Sener, Uğur

Abstract BACKGROUND BRAF pathway alterations are frequent in glial/neuroepithelial tumors. BRAF-targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) has proven efficacy in clinical trials, though mainly enrolling pediatric patients. We sought to investigate real-world data for adult patients with BRAF-pathway mutant glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi. METHODS Adults with BRAF-pathway mutated glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Five patients (n=4 female, median age at diagnosis 36) were identified (tumor types: glioblastoma n=1, high-grade astrocytoma with epithelioid features n=1, low-grade neuroepithelial tumor n=1, pilocytic astrocytoma n=1, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma n=1). Four had BRAF V600E and one had NF1 p.S2687Cfs*5 mutant tumors. Prior to targeted therapy initiation, patients underwent a median 2.4 treatments including surgery (n=4), radiation therapy (n=4), chemotherapy (temozolomide n=4; carboplatin/vincristine n=1). BRAF-targeted therapies included dabrafenib/trametinib (n=4), binimetinib/encorafenib (n=2), binimetinib (n=2). One NF1-mutant glioblastoma received binimetinib followed by binimetinib/bevacizumab. Median BRAFi/MEKi treatment was 15.2 months (range: 6-36 months). Toxicities included leukopenia (n=3), peripheral edema (n=1), reduced ejection fraction (n=1), skin rash (n=5), transaminitis (n=1) with all patients requiring dose reductions and 3 cases requiring discontinuation. Among patients where BRAFi/MEKi was discontinued due to toxicity, 2 received other treatments at progression, then switched to a different BRAFi/MEKi combination, which they tolerated (duration 6-10months). Best radiographic response was partial response, noted in 3 patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib. Four patients remain alive and continue BRAFi/MEKi. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of heavily-pretreated patients with glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms, BRAF-targeted therapy was associated with durable responses. Interestingly, two patients who were unable to tolerate one combination of BRAFi/MEKi were able to tolerate a different combination with sustained response. Our findings support ongoing use of BRAF targeted therapy for CNS tumors. Optimal timing and duration of treatment requires further prospective evaluation in adult patients.

Abstract Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is caused by pathogenic variants in the VHL gene. Abnormal function of VHL protein leads to accumulation of HIF-α and the engagement of hypoxia-sensitive genes with oncogenic effects. VHL is associated with tumors in multiple organs. Belzutifan is an oral selective inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha. Belzutifan was approved in 2021 as a targeted therapy for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Here, we report on our institutional clinical experience with belzutifan for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas. From October 2021 to May 2024, thirteen adults (9 female, 4 male, median age 40) were treated. Median duration of therapy was 24 months. Seven had a partial radiographic response after median of 3 months; one patient had a partial response; 1 patient had progressive disease on belzutifan. Four patients have been taking belzutifan for less than 3 months, and do not have follow-up imaging to assess response. The most common adverse effect was fatigue (7 patients). Four patients experienced anemia and 2 experienced hypoxia. Three patients discontinued belzutifan due to adverse effects. One patient had to take multiple medication pauses, due to seizure and kidney injury, but resumed treatment with dose reduction. Nine patients remain on therapy. Based on this data, belzutifan is often well-tolerated and associated with durable radiographic responses. Toxicity profile among our patients was similar to that encountered in the clinical trial leading to approval of the agent. These findings provide real-world data supporting continued use of belzutifan in this patient population, with an awareness of potential adverse reactions. Future studies should assess continued radiographic response, sex differences, and effects after long-term use.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pituitary adenomas are often effectively managed with medical therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. However, up to 15% of pituitary neoplasms exhibit rapid growth, invasive behavior, or, rarely, metastasize despite optimal standard treatments. Temozolomide is associated with a survival benefit for patients with these aggressive pituitary tumors. METHODS We present a case series of 8 patients with an aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) or pituitary carcinoma (PC) treated with temozolomide. RESULTS Eight patients (3 female, median age at diagnosis 44) with APT (n=6) or PC (n=2) were treated. A variety of pituitary tumor types were represented (1 prolactinoma, 5 corticotroph adenomas, 1 gonadotroph adenoma, 1 thyrotropinoma). Prior to temozolomide initiation, patients underwent a median 5 treatments including medical management (n=4), surgery (n=7), radiation therapy (n=7). Temozolomide was started at median 3.5 recurrence. Median treatment duration was 6 cycles (n=6, 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5, 28-day cycles; n=1, 75 mg/m2, days 1-21, 28-day cycles). Seven patients experienced progression after temozolomide treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months. One patient remains on treatment, progression-free at 5 months. MGMT methylation status was assessed for 3 tumors. Among 2 patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors, PFS was 4 months for one patient, the other remains on treatment. For one patient with MGMT promoter unmethylated corticotroph adenoma, PFS was 9 months. No ≥ grade 4 toxicities were noted. Most common toxicities were nausea (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=3), and fatigue (n=2). CONCLUSION In this group of heavily pretreated patients, temozolomide monotherapy was well-tolerated and associated with median PFS of 4 months. Interestingly, PC patients had longer PFS at 9 months and 24 months. Our findings support use of single-agent temozolomide chemotherapy for patients with APT/PC, but further prospective analysis is needed to identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment and optimal timing of chemotherapy initiation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) are slow-growing tumors of the spine typically involving the medullary conus and cauda equina. MPE is regularly managed with surgical resection with radiation therapy reserved for cases where gross total resection cannot be achieved. Management of inoperable cases represents a clinical challenge. No systemic therapy is approved for treatment of MPE. Addition of chemotherapy may improve outcomes for cases not amenable to resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report feasibility and preliminary efficacy of combination treatment with proton beam radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy for a patient with large, unresectable MPE. RESULTS A 19-year-old female presented with one year of gradually worsening hip and back pain despite treatment with physical therapy. MRI Lumbar spine identified a destructive and expansile T2-heterogenous and hyperintense intraosseous mass (14 x 12 x 13 cm) with extraosseous expansion involving the sacrum, coccyx, and left SI joint with abnormal soft tissue enhancement extending along the posterior spine. No additional lesions were identified on neuro-axis imaging. Biopsy of the mass was consistent with a WHO grade 2 myxopapillary ependymoma. Standard treatment of care would include complete surgical resection. Unfortunately, this would require a morbid procedure in an en block fashion with immediate and permanent loss of bowel, bladder, sexual, and ambulatory function in a young patient whose primary symptom was pain and mild weakness. It was therefore elected to treat the patient in an unconventional approach and begin with proton beam radiation therapy (59.4 Gy in 33 fractions) with concurrent temozolomide followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Mild clinical improvement and significant radiographic response were achieved (size reduced to 8 x 7 x 11 cm). CONCLUSION This case suggests a potential role for use of proton radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for management of myxopapillary ependymoma not amenable to surgical resection.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pineoblastoma is an aggressive, rare tumor of the pineal gland. Due to rarity of pineoblastoma, no large-scale prospective clinical trial data is available to guide clinical practice. Patients often receive treatment based on approaches to other high-grade embryonal central nervous system (CNS) tumors such as medulloblastoma. Multimodality treatment typically consists of maximal surgical resection followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Despite treatment, recurrence is common and five-year survival rate is 60-70%. Pineoblastoma can disseminate through the leptomeninges, which is associated with poor survival. No therapy is known to confer a survival benefit in the setting of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) related to pineoblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report radiographic response and longer than expected survival for a patient with LMD related to pineoblastoma treated with single-agent temozolomide chemotherapy. RESULTS A 22-year-old male with a history of pineoblastoma presented with periodic headaches and leptomeningeal enhancement on surveillance imaging. 5 years prior to presentation (age 17), he was initially diagnosed with pineoblastoma after gross total resection followed by treatment with proton craniospinal radiation and adjuvant carboplatin/vincristine chemotherapy. Surveillance craniospinal MRIs identified diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement involving the posterior fossa and diffusely throughout the spine and lumbosacral nerve roots. While cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology was negative for tumor cells on three separate occasions, CSF cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis isolated tumor DNA. He was started on temozolomide chemotherapy with near complete resolution of leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI after 2 cycles and complete resolution after 6 cycles. Treatment was well-tolerated with grade 1 fatigue as the only toxicity. Patient remains alive 20 months after initial diagnosis of LMD with resolution of headaches and durable radiographic response. CONCLUSION This case highlights utility of CSF cfDNA as a companion tool for diagnosis of LMD. Durable clinical and radiographic response achieved suggests temozolomide can be considered as a salvage treatment option for recurrent pineoblastoma with LMD.

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare autosomal-dominant hereditary disease associated with tumors in multiple organs. VHL is characterized by mutation of the VHL gene which leads to accumulation of HIF-α and the engagement of hypoxia-sensitive genes with oncogenic effects. Conventional management of VHL-associated tumors involves surgical resection and radiation therapy. Belzutifan is an oral selective inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2a). Belzutifan was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2021 as a targeted therapy option for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Our objective here is to report on our clinical experience with use of belzutifan for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively chart reviewed our institutional (Mayo Clinic Rochester) experience of belzutifan in adults (18 years or older) with VHL and craniospinal hemangioblastomas not amenable to surgery. The study period was October 2021 to March 2024. RESULTS Nine adults (5 female, 4 male) were included in the study. Of those able to continue the therapy without interruption (6 patients), the median duration of therapy at last follow-up was 11.5 months (range 3-22 months). Seven had radiographic response to therapy after a median of 3 months (1-5 months), with a maximal response to therapy after a median of 13 months (3-29 months). One patient had a mixed radiographic response, and 1 patient had tumor progression while on belzutifan noted at 5 months. The most common adverse effect was fatigue. Seven patients reported fatigue, 4 patients experienced anemia, and 2 experienced hypoxia. Three patients discontinued belzutifan due to adverse effects, specifically fatigue and hypoxia. One patient had to take multiple medication pauses, once due to seizure and once due to kidney injury, but resumed treatment with dose reduction. CONCLUSION Among patients with VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, belzutifan is often well-tolerated and associated with durable radiographic responses. Toxicity profile among our patients was similar to that encountered in the clinical trial leading to FDA approval of the agent. These findings provide real-world data supporting continued use of belzutifan in this patient population, with an awareness of potential adverse reactions. Future studies should assess continued radiographic response, sex differences, duration of treatment, and effects of cessation after long-term use.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite an established standard of care including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, GBM unfortunately is associated with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, researchers are extensively evaluating avenues to expand GBM therapy and improve outcomes in patients with GBM. In this review, we provide a broad overview of novel GBM therapies that have recently completed or are actively undergoing study in clinical trials. These therapies expand across medical, surgical, and radiation clinical trials. We additionally review methods for improving clinical trial design in GBM.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequelae of metastatic spread that affects approximately 5% of cancer patients. The incidence of LMD is increasing due to advancements in systemic therapy and enhanced detection methods. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the evidence in the detection, prognostication, and treatment of LMD. A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED was conducted to identify articles reporting on LMD including existing data and ongoing clinical trials. We found a wide array of treatment options available for LMD including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy as well as several choices for radiotherapy including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Despite treatment, the prognosis for patients with LMD is dismal, typically 2–4 months on average. Novel therapies and combination approaches are actively under investigation with the aim of improving outcomes and quality of life for patients with LMD. Recent prospective data on the use of proton CSI for patients with LMD have demonstrated its potential survival benefit with follow-up investigations underway. There is a need for validated metrics to predict prognosis and improve patient selection for patients with LMD in order to optimize treatment approaches.

Background: Extracranial metastases occur in <2% of cases of glioblastoma (GBM). When metastases do occur, bone is the most common destination. Herein, we review clinical characteristics of GBM patients with osseous metastases and evaluate both potential risk factors and prognostic significance. Methods: Using an institutional database, we identified and retrospectively analyzed 6 patients with both GBM and osseous metastases. We collected data on patient demographics, tumor genetics, clinical courses, and outcomes. Given the rarity of metastatic GBM, we conducted historical comparisons using previously published literature. Results: Five patients with osseous metastases (83%) were male, with a median age of 46 years at GBM diagnosis (range: 20–84). All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM and 5 (83%) had alterations in TP53 . All patients underwent surgical resection for GBM followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Four patients (67%) received bevacizumab prior to bone metastasis diagnosis. Bone metastases were discovered at a median of 12.2 months (range: 5.3–35.2) after GBM diagnosis and 4.8 months after starting bevacizumab (range: 3.5–13.2). Three patients (50%) received immunotherapy. After osseous metastasis diagnosis, the median survival was 25 days (range: 13–225). Conclusion: In our cohort, most patients were male and young at the time of GBM diagnosis. All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM, and most had alterations in TP53 , which may be important for osseous metastasis. Most patients received bevacizumab, which has been associated with earlier metastasis. Osseous metastases of GBM occur and portend a dismal prognosis in an already aggressive malignancy.