Caron, S.

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare autosomal-dominant hereditary disease associated with tumors in multiple organs. VHL is characterized by mutation of the VHL gene which leads to accumulation of HIF-α and the engagement of hypoxia-sensitive genes with oncogenic effects. Conventional management of VHL-associated tumors involves surgical resection and radiation therapy. Belzutifan is an oral selective inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2a). Belzutifan was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2021 as a targeted therapy option for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Our objective here is to report on our clinical experience with use of belzutifan for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively chart reviewed our institutional (Mayo Clinic Rochester) experience of belzutifan in adults (18 years or older) with VHL and craniospinal hemangioblastomas not amenable to surgery. The study period was October 2021 to March 2024. RESULTS Nine adults (5 female, 4 male) were included in the study. Of those able to continue the therapy without interruption (6 patients), the median duration of therapy at last follow-up was 11.5 months (range 3-22 months). Seven had radiographic response to therapy after a median of 3 months (1-5 months), with a maximal response to therapy after a median of 13 months (3-29 months). One patient had a mixed radiographic response, and 1 patient had tumor progression while on belzutifan noted at 5 months. The most common adverse effect was fatigue. Seven patients reported fatigue, 4 patients experienced anemia, and 2 experienced hypoxia. Three patients discontinued belzutifan due to adverse effects, specifically fatigue and hypoxia. One patient had to take multiple medication pauses, once due to seizure and once due to kidney injury, but resumed treatment with dose reduction. CONCLUSION Among patients with VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, belzutifan is often well-tolerated and associated with durable radiographic responses. Toxicity profile among our patients was similar to that encountered in the clinical trial leading to FDA approval of the agent. These findings provide real-world data supporting continued use of belzutifan in this patient population, with an awareness of potential adverse reactions. Future studies should assess continued radiographic response, sex differences, duration of treatment, and effects of cessation after long-term use.

Abstract BACKGROUND Although glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, extracranial metastasis is rare, occurring in <2% of cases. This rarity has been attributed to the blood brain barrier, immunologic factors, lack of traditional lymphatics in the brain, and the poor prognosis of GBM, limiting its opportunity to metastasize. When GBM does metastasize, bone is the most common destination. GBM may spread hematogenously to bone, especially to vertebral bodies via the surrounding venous plexus. In this single-institution study, we review the clinical characteristics of GBM patients with osseous metastases and evaluate potential risk factors and prognostic significance. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using an institutional database, we identified and retrospectively analyzed 6 GBM patients with osseous metastases and studied their demographics, tumor genetics, clinical courses, and outcomes. RESULTS Five of 6 (83%) GBM patients with osseous metastases were male, with a median age of 46 years at GBM diagnosis (range: 20-84). All patients had IDH wild type and MGMT unmethylated GBM with mutations in TP53. Two patients (33%) were initially diagnosed with gliosarcoma. All patients were treated with surgical resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Five patients (83%) received bevacizumab for vasogenic edema (n=4) or intracranial tumor progression (n=1) prior to bone metastasis diagnosis. Bone metastases were diagnosed a median of 12.2 months (range: 5.3-35.2) after GBM diagnosis and 4.8 months after starting bevacizumab (range: 3.5-13.2). Two patients (33%) received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and two patients (33%) received tumor-treating fields prior to bone metastasis discovery. Bone metastases were symptomatic in 2 patients, presenting with back pain (n=1) and leg weakness and urinary incontinence (n=1). Three patients (50%) had concurrent metastases to other organs. Osseous metastases were biopsy-confirmed in 3 (50%) cases, while the other 3 patients had no known alternative malignancy to explain their bone metastases. After osseous metastasis discovery, the median survival was 27 days (range: 13-225). CONCLUSION Most of our GBM patients with osseous metastases were male and most, but not all, were young at GBM diagnosis. Tumor genetics common to all patients included IDH wild type, MGMT unmethylated status, and TP53 mutation, which may be important for osseous metastasis. Most patients received bevacizumab, which may be associated with earlier metastasis. While rare, metastatic GBM should be within the differential for GBM patients with bone pain or progressive neurologic symptoms, as osseous metastases portend a dismal prognosis in an already aggressive malignancy.