Citations

Abstract Background: Clostridium ramosum ( C. ramosum ) is an anaerobic gram-positive bacillus of the human intestine and a rare cause of bacteremia. This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical characteristics and outcomes of a multicenter cohort of adults with C. ramosum bacteremia. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort included adults (≥ 18 years) with true C. ramosum bacteremia at Mayo Clinic hospitals in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin from September 1, 2012, through December 31, 2025. Data were collected through search for C. ramosum in microbiological culture records. Clinical characteristics assessed included immune status, source of bacteremia, presence of sepsis, neutropenic fever, monomicrobial vs. polymicrobial bacteremia, antimicrobial resistance patterns, antimicrobial therapy, length of stay and 30-day all cause mortality. Exploratory odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: Among 90 patients with a positive C. ramosum blood culture, 17 were classified as contaminants and 73 comprised the study cohort. Median age was 66.0 years (IQR, 56.0–75.0); 44 (60.3%) were male and 33 (45.2%) were immunocompromised (including 26 with active malignancy, while the remaining 7 were received biologic immunosuppression). The most common infection sources were gastrointestinal (32/73, 43.8%) and central line-related (8/73, 11%). At presentation, 50.7% of patients met criteria for sepsis and 15/73 (20.5%), were in septic shock. Of 73 isolates tested, 31/73 (44.3%) were clindamycin resistant and 9/73 (12.9%) tested intermediate. Anaerobic-active antimicrobial therapy was received by 53/73 (72.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 11/73 (15.1%). Mortality was 30.0% (6/20) with therapy without reliable anaerobic activity and 9.4% (5/53) with anaerobic-active antimicrobial therapy (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 0.88–19.46; P = 0.060). The median hospital LOS was 8.0 days. Among 30-day survivors, anaerobic active antimicrobial therapy was associated with a shorter median LOS compared to therapy without reliable anaerobic activity (8.5 vs. 12.0 days). Immunocompromised patients had higher odds of monomicrobial C. ramosum bacteremia than immunocompetent patients (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.19–8.39; p = 0.03). Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia had higher odds of sepsis (OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.43–10.55; P = 0.008) and septic shock (OR, 5.66; 95% CI, 1.17–27.36; P = 0.020). Patients with malignancy or neutropenia demonstrated significantly lower odds of presenting in septic shock (p = 0.018; p = 0.029 retrospectively). Microbiological clearance was achieved in 91.3% (42/46) of evaluable cases. Conclusions: This largest reported cohort defines the clinical and microbiological profile of C. ramosum bacteremia. Frequent clindamycin nonsusceptibility is clinically actionable. Several clinical associations found on univariable analysis should be further investigated in larger studies.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the association between frailty status and risk of readmissions, inpatient death, and cost of admission among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Readmissions Database. Using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, we identified individuals >18 years of age who had a primary or secondary diagnosis of SLE and were hospitalized between January and June 2018. Using the validated claims‐based Hospital Frailty Risk Score, we categorized individuals as frail (score ≥ 5) or nonfrail (score < 5) at the time of index hospitalization. Our primary outcome was readmission rates post discharge from index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were rates of inpatient mortality and the total cost of hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between frailty and risk of readmissions, with adjustment for age, sex, insurance type, household income, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score.ResultsA total of 39,738 patients with SLE met eligibility criteria. Over a median follow‐up of eight months, frail patients with SLE (n = 18,385) had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores and longer length of stay compared to nonfrail patients with SLE (n = 21,353). Frail patients with SLE had higher readmission rates, a higher proportion of prolonged hospitalizations, and higher costs per hospitalization. Frailty was independently associated with a 10% higher risk of readmission after adjustment for covariates.ConclusionAmong hospitalized adults with SLE, presence of frailty was associated with higher readmission and inpatient mortality rates. Our results highlight that frailty status can help risk stratify patients with SLE at increased risk for readmissions and other adverse health outcomes.

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with frequent recurrences. The role of probiotics in preventing CDI remains unclear despite patients frequently using them. Methods We performed a systematic-review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of Saccharomyces boulardii, a yeast probiotic, in preventing primary or recurrent CDI in patients on systemic antimicrobial therapy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 2021 to identify studies (case-control, cohort, or clinical trial studies) reporting the use of systemic antimicrobials with or without S. boulardii and providing information on primary or recurrent CDI. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. Results Eight studies (six randomized control trials and two cohort studies) were included. Six studies with 9,712 patients evaluated primary prevention. The rate of CDI in patients who received S. boulardii was 0.73% (44/5977) compared to 1.09% (41/3735) in the control group. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of CDI among the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; 95%CI, 0.46–1.10; p = 0.124) with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). In two studies with 292 patients evaluating secondary prevention, the rate of recurrent CDI was 36.73% (54/147) on S. boulardii compared to 46.20% (67/145) in controls, with no significant difference (p = 0.19). Subgroup analysis of studies using S. boulardii (250 mg twice daily) showed no difference in the CDI risk with or without S. boulardii. No serious adverse events from S. boulardii were noted. Conclusion The use of S. boulardii appears to have no benefit for preventing either primary or recurrent CDI in patients taking systemic antimicrobials.

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common nosocomial infection and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Purpose We aimed to identify the burden of CDI in patients undergoing common gastrointestinal (GI) surgical procedures in a national inpatient cohort, as GI surgeries have been thought to be a risk factor for CDI. Method We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from Unites States for the years 2016-2019 for this study. We included adult patients (age ≥ 18), who underwent common GI surgeries (identified using ICD-10 procedure codes), and among them identified patients with diagnosis of CDI. Outcomes assessed included risk of CDI among different surgeries, inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS) and cost of hospitalization using regression analyses Result(s) From 2016 to 2019, an estimated total of 4,438,778 patients were hospitalized and underwent any of the studied GI surgeries. CDI was reported in 32,180 admissions (0.72%). Median age for CDI was higher than non-CDI patients (66 vs 56, p&lt;0.001). Incidence of CDI was 2.5 times higher in patients admitted emergently compared to elective admissions (1.00% vs 0.40%, p&lt;0.0001). Among all surgeries, the incidence of CDI was the highest for small bowel resection at 2.1% followed by partial esophagectomy at 1.6% and partial colectomy at 1.4%. Logistic regression analysis showed the patients undergoing esophagectomy had the highest risk with adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) of 2.48, (95% CI 2.01 – 3.07, p&lt;0.0001), followed by pancreatectomy with aOR 2.03 (95% CI 1.91 – 2.16, p&lt;0.0001). Overall, surgical patients with CDI had a significantly higher in-patient mortality compared to non-CDI patients (8.2% vs 1.4%, p&lt;0.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk of inpatient mortality with CDI, with aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30 – 1.42, p&lt;0.0001. Median LOS for surgical patients with CDI was higher than non-CDI patients (14 days vs 3 days, p&lt;0.0001). The linear regression analysis for length of stay showed that among patients undergoing surgical procedures, CDI was associated with an increased LOS with beta of 8.39 days ± SE 0.04 (95% CI 8.31 – 8.46, p&lt;0.0001). The mean cost of hospitalization for surgical patients with CDI was higher than non-CDI patients ($90,590 vs $31,702, p&lt;0.0001) after adjusting for inflation over the four-year period. The linear regression analysis showed that CDI was associated with an increased cost of hospitalization with a beta of $25,343 ± SE 166 (95% CI 25,017 – 25,670, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion(s) CDI among GI surgeries leads to increase in inpatient mortality, length of stay and cost of hospitalization. Although the rate of CDI is showing a downwards trend, its impact on these outcome measures makes it an important complication to prevent and promptly treat in these surgical patients. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared