Vutthikraivit, Wasawat

Background: Revascularization of small vessel coronary artery disease (SvCAD) is still challenging despite the extensive use of drug-eluting stents (DESs), mainly because of an increase in target vessel failure. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has emerged as an alternative strategy in SvCAD. However, the safety and efficacy of DCB in SvCAD is still controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of DCB and DES in SvCAD patients. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2024. Included studies were published randomized control trials (RCTs) that compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and target-vessel revascularization (TVR) between DCB and DES in SvCAD patients. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis involving 1,534 SvCAD patients (775 underwent revascularization with DCB and 759 with DES). There was no difference in MACE, TLR, and TVR between DCB and DES groups ([OR] 1.14, 95% CI 0.64-2.00, I 2 =58.2%, p=0.657, [OR] 1.34, 95% CI 0.56-3.23, I 2 =48.5%, p=0.516, and [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 0.59-2.01, I 2 =49.6%, p=0.795, respectively) (Figure 1). There was no publication bias observed in Funnel plot as well as no small-study effect observed in Egger’s test. Conclusions: As compared to DES, our study showed that DCB was associated with similar clinical outcomes and could be a potential alternative strategy in SvCAD patients.

Introduction: Chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) management remains a challenge. Several studies have reported the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in CTO. However, the outcomes of PCI vs optimal medical therapy (OMT) are still controversial. We conducted an extensive review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes between PCI and OMT in CTO. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2024. Included studies were published cohort (prospective or retrospective) with propensity score matching analysis and randomized trials that reported all-cause death, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI) with PCI and OMT in CTO patients. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Sixteen studies, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 11 observational studies with propensity score with matching (PSMs), were included in this meta-analysis involving 8,316 CTO patients (4,332 underwent PCI and 4,084 received OMT). In the overall analysis, all-cause death, cardiac death, and MI were significantly reduced in PCI compared to OMT group, respectively ([OR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, I 2 =0.0%, p<0.001, [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.74, I 2 =0.0%, p<0.001, and [OR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, I 2 =19.0%, p=0.041). Conclusions: Our study is the most updated meta-analysis to assess the impact of PCI compared to OMT in patients with CTO, analyzing the data being derived from PSMs and RCTs, that demonstrated significant impact of PCI on all-cause death, cardiac mortality, and MI.

AbstractIntroductionBrugada syndrome is an inherited arrhythmic disease associated with major arrhythmic events (MAE). The importance of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome is well recognized; however, ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification remains challenging and controversial. We aimed to assess the association of type of syncope with MAE via systematic review and meta‐analysis.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2021. Included studies were cohort (prospective or retrospective) studies that reported the types of syncope (cardiac, unexplained, vasovagal, and undifferentiated) and MAE. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsSeventeen studies from 2005 to 2019 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 4355 Brugada syndrome patients. Overall, syncope was significantly associated with an increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 2.22–6.85, p < .001, I2 = 76.0%). By syncope type, cardiac (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.87–7.01, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%) and unexplained (OR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.34–16.57, p = .016, I2 = 37.3%) syncope was significantly associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome. Vasovagal (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 0.09–98.45, p = .554, I2 = 70.9%) and undifferentiated syncope (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.00–4.03, p = .050, I2 = 64.6%, respectively) were not.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that cardiac and unexplained syncope was associated with MAE risk in Brugada syndrome populations but not in vasovagal syncope and undifferentiated syncope. Unexplained syncope is associated with a similar increased risk of MAE compared to cardiac syncope.

AbstractIntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a high stroke and mortality rate. The video‐assisted thoracoscopic radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation is a treatment option for patients who fail catheter ablation. Randomized data comparing surgical versus catheter ablation are limited. We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized control trials to explore the outcome efficacy between surgical and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation in patients with AF.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2020. Included studies were published randomized control trials that compared video‐assisted thoracoscopic and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation. Data from each study were combined using the fixed‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian, and Laird to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsSix studies from November 2013 to 2020 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 511 AF patients (79% paroxysmal) with 263 catheter ablation (mean age 56 ± 3 years) and 248 surgical ablations (mean age 52 ± 4 years). Catheter ablation was associated with increased atrial arrhythmias recurrence when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.44−2.39, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%) but associated with less total major adverse events (pooled relative risk = 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.16−0.53, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%). In subgroup analysis, catheter ablation was associated with increased AF recurrence in refractory paroxysmal AF when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.31−4.65, p = .005, I2 = 0.0%) but not in persistent AF (relative risk = 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.60−2.0, p = .773).ConclusionCatheter ablation was associated with higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence when compared with surgical ablation. However, our study suggests that the benefit of surgical ablation in patients with persistent AF is unclear. More studies and alternative ablation strategies investigation in persistent AF are warranted.

Background Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with major arrhythmic events (MAEs). The presence of a positive family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) as a risk predictor of MAE remains controversial. We aimed to examine the association between family history of SCD and MAEs stratified by age of SCD with a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods and Results We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1992 to January 2020. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects model. Fitted metaregression was performed to evaluate the association between the age of SCD in families and the risk of MAE. Twenty‐two studies from 2004 to 2019 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 3386 patients with Brugada syndrome. The overall family history of SCD was not associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.51; P =0.489, I 2 =45.0%). However, a history of SCD in family members of age younger than 40 years of age did increase the risk of MAE by ≈2‐fold (pooled OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.11–3.73; P =0.022, I 2 =0.0%). When stratified by the age of cut point at 50, 45, 40, and 35 years old, a history of SCD in younger family member was significantly associated with a higher risk of MAE (pooled OR, 0.49, 1.30, 1.51, and 2.97, respectively; P =0.046). Conclusions A history of SCD among family members of age younger than 40 years was associated with a higher risk of MAE.

Introduction: Drug challenge testing is performed to unmask Type-1 Brugada pattern. The safety and prevalence of its complications during the test are unclear. We aimed to assess the relation of complications in patients with positive and negative results by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypothesis: The prevalence of arrhythmic complications is higher in patients with positive drug challenge testing. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2020. Included studies were cohort studies that reported ventricular arrhythmia that required interventions (VAI) (sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT], polymorphic VT, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] shock, or sudden cardiac arrest) and ventricular arrhythmias that did not required interventions (VANI) (premature ventricular complexes and non-sustained VT) during drug challenge testing. Data were combined using the random-effects model. Results: Thirteen studies involving 2,688 patients (62.7% positive) were included. The overall prevalence of VAI and VANI were 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-5.7) and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1-0.9), respectively. VAI were more common in positive when compared to negative test result patients (1.5% [95% CI: 0.6-2.4] and 0%, respectively) but the prevalence of VANI were similar (2.7% [95% CI: 0.8-4.6] and 2.6% [95% CI: 0.8-4.6], respectively). VAI in positive result patients were more common with flecainide followed by pilsicainide and ajmaline (2.4% [95% CI: -4.3 to 9.2], 2.2% [95% CI: 0.5-4.0], and 1.5% [95% CI: 0.6 to 2.4], respectively). Most of patients with VAI during drug challenge testing underwent ICD implantation (94%). VAI during drug challenge testing in positive result patients carries an increased risk of VAI during 8.6 ± 4.9 years follow-up (odds ratio 3.73, 95% CI: 1.77-7.86, p=0.001). Conclusions: VAI were more common in patients with positive drug challenge testing, more often occurring with positive flecainide challenge, and carries an increased risk of VAI over long-term follow-up in patients with positive drug challenge testing.

Background: Although high power, shorter duration (HPSD) ablation and low power, longer duration (LPLD) ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently advocated to enhance safety and efficacy, there exists a need for comparative data from large populations. We performed a meta-analysis to compare arrhythmia-free survival, procedure time and complications rates between the two strategies. Methods: We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to April 2020. Included studies were case-control studies, cohort studies, or randomized controlled trials that compared patients undergoing HPSD and LPLD strategies for AF ablation and reported either of the following outcomes: freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) including AF and atrial flutter, procedure time, or periprocedural complications. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Ten studies from 2006 to 2020 involving 2,189 patients were included (1,350 patients underwent HPSD strategy and 839 patients underwent LPLD strategy). Both HPSD and LPLD strategies resulted in a similar freedom from AT at 12-month follow-up (OR=1.36, 95% CI:0.91-2.04, p=0.13, Figure 1A). HPSD strategy did result in a significant reduction in total procedure time (WMD=47.34, 95% CI:29.47-65.21, p<0.001, Figure 1B) compared to LPSD. HPSD wasn’t associated with reduction in esophageal ulcer/arterioesophageal fistula (OR=0.35, 95%CI=0.12-1.06, p=0.06) or pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade (OR=0.96, 95%CI: 0.24-3.79, p=0.95) Conclusions: In this large meta-analysis both LPLD and HPSD are equally effective and safe. Although HPSD is often advocated to reduce esophageal injury, risk was similar between approaches. However, HPSD strategy significantly lowers procedure times.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) especially from arteriovenous malformations (AVM) remains one of the devastating complications following continuous-flow left ventricular device (CF-LVAD) implantation. Blockade of angiotensin II pathway using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) was reported to mitigate the risk of GIB and AVM-related GIB by suppressing angiogenesis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between ACEI/ARB treatment and GIB in CF-LVAD population. Comprehensive literature search was performed through December 2019. We included studies reporting risk of GIB and/or AVM-related GIB events in LVAD patients who received ACEI/ARB with those who did not. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects to calculate odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Three retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis involving 619 LVADs patients (467 patients receiving ACEI/ARB). The use of ACEI/ARB was statistically associated with decreased incidence of overall GIB (pooled OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22–0.56, I 2 = 0.0%, p < 0.001). There was a non-significant trend toward lower risk for AVM-related GIB in patients who received ACEI/ARB (pooled OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19–1.07, I 2 = 51%, p = 0.07). Larger studies with specific definitions of ACEI/ARB use and GIB are warranted to accurately determine the potential non-hemodynamic benefits of ACEI/ARB in CF-LVAD patients.

AbstractIntroductionBrugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification is challenging, as major arrhythmic events (MAEs) are rare. We assessed the utility of drug challenge testing in BrS by a systematic review and meta‐analysis.Methods and ResultsWe comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2019. Included studies compared the incidence of MAE between spontaneous and drug challenge–induced Type 1. Mixed‐effects Poisson regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR). Eighteen studies from 2006 to 2018 were included (4099 patients, mean follow‐up: 4.5 years). Pooled annual incidences of MAE in spontaneous, drug challenge induced (regardless of symptoms), asymptomatic drug challenge induced, and symptomatic drug challenge–induced Type 1 were 23.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8–27.8), 6.5 (95% CI: 3.9–9.1), 2.1 (95% CI: −0.3 to 4.4), and 19.6 (95% CI: 9.9–29.3) per 1000 person‐years, respectively. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was not statistically different (IRR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.6–1.7).ConclusionsThe incidence of MAE in drug challenge–induced Type 1 in asymptomatic patients is low. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type 1 was similar.

Introduction: Brugada syndrome is associated with ventricular arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification is challenging, as major arrhythmic events (MAE) are rare. We assessed the utility of drug challenge testing in Brugada syndrome by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods and results: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2019. Included studies compared the incidence of MAE between spontaneous and drug challenge induced Type-1. Data were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method, to calculate pooled incidence and odds ratio (OR). Mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to calculated incidence rate ratio (IRR). Eighteen studies from 2006 to 2018 were included (4,099 patients, mean follow-up 4.5 years). Pooled annual incidences of MAE in spontaneous, drug challenge induced (regardless of symptoms), asymptomatic drug challenge induced, and symptomatic drug challenge induced Type-1 were 23.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.8-27.8), 6.5 (95% CI: 3.9-9.1), 2.1 (95% CI: -0.3-4.4), and 19.6 (95% CI: 9.9-29.3) per 1,000 person-years respectively. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type-1 was not statistically different (IRR=1.0, 95%CI: 0.6-1.7). The presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia during drug challenge testing was a predictor of MAE (OR=3.73, 95% CI: 1.77-7.86, p=0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of MAE in drug challenge induced Type-1 in asymptomatic patients is low. The incidence of MAE between symptomatic drug challenge induced and asymptomatic spontaneous Type-1 was similar. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia during drug challenge testing could be a useful risk marker for MAE in Brugada syndrome.