive evaluation and treatment initiation for CPVT with pharmacologic therapy in 14/14 patients (100%), denervation surgery in 12 (86%), and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in 4 (29%). Prior to Mayo Clinic evaluation, 10 patients (71%) treated for CPVT had a breakthrough cardiac event, without being on stimulant therapy, while 4 patients (29%) had an event while being treated for both CPVT and ADHD for an average time on stimulant therapy of 6 ± 6 years. Following CPVT treatment optimization and ADHD stimulant (re)initiation, patients have remained event-free for a total of 82 patient years (mean follow-up 6 ± 5 years). Conclusion: Among patients with CPVT, the prevalence of ADHD was similar to that in the general population, which can be treated safely and effectively with stimulant therapy. Although the rate of adverse events was low in stimulant-treated patients, physicians should weigh the potential effects of suboptimal treatment of ADHD with the theoretical proarrhythmic risk from stimulant medications on a case-by-case basis.