Steinbacher, Derek M.

Background: Patients with Crouzon syndrome develop various types of anatomic deformities due to different forms of craniosynostosis, yet they have similar craniofacial characteristics. However, exact homology is not evident. Different pathology then may be best treated by different forms of surgical technique. Therefore, precise classification of Crouzon syndrome, based on individual patterns of cranial suture involvement is needed. Methods: Ninety-five computed tomography (CT) scans (Crouzon, n = 33; control, n = 62) were included in this study. All the CT scans are divided into 4 types based on premature closure of sutures: class I = coronal and lambdoidal synostosis; class II = sagittal synostosis; class III = pansynostosis; and class IV = “Others.” The CT scan anatomy was measured by Materialise software. Results: The class III, pansynostosis, is the most prevalent (63.6%). The classes I, III, and IV of Crouzon have significantly shortened entire anteroposterior cranial base length, with the shortest base length in class III. The external cranial measurements in class I show primarily a decreased posterior facial skeleton, while the class III presented with holistic facial skeleton reduction. Class II has the least severe craniofacial malformations, while class III had the most severe. Conclusion: The morphology of patients with Crouzon syndrome is not identical in both cranial base and facial characteristics, especially when they associated with different subtypes of cranial suture synostosis. The classification of Crouzon syndrome proposed in this study, summarizes the differences among each subgroup of craniosynostosis suture involvement, which, theoretically, may ultimately influence both the timing and type of surgical intervention.

Background: Based on an established classification system of Crouzon syndrome subtypes, detailed regional morphology and volume analysis may be useful, to clarify Crouzon cranial structure characteristics, and the interaction between suture fusion and gene regulated overall growth of the calvarium and basicranium. Methods: CT scans of 36 unoperated Crouzon syndrome patients and 56 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; type II. Sagittal synostosis; type III. Pansynostosis; type IV. Perpendicular combination synostosis. Results: Type I of Crouzon syndrome patients developed a slightly smaller posterior fossa (22%), and increased superior cranial volume (13%), which is the only subtype that develops a greater superior cranial volume. The effect of competing increased and decreased segmental volume is associated with a 24% enlargement of overall cranial volume (P = 0.321). In class III, the anterior fossa volume was increased by 31% (P = 0.007), while the volume of posterior fossa was decreased by 19% (P < 0.001). These resulted in a 7% (P = 0.046) reduction in the overall intracranial volume. Type II and type IV patients developed a trend toward anterior, middle, and posterior fossae, and entire cranial volume reduction. Conclusions: Pansynostosis is the most often form of associated craniosynostoses of Crouzon syndrome, however bilateral coronal synostosis may not dominate this form of Crouzon syndrome. The anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae may have simultaneously reduced volume if the midline suture synostosis is involved. Individualized treatment planning for Crouzon syndrome patient, theoretically should include the patient's age and temporal associated maldevelopment suture sequence.

Background: Based on an established classification system of Apert syndrome subtypes, detailed regional morphology and volume analysis may be useful to provide additional clarification to individual Apert cranial structure characteristics, and treatment planning. Methods: Computed tomography scans of 32 unoperated Apert syndrome and 50 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, pansynostosis; type III, perpendicular combination synostosis. Three-dimensional analysis of craniometric points was used to define structural components using Materialise Mimics and 3-Matics software. Results: Occipitofrontal circumference of all subtypes of Apert syndrome patients is normal. Intracranial volumes of types I and II were normal, but type III was 20% greater than controls. Middle cranial fossa volume was increased in all 3 types, with the greatest increase in type II (86%). Type II developed a 69% increase in anterior cranial fossa volume, whereas type III had 39% greater posterior cranial fossa volume. Increased cranial fossa depth contributed most to above increased volume. The anteroposterior lengths of middle and posterior cranial fossae were reduced in type I (15% and 17%, respectively). However, only the anterior cranial fossa was significantly shortened in type III. Conclusions: Occipitofrontal circumference and overall intracranial volume is not always consistent in individual subunits of Apert syndrome. Detailed and segmental anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae volumes and morphology should be analyzed to see what impact this may have related to surgical planning.

Background: Considerable craniofacial features of Crouzon syndrome are attributed to the dysmorphology of the cranial base. As cephalometric studies have focused mainly on the facial deformity, rather than the cranial base, the underlying cause of deformity is not as well understood. Therefore, the authors compared the cranial base development of Crouzon syndrome to controls to trace the timing of deformity in the cranial base and face, to analyze their temporal correlation. Methods: Ninety computed tomographic scans were included (Crouzon, n = 36; controls, n = 54) and divided into five age subgroups. Craniofacial cephalometric measurements were analyzed by Materialise software. Results: The overall cranial base length in Crouzon syndrome compared with controls decreased 8 percent (p = 0.014) on average. The posterior cranial fossa shortening accounted for most of this reduction. The cranial base displaced with the distances from basion, sella, and ethmosphenoid to posterior nasal spine shortened by 21%, 18%, and 16%, respectively (all p < 0.01) during life. Although the cranial base angle on intracranial surface remains normal, the angles on facial surface narrowed were reduced. Conclusions: The cranial base deformity of Crouzon syndrome consists of the whole skull base and particularly anterior skull base shortening early, leading to a compensatory widened anterior skull base. However, when this widening did not compensate fully for the rapid enlargement of the brain, the posterior skull base displaced inferiorly and became kyphotic. The cranial base deformity develops sequentially anterior to posterior in a probable cascade of influence pattern. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Background: Apert syndrome is frequently combined with respiratory insufficiency, because of the midfacial deformity which, in turn, is influenced by the malformation of the skull base. Respiratory impairment resulting from Apert syndrome is caused by multilevel limitations in airway space. Therefore, this study evaluated the segmented nasopharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal anatomy to clarify subcranial anatomy in children with Apert syndrome and its relevance to clinical management. Methods: Twenty-seven patients (Apert syndrome, n = 10; control, n = 17) were included. All of the computed tomographic scans were obtained from the patients preoperatively, and no patient had confounding disease comorbidity. Computed tomographic scans were analyzed using Surgicase CMF. Craniometric data relating to the midface, airway, and subcranial structures were collected. Statistical significance was determined using t test analysis. Results: Although all of the nasal measurements were consistent with those of the controls, the nasion-to–posterior nasal spine, sphenethmoid-to–posterior nasal spine, sella-to–posterior nasal spine, and basion-to–posterior nasal spine distances were decreased 20 (p < 0.001), 23 (p = 0.001), 29 (p < 0.001), and 22 percent (p < 0.001), respectively. The distance between bilateral gonions and condylions was decreased 17 (p = 0.017) and 18 percent (p = 0.004), respectively. The pharyngeal airway volume was reduced by 40 percent (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The airway compromise seen in patients with Apert syndrome is attributable more to the pharyngeal region than to the nasal cavity, with a gradually worsening trend from the anterior to the posterior airway, resulting in a significantly reduced volume in the hypopharynx.

Background: The morphologic effect of squamosal synostosis has not been clarified, due to its low occurrence rate, and its inclination to be combined with premature closure of other major sutures, especially in syndromic synostosis. This study's goal is to explore the morphological influence of squamosal synostosis in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients. Methods: Twenty-five computed tomography (CT) scans from nonsyndromic squamosal synostosis (NSS), Crouzon syndrome with squamosal synostosis (CSS), Crouzon syndrome without squamosal synostosis, and normal controls were included. Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometry, entire cranial volume and cranial fossa volume were measured using Materialise software. Results: The entire cranial volume of all groups was similar. The NSS developed a gradual reduction in the severity of reduced segmental volume from the anterior cranial fossa, to the middle cranial fossa, and to the unaffected volume of posterior cranial fossa. The CSS developed the most severe volume reduction of middle cranial fossa (12608.30 ± 2408.61 mm3 vs 26077.96 ± 4465.74 mm3, 52%), with proportionate volume reduction of the anterior (7312.21 ± 2435.97 mm3 vs 10520.63 ± 2400.43 mm3, 30%) and posterior cranial fossa (33487.29 ± 5598.93 mm3 vs 48325.04 ± 14700.44 mm3, 31%). The NSS developed a narrower anterior cranial fossa, a clockwise rotated Frankfort horizontal plane, and a retracted chin (pogonion). Conclusion: Squamosal synostosis may alter the development of cranial fossa volume, especially the volume of middle cranial fossa. However, the development of cranial base, and related facial features are determined largely by major vault sutures and associated syndromic conditions, rather than the squamosal suture alone. Level of Evidence: II

Background From infancy to adulthood, the mandible develops increased ramus height, prominence of the chin, and laterally widened gonial angles. In Crouzon and Apert syndromes, both relative retrognathia and prognathic jaws have been reported. Growth is influenced by a variety of factors, including the growth and relative position of the skull base, functional coordination, and the spatial influence of the laryngopharynx. Thus, this study aimed to explore in detail the evolution of the mandible in both syndromes and its relationship with the entire facial structure and skull base. Methods One hundred twenty-three preoperative computed tomographic scans (Crouzon, n = 36; Apert, n = 33; control, n = 54) were included and divided into 5 age subgroups. Computed tomographic scans were measured using Materialise software. Cephalometrics relating to the mandible, facial structures, and cranial base were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using t test and statistical power analysis. Results In Crouzon syndrome, the angle between the cranial base and gnathion was increased prior to 6 months of age by 10.29 degrees (P < 0.001) and by adulthood to 11.95 degrees (P = 0.003) compared with normal. After 6 months of age, the distance between bilateral mandibular condylions (COR-COL) was narrower by 15% (P < 0.001) in Crouzon syndrome compared with control subjects. Before 6 months of age, Apert COR-COL decreased 16% (P < 0.001) compared with control subjects and 13% (P = 0.006) narrower than Crouzon. During 2 to 6 years of age, Apert mandibular ramus height caught up to, and became longer than, Crouzon by 12% (P = 0.011). The nasion-sella-articulare angle of the Apert skull was 5.04 degrees (P < 0.001) less than Crouzon overall. Conclusions In Crouzon syndrome, the changes of the spatial relationship of the mandible to the cranial base develop earlier than the mandibular shape deformity, whereas in Apert syndrome, the spatial and morphological changes are synchronous. The morphological changes of the mandible are disproportional in 3 directions, initially significant shortening of the mandibular width and length, and, subsequently, reduced height. Crouzon has more shortening in mandibular height compared with Apert, reflecting the more shortened posterior cranial base length. The narrowed angle between the mandible and the posterior cranial base in Apert skulls is consistent with the more limited nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airway space.

Background: Apert syndrome patients are different in clinical pathology, including obstructive sleep apnea, cleft palate, and mental deficiency. These functional deficiencies may be due to anatomic deformities, which may be caused by different forms of associated suture fusion. Therefore, a classification system of Apert syndrome based on the type of craniosynostosis pattern might be helpful in determining treatment choices. Methods: CT scans of 31 unoperated Apert syndrome and 51 controls were included and subgrouped as: class I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; class II. Pansynostosis; and class III. Perpendicular combination synostosis: a. unilateral coronal and metopic synostosis; b. sagittal with bilateral/unilateral lambdoid synostosis; and c. others. Results: Class I is the most common (55%) subtype. The cranial base angulation of class I was normal; however, the cranial base angulation on the cranium side of the skull in class II increased 12.16 degrees (P = 0.006), whereas the facial side cranial base angle of class IIIa decreased 4.31 degrees (P = 0.035) over time. The external cranial base linear measurements of class I showed more evident reduction in anterior craniofacial structures than posterior, whereas other subtypes developed more severe shortening in the posterior aspects. Conclusions: Bicoronal synostosis is the most common subtype of Apert syndrome with the normalized cranial base angulation. Combined pansynostosis patients have flatter cranial base, whereas the combined unilateral coronal synostosis have a kyphotic cranial base. Class I has more significant nasopharyngeal airway compromise in a vertical direction, whereas classes II and III have more limited oropharyngeal space.