Citations

Aortic stenosis (AS), the most common valvular heart disease, is traditionally graded based on several echocardiographic quantitative parameters, such as aortic valve area (AVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and peak jet velocity (Vmax). This systematic review evaluates the clinical significance and prognostic implications of discordant high-gradient AS (DHG-AS), a distinct hemodynamic phenotype characterized by elevated MPG despite a preserved AVA (>1.0 cm2). Although often overlooked, DHG-AS presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, as high gradients remain a strong predictor of adverse outcomes despite moderately reduced AVA. Sixty-three studies were included following rigorous selection and quality assessment of the key studies. Prognostic outcomes across five key studies were discrepant: some showed better survival in DHG-AS compared to concordant high-gradient AS (CHG-AS), while others reported similar or worse outcomes. For instance, a retrospective observational study including 3209 patients with AS found higher mortality in CHG-AS (unadjusted HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.7), whereas another retrospective multicenter study including 2724 patients with AS observed worse outcomes in DHG-AS (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.56). These discrepancies may stem from delays in intervention or heterogeneity in study populations. Despite the diagnostic ambiguity, the presence of high gradients warrants careful evaluation, aggressive risk stratification, and timely management. Current guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) calcium scoring, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) planimetry, and, when needed, catheterization. Anatomic AVA assessment by TEE, CT, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can improve diagnostic accuracy by directly visualizing valve morphology and planimetry-based AVA, helping to clarify the true severity in discordant cases. However, these modalities are limited by factors such as image quality (especially with TEE), radiation exposure and contrast use (in CT), and availability or contraindications (in CMR). Management remains largely based on CHG-AS protocols, with intervention primarily guided by transvalvular gradient and symptom burden. The variability among the different guidelines in defining severity and therapeutic thresholds highlights the need for tailored approaches in DHG-AS. DHG-AS is clinically relevant and associated with substantial prognostic uncertainty. Timely recognition and individualized treatment could improve outcomes in this complex subgroup.

Purpose of review We present a review of the natural progression, response to hormonal therapy, and risk of malignancy associated with deep endometriosis (DE) to guide evidence-based discussion of conservative treatment. Recent findings Advanced imaging protocols have enhanced nonsurgical detection of DE, allowing noninvasive diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance. While some DE is progressive, 50% of disease appears stable over time, and progression is reduced by half with hormonal treatments (21 versus 12%). Hormonal treatment can reduce the size of DE lesions by 1 cm³, with reductions occurring after 6 months and remaining stable up to 3 years. Most hormonal therapies improve symptoms and quality of life, regardless of changes in DE size, with combined contraceptives and progestins being the most studied. DE may present a higher risk of ovarian and extraovarian cancer than previously hypothesized, though further research is needed to confirm findings. Limitations of DE research include differing imaging strategies, definitions of disease and progression, short follow-up, focus on rectosigmoid DE only, and lack of randomized trials. Summary DE is a subtype of endometriosis that is increasingly diagnosed and treated with noninvasive strategies. Hormonal treatments improve symptoms and reduce progression of DE. Further research on optimal conservative management and risk of malignancy is warranted.

Introduction: Atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is a lipid-driven chronic inflammatory disease. We have identified the co-stimulatory CD40-CD40L immune checkpoint dyad as a key driver of inflammation during atherosclerosis. CD40 and CD40L exert cell-type divergent functions via different signaling pathways. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CD40 on endothelial cell (ECs) induces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT)-mediated vascular inflammation in atherosclerosis. Methods & Results: Using single cell RNAseq, we found that CD40 (TNFRSF5) is expressed on PDE3A + GJA5 + and KDR + COL15A1 + ECs of advanced human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. CD40 is highly expressed in the endothelial lining of human and mouse atherosclerotic plaques, and colocalizes with the EndMT markers fibronectin and collagen and adhesion molecule ICAM-1. CD40L activation of human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) results in expression of the EndMT markers fibronectin, vimentin, sm22α, FSP1 and snail. Activation of CD40 in EC induces filamin A dependent translocation of CD40 into lipid rafts, increases TNF-receptor associated factor (TRAFs) -2, -3 and 6 levels, induces Akt signaling and increases expression of VCAM1 and CCL2. Conclusions: The endothelial cell has been more and more regarded as a cell type that plays a major role in driving inflammation. Our data suggest that the CD40-CD40L axis plays a significant role in EC-mediated inflammation in atherosclerosis by driving EndMT.

Background The effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) stroke patients with occlusion of the second segment of the middle cerebral artery (M2) is unclear. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients with M1 or M2 occlusions and low ASPECTS (<6) who underwent successful EVT (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score of 2b or higher) were included. Primary outcome was futile EVT reperfusion (defined as 90-day modified Rankin scale of 5 or 6). Other outcomes of interest include acceptable outcomes (modified Rankin scale of 3 or less) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause 90-day mortality. Outcomes for M1 patients were compared to M2 patients with multivariable logistic regression models accounting for potential confounders. Results 173 patients with M1 or M2 occlusions and low ASPECTS (<6) who underwent successful EVT were identified. After multivariable adjustments, M2 patients had significantly higher odds of futile reperfusion (OR 5.48 [95%CI 1.91 to 15.7], p = 0.002), lower odds of acceptable outcomes (OR 0.33 [95%CI 0.12 to 0.89], p = 0.028), and higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 4.90 [95%CI 1.65 to 14.5], p = 0.004). These findings suggest that EVT's efficacy for low-ASPECTS stroke patients may be diminished for patients with M2 occlusions. M2 occlusion was not significantly associated with ICH. Conclusions Among low-ASEPCTS stroke patients who underwent successful EVT, those with M2 occlusions had significantly higher odds of poor outcome compared to those with M1 occlusions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It remains unclear whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in patients who suffer symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to study the effect of DC on functional outcomes in patients with sICH after AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS: Patients with AIS from anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent MT and subsequently developed sICH were identified from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry database. The primary outcome was acceptable 90-day functional neurological outcome, defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-3. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score matching were used to identify and quantify risk factors. RESULTS: Of 464 patients identified with sICH after AIS after MT, 97 patients (20.9%) underwent DC. Patients who underwent DC were more likely to be female ( P < .001), younger ( P < .001), have a measured medical comorbidity, have higher baseline mRS ( P = .02), and have higher-grade hemorrhages ( P = .01). At 90 days, 14% of patients had the primary outcome of mRS 0-3 and 56% had died. The primary outcome was observed in 11 patients who underwent DC (11%) and 55 (15%) of those without DC (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.4, P = .40). DC did not affect mRS shift at 90 days ( P = .10) but was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, P = .01). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that DC decreased the odds of primary outcome (adjusted OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-0.9, P = .045), but did not affect mortality ( P = .94), mRS shift ( P = .50), or length of stay ( P = .90). Propensity-matched analysis similarly demonstrated that non-DC patients were more likely to achieve the primary outcome (24% vs 8%, P = .045). CONCLUSION: In patients with sICH after AIS after MT, those selected for DC had less favorable outcomes and similar rates of mortality at 90 days.

5060 Background: Rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with BRCA-mutated chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) vs a control arm of physician’s choice of therapy (docetaxel or androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor [ARPI] therapy: abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) in the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 TRITON3 (NCT02975934) study. Herein, we conducted an analysis to determine the impact of germline vs somatic mutation status on the efficacy of rucaparib. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive rucaparib 600 mg BID or physician’s choice of docetaxel or ARPI following progression while on 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Color Health did genetic testing. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for the BRCA subgroup. Results: In the rucaparib arm, 201/270 patients had BRCA mutations, and in the physician’s choice arm, 101/135 patients had BRCA mutations. Of patients with BRCA mutations: in the rucaparib arm, 80/201 (40%) were germline and 116/201 (58%) were somatic with 5/201 (2%) BRCA mutation status unknown, while in the physician’s choice arm, 39/101 (39%) were germline and 48/101 (48%) were somatic with 14/101 (14%) BRCA mutation status unknown. rPFS was significantly improved with rucaparib treatment vs physician’s choice in both the germline and somatic mutation groups (germline: HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32–0.84]; somatic: HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.25–0.59]). Incidence rates of TEAEs were similar overall between patients with germline and somatic BRCA mutations in both arms. Conclusions: Rucaparib improves progression-free survival for patients with mCRPC with either germline or somatic BRCA mutations with a manageable safety profile. These data support the use of rucaparib as a beneficial treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC with germline or somatic mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 .

Cardiovascular disease is the global #1 cause of mortality and morbidity. The majority of cardiovascular diseases is caused by atherosclerosis, a lipid-driven, inflammatory disease of the middle- and large-sized arteries. The disease is characterized by the formation of atherosclerotic plaques throughout the arterial tree. Over the years, insights into the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis have shifted from a ‘lipid-driven’ model to a ‘response-to-injury’ perspective, and more recently to a ‘lipid-driven inflammatory disease’ viewpoint. We are now aware that a network of multiple immune cell-types and -subsets of the innate and adaptive immune system inhabit our arteries. Intricate interactions between these immune cellsubsets, non-immune cells, and local environmental substances such as lipids, cell debris and calcium cause a fluidic balance of pro-inflammatory and regulatory responses. A dysregulation of this balance towards a pro-inflammatory milieu drives atherosclerotic disease progression. Although we have acknowledged that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease, state-of-theart treatments are still based on lipid lowering, anti-hypertensive and lifestyle-changing strategies. In the past decade, clinical phase I, II and III trials targeting the immune system revealed that patients tolerate immunotherapy, show decreased inflammation and/or had a reduction in cardiovascular endpoints. However, the search for novel immunotherapeutic targets and treatment regimens as well as stratification of patients who would benefit from such treatments to combat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is only just beginning. In this review article, we will highlight the newest insights on the different cell subsets and components of the immune system in atherosclerosis and elaborate on current and future immunotherapeutics to treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Abstract Aims Significant advancements have been made in the management of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), yet the extent of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient reduction achieved with commonly used pharmacological therapies [beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), disopyramide, and cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs)] relative to each other is still unclear. Methods and results PubMed and Scopus were searched up to September 2024. Clinical trials or observational studies that assessed the changes associated with BBs, CCBs, disopyramide, or CMIs in LVOT gradient at rest or with provocation in patients with oHCM were included. Mean changes in LVOT gradients were pooled as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects model. Thirty-seven studies, with 44 arms and 1898 patients, were included in the analysis. At the therapeutic class level, pooled analysis showed that disopyramide was associated with the highest reduction in LVOT gradient at rest [MD: −43.5 (95% CI, −51.6 to −35.3)], followed by CMIs [MD: −34.8 (95% CI, −40.6 to −29.0)], BBs [MD: −20.7 (95% CI, −29.4 to −12.0)], and then CCBs [MD: −14.7 (95% CI, −23.3 to −6.1)], inter-action P &lt; 0.01. Within CMIs, mavacamten had a higher effect than aficamten on gradient reduction; among the included BBs, metoprolol showed the highest gradient reduction, while among CCBs, verapamil was the most effective (inter-action P &lt; 0.01). Similar results were observed for provocable LVOT gradients. Conclusion Pharmacological therapies effectively reduced LVOT gradients in oHCM patients to varying degrees, with disopyramide and CMIs showing the highest effect, followed by BBs and CCBs.

ABSTRACTBackground and PurposeLarge‐bore aspiration catheters (LBACs) are used for thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion (LVO), either as a standalone direct aspiration first‐pass technique or combined with a stent retriever (ASR). LBAC design may influence ASR thrombectomy efficacy. We compared the safety and performance of the novel MIVI Q segmental catheter with the well‐established SOFIA aspiration device in ASR thrombectomy.MethodsWe analyzed data from the Registry cOmbined vS SinglE Thrombectomy TechnIques registry of consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO and compared the outcomes of those treated with first‐line ASR thrombectomy using Q (Q5 or Q6) or SOFIA (5F or 6F Plus) catheters. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data (24‐h National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] and modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months) were compared.ResultsOf the 853 patients, 155 (18.2%) were treated with MIVI Q and 698 (81.8%) with SOFIA catheters. After adjusting for age, sex, NIHSS score at baseline, tPA use, site occlusion, anesthesia type, and diameter and length of SR, the MIVI Q group was comparable to the SOFIA group in terms of first‐pass effect or successful final recanalization and safety. However, the MIVI Q group had a shorter mechanical thrombectomy time (20 [10–45] min vs. 33 [20–51] min; odds ratio [OR] = 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–14; p = 0.021) and a lower rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.3% vs. 8.8%; OR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.45–10.9; p = 0.011).ConclusionsIn ASR neurothrombectomy, SOFIA aspiration catheters were not superior to MIVI Q in achieving successful and complete first‐passage recanalization; however, MIVI Q had shorter procedural times and a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.