Back to Authors

Weiss, Edward P.

Mayo Clinic

Saint Louis University

Citations 2

The historical context and scientific legacy of John O. Holloszy
Hagberg, James M. , Coyle, Edward F. , Baldwin, Kenneth M., Cartee, Gregory D. , Fontana, Luigi , Kirwan, John P. , Weiss, Edward P., Kirwan, John P , Joyner, Michael J. , Seals, Douglas R.

Journal of Applied Physiology | February 7, 2019 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 277-305

10.1152/japplphysiol.00669.2018 Get It

John O. Holloszy, as perhaps the world’s preeminent exercise biochemist/physiologist, published >400 papers over his 50+ year career, and they have been cited >41,000 times. In 1965 Holloszy showed for the first time that exercise training in rodents resulted in a doubling of skeletal muscle mitochondria, ushering in a very active era of skeletal muscle plasticity research. He subsequently went on to describe the consequences of and the mechanisms underlying these adaptations. Holloszy was first to show that muscle contractions increase muscle glucose transport independent of insulin, and he studied the mechanisms underlying this response throughout his career. He published important papers assessing the impact of training on glucose and insulin metabolism in healthy and diseased humans. Holloszy was at the forefront of rodent studies of caloric restriction and longevity in the 1980s, following these studies with important cross-sectional and longitudinal caloric restriction studies in humans. Holloszy was influential in the discipline of cardiovascular physiology, showing that older healthy and diseased populations could still elicit beneficial cardiovascular adaptations with exercise training. Holloszy and his group made important contributions to exercise physiology on the effects of training on numerous metabolic, hormonal, and cardiovascular adaptations. Holloszy’s outstanding productivity was made possible by his mentoring of ~100 postdoctoral fellows and substantial NIH grant funding over his entire career. Many of these fellows have also played critical roles in the exercise physiology/biochemistry discipline. Thus it is clear that exercise biochemistry and physiology will be influenced by John Holloszy for numerous years to come.
Sex‐specific effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on bone mineral density and body composition: A pooled analysis of four clinical trials
Jankowski, Catherine M. , Wolfe, Pamela, Schmiege, Sarah J. , Mühlen, Denise von, Laughlin, Gail A., Bergstrom, Jaclyn , Bettencourt, Richele, Weiss, Edward P., Villareal, Dennis T. , Kohrt, Wendy M., Nair, K. Sreekumaran , Khosla, Sundeep , Jensen, Michael, Kritz‐Silverstein, Donna C.

Clinical Endocrinology | November 13, 2018 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 293-300

10.1111/cen.13901 Get It

SummaryObjectiveStudies of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) therapy in older adults suggest sex‐specific effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition, but the ability of a single study to reach this conclusion was limited. We evaluated the effects of DHEA on sex hormones, BMD, fat mass and fat‐free mass in older women and men enrolled in four similar clinical trials.DesignPooled analyses of data from four double‐blinded, randomized controlled trials.ParticipantsWomen (n = 295) and men (n = 290) aged 55 years or older who took DHEA or placebo tablet daily for 12 months.MeasurementsTwelve‐month changes in BMD, fat mass, fat‐free mass and serum DHEA sulphate (DHEAS), (17)estradiol, testosterone and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1).ResultsWomen on DHEA had increases (mean ± SD; all P < 0.001 vs placebo) in DHEAS (231 ± 164 µg/dL), testosterone (18.6 ± 20.9 µg/dL), (17)estradiol (8.7 ± 11.0 pg/mL) and IGF‐1 (25.1 ± 52.3 ng/mL), and men had increases in DHEAS (269.0 ± 177 µg/dL; P < 0.01), (17)estradiol (4.8 ± 12.2 pg/m; P < 0.01) and IGF‐1 (6.3 ± 41.4 ng/mL; P < 0.05). Women on DHEA had increases in lumbar spine (1.0% ± 3.4%) and trochanter (0.5% ± 3.8%) BMD and maintained total hip BMD (0.0% ± 2.8%); men had no BMD benefit and a decrease in fat mass (−0.4 ± 2.6 kg; all P < 0.01 vs placebo).ConclusionsDehydroepiandrosterone therapy may be an effective approach for preserving bone and muscle mass in women. Key questions are (a) the extent to which longer duration DHEA can attenuate the loss of bone and muscle in women, and (b) whether DHEA has a more favourable benefit‐to‐risk profile for women than oestrogen therapy.