Citations

ABSTRACT Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a progressive condition marked by tissue destruction and inflammation. The therapeutic effector functions of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) makes them an attractive therapy for patients with IVDD. While several sources of MSCs exist, the optimal choice for use in the inflamed IVD remains a significant question. Adipose (AD)‐ and amnion (AM)‐derived MSCs have several advantages compared with other sources, however, no study has directly compared the impact of IVDD inflammation on their effector functions. Human MSCs were cultured in media with or without supplementation of interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) and tumor necrosis factor‐α at concentrations reportedly produced by IVDD cells. MSC proliferation and production of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines were quantified following 24 and 48 h of culture. Additionally, the osteogenic and chondrogenic potential of AD‐ and AM‐MSCs was characterized via histology and biochemical analysis following 28 days of culture. In inflammatory culture, AM‐MSCs produced significantly more anti‐inflammatory IL‐10 (14.47 ± 2.39 pg/ml; p = 0.004) and larger chondrogenic pellets (5.67 ± 0.26 mm 2 ; p = 0.04) with greater percent area staining positively for glycosaminoglycan (82.03 ± 3.26%; p < 0.001) compared with AD‐MSCs (0.00 ± 0.00 pg/ml; 2.76 ± 0.18 mm 2 ; 34.75 ± 2.49%; respectively). Conversely, AD‐MSCs proliferated more resulting in higher cell numbers (221,000 ± 8,021 cells; p = 0.048) and produced higher concentrations of pro‐inflammatory cytokines prostaglandin E 2 (1,118.30 ± 115.56 pg/ml; p = 0.030) and IL‐1β (185.40 ± 7.63 pg/ml; p = 0.010) compared with AM‐MSCs (109,667 ± 5,696 cells; 1,291.40 ± 78.47 pg/ml; 144.10 ± 4.57 pg/ml; respectively). AD‐MSCs produced more mineralized extracellular matrix (3.34 ± 0.05 relative absorbance units [RAU]; p < 0.001) compared with AM‐MSCs (1.08 ± 0.06 RAU). Under identical inflammatory conditions, a different effector response was observed with AM‐MSCs producing more anti‐inflammatories and demonstrating enhanced chondrogenesis compared with AD‐MSCs, which produced more pro‐inflammatory cytokines and demonstrated enhanced osteogenesis. These findings may begin to help inform researchers which MSC source may be optimal for IVD regeneration. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2445–2456, 2019

AbstractObjectiveNeuromodulator injections of the forehead are often performed using standardized protocols. This study was designed to identify the individual skin motion pattern of the forehead and to relate this pattern to the underlying frontalis muscle morphology to offer guidance for neuromodulator placement.Material and MethodsThirty‐seven healthy volunteers (29 Caucasians, six African Americans, two Asians) with a mean age of 39.84 ± 14.4 years [range: 22‐73] were enrolled. 3D images of the forehead were analyzed using a Vectra H1 camera system computing skin displacement vectors between the noncontracted and the maximally contracted forehead of the volunteers. Relationships between the shape of the horizontal forehead lines (straight vs wavy) and the forehead motion pattern were calculated.ResultsIndependent of age or gender, a greater forehead motion angle was associated with the presence of wavy forehead lines 21.34°± 5.9 with P < 0.001, whereas straight forehead lines were associated with a smaller forehead motion angle 6.68°± 2.9 P < 0.001. Females had more frequently straight horizontal forehead lines versus males: 68.4% vs 44.4% (P = 0.037). Young volunteers (<39.8 years) did not differ in their mean forehead motion angle when compared to older volunteers (>39.8 years): 13.70°± 9.0 vs 12.39°± 8.0 with P = 0.530.ConclusionInjections of neuromodulators in the forehead can be individualized by respecting the shape of the horizontal forehead lines. Wavy lines require injection points that are located more laterally, whereas straight lines require more centrally located injection points.

AbstractMisfolding and aggregation of alpha‐synuclein (α‐synuclein) with concomitant cytotoxicity is a hallmark of Lewy body related disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. Although it plays a pivotal role in pathogenesis and disease progression, the function of α‐synuclein and the molecular mechanisms underlying α‐synuclein‐induced neurotoxicity in these diseases are still elusive. Many in vitro and in vivo experimental models mimicking α‐synuclein pathology such as oligomerization, toxicity and more recently neuronal propagation have been generated over the years. In particular, cellular models have been crucial for our comprehension of the pathogenic process of the disease and are beneficial for screening of molecules capable of modulating α‐synuclein toxicity. Here, we review α‐synuclein based cell culture models that reproduce some features of the neuronal populations affected in patients, from basic unicellular organisms to mammalian cell lines and primary neurons, to the cutting edge models of patient‐specific cell lines. These reprogrammed cells known as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have garnered attention because they closely reproduce the characteristics of neurons found in patients and provide a valuable tool for mechanistic studies. We also discuss how different cell models may constitute powerful tools for high‐throughput screening of molecules capable of modulating α‐synuclein toxicity and prevention of its propagation. image This article is part of the Special Issue “Synuclein”.

Numerous social, economic and academic pressures can have a negative impact on representations of biomedical research. We review several of the forces playing an increasingly pernicious role in how health and science information is interpreted, shared and used, drawing discussions towards the role of narrative. In turn, we explore how aspects of narrative are used in different social contexts and communication environments, and present creative responses that may help counter the negative trends. As traditional methods of communication have in many ways failed the public, changes in approach are required, including the creative use of narratives.

AbstractWe describe a case of a mass‐like echocardiographic density on a mechanical prosthetic aortic valve. We initially suspected a thrombus vs vegetation on transthoracic echocardiography, but after transesophageal echocardiography, the density was subsequently determined to be cavitation by reviewing the initial images in slow motion.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) and follicular lymphoma (FL) are the most common subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas in adults. Histologic transformation of FL to DLBCL (TFL) occurs in approximately 15% of patients and is generally associated with a poor clinical outcome. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have shown promising results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory FL. CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) has emerged as a novel treatment option for relapsed/refractory DLBCL and TFL. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight important updates to the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas regarding the treatment of TFL and relapsed/refractory FL and DLBCL.

Background:IBER is a novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) with enhanced tumoricidal and immunostimulatory activities. Preclinically, IBER overcomes immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) resistance and has synergy with daratumumab (DARA), bortezomib (BORT), and dexamethasone (DEX).Aims:This phase 1b/2a multicenter, open‐label, dose‐escalation study (NCT02773030) was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety and preliminary efficacy of IBER in combination with DEX, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Methods:Eligible patients had RRMM and must have received ≥2 prior regimens including lenalidomide (LEN) and/or pomalidomide (POM), and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). All patients had progressed on or within 60 days of last MM therapy. Escalating doses of IBER were given on days 1–21, in combination with DEX 40 mg (20 mg in patients aged >75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, of each 28‐day cycle. Dose escalation was reviewed by a dose escalation committee.Results:As of January 2019, 58 patients had received IBER + DEX. Median age was 64.5 years (range 33–79), and median number of prior regimens was 5 (2–12). Prior therapies included autologous stem cell transplantation (79%), LEN (100%), POM (69%), PIs (100%), and DARA (66%). IBER dose ranged from 0.3 to 1.2 mg; MTD/RP2D was not reached. Median duration of therapy was 12+ weeks (range 4–109). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 41 (72%) patients and were not related to dose. Grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and fatigue occurred in 26%, 11%, 2%, and 0% patients, respectively. Three patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Clinical activity occurred early and was observed across all dose levels (Table 1); 20 of 51 patients remain on treatment (2–27+ cycles).Summary/Conclusion:IBER + DEX showed favorable efficacy and safety in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM who failed multiple prior therapies. This study is ongoing, including combinations of IBER with DARA or BORT.image