Kharbanda, Anupam B.

OBJECTIVES The 2-bag intravenous (IV) fluid system for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has been associated with shorter duration of insulin and faster resolution of acidosis. Our aims were to increase the use of 2-bag IV fluids among children with medium- or high-risk DKA treated at 2 tertiary care pediatric hospitals and to increase the proportion of children who receive timely administration of fluid and insulin treatments. METHODS We conducted a quality improvement initiative using data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, among patients 21 years or younger with medium- or high-risk DKA. The study spanned pre- and post-initiative periods and a stability period. Our interventions included development of a clinical practice guideline, education, and electronic medical record updates. Statistical process control methods were used to evaluate outcome changes. RESULTS We identified 876 eligible encounters. Age, sex, and the proportion of children with medium- or high-risk DKA were similar across study periods. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic Black children was observed in the stability period (26.3%) than the pre- (17.7%) and post-initiative (18.2%) periods. We observed an increase in 2-bag IV fluid use from an average of 41.3% to 77.7%. We did not observe changes in time to isotonic fluid bolus, continuous insulin, or 2-bag IV fluids. There was no change in hypoglycemic events. CONCLUSION We increased the proportion of children with medium- or high-risk DKA treated with 2-bag IV fluids through a combination of interventions, including implementation and refinement of a clinical guideline, creation of a nurse algorithm, and nursing education.

Abstract Using vaccine data combined with electronic health records, we report that mRNA boosters provide greater protection than a 2-dose regimen against SARS-CoV-2 infection and related hospitalizations. The benefit of a booster was more evident in the elderly and those with comorbidities.

AbstractObjectiveTo test the hypotheses that use of the Head CT Choice decision aid would be similarly effective in all parent/patient dyads but parents with high (vs low) numeracy experience a greater increase in knowledge while those with low (vs high) health literacy experience a greater increase in trust.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial conducted at seven sites. One hundred seventy‐two clinicians caring for 971 children at intermediate risk for clinically important traumatic brain injuries were randomized to shared decision making facilitated by the DA (n = 493) or to usual care (n = 478). We assessed for subgroup effects based on patient and parent characteristics, including socioeconomic status (health literacy, numeracy and income). We tested for interactions using regression models with indicators for arm assignment and study site.ResultsThe decision aid did not increase knowledge more in parents with high numeracy (P for interaction [Pint] = 0.14) or physician trust more in parents with low health literacy (Pint = 0.34). The decision aid decreased decisional conflict more in non‐white parents (decisional conflict scale, −8.14, 95% CI: −12.33 to −3.95; Pint = 0.05) and increased physician trust more in socioeconomically disadvantaged parents (trust in physician scale, OR: 8.59, 95% CI: 2.35‐14.83; Pint = 0.04).ConclusionsUse of the Head CT Choice decision aid resulted in less decisional conflict in non‐white parents and greater physician trust in socioeconomically disadvantaged parents. Decision aids may be particularly effective in potentially vulnerable parents.