Citations

Abstract Background We previously tested an intervention featuring educational outreach with modified academic detailing (AD) to increase anticoagulation (AC) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, we compare providers receiving and not receiving AD in terms of inclusion of our AD educational topics and shared decision-making elements in documentation. Methods Physicians reviewed themes discussed with providers during AD and evaluated charts for evidence of shared decision-making. We then compared frequency of documentation of individual items for providers receiving AD compared with non-AD providers. To understand baseline documentation practices of AD providers, we also randomly selected encounters of AD providers before their AD participation. Results There were 113 eligible encounters in the four months after AD - 36 from AD providers and 77 from non-AD providers. We also identified 35 encounters from AD providers before participating in the intervention. Providers infrequently documented many reviewed items (% documenting): AC mentioned (44%), multiple options for AC (5%), CHA2DS2-VASc score (11%), bleeding risk factors (2%). Compared with non-AD providers, AD providers had statistically significant higher percentages for the following items: mention of AC (64% versus 35%), stroke risk (11% versus 0%), AC benefits (8% versus 0%), patient involvement (70% versus 0%). There was no improvement, however, for AD providers compared with baseline documentation percentages. Conclusions Providers infrequently documented important items in AC management and shared decision-making. AD participation did not improve documentation. Improving adoption of AD educational items may require more prolonged interaction with providers. Improving shared decision-making may require an intervention more focused on it and its documentation. Trial Registration The trial was registered as NCT03583008 on Clinicaltrials.gov on July 11, 2018.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly ulcerative colitis (UC), have a higher risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) than the general population (1). The incidence of CDI is increasing among patients with IBD, and certain UC treatments may be associated with greater risk (1). We report CDI events in the tofacitinib UC clinical program, and the incidence of CDI among patients receiving other treatments for UC. METHODS: For the tofacitinib UC program, rates of CDI (patients with an adverse event [AE] of CDI, Clostridium difficile colitis, or Clostridium test-positive, plus concomitant oral metronidazole or vancomycin, counted once per cohort) are reported for Induction Cohort (patients from an 8-week Phase [P]2 and two 8-week P3 induction studies; placebo or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily [BID; NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951]); Maintenance Cohort (patients from a 52-week maintenance study; placebo or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID [NCT01458574]); and Overall Cohort (all tofacitinib-treated patients in P2/3 induction and maintenance studies and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension study [as of December 2016; NCT01470612]). Positive Clostridium difficile test at screening was an exclusion criterion for program entry. Overall Cohort incidence rate (IR) was calculated as number of unique patients with events per 100 patient-years (PY). For contextualization, CDI rates among patients receiving other UC medications were obtained from a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Truven MarketScan ® Database, an administrative healthcare claims database in the US. Patients with moderately to severely active UC, with either an inpatient or outpatient diagnosis code of CDI, plus a prescription for oral therapy (including metronidazole, vancomycin, and fidaxomicin) within 14 days of CDI diagnosis (observation period: October 1, 2010–September 30, 2015), were included. Truven cohort IRs were calculated as number of patients with events per 100 PY. RESULTS: In the tofacitinib Induction Cohort, CDI occurred in 3 patients (placebo, 1/282 [0.4%]; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, 2/938 [0.2%]). In the Maintenance Cohort, CDI occurred in 3 patients (placebo, 3/198 [1.5%]; tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID, 0/394 [0.0%]). In the Overall Cohort of all tofacitinib-treated patients (1,664 PY of follow-up), CDI occurred in 8/1,157 patients (0.7%), with an IR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.48 (0.21, 0.95). Two cases were reported as serious AEs. All were mild (n = 4) or moderate (n = 4) in severity; 6 continued with study treatment, one temporarily discontinued, one permanently discontinued. All CDI cases resolved with treatment. In the Truven Cohort, 160 CDI events occurred during 4,918 PY of follow-up, with an overall CDI IR (95% CI) of 3.25 (2.77, 3.80); of which 116 were CDI-associated hospitalizations (4,936 PY of follow-up). Among patients receiving azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, CDI IRs were 3.23 (2.18, 4.62), 2.31 (1.26, 3.87), and 3.58 (2.95, 4.29), respectively. CONCLUSION(S): In the tofacitinib UC program, CDI rates among patients receiving tofacitinib were similar to or lower than those observed with placebo. The IR among patients receiving tofacitinib was numerically lower than those observed for immunomodulators and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in the Truven Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib were demonstrated in Phase (P) 2/3 induction studies (NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951), a 52-week, P3 maintenance study (NCT01458574), and are being further investigated in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (NCT01470612). This analysis assessed age as a risk factor for adverse events (AEs) in the tofacitinib UC clinical program. METHODS: Analyses of AEs were performed for 2 cohorts: the Maintenance Cohort (patients who received placebo or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily in the maintenance study) and the Overall Cohort (all tofacitinib-treated patients in the P2/P3/OLE studies [as of December 2016]), stratified by age (≥65 years vs <65 years). AEs of special interest included serious infections (SIs), opportunistic infections (OIs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]), NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and gastrointestinal perforations. Risk factors (based on baseline characteristics) for SIs, OIs, HZ, and NMSC in the Overall Cohort were evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional regression models. RESULTS: AEs occurred in 75.3% (placebo) and 75.9% (tofacitinib) of patients in the Maintenance Cohort, and 82.1% in the Overall Cohort (in which 83.9% received predominantly tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily). Most patients (Maintenance Cohort: 180/198 [90.9%] and 364/394 [92.4%] receiving placebo and tofacitinib, respectively; Overall Cohort: 1,080/1,157 [93.3%]) were aged <65 years. In both the placebo and tofacitinib groups of the Maintenance Cohort, rates of AEs, serious AEs, severe AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (placebo: 83.3%, 11.1%, 11.1%, and 22.2%; tofacitinib: 80.0%, 16.7%, 10.0%, and 16.7%) vs <65 years (placebo: 74.4%, 6.1%, 9.4%, and 18.3%; tofacitinib: 75.5%, 4.4%, 7.1%, and 8.8%). AEs of special interest were generally infrequent in both the placebo and tofacitinib groups of the Maintenance Cohort. In the Overall Cohort, AE, serious AE, and severe AE rates were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (88.3%, 19.5%, and 15.6%) vs <65 years (81.7%, 14.3%, and 12.2%). OI, HZ, malignancies (excluding NMSC), NMSC, and MACE rates were numerically higher in patients aged ≥65 years (3.9%, 14.3%, 2.6%, 5.3%, and 2.6%) vs <65 years (1.7%, 5.0%, 0.6%, 0.7%, and 0.2%); SI and gastrointestinal perforation rates were similar between age groups (≥65 years: 2.6% and 0.0%; <65 years: 2.9% and 0.4%). In multivariate modeling in the Overall Cohort, increasing age (every 10 years) was associated with increased risk of OIs (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.54 [1.15, 2.08]) and HZ (1.58 [1.34, 1.87]), but not SIs or NMSC (univariate modeling: 1.0 [0.78, 1.27] and 2.31 [1.46, 3.66]). CONCLUSION(S): In the tofacitinib UC program, AE rates were higher among patients aged ≥65 years vs those aged <65 years, regardless of whether they received tofacitinib or placebo. In multivariate analyses, older age was associated with increased OI and HZ risk. Although this is consistent with the general population, due to the small number of patients aged ≥65 years (<10% of the total), these findings should be interpreted with caution.