Baker, Ross

Polycythemia vera is characterized by erythrocytosis and increased risk of thrombosis. Sapablursen is an antisense oligonucleotide that suppresses transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6), increases hepcidin production, and reduces iron availability for erythropoiesis. IMPRSSION; an ongoing phase 2a, randomized, open-label study includes patients meeting 2016 WHO criteria for polycythemia vera, requiring ≥3 phlebotomies within 6 months of screening and ≥1 phlebotomy within the last 12 weeks. Cohort A (120 or 80 mg) and Cohort B (40 mg) received sapablursen subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (Q4W). The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in phlebotomy frequency from baseline to weeks 17-37 in patients who received ≥1 dose. Forty-nine patients received ≥1 sapablursen dose (median age 61 years; 82% male). The baseline mean±SD weekly phlebotomy rate was 0.15±0.07 in Cohort A; 0.17±0.07 in Cohort B and was reduced by -0.10 (95%CI, -0.13, -0.07; n=32;p<0.0001) in Cohort A; -0.10 (95%CI, -0.14, -0.06; n=17;p=0.0001) in Cohort B. Sapablursen reduced the median (IQR) number of phlebotomies from 5.0 (3.0-6.0,Cohort A; 3.5-6.5,Cohort B) at baseline (26-weeks) to 0 (0-1.0) in the efficacy evaluation window (20-weeks) in Cohort A and 1.5 (0-2.5) in Cohort B. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; anemia and fatigue were most common. The mean change in MPN-SAF-TSS at week 37 was -6.21 points (95%CI: -10.56, -1.85, p=0.0052) in Cohort A; -2.71 points in Cohort B (95% CI: -8.33, 2.91, p=0.34). Sapablursen reduced phlebotomy need, improved symptoms, and was safe and well-tolerated in patients with polycythemia vera. (Funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05143957)

Abstract Introduction : Current standard of care for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), is observation until progression to active MM. Increasing evidence suggests that patients (pts) with SMM at high risk for progression to active MM may benefit from early treatment (tx). In AQUILA, a phase 3 study in pts with high-risk SMM (NCT03301220), daratumumab (Dara) monotherapy significantly reduced risk of progression to active MM or death with a trend of extending overall survival (OS) vs active monitoring (ActMon), with no new safety concerns. Given the evolution in SMM risk stratification, a post hoc analysis was performed to assess outcomes using the IMWG 2020 and IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic risk models to assess which AQUILA pts benefited most from Dara monotherapy. Safety and efficacy analysis by age and stem cell collection outcomes were also assessed. Methods: Eligible pts with a confirmed diagnosis (≤5 y) of high-risk SMM per IMWG 2014 criteria, defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) ≥10% and ≥1 risk factor (IgA SMM, serum protein ≥30 g/dL, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain [I/U FLC] ratio ≥8 and <100, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, and/or clonal BMPC >50% to <60%) at study entry, were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous Dara or ActMon for 39 cycles, 36 months, or until confirmed disease progression (PD), whichever came first. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent review committee, defined as progression to active MM (based on IMWG SLiM-CRAB diagnostic criteria) or death. Secondary endpoints included time to first-line (1L) MM tx and OS. For this post hoc analysis, we assessed outcomes by age, IMWG 2020 high-risk SMM criteria (BMPC >20%, monoclonal spike >2 g/dL, serum FLC ratio >20; ≥2 factors=high risk; also known as the Mayo 2018 or the 20-2-20 criteria), and the IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic criteria (IMWG 2020 criteria + presence of ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [t(4;14), t(14;16), +1q and/or del13q]; ≥3 factors=high risk). Results : Dara tx showed a PFS benefit across all IMWG 2020 risk subgroups (low: hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; intermediate: HR, 0.70), with the largest benefit in the high-risk subgroup, where the PD/death rate in the ActMon arm was ~1.6-fold that in the Dara arm (62.8% vs 37.5%; HR, 0.36). This benefit of Dara vs ActMon was preserved over time, with 5-year PFS rates of 78.2% vs 71.6%, 56.2% vs 42.9%, and 60.4% vs 23.6% in IMWG 2020 low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. There was a positive trend favoring Dara for time to 1L MM treatment across all IMWG 2020 risk groups (low-risk HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.22–1.80; intermediate-risk HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35–0.92; high-risk HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25–0.62). IMWG 2020 plus cytogenetic risk classification results will be available at the time of presentation. When comparing the younger (<65y HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32–0.79) vs the older (≥65y, HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32–0.77) pt population, a PFS benefit was observed regardless of age. Similarity was also observed in TEAE incidence rate when looking into <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 y subgroups (82.7%, 81.1%, and 87.5% with ActMon; 96.2%, 98.5%, and 95.2% with Dara); however, serious TEAEs were more frequently observed in older ActMon pts (12.2%, 18.9%, and 50.0% with ActMon; 24.8%, 35.8%, and 28.6% with Dara). Across all pts treated/monitored in AQUILA, 23 (11.9%) and 41 (20.9%) pts in the Dara and ActMon arms, respectively, received autologous stem cell transplant as part of their first tx after progressing to active MM, with very limited plerixafor use (Dara, 3 [1.6%] vs ActMon, 9 [4.6%]). Median (range) CD34+ cell yield was 5.0 (2–20)×106 cells/kg body weight among 22 pts in the Dara arm and 5.1 (2–21)×106 cells/kg body weight among 39 pts in the ActMon arm. Conclusions : In this analysis, pts with high-risk SMM from the phase 3 AQUILA study treated with Dara monotherapy experienced long-term PFS benefit across IMWG 2020 subgroups, with the most pronounced benefit in the high-risk subgroup. No notable differences in PFS or safety were observed across age subgroups. Early Dara tx for high-risk SMM did not have a detrimental impact on stem cell yield. Although mature OS analyses are forthcoming, overall, these results further support early intervention with Dara monotherapy vs ActMon among pts with high-risk SMM, regardless of risk stratification criteria used.

Abstract Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by excessive erythrocytosis and elevated hematocrit (Hct), which is associated with increased risk of thrombotic events. Controlling Hct levels (<45%) is a key therapeutic goal to reduce thrombotic events. Sapablursen (ISIS 702843) is a liver-directed, ligand-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide that suppresses transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6) to enhance hepcidin production thereby restricting iron availability and reduced erythrocytosis. We are reporting the topline results of the IMPRSSION study (NCT05143957), an ongoing global, open-label phase 2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of sapablursen for Hct control and reducing phlebotomy rate in patients with PV. Methods: Eligible patients met 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria for PV, were required to have >3 phlebotomies within six months prior to screening, including >1 phlebotomy in the last 12 weeks. There were no exclusions for HCT prior to randomization. Patients received monthly subcutaneous doses of sapablursen in Cohort A (high dose) or Cohort B (low dose), during a 37-week treatment period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in the frequency of phlebotomy during the last 20 weeks of the treatment period (Week 17-37) compared to baseline (defined as the mean weekly phlebotomy rate during the six months prior to screening through the first dose of sapablursen). Phlebotomy was performed when Hct levels were ≥45% or at the investigator's discretion, confirmation of Hct was not required for phlebotomy. Serial assessments of serum hepcidin, TSAT and ferritin were conducted. The 10-item Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF-TSS) assessed the change in symptoms from baseline to Week 37. Results: Forty-nine (49) patients received at least one dose of sapablursen (full analysis set) in either Cohort A (n=32) or Cohort B (n=17). The median age was 61 years, 40 (82%) were male, and 29 (59%) classified as high risk. The primary endpoint was met at both dose levels. The weekly phlebotomy rate (mean±SD) decreased from baseline of 0.15±0.07 (~7.8/yr) to 0.05±0.09 (~2.6/yr) during the primary endpoint window (Week 17-37) in Cohort A (n=32, p<0.0001; 95%CI, -0.13, -0.07), and from 0.17±0.07 (~8.9/yr) to 0.07±0.07 (~3.6/yr) in Cohort B (n=17, p=0.0001; 95%CI, -0.14, -0.06). The mean MPN-SAF-TSS was reduced at Week 37 by 32% in Cohort A (change from baseline LSM -6.2, p=0.005) and 11% in Cohort B (change from baseline LSM -2.7, p=0.344). The proportion of patients with Hct control (<45%) without phlebotomy from week 17 to 37 in Cohort A and B was 53% (17/32) and 35% (6/17), respectively. Serum hepcidin was increased from baseline values of 0.25±0.6 to 5.05±4.7 nM at Week 13 in Cohort A (p<0.0001) and from 0.68±1.7 to 2.06±3.6 nM in Cohort B (p=0.0142). A sustained low TSAT was observed between Weeks 17-37 (6.0±2.1% and 5.5±2.0% in Cohort A and 8.9±5.0% and 7.0±3.4% in Cohort B). Serum ferritin increased over time from 18±22 ng/mL and 28±58 ng/mL at baseline in Cohort A and B, respectively, to 44±47 ng/mL and 41±85 ng/mL at Week 37, respectively. Sapablursen was generally safe and well-tolerated. The incidence of injection site reactions was 12.2% (6/49). Injection site reactions did not recur following multiple injections, were not progressive and resolved spontaneously. There was one death on study due to transformation to AML which was deemed as not related to the study drug. Conclusions: Treatment of PV patients with sapablursen increased serum hepcidin, controlled Hct, reduced phlebotomy need and improved quality of life in a dose-dependent manner. These findings highlight the potential of sapablursen as a therapeutic approach in PV and support further development.

Introduction: High-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor disorder to active multiple myeloma (MM) without approved treatment options. However, recent evidence suggests patients at high risk of progression to MM may benefit from early treatment. Daratumumab (DARA) is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action. DARA is approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) and in combination with standard-of-care regimens for RRMM and newly diagnosed MM. Based on the encouraging activity and tolerability observed with DARA monotherapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk SMM in the phase 2 CENTAURUS study, the phase 3 AQUILA study sought to determine if DARA could delay progression to MM versus active monitoring. Here we report the primary analysis from the AQUILA study. Methods: Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk SMM for ≤5 years, defined as clonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) ≥10% and ≥1 risk factor (serum M protein ≥30 g/L, IgA SMM, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 and <100, and/or clonal BMPCs >50% to <60%). Focal and lytic lesion assessment was performed in screening by CT and MRI and centrally reviewed prior to study enrollment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive DARA SC versus active monitoring. DARA (QW in Cycles 1 and 2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter) was given in 28-day cycles until cycle 39, 36 months, or disease progression, whichever came first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as progression to active MM as assessed by an independent review committee and according to IMWG diagnostic criteria for MM (SLiM-CRAB) or death. Major secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), PFS on first-line MM treatment (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 390 patients (DARA, n = 194; active monitoring, n = 196) were randomized. Median (range) age (64 [31-86] years) and time from initial SMM diagnosis to randomization (0.72 [0-5.0] years) were balanced between treatment groups. Median treatment duration in the DARA group was 38 cycles (35.0 months). At a median (range) follow-up of 65.2 (0-76.6) months, PFS was significantly improved with DARA versus active monitoring (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67; P <0.0001). Median PFS was not reached in the DARA group versus 41.5 months for active monitoring; estimated 60-month PFS rates were 63.1% versus 40.8%, respectively. Prespecified analyses showed generally consistent PFS improvement with DARA versus active monitoring across subgroups. ORR was 63.4% with DARA versus 2.0% with active monitoring (P <0.0001). As of the clinical cutoff, 64 (33.0%) patients in the DARA group and 102 (52.0%) patients in the active monitoring group had started first-line MM treatment. Median time from randomization to the date of first-line MM treatment was not reached with DARA versus 50.2 months with active monitoring (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.62; nominal P <0.0001). There was a positive trend in favor of DARA for PFS2 (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.96) and OS (60-month OS rates: DARA, 93.0%; active monitoring, 86.9%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.98). A total of 41 deaths were observed, 15 for the DARA group and 26 for the active monitoring group. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 40.4% and 30.1% of patients in the DARA and active monitoring groups, respectively. The most common (≥5% in either group) grade 3/4 TEAE was hypertension (DARA, 5.7%; active monitoring, 4.6%). The frequency of TEAEs leading to DARA discontinuation was low (5.7%), as was the incidence of fatal TEAEs in both groups (DARA, 1.0%; active monitoring, 2.0%). Conclusions: DARA monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated a clinically meaningful and significant benefit in preventing or delaying progression to active MM compared with active monitoring in patients with high-risk SMM. ORR was significantly higher and time to first-line MM treatment was prolonged with DARA compared with active monitoring. This was accompanied by positive trends for PFS2 and OS in favor of DARA. These results strongly support the benefit of early intervention with DARA monotherapy versus active monitoring, the current standard of care, in patients with high-risk SMM.

TPS8075 Background: Standard of care for SMM includes active monitoring until progression to multiple myeloma (MM); however, recent evidence suggests pts with high-risk features may benefit from early treatment. DARA is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that is approved as monotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) or in combination with standard of care for RRMM or newly diagnosed MM. Results from the phase 3 COLUMBA study showed that DARA SC demonstrated similar efficacy to intravenous (IV) DARA but with a lower rate of infusion-related reactions and shorter administration time. Based on the promising single-agent activity observed with IV DARA in intermediate- or high-risk SMM pts during the phase 2 CENTAURUS study, we hypothesized that DARA SC may delay progression to MM versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. Methods: AQUILA is an ongoing, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study of DARA SC versus active monitoring in pts with high-risk SMM. DARA SC (DARA 1,800 mg + recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; 2,000 U/mL; Halozyme]) is administered by manual injection over approximately 5 minutes at alternating locations on the abdomen weekly in Cycles 1 and 2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter until 39 cycles (28 days/cycle), up to 36 months, or until disease progression. Eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of SMM for ≤5 years, factors indicating high risk of progression to MM (clonal bone marrow plasma cells [BMPCs] ≥10% and ≥1 of the following: serum M protein ≥30 g/L, IgA SMM, immunoparesis with reduction of 2 uninvolved Ig isotypes, serum involved:uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥8 to < 100, or clonal BMPCs > 50% to < 60% with measurable disease), and ECOG performance status ≤1. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee, with disease progression defined according to International Myeloma Working Group diagnostic criteria for MM. Secondary endpoints include time to biochemical or diagnostic (SLiM-CRAB) progression, overall response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, time to response, time to first-line treatment for MM, PFS on first-line treatment for MM (PFS2), overall survival, and incidence of MM with adverse prognostic features. The study completed enrollment on May 6, 2019; 390 pts have been randomly assigned to DARA SC or active monitoring. The primary efficacy analysis will be performed after approximately 165 PFS events have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT03301220.