Ko, Nway L. Ko

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic Background/Introduction Syncope is a common presentation in heart failure (HF) patients. However, the associations between syncope and prognosis in HF patients with the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) have not been demonstrated. It is unclear whether syncope increases all-cause mortality in HF patients with CIED. Purpose We aimed to examine the association between syncope and all-cause mortality in the largest cohort of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mid-ranged ejection fraction (HFmEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients with and without CIED. Methods A retrospective cohort of patients with HF and syncope at our hospital between 2010 and 2015 were identified, and 1:1 propensity was matched with a control group of HF patients without syncope. A chart review was conducted. The multivariate Cox regression model was applied to estimate the association between syncope and the all-cause mortality endpoint. Results 3,449 HF patients were diagnosed with syncope (mean age, 72.8±14.5 years; 41.5% women), and the propensity-matched control HF patients without syncope (n=3,449) aged 72.8±14.3 years, and 42.5% women were selected. Cardiac implantable electronic devices were implanted more in HF patients with syncope (32.5% versus 13.7%, p<0.001). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were implanted more in HF patients with syncope (15.6% versus 8.3%, p<0.001) as well as pacemakers (16.9% versus 7.5%, p<0.001) and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (6.9% versus 4.8%, p=0.015). Among HF patients with CIED, syncope significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients (hazard ratio [HR]=1.479, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.197-1.828, p<0.001) but not in HFpEF (HR=0.980, 95%CI: 0.793-1.210, p=0.849)(Figure 1). Syncope also tended to increase the risk of all-cause mortality in HFmEF patients with CIED but was not significant (HR=1.193, 95%CI: 0.762-1.865, p=0.762)(Figure 1). Among HF patients without CIED, syncope did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality in HFrEF (HR=0.923, 95%CI: 0.806-1.057, p=0.247), HFmEF (HR=1.074, 95%CI: 0.848-1.360, p=0.554), or HFpEF (HR=0.964, 95%CI: 0.883-1.052, p=0.406). Conclusions Syncope significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients but not in HFmEF or HFpEF patients with CIED. The association of syncope and increased mortality in HFrEF patients with CIED suggests that syncope may be a marker and a factor of mortality and warrants further investigation.

AbstractIntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a high stroke and mortality rate. The video‐assisted thoracoscopic radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation is a treatment option for patients who fail catheter ablation. Randomized data comparing surgical versus catheter ablation are limited. We performed a meta‐analysis of randomized control trials to explore the outcome efficacy between surgical and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation in patients with AF.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2020. Included studies were published randomized control trials that compared video‐assisted thoracoscopic and catheter radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation. Data from each study were combined using the fixed‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian, and Laird to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.ResultsSix studies from November 2013 to 2020 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 511 AF patients (79% paroxysmal) with 263 catheter ablation (mean age 56 ± 3 years) and 248 surgical ablations (mean age 52 ± 4 years). Catheter ablation was associated with increased atrial arrhythmias recurrence when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.44−2.39, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%) but associated with less total major adverse events (pooled relative risk = 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.16−0.53, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%). In subgroup analysis, catheter ablation was associated with increased AF recurrence in refractory paroxysmal AF when compared to surgical ablation (pooled relative risk = 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.31−4.65, p = .005, I2 = 0.0%) but not in persistent AF (relative risk = 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.60−2.0, p = .773).ConclusionCatheter ablation was associated with higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence when compared with surgical ablation. However, our study suggests that the benefit of surgical ablation in patients with persistent AF is unclear. More studies and alternative ablation strategies investigation in persistent AF are warranted.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The prevalence of Type-1 Brugada pattern in Caucasians and Asians have been estimated to be 20 and 180 per 100,000. However, the prevalence of Type-1 Brugada pattern in African Americans has never been studied. Purpose This study aims to identify the prevalence of Type-1 Brugada pattern in African Americans. Methods Medical records of African American patients ages 18 years old or older with at least one 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at 16 hospitals from 5 states in a single healthcare system between January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020 were included. The search engine software was used to identify patients with keywords (Brugada pattern, Brugada ECG, Brugada Type-1, or Brugada syndrome) documented in the electronic medical record. The 12-lead ECGs were retrospectively analyzed by 2 cardiologists. Any inconsistencies were reviewed by a third cardiac electrophysiologist. Type-1 Brugada pattern was diagnosed according to the recent Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement. Results Among 43,116 African American patients, (46.9% males), 6 patients (mean age 44.8±13.9 years, 100% males) had Type-1 Brugada pattern documented on at least one 12-lead ECG. The prevalence of Type-1 Brugada pattern in this large patient population of African American was 13.9 per 100,000. None of the patients had major arrhythmic event at 6.7±4.7 years follow-up. Conclusions The prevalence of Type-1 Brugada pattern in African American is lower than Caucasian and Asian populations. The risk of major arrhythmic event of Type-1 Brugada pattern in African American appears to be low; however longer follow-up data is needed.

Background Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac channelopathy associated with major arrhythmic events (MAEs). The presence of a positive family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) as a risk predictor of MAE remains controversial. We aimed to examine the association between family history of SCD and MAEs stratified by age of SCD with a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods and Results We searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1992 to January 2020. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects model. Fitted metaregression was performed to evaluate the association between the age of SCD in families and the risk of MAE. Twenty‐two studies from 2004 to 2019 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 3386 patients with Brugada syndrome. The overall family history of SCD was not associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82–1.51; P =0.489, I 2 =45.0%). However, a history of SCD in family members of age younger than 40 years of age did increase the risk of MAE by ≈2‐fold (pooled OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.11–3.73; P =0.022, I 2 =0.0%). When stratified by the age of cut point at 50, 45, 40, and 35 years old, a history of SCD in younger family member was significantly associated with a higher risk of MAE (pooled OR, 0.49, 1.30, 1.51, and 2.97, respectively; P =0.046). Conclusions A history of SCD among family members of age younger than 40 years was associated with a higher risk of MAE.