Back to Authors

Gärtner, Fania R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0351-0204

Mayo Clinic

Leiden University Medical Center

Citations 2

Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes
Kunneman, Marleen , Henselmans, Inge , Gärtner, Fania R. , Bomhof‐Roordink, Hanna , Pieterse, Arwen H.

Medical Decision Making | September 26, 2019 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 886-893

10.1177/0272989x19874347 Get It

Background. There is a growing need for valid shared decision-making (SDM) measures. We aimed to determine whether the items of extant SDM observer-based coding schemes assess the 4 key elements of SDM. Methods. Items of SDM coding schemes were extracted and categorized. Except for the 4 key elements of SDM (fostering choice awareness, informing about options, discussing patient preferences, and making a decision), (sub)categories were created inductively. Two researchers categorized items independently and in duplicate. Results. Five of 12 coding schemes assessed all 4 SDM elements. Seven schemes did not measure “fostering choice awareness,” and 3 did not measure “discussing patient preferences.” Seventy of 194 items (36%) could not be classified into one of the key SDM elements. Items assessing key SDM elements most often assessed “informing about options” ( n = 57/124, 46%). Conclusion. Extant SDM coding schemes often do not assess all key SDM elements and have a strong focus on information provision while other crucial elements of SDM are underrepresented. Caution is therefore needed in reporting and interpreting the resulting SDM scores.
Commentary on “The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer”
Kunneman, Marleen , Gärtner, Fania R. , Hargraves, Ian , Montori, Víctor M.

Journal of Argumentation in Context | October 12, 2018 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 204-208

10.1075/jaic.18021.kun Get It