Citations

ImportanceRacially and ethnically minoritized US adults were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and experience poorer cancer outcomes, including inequities in cancer treatment delivery.ObjectiveTo evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in cancer treatment delays and discontinuations (TDDs) among patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 during different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used data from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Survey on COVID-19 in Oncology Registry (data collected from April 2020 to September 2022), including patients with cancer also diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 during their care at 69 US practices. Racial and ethnic differences were examined during 5 different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States based on case surge (before July 2020, July to November 2020, December 2020 to March 2021, April 2021 to February 2022, and March to September 2022).ExposuresRace and ethnicity.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTDD was defined as any cancer treatment postponed more than 2 weeks or cancelled with no plans to reschedule. To evaluate TDD associations with race and ethnicity, adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression, accounting for nonindependence of patients within clinics, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, cancer type, cancer extent, and SARS-CoV-2 severity (severe defined as death, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or mechanical ventilation).ResultsA total of 4054 patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 were included (143 [3.5%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 176 [4.3%] Asian, 517 [12.8%] Black or African American, 469 [11.6%] Hispanic or Latinx, and 2747 [67.8%] White; 2403 [59.3%] female; 1419 [35.1%] aged 50-64 years; 1928 [47.7%] aged ≥65 years). The analysis focused on patients scheduled (at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis) to receive drug-based therapy (3682 [90.8%]), radiation therapy (382 [9.4%]), surgery (218 [5.4%]), or transplant (30 [0.7%]), of whom 1853 (45.7%) experienced TDD. Throughout the pandemic, differences in racial and ethnic inequities based on case surge with overall TDD decreased over time. In multivariable analyses, non-Hispanic Black (third wave: aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.31-1.85) and Hispanic or Latinx (third wave: aPR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.62) patients with cancer were more likely to experience TDD compared with non-Hispanic White patients during the first year of the pandemic. By 2022, non-Hispanic Asian patients (aPR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08-2.12) were more likely to experience TDD compared with non-Hispanic White patients, and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native patients were less likely (aPR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.89).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2, racial and ethnic inequities existed in TDD throughout the pandemic; however, the disproportionate burden among racially and ethnically minoritized patients with cancer varied across SARS-CoV-2 waves. These inequities may lead to downstream adverse impacts on cancer mortality among minoritized adults in the United States.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter registry. Objective: To assess whether upper or lower limb mJOA improvement more strongly associates with patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Summary of Background Data: The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) is commonly used to assess functional status in patients with CSM. Patients present with upper and/or lower extremity dysfunction, and it is unclear whether improvement in one and/or both symptoms drives postoperative patient satisfaction. Methods: This study utilizes the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM data set. Clinical outcomes included mJOA and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction. The upper limb mJOA score was defined as upper motor plus sensory mJOA, and the lower limb mJOA as lower motor plus sensory mJOA. Ordered logistic regression was used to determine whether upper or lower limb mJOA was more closely associated with NASS satisfaction, adjusting for other covariates. Results: Overall, 1141 patients were enrolled in the QOD CSM cohort. In all, 780 had both preoperative and 24-month mJOA scores, met inclusion criteria, and were included for analysis. The baseline mJOA was 12.1±2.7, and postoperatively, 85.6% would undergo surgery again (NASS 1 or 2, satisfied). Patients exhibited mean improvement in both upper (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mo:5.0±1.1, P<0.001) and lower limb mJOA (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mon:4.5±1.5, P<0.001); however, the 24-month change in the upper limb mJOA was greater (upper:1.1±1.6 vs. lower:0.6±1.6, P<0.001). Across 24-month NASS satisfaction, the baseline upper and lower limb mJOA scores were similar (pupper=0.28, plower=0.092). However, as satisfaction decreased, the 24-month change in upper and lower limb mJOA decreased as well (pupper<0.001, plower<0.001). Patients with NASS scores of 4 (lowest satisfaction) did not demonstrate significant differences from baseline in upper or lower limb mJOA (P>0.05). In ordered logistic regression, NASS satisfaction was independently associated with upper limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; P=0.019) but not lower limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.0; P=0.054). Conclusions: As the magnitude of upper and lower mJOA improvement decreased postoperatively, so too did patient satisfaction with surgical intervention. Upper limb mJOA improvement was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction, whereas lower limb mJOA improvement was not. These findings may aid preoperative counseling, stratified by patients’ upper and lower extremity treatment expectations. Level of Evidence: Level—III.

Abstract Background Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) in the monarchE trial (NCT03155997). The benefit of abemaciclib was sustained beyond completion of treatment and deepened in magnitude at 4 years for IDFS and DRFS. This pilot study investigated the technical feasibility of ctDNA detection beginning prior to study treatment, as well as rates of persistence and clearance in a subset of EBC pts from monarchE using the clinically validated SignateraTM ctDNA assay. Methods Samples were analyzed from a selected subset of pts (n=178; 84 from abemaciclib+ET arm; 94 ET alone) who had blood collected both before initiating protocol directed therapy, Visit 1 (V1; randomization + ≤ 3 days) and near completion of the 2-year treatment period, Visit 27 (V27; 24 months +/- 5 days from V1). This cohort of pts was enriched for overall IDFS events compared to the total monarchE study population, however pts with relapses occurring prior to V27 were excluded. Primary tumors from selected pts were subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES). Selected samples included those from pts with a range of tumor mutation burden. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 356 plasma samples. A Signatera ctDNA assay was developed for each pt based on up to 16 variants detected by WES from each baseline tumor sample. Results The IDFS event rate for the selected subset (n=178) was 39.3% (abemaciclib+ET 34.5% [29/84] and ET alone 43.6% [41/94]). Ten pts (5.6%) were initially ctDNA+ and 42 pts (23.6%) were persistently (7 pts, 3.9%) or became (35 pts, 19.7%) ctDNA+ at V27. Notably, 70% of pts who were initially ctDNA+ and 100% of pts who were either persistently ctDNA+ or became ctDNA+ experienced recurrence (see Table 1). In contrast, none of the 3 pts that cleared ctDNA+ developed recurrence. In pts persistently ctDNA negative (neg), 28 (21.1%) experienced recurrence. Overall, 10% (7/70) of pts with IDFS events were initially ctDNA+ and 50% (35/70) had detectable ctDNA at V27. Conclusions Detection of ctDNA soon after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy was infrequent, but also associated with a high-risk of recurrence. ctDNA positivity was common at the end of the 2-year treatment period and was highly prognostic with all pts subsequently developing disease recurrence. Importantly, ~30% of pts with early ctDNA detection ultimately dropped below detection limits during the 2-year treatment period and none developed recurrence. Although some pts remained persistently ctDNA neg during this study and experienced recurrence, the delay in recurrence may indicate longitudinal benefit from remaining ctDNA neg. Future planned analysis of an expanded cohort reflective of the intent to treat population including additional timepoints within the 2-year treatment period will further define how ctDNA dynamics may identify pts at high-risk of recurrence. Table 1. Summary of Subset Positivity Rates. + positive; - negative; NA, not applicable. Citation Format: Sherene Loi, Stephen Johnston, Carlos Arteaga, Stephanie Graff, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Matthew Goetz, Christine Desmedt, Jorge Reis-Filho, Hironobu Sasano, Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine, Anthony Sireci, Cynthia Sandoval Rubenstein, Helen Won, Deli Liu, Lacey M. Litchfield, Nicholas Turner. Results from a pilot study exploring ctDNA detection using a tumor-informed assay in the monarchE trial of adjuvant abemaciclib with endocrine therapy in HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS06-01.

Abstract Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene amplification and overexpression is associated with an adverse prognosis in hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) breast cancer and is observed in ~10% of all invasive breast cancers. The phase 2 FOENIX-MBC2 study (NCT04024436) was designed to evaluate the effect of futibatinib, a highly selective and potent irreversible covalent inhibitor of FGFR1–4 (FDA-approved for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma), used either alone or in combination with fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Here, we report final efficacy and safety data for the cohort of patients receiving futibatinib plus fulvestrant for HR+/HER2− breast cancer harboring high-level FGFR1 gene amplification. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had disease progression after prior therapy for advanced/metastatic disease, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, were fulvestrant-naïve, and had previously received 1–2 endocrine-containing therapies, ≤1 chemotherapy regimen, and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor for advanced cancer (unless ineligible). High-level FGFR1 gene amplification, determined in tumor tissue using next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or similar assays, was defined as FGFR1/centromere 8 ratio ≥5 or FGFR1 copy number ≥10 signals per cell. Local FGFR1 determination results were confirmed in tumor tissue by a central laboratory using FISH. Patients received oral futibatinib 20 mg once daily and standard fulvestrant dosing until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and overall safety. Results: Overall, 22 female patients were enrolled in this cohort. Patients were a median age of 58 years, had received a median of 3 lines of any prior systemic anticancer therapy, and had all received CDK4/6 inhibitor pretreatment. PFS at 6 months was observed in 10 (45.5%) patients (95% CI: 24.4, 67.8) and the median PFS was 7.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1, 7.6) months. Four patients had a confirmed partial response (ORR: 18.2%; 95% CI: 5.2, 40.3). The median duration of response was 6.3 (range: 3.3–12.8) months. All patients had ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), the most common being hyperphosphatemia (95.5%), alopecia (54.5%), constipation (45.5%), and dry mouth (40.9%). There were 5 (22.7%) patients with a Grade 3 TRAE (no Grade 4 or 5). TRAEs leading to study treatment interruption or reduction were seen in 9 (40.9%) and 15 (68.2%) patients, respectively. There were 2 (9.1%) patients who had TRAEs leading to study treatment discontinuation. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Futibatinib plus fulvestrant showed antitumor activity in patients with advanced HR+/HER2− breast cancer with FGFR1 amplification progressing on prior CDK4/6 inhibitors, with a numerically higher ORR and doubling in PFS relative to historical fulvestrant results in post-CDK4/6 patients. The safety profile was consistent with those of the individual study drugs. Further biomarker work is ongoing. Citation Format: Senthil Damodaran, Fabrice André, Nisha Unni, Marta Ferreira, Karthik Giridhar, Brooke Daniel, Marco Colleoni, Luis Costa, Thomas Bachelot, Ciara O’Brien, Gail Wright, Masashi Shimura, Gareth Tomlinson, Maciej Gil, Nicholas Turner. Final results from the phase 2, open-label FOENIX-MBC2 study: efficacy and safety of futibatinib in adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer harboring high-level FGFR1 gene amplification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr RF01-04.

Abstract Background Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer in the monarchE trial (NCT03155997). Abemaciclib benefit was sustained beyond the completion of treatment (tx) with deepening magnitude of absolute benefit in IDFS and DRFS at 5 years. Here, we evaluate comprehensive molecular profiling of archived primary tumor tissue and association with clinical outcomes. Methods For biomarker analysis, a proportionally stratified random sampling case-cohort design was utilized to include all patients who experienced an IDFS event at a pre-specified interim analysis with a median follow up of 54 months. A cohort of 895 pts (189 with IDFS event) in the abemaciclib + ET arm was matched 1:1 with 903 pts (270 with IDFS event) in the ET arm. Baseline primary tumor samples underwent exome-capture RNA sequencing (RNAseq; n=1324, 23% intent-to-treat (ITT) population) and paired tumor-normal (germline blood samples) whole-exome sequencing (WES; n=1234, 22% ITT population). Expression-based intrinsic subtypes (i.e., luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), HER2-enriched (HER2E), basal- and normal-like) were characterized using the Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping model. The 21-gene expression signature score (Oncotype DX test) was inferred from RNAseq; samples were categorized into lower (0-25) and high (26-100) risk groups. To investigate associations of biomarkers with abemaciclib benefit, WES genomic events including oncogenic and hotspot mutations by OncoKB, and copy number events, of incidence &gt;9% were pre-selected. Results The biomarker subset of monarchE was reflective of the ITT population. A total of 1190 tumors (abemaciclib+ET n= 605; ET alone n=585) yielded adequate RNAseq results. Intrinsic subtype distribution was consistent across tx arms (Table A). Low tumor purity limited assessment of the normal-like subtype. The 4-year IDFS benefit of abemaciclib was consistent across all subtypes. LumA cancers had the lowest risk of recurrence while HER2E and basal-like subtypes had the highest. Inferred 21-gene expression signature score showed similar benefits from abemaciclib in both lower and high-risk groups (Table B). A total of 1173 tumors yielded adequate WES results (abemaciclib+ET n=580; ET alone n=593). Consistent abemaciclib benefit was observed across the most frequently altered genes (Table C). In exploratory analysis, lower benefit from abemaciclib was seen in the subset of focal-high level MYC amplified tumors (n=176, HR 1.30, 95% CI, 0.77, 2.20) compared to MYC non-amplified tumors (n=997, HR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.47, 0.80, nominal interaction p=0.014). The treatment benefit of abemaciclib was observed across all subpopulations of altered genes based on gene expression data. Conclusions Adjuvant abemaciclib+ET maintained IDFS benefit compared to ET alone across all molecular subtypes as measured by RNAseq. Benefit was consistent across most altered genes assessed by WES, except for the subset of tumors with MYC amplification. Additional research is necessary to confirm these findings. Table. Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Jorge Reis-Filho, Matthew Goetz, Christine Desmedt, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Hironobu Sasano, Carlos Arteaga, Sherene Loi, Stephanie Graff, Deli Liu, Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine, Anthony Sireci, Cynthia Sandoval Rubenstein, Helen Won, Lacey M. Litchfield, Maria Munoz, Stephen Johnston. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of primary tumors from patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer in the monarchE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS03-06.

Introduction: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is among the most commonly prescribed antihypertensives in the US, yet <50% of HCTZ treated patients achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Hypothesis: Integrating metabolomic and genomic profiles of HCTZ treated patients could identify novel pathways/biomarkers for optimizing the use of HCTZ. Methods: Primary analysis included 228 white hypertensives treated with HCTZ from the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Response (PEAR) study. Genotyping was determined via Illumina Omni 1M-Quad Chip and untargeted metabolomics was performed on baseline fasting plasma samples using a GC-TOF MS platform. Pathway analysis was used to integrate metabolites significantly associated with HCTZ BP response (FDR<.05) and genetic signals at p<5x10-5 from HCTZ BP genome-wide analysis. Replication was conducted in another 212 white HCTZ treated patients. Replicated genetic signals were used to create a BP response score by summing their BP lowering alleles. We validated this score by testing it in 196 white HCTZ treated patients in the Genetic Epidemiology of Responses to Antihypertensives (GERA) study. Results: Thirteen metabolites were significantly associated with HCTZ systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) responses (FDR<.05). Metabolomics-genomics integration revealed significant metabolites along with rs2727563 PRKAG2, rs12604940 DCC, and rs13262930 EPHX2, in the netrin signalling pathway (p=1x10-5), as potential markers significantly influencing HCTZ BP response. We successfully replicated those 3 genetic signals and added their alleles to create a response score which explained 11.3% and 11.9% of the variability to HCTZ SBP and DBP responses, respectively. We found that patients carrying one “response” allele had a significantly worse response than carriers of six alleles (ΔSBP/ΔDBP: -1.5/1.2 vs -16.3/-10.4 mmHg, respectively, SBP score p=1x10-8 and DBP score p=3x10-9). We further validated this response score by testing it in the GERA (DBP score p=0.03, SBP score p=0.07). Conclusion: This study highlights the power of using different omics to identify novel pathways/biomarkers of drug response, and suggests that PRKAG2, DCC and EPHX2 might be important determinants of HCTZ BP response.