Mwangi, Raphael

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in AL amyloidosis effectively produces a high overall hematological response rate, complete response rate, and durable remissions. However, it is a high-dose chemotherapy-based therapy with high morbidity which can be offered only to a subset of AL amyloidosis patients who are considered fit for this therapy. Transplant-related mortality (TRM) in AL amyloidosis has decreased over the past three decades due to improvement in patient selection. New therapeutic options question the utilization of ASCT. A model to predict TRM can improve the decision-making process, patient selection and further reduce TRM. AL amyloidosis patients (n=1718) from 9 centers globally, transplanted in the years 2003-2020 were included. Pre-ASCT variables of interest were assessed for association with Day-100 all-cause mortality, including age at ASCT (≥ 60 years), sex, light chain isotype, ECOG performance status (ECOG PS; 0, 1 and 2/3), the difference between involved and uninvolved light chains (dFLC; ≥180 mg/L), N-terminal prohormone of B natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; ≥1800 pg/mL) or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP; ≥400 pg/mL), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF, <50%), interventricular septum (>16 mm), corrected diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (cDLCO; ≤65% of predicted), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1; ≤65% of predicted), serum albumin (<2.5 g/dL), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <30 mL/min/m2), alkaline phosphatase (>X2 upper limit of normal), and systolic blood pressure (<100 mmHg). Troponins could not be included in our modeling given the multitude of assays used across institutions and periods that could not be reconciled. A random forest (RF) classifier with 10-fold cross-validation was used to assist in variable selection. The final model variables were selected based on statistical performance and clinical relevance. The model was fitted using logistic regression. The median age at ASCT was 58, and 40% of patients were women. The most frequently involved organs were the kidneys (69%) and the heart (52%). Mayo 2004 stages I and II were collectively present in 83% of patients. Day-100 TRM occurred in 75 patients (4.4%) with the 3 main causes being shock (n=27), cardiac arrhythmia (n=26), and organ failure (n=22). Age at ASCT, sex, and light chain isotype were not predictors of Day-100 TRM. Across the other pre-ASCT variables, adverse features were present from 6.9% (LVEF <50%) to 25.8% (dFLC ≥180 mg/L) of patients. Ten factors were associated with Day-100 TRM on univariate analysis. The odds ratio of these variables ranged from 1.6 to 10.2. RF classifier using all these variables identified a model with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72±0.12. Using the importance hierarchy function to refine the model selection, a 4-variable model [NT-proBNP/BNP ≥1800/400 pg/mL, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL, ECOG PS 1 or 2/3, and systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg] was built with an AUC of 0.70±0.12. Based on logistic regression coefficients, ECOG PS 2/3 was assigned two points, while other adverse predictors were assigned 1-point each (model score range 0-5). We then applied the model scoring to our study population. Score distribution was as follows: 0 (n=431, 25.1% of patients), 1 (n=688,40.1%), 2 (n=413, 24.0%), and 3 and above (n=186, 10.8%). Day-100 TRM rates were 0.46%, 3.2%, 5.8%, and 14.5% for 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 points, respectively. The respective rates for the years 2003-2011 were 1.1%, 3.3%, 6.4%, and 19.2%, while for the years 2012-2020 0%, 3.1%, 5.2%, and 8.4%. We developed a simple clinical tool to predict the Day-100 TRM risk in AL patients undergoing ASCT. This tool will allow more informed decision making weighing the individual benefits and risks of ASCT compared to other therapies.

Background: The Optimized Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) Inflammatory (OHI, Zoref-Lorenz et al, Blood, 2022) index, defined by the combined elevation in serum soluble CD25 (sCD25) and ferritin, has emerged as a promising prognostic tool for patients with newly diagnosed hematologic malignancies, demonstrating superior performance in predicting 500-day mortality compared to HLH-2004 criteria. However, previous studies were retrospective, with a substantial proportion (65%) of patients suspected clinically to have HLH. We evaluated the performance of the OHI index in an unselected, prospective cohort of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods: We analyzed the predictive utility of the OHI index in 331 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients enrolled from 2002-2015 in the prospective Iowa/Mayo Molecular Epidemiology Resource cohort. Ferritin and sCD25 levels were quantified in pre-treatment serum samples using R&D ELISA kits. OHI values were also optimized based on 500-day mortality in the cohort using receiver operating curve analysis with internal validation. Patients were classified as OHI+ using the original and newly optimized thresholds for sCD25 and ferritin. The primary endpoint was 500-day survival, and the secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) at 24 months (EFS24), EFS, and overall survival (OS). The predictive capability of the OHI index was evaluated using logistic regression to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 500-day mortality and EFS24, as well as Cox regression to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for EFS and OS. Results: The median age at diagnosis of the 331 patients was 63.5 years (interquartile range, 54.5-74), and 168 (51%) were male. Using the original thresholds (sCD25 3,900 U/mL and ferritin 1,000 ng/mL), 4.2% of patients were OHI+, with a more than 5-fold higher 500-day mortality risk compared to OHI- patients (OR=5.6; CI 1.6-17, p<0.001). After optimizing thresholds for sCD25 (2,400 U/mL) and ferritin (250 ng/mL) to predict 500-day mortality, 23.6% were OHI+ and the OHI+ group had a 9-fold higher 500-day mortality risk (OR=9.2; CI 4.0-24, p<0.001), with 31% mortality in the OHI+ vs 5% in the OHI- group. OHI+ patients exhibited more B-symptoms (35% vs 20%, p=0.027), elevated LDH levels (76% vs 34%, p<0.001), poorer performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2+: 38% vs 12%, p<0.001), and more advanced stage disease (Stage IV: 57% vs 38%, p<0.001), although the frequency of a high International Prognostic Index (IPI) was not statistically different between the groups (IPI 3-5: 44% vs 36%, p=0.28). After adjusting for age and IPI, OHI+ remained a strong predictor of 500-day mortality (OR=5.0; CI 1.9-13, p=0.001). Further adjustment for the cell of origin did not impact the results. The association of OHI+ status with 500-day mortality was similar in IPI 0-2 (OR=5.8; CI 1.2-29, p=0.033) and 3-5 (OR=6.8; CI 0.6-73, p=0.11). OHI+ patients were also more likely to not achieve EFS24 (45% vs 13%), with a 3-fold greater risk after adjusting for age and IPI (OR=3.2; CI 1.5-6.5, p=0.0018). The OHI index also retained its predictive ability over longer-term follow-up (median 9.8 years for living patients) for both OS (HR=2.0; CI 1.0-4.0, p=0.040) and EFS (HR=2.2; CI 1.1-4.3, p=0.030) after adjusting for age and IPI. Cytokine profiling using multiplex ELISA identified elevated inflammatory markers in OHI+ patients, underscoring the role of systemic inflammation in prognosis. The distribution of cytokines was significantly different between the groups, with consistently higher means in the OHI+ vs OHI- group, including IL1a (1,628 vs 759 pg/ml, p=0.008), CCL2 (1,020 vs 724 pg/ml, p=0.028), CXCL10 (165 vs 53 pg/ml, p<0.0001), and CXCL9 (380 vs 150 pg/ml, p<0.0001). Conclusions: While the original OHI index for prediction of 500-day mortality was validated in this unselected cohort of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, optimization of the OHI thresholds identified a larger OHI+ group (24%), enhanced the identification of hyperinflammation, improved predictive ability for early (500-day) mortality, and predicted EFS24 status and long-term OS. This underscores the clinical relevance of the OHI index, supports the need to evaluate disease-specific thresholds, and suggests its potential for use in routine management and as enrollment criteria in clinical trials for novel therapies.

Background Advancements in imaging techniques, diagnostic procedures, and increased routine health care visits are anticipated to lead to a higher number of patients with an incidental diagnosis of cancer, including the most common lymphoma DLBCL. In parallel, multiple cancer early detection (MCED) blood assays are emerging to screen for cancer in asymptomatic, average risk individuals. Assays that use methylated DNA markers (MDM) are of special interest and have been shown to detect evidence of DLBCL in the blood in 80% of DLBCL cases (Witzig TE et al ASCO 2022). While these MDMs are candidates for inclusion in MCED assays, the impact of early detection of lymphoma in general and DLBCL specifically remains controversial. Since the outcomes for patients with an incidental diagnosis of DLBCL have not been previously studied and to give further insight to the early detection question, we investigated clinical characteristics and outcome differences between patients with DLBCL found incidentally and those with symptoms or obvious signs of disease that led them to seek medical evaluation. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients enrolled into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence from 2002-2015. We reviewed the medical records of the Mayo component to assign a mode of diagnosis (incidental vs symptomatic). We examined disease characteristics and impact on event-free survival (EFS) and overall (OS) survival according to the mode of diagnosis. EFS was the time from diagnosis to relapse, progression, retreatment, or death from any cause. OS was defined as the time from diagnosis to death from any cause. Results 1140 patients with DLBCL (90.6%), high grade B cell lymphoma (2.4%) or primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (7.0%) were reviewed; 85 (7.5%) patients presented incidentally (incidental group), while 1055 (92.5%) presented with a lymphoma-related symptom or sign, e.g., palpation of a lump/mass, B symptoms and/or other symptoms caused by the lymphoma such as abdominal pain (symptomatic group). In the incidental group, 67.5% (65/85) of patients were diagnosed after an incidental finding on imaging or diagnostic/surgical procedure, 14.1% (12/85) were diagnosed after an incidental lab finding, and 9.4% (8/85) were diagnosed after a clinical health care professional incidentally identified a lump/mass. Compared to the symptomatic group, patients with incidental diagnosis were older at diagnosis (median age 66 vs 63 years, P=0.01) and more likely to present with an earlier stage I/II (62.4% vs 38.9%, P<0.001). Patients who presented with symptoms were more likely to have ≥ 1 extra-nodal site involvement (29.8% vs 15.5%, P=0.005), elevated LDH level (55.4% vs 40.8%, P=0.01), and high-risk IPI score (13.7% vs 5.9% P=0.03) compared to the incidental group. The median diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) was significantly longer in the incidental group (21 days, IQR 12-34) compared to the symptomatic group (15 days, IQR 9-24) (P = 0.0014). The median follow-up time was 152.3 months in the incidental group and 123.7 months in the symptomatic group. We observed no difference in early failure rates as measured by failure to achieve event-free status at 24 months (EFS24) for incidentally vs symptomatic diagnosis (25.9% vs 31.9%, P=0.25). There was no difference in EFS between the two groups in univariate (HR=1.08, 95%CI=0.8-1.45) or multivariable analysis adjusted for IPI (aHR=0.97, 95%CI=0.72-1.31). There was also no difference in OS in univariate (HR=0.98, 95%CI=0.72-1.34) or multivariable analysis adjusted for IPI (aHR=0.87, 95%CI=0.64-1.19). Conclusion In this large cohort of aggressive B-cell lymphoma, incidental diagnosis occurred in only 7.5% of cases and these patients had earlier stage, lower IPI score, lower LDH levels and less extranodal involvement. These differences in clinical characteristics did not translate into EFS or OS differences. Our findings are the first to describe presentation and outcomes of incidentally diagnosed DLBCL and provide data regarding what investigators may find with MCED assays. Finding more early stage DLBCL patients with lower tumor burden may influence type of treatment, enable the use of fewer chemotherapy cycles, and avoid symptoms and complications of advanced stage disease such as tumor lysis syndrome and organ compression.

Background: Chemoimmunotherapy using rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunomycin), vincristine sulfate (Oncovin), and prednisone (R-CHOP) has been the standard of care treatment of DLBCL for over 20 years. Despite its widespread usage, there is no accepted standard for the dose of prednisone in this setting which varies from fixed-dose (100 mg daily for 5 days) to different levels of BSA-adjusted dosage (ranging from 40-100 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). BSA-adjusted dosage results in high doses of prednisone administered to patients with increased body surface area which may lead to significant adverse events. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if fixed-dose prednisone during R-CHOP therapy results in equivalent outcomes compared to BSA-adjusted dosing. Methods: A comprehensive search of several databases from each database's inception to April 29th, 2024, English language, was conducted. The databases included Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The search strategy was designed and conducted by an experienced librarian with input from the study's principal investigator. Controlled vocabulary supplemented with keywords was used to search for prospective clinical studies of R-CHOP for adult patients with untreated DLBCL. Search results were reviewed independently by 2 members of the study team for final inclusion. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third member and reviewed by the senior author. Prednisone dosage and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the available public data. Meta-analysis was performed using the metafor package in R version 4.2.2 by applying a mixed-effects model to combine results from the multiple studies. The analysis was first conducted overall to determine the general effect, and then stratified by prednisone dose (fixed- vs. BSA-adjusted) to explore dose-dependent variations in outcomes. Results: Our search resulted in 2287 entries which were individually reviewed by the study team. A total of 30 studies with a combined sample size of 3573 treated patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis set. Nineteen (63%) studies with a combined sample size of 1930 patients (median 155, range 12-399) used fixed-dose prednisone. Eleven (37%) studies with a combined sample size of 1643 patients (median 70, range 9-439) used BSA-adjusted dosing. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years data were available for 11 (37%) of the studies. Progression free survival (PFS) at 2 years data were available for 8 studies (27%). Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) data were available for 16 (54%) and 14 (47%) of the included studies, respectively. OS at 2 years for all studies was 84% (SD 78%-91%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (88%, SD 79%-97%) and BSA-adjusted dose (82%, 73%-91%). PFS at 2 years for all studies was 77% (SD 68%-85%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (80%, SD 68%-93%) and BSA-adjusted dose (74%, SD 62%-86%). ORR for all studies was 86% (SD 79%-92%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (86%, SD 76%-96%) and BSA-adjusted dosage (84%, SD 80%-88%). CRR for all studies was 70% (SD 61%-80%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (67%, SD 54%-81%) and BSA-adjusted dose (77%, SD 64%-89%). Heterogeneity tests performed according to available clinical outcomes yielded results between 0% and 76%. Conclusion: The result of our systematic review and meta-analysis combining 30 prospective studies and a total of 3573 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with frontline R-CHOP found no difference in clinical outcomes between patients treated with fixed-dose and BSA-adjusted dose prednisone. Our findings provide scientific evidence for the widespread practice of capping prednisone at the maximum dose of 100 mg daily for 5 days, potentially avoiding unnecessary adverse effects from BSA-adjusted dosing.

AbstractRenal AL amyloidosis can be complicated by end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). In this study, we describe the long‐term outcomes of renal AL amyloidosis patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and assess the utility of the renal staging system. Retrospective study of renal AL patients (n = 697; Mayo Clinic, Boston University) who underwent ASCT between 2003 and 2020. Renal stage was assigned based on 24‐h proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate measurements. Renal survival was defined as the time from ASCT until initiation of RRT, while patients who were not placed on RRT were censored at their last follow‐up. With a median follow‐up of 10.4 years, RRT was required in 149 patients (21%). The median time from ASCT to ESRD was 3.4 years, with late events of progression to ESRD seen >10 years from ASCT. Pre‐ASCT renal stage was significantly associated with the cumulative incidence of RRT: 3‐year RRT rate was 3%, 10%, and 37% for renal stages I, II, and III, respectively. However, in the 2012–2020 period subset, a significant decrease in ESRD risk was noted across all renal stages (3‐year RRT 0%, 5%, and 24%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, renal survival was independently associated with the pre‐ASCT renal stage, lambda isotype, bone marrow plasmacytosis ≥20%, post‐ASCT hematologic response, and year of ASCT. Long‐term outcomes of renal AL amyloidosis treated with ASCT are presented. Renal stage reliably predicts renal outcomes in patients with AL undergoing ASCT, despite a reduction in the proportion of patients progressing to RRT in recent years.

Abstract Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic subgroups in cancer clinical trials remains a persistent challenge. Restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria have been shown to exacerbate this problem. We previously identified that up to 24% of patients treated with standard immunochemotherapy would have been excluded from recent first-line trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on 5 laboratory-based criteria. These ineligible patients had worse clinical outcomes and increased deaths related to lymphoma progression, suggesting the potential exclusion of patients who could have benefited most from the novel therapies being evaluated. Using data from the prospectively enrolled Lymphoma Epidemiology Outcomes cohort study, with demographics broadly similar to the US patients diagnosed with lymphoma, we evaluated the impact of laboratory eligibility criteria from recent first-line DLBCL trials across various racial and ethnic backgrounds. There were significant differences in the baseline laboratory values by race/ethnicity with Black/African American (AA) patients having the lowest mean hemoglobin and highest creatinine clearance. Based on recent clinical trial eligibility criteria, AA and Hispanic patients had higher rates of laboratory-based ineligibility than non-Hispanic White patients. The largest gap in the clinical outcomes between eligible and noneligible patients was noted within AA patients with an overall survival hazard ratio based on POLARIX clinical trial criteria of 4.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.83-9.14). A thoughtful approach to the utility of each criterion and cutoffs for eligibility needs to be evaluated in the context of its differential impact across various racial/ethnic groups.

Abstract Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that fail to achieve a complete response (CR) or who relapse early after anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (IC) have a poor prognosis and are commonly considered to have “primary refractory disease.” However, different definitions of primary refractory disease are used in the literature and clinical practice. In this study, we examined variation in the time to relapse used to define refractory status and association with survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory LBCL in a single-center prospective cohort with validation in an independent multicenter cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed LBCL were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiological Resource cohort (MER; N = 949) or the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort (LEO; N = 2755) from September 2002 to May 2021. Primary refractory LBCL was defined as no response (stable disease [SD]) or progressive disease (PD) during, or by the end of, frontline (1L) IC (primary PD; PPD); partial response at end of treatment (EOT PR); or relapse within 3 to 12 months after achieving CR at EOT to 1L IC (early relapse). In the MER cohort, patients with PPD had inferior overall survival (OS; 2-year OS rate: 15% MER, 31% LEO) when compared with other subgroups considered in defining primary refractory disease, EOT PR (2-year OS rate: 38% MER, 50% LEO) and early relapse (2-year OS rate: 44% MER, 58% LEO). Among patients receiving 1L IC with curative intent, we identified that patients with PPD are the key subgroup with poor outcomes. We propose a definition of primary refractory LBCL as SD or PD during, or by the end of, 1L treatment.

Abstract Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) exhibits a substantial familial risk that extends beyond CLL to other B-cell lymphomas (including follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). Monoclonal B-cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), a precursor to CLL, is also associated with a significant risk for hematologic malignancies overall and for lymphoid malignancies, specifically. Moreover, previous research has shown an association between the CLL polygenic risk score (CLL-PRS) and common lymphoma subtypes. This study aims to further evaluate CLL-PRS associations with hematological cancer overall and by lineage while also considering MBL status a strong risk factor for lymphoid malignancies. Utilizing the Mayo Clinic Biobank, we selected individuals aged 40 years or older, residing in proximal counties, who had no prior hematologic malignancies, and with available biospecimens. MBL screening was done using 8-color flow cytometry, and MBL with CLL (CD5+/CD20dim) or atypical CLL (CD5+/CD20+) immunophenotype were included. CLL-PRS was calculated from 41 known susceptibility variants, with weights being the log of the odds ratios from the largest CLL genome-wide association study. Incident hematologic malignancies were ascertained through ICD codes and confirmed via medical record review. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with hematologic malignancies were estimated through Cox regression. Of 7,332 participants, 1,150 (16%) screened positive for MBL; median age was 67 years (range 40-101), and 37% male. Median follow-up was 2.9 years (range 0-13), and 56 hematologic cancers were identified. After adjusting for age and sex, the CLL-PRS was associated with increased risk of developing hematologic (HR=1.49, 95%CI=1.12-1.98, P=0.006) which was all attributable to lymphoid cancers (HR=1.79, 95%CI=1.26-2.56, P=0.001). When adjusting for baseline MBL status in the models, the CLL-PRS associations remained significant but were attenuated for hematological (HR=1.33, 95%CI=0.99-1.79, P=0.058) and lymphoid (HR=1.56, 95%CI=1.07-2.26, P=0.020) malignancies, while MBL status was also significantly associated with risk of hematologic (HR=2.76, 95%CI=1.55-4.91, P=0.001) and lymphoid (HR=3.61, 95%CI=1.78-3.32, P<0.001) malignancies. In this prospective cohort study of individuals screened for MBL, CLL-PRS was associated with an elevated risk of hematologic malignancies overall and within the lymphoid lineage, underscoring a shared genetic etiology across many B-cell lymphomas. However, the associations between CLL-PRS and hematologic malignancies were attenuated when accounting for MBL status or when analyzing among MBL-positive individuals, highlighting the role of MBL status in these associations. Further research with expanded cohorts is needed to unravel these complex genetic and clinical interactions. Citation Format: Raphael Mwangi, Dennis P. Robinson, Sara J. Achenbach, Geffen Kleinstern, Aaron D. Norman, Kari G. Rabe, Janet E. Olson, Neil E. Kay, Rosalie Griffin, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Esteban Braggio, Sameer A. Parikh, Curtis A. Hanson, Celine M. Vachon, James R. Cerhan, Tait D. Shanafelt, Susan L. Slager. Genetic associations with hematologic malignancies: An evaluation of CLL polygenic risk score and MBL status in the Mayo Clinic Biobank Cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6152.