Levites, Yona

AbstractIntron retention (IR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of complex diseases such as cancers; its association with Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains unexplored. We performed genome‐wide analysis of IR through integrating genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data of AD subjects and mouse models from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership‐Alzheimer's Disease project. We identified 4535 and 4086 IR events in 2173 human and 1736 mouse genes, respectively. Quantitation of IR enabled the identification of differentially expressed genes that conventional exon‐level approaches did not reveal. There were significant correlations of intron expression within innate immune genes, like HMBOX1, with AD in humans. Peptides with a high probability of translation from intron‐retained mRNAs were identified using mass spectrometry. Further, we established AD‐specific intron expression Quantitative Trait Loci, and identified splicing‐related genes that may regulate IR. Our analysis provides a novel resource for the search for new AD biomarkers and pathological mechanisms.

AbstractBackgroundPathological aging (PA) patients are individuals that are cognitively normal prior to death but have abundant and widespread amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposits. These individuals typically have few cored amyloid deposits with variable levels of diffuse parenchymal deposits and/or vascular deposits. There is little or no inflammatory reaction, neuritic pathology or neurofibrillary tangles in the cortex. Previously, we have shown that total Aβ levels in PA brain lysates were similar to the levels in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain lysates, with overlap in the length of the Aβ peptides that were deposited and no major differences in SDS‐stable Aβ oligomeric assemblies. Despite these similarities, it is unclear whether PA represents a prodromal phase of AD or if the amyloid pathology of PA patients represents a less pathogenic variant. To explore this idea, we examined the seeding capacity of AD and PA brain homogenates to induce Aβ deposition and to secondarily induce tau pathology.MethodWe determined the seeding capacity of two AD, four PA and two control brain homogenates in transgenic mice expressing APPswe/ind with and without Tau‐P301L by intracerebral injection at neonatal day 0. At either 6, 9, 12 or 18 months, we assessed Aβ deposition and neurofibrillary pathology in all 4 genotypes by immunohistochemical and biochemical methods. Furthermore we examined the seeding activity of human AD brain lysates in brain slice cultures from APP/Tau transgenic mice.ResultIn our newborn mouse injections, we observed widespread Aβ seeding as evidenced by accelerated onset of diffuse parenchymal Aβ deposition that was largely proportional to the burden of parenchyma deposits in patient brains. In all cases, high levels of pial deposition were observed and Aβ42 was the predominant peptide deposited. Tau pathology was not induced in any animal, and with the absence of neuritic plaques there was no induction of tau positive neurites.ConclusionThis study provides evidence that the Aβ conformers associated with diffuse Aβ deposits in the brains of cognitively normal individuals possess seeding activities similar to those found in the brains of AD patients. The findings are consistent with the idea that pathological aging is on a continuum with AD.

Abstract Background Self-assembly of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide into aggregates, from small oligomers to amyloid fibrils, is fundamentally linked with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However it is clear that not all forms of Aβ are equally harmful, and that linking a specific aggregate to toxicity also depends on the assays and model systems used [1, 2]. Though a central postulate of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, there remain many gaps in our understanding regarding the links between Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration. Methods In this study, we examined familial mutations of Aβ that increase aggregation and oligomerization, E22G and DE22, and induce cerebral amyloid angiopathy, E22Q and D23N. We also investigated synthetic mutations that stabilize dimerization, S26C, and a phospho-mimetic, S8E, and non-phospho-mimetic, S8A. To that end, we utilized BRI2-Aβ fusion technology and rAAV2/1 based somatic brain transgenesis in mice to selectively express individual mutant Aβ species in vivo. In parallel we generated PhiC31-based transgenic Drosophila melanogaster expressing wild type (WT) and Aβ40 and Aβ42 mutants, fused to the Argos signal peptide to assess the extent of Aβ42-induced toxicity as well as to interrogate the combined effect of different Aβ40 and Aβ42 species.Results When expressed in the mouse brain for 6 months, Aβ42 E22G, Aβ42 E22Q/D23N, and Aβ42WT formed amyloid aggregates consisting of some diffuse material as well as cored plaques, whereas other mutants formed predominantly diffuse amyloid deposits. Moreover, while Aβ40WT showed no distinctive phenotype, Aβ40 E22G and E22Q/D23N formed unique aggregates that accumulated in mouse brains. This is the first evidence that mutant Aβ40 overexpression leads to deposition under certain conditions. Interestingly, we found that mutant Aβ42 E22G, E22Q, and S26C, but not Aβ40, were toxic to the eye of Drosophila. In contrast, flies expressing a copy of Aβ40 (WT or mutants) in addition to Aβ42WT, showed improved phenotypes, suggesting possible protective qualities for Aβ40. Conclusions These studies suggest that while some Aβ40 mutants form unique amyloid aggregates in mouse brains, they do not exacerbate Aβ42 toxicity in Drosophila, which highlights the significance of using different systems for a better understanding of AD pathogenicity and more accurate screening for new potential therapies.

Abstract BackgroundSelf-assembly of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide into aggregates, from small oligomers to amyloid fibrils, is fundamentally linked with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However it is clear that not all forms of Aβ are equally harmful, and that linking a specific aggregate to toxicity also depends on the assays and model systems used [1, 2]. Though a central postulate of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, there remain many gaps in our understanding regarding the links between Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration.MethodsIn this study, we examined familial mutations of Aβ that increase aggregation and oligomerization, E22G and DE22, and induce cerebral amyloid angiopathy, E22Q and D23N. We also investigated synthetic mutations that stabilize dimerization, S26C, and a phospho-mimetic, S8E, and non-phospho-mimetic, S8A. To that end, we utilized BRI2-Aβ fusion technology and rAAV2/1 based somatic brain transgenesis in mice to selectively express individual mutant Aβ species in vivo . In parallel we generated PhiC31-based transgenic Drosophila melanogaster expressing wild type (WT) and Aβ40 and Aβ42 mutants, fused to the Argos signal peptide to assess the extent of Aβ42-induced toxicity as well as to interrogate the combined effect of different Aβ40 and Aβ42 species.ResultsWhen expressed in the mouse brain for 6 months, Aβ42 E22G, Aβ42 E22Q/D23N, and Aβ42WT formed amyloid aggregates consisting of some diffuse material as well as cored plaques, whereas other mutants formed predominantly diffuse amyloid deposits. Moreover, while Aβ40WT showed no distinctive phenotype, Aβ40 E22G and E22Q/D23N formed unique aggregates that accumulated in mouse brains. This is the first evidence that mutant Aβ40 overexpression leads to deposition under certain conditions. Interestingly, we found that mutant Aβ42 E22G, E22Q, and S26C, but not Aβ40, were toxic to the eye of Drosophila . In contrast, flies expressing a copy of Aβ40 (WT or mutants) in addition to Aβ42WT, showed improved phenotypes, suggesting possible protective qualities for Aβ40.ConclusionsThese studies suggest that some Aβ40 mutants form unique amyloid aggregates in mouse brains, despite protecting against Aβ42 toxicity in Drosophila , which highlights the significance of using different systems for a better understanding of AD pathogenicity and more accurate screening for new potential therapies.

Abstract BackgroundSelf-assembly of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide into aggregates, ranging from small oligomers to amyloid fibrils, is fundamentally linked with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However it is clear that not all forms of Aβ are equally harmful, and that linking a specific aggregate to toxicity also depends on the assays and model systems used [1, 2]. Indeed, though a central postulate of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, there remain many gaps in our understanding regarding the links between Aβ deposition and neurodegeneration.MethodsIn this study we utilized BRI2-Aβ fusion technology and rAAV2/1 based somatic brain transgenesis to examine Aβ aggregates that form from selective expression of individual mutant Aβ species in vivo. In parallel we generated PhiC31-based transgenic Drosophila melanogaster expressing WT and mutant Aβ40 and Aβ42, fused to the Argos signal peptide and placed under the GAL4-upstream activation sequence (UAS) expression system in order to assess the extent of Aβ42-induced toxicity as well as to interrogate the combined effect of different forms of Aβ40 and Aβ42 species.ResultsWhen expressed in the mouse brain for 6 months, Aβ42 E22G, Aβ42 E22Q/D23N, and Aβ42 WT formed amyloid aggregates consisting of some diffuse material as well as cored plaques, whereas other mutants formed predominantly diffuse amyloid deposits. Moreover, while Aβ40WT showed no distinctive phenotype, Aβ40 E22G and E22Q/D23N formed unique aggregates that accumulated in mouse brains. This is the first evidence that mutant Aβ40 overexpression leads to deposition under certain conditions. Interestingly, we found that mutant Aβ42 E22G, E22Q, and S26C, but not Aβ40, were toxic to the eye of the flies and exacerbated their behavior. In contrast, flies expressing a copy of Aβ40 (wild type [WT] or mutants) in addition to Aβ42 WT, showed improved phenotypes, suggesting possible protective qualities for Aβ40.ConclusionsThese studies suggest that some Aβ40 mutants form unique amyloid aggregates in mouse brains, despite being protective against Aβ42 toxicity in Drosophila, which highlights the significance of using different systems for a better understanding of AD pathogenicity and more accurate screening for new potential therapies.

It has been challenging to produce ex vivo models of the inclusion pathologies that are hallmark pathologies of many neurodegenerative diseases. Using three-dimensional mouse brain slice cultures (BSCs), we have developed a paradigm that rapidly and robustly recapitulates mature neurofibrillary inclusion and Lewy body formation found in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, respectively. This was achieved by transducing the BSCs with recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) that express α-synuclein or variants of tau. Notably, the tauopathy BSC model enables screening of small molecule therapeutics and tracking of neurodegeneration. More generally, the rAAV BSC “toolkit” enables efficient transduction and transgene expression from neurons, microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, alone or in combination, with transgene expression lasting for many months. These rAAV-based BSC models provide a cost-effective and facile alternative to in vivo studies, and in the future can become a widely adopted methodology to explore physiological and pathological mechanisms related to brain function and dysfunction.

Proinflammatory stimuli, after amyloid β (Aβ) deposition, have been hypothesized to create a self‐reinforcing positive feedback loop that increases amyloidogenic processing of the Aβ precursor protein (APP), promoting further Aβ accumulation and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), a proinflammatory cytokine, has been shown to be increased in AD patients implying a pathological interaction. To assess the effects of IL‐6 on Aβ deposition and APP processing in vivo ,we overexpressed murine IL‐6 (mIL‐6) in the brains of APP transgenic TgCRND8 and TG2576 mice. mIL‐6 expression resulted in extensive gliosis and concurrently attenuated Aβ deposition in TgCRND8 mouse brains. This was accompanied by up‐regulation of glial phagocytic markers in vivo and resulted in enhanced microglia‐mediated phagocytosis of Aβ aggregates in vitro . Further, mIL‐6‐induced neuroinflammation had no effect on APP processing in TgCRND8 and had no effect on APP processing or steady‐state levels of Aβ in young Tg2576 mice. These results indicate that mIL‐6‐mediated reactive gliosis may be beneficial early in the disease process by potentially enhancing Aβ plaque clearance rather than mediating a neurotoxic feedback loop that exacerbates amyloid pathology. This is the first study that methodically dissects the contribution of mIL‐6 with regard to its potential role in modulating Aβ deposition in vivo .—Chakrabarty, P., Jansen‐West, K., Beccard, A., Ceballos‐Diaz, C., Levites, Y., Verbeeck, C., Zubair, A. C., Dickson, D., Golde, T. E., Das, P. Massive gliosis induced by interleukin‐6 suppresses Aβ deposition in vivo: evidence against inflammation as a driving force for amyloid deposition. FASEB J . 24, 548–559 (2010). www.fasebj.org