Citations

Abstract Introduction : Current standard of care for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), is observation until progression to active MM. Increasing evidence suggests that patients (pts) with SMM at high risk for progression to active MM may benefit from early treatment (tx). In AQUILA, a phase 3 study in pts with high-risk SMM (NCT03301220), daratumumab (Dara) monotherapy significantly reduced risk of progression to active MM or death with a trend of extending overall survival (OS) vs active monitoring (ActMon), with no new safety concerns. Given the evolution in SMM risk stratification, a post hoc analysis was performed to assess outcomes using the IMWG 2020 and IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic risk models to assess which AQUILA pts benefited most from Dara monotherapy. Safety and efficacy analysis by age and stem cell collection outcomes were also assessed. Methods: Eligible pts with a confirmed diagnosis (≤5 y) of high-risk SMM per IMWG 2014 criteria, defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) ≥10% and ≥1 risk factor (IgA SMM, serum protein ≥30 g/dL, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain [I/U FLC] ratio ≥8 and <100, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, and/or clonal BMPC >50% to <60%) at study entry, were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous Dara or ActMon for 39 cycles, 36 months, or until confirmed disease progression (PD), whichever came first. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent review committee, defined as progression to active MM (based on IMWG SLiM-CRAB diagnostic criteria) or death. Secondary endpoints included time to first-line (1L) MM tx and OS. For this post hoc analysis, we assessed outcomes by age, IMWG 2020 high-risk SMM criteria (BMPC >20%, monoclonal spike >2 g/dL, serum FLC ratio >20; ≥2 factors=high risk; also known as the Mayo 2018 or the 20-2-20 criteria), and the IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic criteria (IMWG 2020 criteria + presence of ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [t(4;14), t(14;16), +1q and/or del13q]; ≥3 factors=high risk). Results : Dara tx showed a PFS benefit across all IMWG 2020 risk subgroups (low: hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; intermediate: HR, 0.70), with the largest benefit in the high-risk subgroup, where the PD/death rate in the ActMon arm was ~1.6-fold that in the Dara arm (62.8% vs 37.5%; HR, 0.36). This benefit of Dara vs ActMon was preserved over time, with 5-year PFS rates of 78.2% vs 71.6%, 56.2% vs 42.9%, and 60.4% vs 23.6% in IMWG 2020 low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. There was a positive trend favoring Dara for time to 1L MM treatment across all IMWG 2020 risk groups (low-risk HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.22–1.80; intermediate-risk HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35–0.92; high-risk HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25–0.62). IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic risk classification results will be available at the time of presentation. When comparing the younger (<65y HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32–0.79) vs the older (≥65y, HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32–0.77) pt population, a PFS benefit was observed regardless of age. Similarity was also observed in TEAE incidence rate when looking into <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 y subgroups (82.7%, 81.1%, and 87.5% with ActMon; 96.2%, 98.5%, and 95.2% with Dara); however, serious TEAEs were more frequently observed in older ActMon pts (12.2%, 18.9%, and 50.0% with ActMon; 24.8%, 35.8%, and 28.6% with Dara). Across all pts treated/monitored in AQUILA, 23 (11.9%) and 41 (20.9%) pts in the Dara and ActMon arms, respectively, received autologous stem cell transplant as part of their first tx after progressing to active MM, with very limited plerixafor use (Dara, 3 [1.6%] vs ActMon, 9 [4.6%]). Median (range) CD34+ cell yield was 5.0 (2–20)×106 cells/kg body weight among 22 pts in the Dara arm and 5.1 (2–21)×106 cells/kg body weight among 39 pts in the ActMon arm. Conclusions : In this analysis, pts with high-risk SMM from the phase 3 AQUILA study treated with Dara monotherapy experienced long-term PFS benefit across IMWG 2020 subgroups, with the most pronounced benefit in the high-risk subgroup. No notable differences in PFS or safety were observed across age subgroups. Early Dara tx for high-risk SMM did not have a detrimental impact on stem cell yield. Although mature OS analyses are forthcoming, overall, these results further support early intervention with Dara monotherapy vs ActMon among pts with high-risk SMM, regardless of risk stratification criteria used.

Abstract Introduction: BGB-16673 is an orally available protein degrader that blocks BTK signaling by tagging BTK for degradation through the cell's proteasome pathway, leading to tumor regression. CaDAnCe-101 (BGB-16673-101; NCT05006716) is an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating BGB-16673 monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Here, updated safety and efficacy results of BGB-16673 are presented in patients with WM in the phase 1 portion of the study. Methods Eligible patients had confirmed relapsed/refractory (R/R) WM (≥2 prior therapies), an ECOG performance status of 0-2 (0-1 in the EU), and previous treatment with an anti-CD20 antibody and, in the US, Japan, and EU, a covalent BTK inhibitor. BGB-16673 was dosed once daily orally. The primary objectives of this phase 1 study were to evaluate safety and tolerability (NCI-CTCAE v5.0) and establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for expansion. A secondary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR; modified IWWM-6 consensus criteria), with the first assessment after 4 weeks of treatment. Results As of May 23, 2025, 42 patients with WM were enrolled and treated (100 mg, n=15; 200 mg, n=14; 350 mg, n=13). Median age was 72.0 years (range, 46-81 years), and the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-11), including prior covalent BTK inhibitors (n=42 [100%]), BCL2 inhibitors (n=10 [23.8%]), noncovalent BTK inhibitors (n=7 [16.7%]), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (n=42 [100%]), and chemotherapy (n=39 [92.9%]). In total, 33.3% of patients (12/36) had WM with BTK mutations, 85.7% (36/42) with MYD88 mutations, 51.3% (20/39) with CXCR4 mutations, 52.8% (19/36) with TP53 mutations, and 5.6% (2/36) with PLCG2 mutations. Median follow-up was 8.8 months (range, 0.8-31.0 months). Overall, 97.6% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (grade ≥3, 59.5%; serious TEAEs, 35.7%). The most common (≥20% incidence) TEAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were neutropenia (38.1%; grade ≥3, 33.3%, most common grade ≥3 TEAE), diarrhea (26.2%; no grade ≥3), contusion/bruising (26.2%; no grade ≥3), and thrombocytopenia (21.4%; grade ≥3, 7.1%). No atrial fibrillation was observed. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and major hemorrhage (grade 3 hematemesis caused by concurrent gastritis/duodenitis unrelated to treatment) occurred in 1 patient (2.4%) each. Seven patients (16.7%) had a grade ≥3 infection, including 2 patients with fungal infections. Three patients (7.1%) had TEAEs that led to treatment discontinuation (anemia, cerebral aspergillosis, pericardial effusion/pleural effusion; n=1 each), and 2 patients (4.8%) had a TEAE that led to dose reduction. Two patients (4.8%) died due to TEAEs (septic shock in the context of progressive disease [PD] and cerebral aspergillosis; n=1 each). All 42 patients were response-evaluable and the ORR (minor response [MR] or better) was 83.3% (n=35), the major response rate (partial response [PR] or better) was 64.3% (n=27), and the very good partial response (VGPR) rate was 26.2% (n=11). Median time to first overall response was 1.0 months (range, 0.9-3.8 months) and to best overall response was 1.9 months (range, 0.9-7.4 months). Responses deepened over time: of 9 patients with stable disease at first disease assessment, 3 transitioned to MR and 2 to PR; of 20 patients with initial MR, 10 transitioned to PR and 2 to VGPR; and of 13 patients with initial PR, 7 transitioned to VGPR. Thirty patients (71.4%) remain on treatment. Two deaths were due to PD. Responses were seen in patients previously treated with a covalent BTK inhibitor (35/42 [83.3%]) and a noncovalent BTK inhibitor (7/7 [100%]) and in patients who discontinued a prior BTK inhibitor due to PD (28/35 [80%]). Responses were independent of mutations in BTK (with, 12/12; without, 17/24), MYD88 (with, 30/36; without, 5/6), CXCR4 (with, 18/20; without, 14/19), TP53 (with, 16/19; without, 13/17), and PLCG2 (with, 1/2; without, 28/34). The 9-month duration of response rate was 84.1% (95% CI, 63.1%-93.7%). Conclusions Data from this ongoing phase 1 study demonstrate that the novel BTK degrader BGB-16673 was well tolerated and continued to show substantial antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated BTK inhibitor–exposed R/R WM, including those with BTK, MYD88, CXCR4, and TP53 mutations. Enrollment is ongoing in the phase 2 portion of the study.

Abstract Introduction: BTK inhibitors are effective treatments for CLL/SLL; however, treatment intolerance and resistance to BTK inhibitors are major clinical challenges for many patients. BGB-16673 is an orally available protein degrader that blocks BTK signaling by tagging BTK for degradation through the cell's proteasome pathway, leading to tumor regression. CaDAnCe-101 (BGB-16673-101; NCT05006716) is an ongoing open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating BGB-16673 monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Here, updated phase 1 safety and efficacy data are reported for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL. Methods: Eligible patients must have confirmed R/R CLL/SLL (≥2 prior therapies), an ECOG performance status of 0-2 (0-1 in the EU), and adequate organ function. In the US, EU, and Australia, patients must have previously received a covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi). Patients received BGB-16673 once daily orally. The primary phase 1 objectives were to assess safety/tolerability (NCI-CTCAE v5.0; iwCLL hematologic toxicity criteria) and to establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for expansion. A secondary objective was to assess overall response rate (ORR) per iwCLL 2018 criteria with partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L) modification and per 2014 Lugano criteria for SLL, with the first response assessment after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: As of May 23, 2025, 67 patients with CLL/SLL were enrolled and treated (50 mg, n=1; 100 mg, n=22; 200 mg, n=17; 350 mg, n=15; 500 mg, n=12). Patients had a median age of 70 years (range, 47-91 years) and a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-10), including cBTKis (n=63 [94.0%]), BCL2is (n=55 [82.1%]), and noncovalent BTK inhibitors (ncBTKis; n=14 [20.9%]). At study baseline, 65.7% (44/67) of patients had CLL/SLL with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation, 77.6% (38/49) with unmutated IGHV, 38.1% (24/63) with BTK mutation, and 15.9% (10/63) with PLCG2 mutation. Median study follow-up was 18.0 months (range, 0.3-31.0 months); 39 patients (58.2%) remained on treatment at the data cutoff. Overall, 95.5% of patients had any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); any-grade TEAEs in ≥25% of patients were fatigue (37.3%), contusion/bruising (31.3%), diarrhea (28.4%), and neutropenia (28.4%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 62.7% of patients; grade ≥3 TEAEs in ≥5% of patients were neutropenia (23.9%), pneumonia (10.4%), and thrombocytopenia (6.0%). Eight patients (11.9%) had a TEAE leading to dose reduction. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 12 patients (17.9%), three (4.5%) of whom had treatment-related TEAEs (subdural hemorrhage, maculopapular rash, and disseminated aspergillosis). Four patients (6.0%) had TEAEs that led to death (all due to infections, including 1 fungal infection); no deaths were deemed related to treatment. In 66 response-evaluable patients (1 patient on treatment did not reach the first assessment by the data cutoff), ORR (PR-L or better) was 86.4% (n=57), with a 4.5% (n=3) complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete marrow recovery rate. At 200 mg, ORR was 93.8% (15/16), including 1 CR. The median time to first response was 2.8 months (range, 2.0-19.4 months). Thirty-three patients (49.3%) remained on treatment for ≥12 months. Responses deepened over time: of 22 patients with initial PR-L, 15 transitioned to partial response (PR); of 16 patients with initial stable disease, 1 transitioned to PR-L and 10 to PR. Responses were seen in patients previously treated with a cBTKi (53/62 [85.5%]) or ncBTKi (10/14 [71.4%]), with double (cBTKi and BCL2i; 39/42 [92.9%]) and triple exposure (cBTKi, BCL2i, and ncBTKi; 9/12 [75.0%]), with (18/24 [75.0%]) and without (36/39 [92.3%]) BTK mutations, with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation (35/43 [81.4%]), and with PLCG2 mutation (9/10 [90.0%]). The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 79.2%; 15 patients (22.4%) had progressive disease (2 associated with Richter transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma), and 4 (6.0%) died. Further exploratory analyses will be presented at the meeting.Conclusions: Data from the ongoing CaDAnCe-101 study demonstrate that the novel BTK degrader BGB-16673 has a tolerable safety profile and shows robust and deepening responses in patients with heavily pretreated R/R CLL/SLL, including those with prior BTK inhibitor treatment and BTK mutations. The 200-mg dose of BGB-16673 is being evaluated in phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with R/R CLL/SLL.

PURPOSE Testing for germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) is recommended for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) breast cancer (BC) to guide treatment selection with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). However, real-world data on germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (gBRCA) testing and PARPi treatment patterns in metastatic BC (mBC) are limited. METHODS Deidentified patient data from adults diagnosed with HER2– mBC between 2014 and 2022 were captured from electronic health records in the US Flatiron Health database. gBRCA testing patterns and prevalence were examined by tumor subtype (hormone receptor–positive [HR+]/triple-negative) and disease stage at diagnosis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described by receipt of gBRCA testing and PARPi. PARPi treatment patterns were assessed, and real-word overall survival (OS) was estimated in patients with gBRCAm diagnosed with mBC after January 1, 2018. RESULTS Of the 15,006 total patients, 4,654 (31.0%) received a gBRCA test. gBRCA testing rates mostly increased from 2014 to 2022 and were lower in patients with HR+ than triple-negative tumors. Of the patients who underwent gBRCA testing, 337 (7.2%) had gBRCAm. From 2018 to 2022, PARPi was initiated in 94 (45.6%) of 206 patients with gBRCAm. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months across patients with available first-line treatment start dates, real-world OS was numerically longer among 94 patients with gBRCAm who received PARPi (32.3 months [95% CI, 22.7 to 47.4]) than among 99 patients who did not (21.9 months [95% CI, 18.4 to not reached]). CONCLUSION Although gBRCA testing increased over time, testing and PARPi utilization rates remained suboptimal in potentially eligible patients with HER2– mBC. Exploratory analysis showed numerically longer OS in patients who received PARPi. Wider and timelier gBRCA testing is warranted to inform potentially optimal treatment decisions.

T cell aging contributes to the lower vaccine efficacy in older adults, yet the molecular mechanism remains elusive. Here, we show the density of initially responding naïve CD4 + T cells is instructive in T follicular helper (TFH) cell fate decisions and declines with age. A lower number of initially responding cells did not affect TFH differentiation at peak responses after immunization but accounted for an increased contraction phase manifesting as a larger loss of CXCR5 expression. Mechanistically, cells activated at a lower initial density had more sustained mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activities that impair CXCR5 maintenance. YAP-dependent regulation of SLC7A5 involved in the cell density–dependent regulation of mTORC1 activities and TFH loss. Old mice fed with a leucine-restricted diet after peak responses showed smaller TFH loss and improved humoral immune responses. Attenuating mTORC1 signaling after peak response is a strategy to boost vaccine responses in older individuals.

Introduction: High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor disorder to active multiple myeloma (MM) without approved treatment options. However, recent evidence suggests patients at high risk of progression to MM may benefit from early treatment. Daratumumab (DARA) is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action. DARA is approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) and in combination with standard-of-care regimens for RRMM and newly diagnosed MM. Based on the encouraging activity and tolerability observed with DARA monotherapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk SMM in the phase 2 CENTAURUS study, the phase 3 AQUILA study sought to determine if DARA could delay progression to MM versus active monitoring. Here we report the primary analysis from the AQUILA study. Methods: Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk SMM for ≤5 years, defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) ≥10% and ≥1 risk factor (serum M protein ≥30 g/L, IgA SMM, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 and <100, and/or clonal BMPCs >50% to <60%). Focal and lytic lesion assessment was performed in screening by CT and MRI and centrally reviewed prior to study enrollment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive DARA SC versus active monitoring. DARA (QW in Cycles 1 and 2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter) was given in 28-day cycles until cycle 39, 36 months, or disease progression, whichever came first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as progression to active MM as assessed by an independent review committee and according to IMWG diagnostic criteria for MM (SLiM-CRAB) or death. Major secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), PFS on first-line MM treatment (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 390 patients (DARA, n = 194; active monitoring, n = 196) were randomized. Median (range) age (64 [31-86] years) and time from initial SMM diagnosis to randomization (0.72 [0-5.0] years) were balanced between treatment groups. Median treatment duration in the DARA group was 38 cycles (35.0 months). At a median (range) follow-up of 65.2 (0-76.6) months, PFS was significantly improved with DARA versus active monitoring (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67; P <0.0001). Median PFS was not reached in the DARA group versus 41.5 months for active monitoring; estimated 60-month PFS rates were 63.1% versus 40.8%, respectively. Prespecified analyses showed generally consistent PFS improvement with DARA versus active monitoring across subgroups. ORR was 63.4% with DARA versus 2.0% with active monitoring (P <0.0001). As of the clinical cutoff, 64 (33.0%) patients in the DARA group and 102 (52.0%) patients in the active monitoring group had started first-line MM treatment. Median time from randomization to the date of first-line MM treatment was not reached with DARA versus 50.2 months with active monitoring (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.62; nominal P <0.0001). There was a positive trend in favor of DARA for PFS2 (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.96) and OS (60-month OS rates: DARA, 93.0%; active monitoring, 86.9%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.98). A total of 41 deaths were observed, 15 for the DARA group and 26 for the active monitoring group. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 40.4% and 30.1% of patients in the DARA and active monitoring groups, respectively. The most common (≥5% in either group) grade 3/4 TEAE was hypertension (DARA, 5.7%; active monitoring, 4.6%). The frequency of TEAEs leading to DARA discontinuation was low (5.7%), as was the incidence of fatal TEAEs in both groups (DARA, 1.0%; active monitoring, 2.0%). Conclusions: DARA monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated a clinically meaningful and significant benefit in preventing or delaying progression to active MM compared with active monitoring in patients with high-risk SMM. ORR was significantly higher and time to first-line MM treatment was prolonged with DARA compared with active monitoring. This was accompanied by positive trends for PFS2 and OS in favor of DARA. These results strongly support the benefit of early intervention with DARA monotherapy versus active monitoring, the current standard of care, in patients with high-risk SMM.

ABSTRACTIntroductionLow body weight in patients with COPD is associated with a poor prognosis and more comorbidities. However, the impact of increased body weight in patients with COPD remains controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical features of overweight patients with AECOPD.MethodsIn this multicenter cross‐sectional study, a total of 647 AECOPD patients were recruited. Finally, 269 normal weight and 162 overweight patients were included. Baseline characteristics and clinical and laboratory data were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed to determine potential features, which were substituted into binary logistic regression to reveal overweight‐associated clinical features. The nomogram and its associated curves were established to visualize and verify the logistic regression model.ResultsSix potential overweight‐associated variables were selected by LASSO regression. Subsequently, a binary logistic regression model identified that the rates of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and hypertension and levels of lymphocytes (LYM)%, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were independent variables of overweight in AECOPD patients. The C‐index and AUC of the ROC curve of the nomogram were 0.671 and 0.666, respectively. The DCA curve revealed that the nomogram had more clinical benefits if the threshold was at a range of 0.22~0.78.ConclusionsCollectively, we revealed that T2DM and hypertension were more common, and LYM% and ALT were higher in AECOPD patients with overweight than those with normal weight. The result suggests that AECOPD patients with overweight are at risk for additional comorbidities, potentially leading to worse outcomes.

1113 Background: Testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations (BRCAm) aids systemic treatment decisions for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This retrospective study explored real-world germline/tumor (g/t) BRCA testing patterns and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) use in US pts with mBC. Methods: Data from pts ≥18 years old diagnosed with HER2-negative mBC from 2014–2022 were captured in the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database. Patterns and timing of prospective or incidental BRCA testing were compared across mBC subtypes (hormone receptor-positive [HR+ mBC]/triple-negative mBC [mTNBC]) and disease stage (recurrent/ de novo). BRCAm prevalence was compared by testing modality and mBC subtype. PARPi initiation was assessed in pts with mBC diagnosed from 2018 onwards and a positive BRCAm test result. Clinical characteristics were compared by receipt of a BRCA test, testing modality, and PARPi initiation. Real-world overall survival (OS) by PARPi use was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 15,006 pts (including 12,349 with HR+ mBC; 1998 with mTNBC), 8178 (54.5%) did not receive any type of BRCA test, 4654 (31.0%) received a gBRCA test, 3075 (20.5%) received a tumor tissue DNA (ttDNA) test, and 1418 (9.4%) received a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test. BRCA testing prevalence was numerically higher in pts with mTNBC (n=1164; 58.3%) than in pts with HR+ mBC (n=5323; 43.1%). As expected, testing prevalence was higher with ttDNA than with ctDNA (mTNBC: n=569 [28.5%] vs n=137 [6.9%]; HR+ mBC: n=2339 [18.9%] vs n=1224 [9.9%]). Over 93% of pts (recurrent and de novo) who received a tBRCA test were tested after an mBC diagnosis, and >1/3 were tested after first-line therapy, with median times from diagnosis to a ttDNA and ctDNA test of 127 and 431 days, respectively. Both gBRCA and tBRCA testing rates increased from 2014–2022, and testing occurred earlier in pts with recurrent than de novo disease. Among pts with tBRCAm, 66.0% had HR+ mBC, and 25.6% had mTNBC. BRCA1 mutations were more common in mTNBC (59.0%) than in HR+ mBC (22.9%) tumors. Of 219 pts with tBRCAm tumors who were diagnosed with mBC from 2018 onwards, PARPi was initiated in 39/74 (52.7%) pts with gBRCAm, 15/71 (21.1%) pts who were gBRCAm-negative, and 19/74 (25.7%) pts with gBRCAm status unknown. Among pts with g or tBRCAm and available OS data, median OS was numerically longer in pts who received PARPi (32.3 months [95% CI: 24.2, 47.4], n=128) versus pts who did not (29.0 months [95% CI: 21.9, 31.9], n=204; median follow-up time 23.2 months). Conclusions: While NCCN guidelines recommend gBRCA testing for all pts with mBC, more than half of pts with HER2-negative mBC (56.9% of pts with HR+ mBC) did not receive any BRCA test. Among pts with tBRCAm, ~2/3 had HR+ disease. Despite the potential benefits of PARPi for pts with BRCAm mBC, utilization remained low from 2018–2022.

Abstract Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated progression-free survival benefits vs. chemotherapy in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and germline BRCA mutations (gBRCAm). NCCN guidelines recommend that all pts with mBC are offered gBRCAm testing to aid in systemic treatment decisions with PARPi. Understanding real-world gBRCAm testing patterns and PARPi use would be beneficial for improving clinical outcomes of pts with gBRCAm mBC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified pts ≥ 18 years old with HER2-negative mBC, diagnosed from 2014 to 2022 (US Flatiron Electronic Health Record database). gBRCAm testing patterns in mBC over time were examined by BC subtype (hormone receptor-positive [HR+] or triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]) and disease stage at diagnosis [de novo or recurrent]). Timing of gBRCAm testing and subsequent initiation of first-line or later PARPi in pts with gBRCAm HR+ and TNBC mBC was assessed in pts diagnosed after 2018 when PARPi were approved in mBC. Prevalence of gBRCAm was calculated overall and by mBC subtype. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described by gBRCAm testing and PARPi initiation (yes/no). Real-world overall survival (OS) by PARPi use since mBC diagnosis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Results: Of 15,006 total pts, 4654 (31.0%) had a gBRCAm test. Compared with pts who were not tested, gBRCAm-tested pts were younger at initial mBC diagnosis (median age: 53.5 vs. 62.0 years), had a shorter median disease-free interval before mBC diagnosis (821 vs. 959 days), and were less likely to have de novo mBC (28.0% vs. 31.2%). gBRCAm testing prevalence was 6.1% in the HR+ group (n=11,945) and 8.9% in the TNBC group (n=2430). gBRCAm testing rates mostly increased from 2014 to 2022 and were lowest in HR+ tumor subtypes; < 2/3 of all pts had a gBRCAm test from 2020 onwards (Table). Most pts with recurrent mBC (HR+: 68.3%; TNBC: 76.1%) were gBRCAm tested before diagnosis, whereas pts with de novo mBC were tested at a later timepoint ( > 60 days after mBC diagnosis – HR+: 48.3%; TNBC: 38.4%). Of all pts with gBRCAm diagnosed from 2018 onwards (n=187), 44.4% initiated PARPi. A higher proportion of pts with gBRCAm in the TNBC group initiated PARPi (52.9%) than in the HR+ group (42.4%). Pts with gBRCAm in the TNBC group received PARPi earlier than pts with gBRCAm in the HR+ group (mean days from mBC diagnosis to first PARPi use: 173 and 411 days, respectively). Fewer pts with de novo mBC (35.7%) initiated PARPi than pts with recurrent mBC (50.8%). With a median follow-up of 15.3 months, pts with gBRCAm initiated on PARPi had numerically longer median OS (32.3 months [95% CI: 24.2–47.4]) than PARPi non-initiators (21.4 months [95% CI:18.4–43.5]). OS results should be regarded with caution due to the small sample size (n=187). Conclusions: Despite NCCN guideline gBRCAm-testing recommendations, < 2/3 of pts with HER2-negative mBC in our study were gBRCAm tested from 2020 onwards. gBRCAm testing was lower in pts with HR+ disease and was performed at a later timepoint for pts with de novo disease. Wider and timelier implementation of gBRCAm testing to identify pts that could benefit from PARPi is warranted. Fewer pts with gBRCAm who had HR+ tumors or de novo disease received PARPi than pts with TNBC. Our data suggest that pts who initiated PARPi had numerically longer OS than PARPi non-initiators; further research into OS trends and PARPi use in gBRCAm mBC would be of interest. Editorial acknowledgment: Medical writing assistance was provided by Leigh-Ann Booth, Ph.D. from BOLDSCIENCE Inc., funded by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, US Legal entity responsible for the study: AstraZeneca. Funding: This study was supported by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, US, who are codeveloping olaparib. Table. gBRCAm testing rates over time in pts with HER2-negative mBC HER2-negative mBC is defined as IHC 0, or 1-positive, or IHC2-positive/ISH-negative. *Olaparib approved in mBC; †Olaparib approved in eBC. eBC, early breast cancer; gBRCAm, germline breast cancer gene mutation; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; mBC, metastatic breast cancer; pt, patient; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer. Citation Format: Siddhartha Yadav, Sam Hillman, Linlin Luo, Weiyan Li, Jagadeswara Earla, Xiaoqing Xu. BRCA testing and PARP inhibitor utilization in real-world HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS04-02.