Murray, Melissa E.

AbstractTo examine the length of a hexanucleotide expansion in C9orf72, which represents the most frequent genetic cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neuron disease, we employed a targeted amplification-free long-read sequencing technology: No-Amp sequencing. In our cross-sectional study, we assessed cerebellar tissue from 28 well-characterized C9orf72 expansion carriers. We obtained 3507 on-target circular consensus sequencing reads, of which 814 bridged the C9orf72 repeat expansion (23%). Importantly, we observed a significant correlation between expansion sizes obtained using No-Amp sequencing and Southern blotting (P = 5.0 × 10−4). Interestingly, we also detected a significant survival advantage for individuals with smaller expansions (P = 0.004). Additionally, we uncovered that smaller expansions were significantly associated with higher levels of C9orf72 transcripts containing intron 1b (P = 0.003), poly(GP) proteins (P = 1.3 × 10− 5), and poly(GA) proteins (P = 0.005). Thorough examination of the composition of the expansion revealed that its GC content was extremely high (median: 100%) and that it was mainly composed of GGGGCC repeats (median: 96%), suggesting that expanded C9orf72 repeats are quite pure. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that No-Amp sequencing is a powerful tool that enables the discovery of relevant clinicopathological associations, highlighting the important role played by the cerebellar size of the expanded repeat in C9orf72-linked diseases.

Abstract Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) is a neurodegenerative entity defined as Alzheimer-type neurofibrillary degeneration primarily affecting the medial temporal lobe with minimal to absent amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition. The extent to which PART can be differentiated pathoanatomically from Alzheimer disease (AD) is unclear. Here, we examined the regional distribution of tau pathology in a large cohort of postmortem brains (n = 914). We found an early vulnerability of the CA2 subregion of the hippocampus to neurofibrillary degeneration in PART, and semiquantitative assessment of neurofibrillary degeneration in CA2 was significantly greater than in CA1 in PART. In contrast, subjects harboring intermediate-to-high AD neuropathologic change (ADNC) displayed relative sparing of CA2 until later stages of their disease course. In addition, the CA2/CA1 ratio of neurofibrillary degeneration in PART was significantly higher than in subjects with intermediate-to-high ADNC burden. Furthermore, the distribution of tau pathology in PART diverges from the Braak NFT staging system and Braak stage does not correlate with cognitive function in PART as it does in individuals with intermediate-to-high ADNC. These findings highlight the need for a better understanding of the contribution of PART to cognitive impairment and how neurofibrillary degeneration interacts with Aβ pathology in AD and PART.

AbstractBackgroundMultiple imaging modalities have been individually shown to be useful in diagnosing Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). Reduced striatonigral uptake on ioflupane‐SPECT reflects striatonigral dopamine dysfunction observed in DLB, while other imaging modalities assess different aspects of DLB, which potentially work complementarily when used together. We assessed how well ioflupane‐SPECT differentiates DLB from Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia (ADem) and whether adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT would provide additional value.MethodIoflupane‐SPECT, MRI, FDG‐PET, and PiB‐PET were assessed on 35 DLB and 14 ADem patients (including 12 patients with eventual autopsy confirmation). Striatonigral dopamine transporter uptake was evaluated semi‐quantitatively with ioflupane‐SPECT using DaTQUANT software (GE Healthcare) to calculate z‐scores of putamen uptake. Hippocampal volume was calculated with structural MRI, cingulate island sign (CIS) ratio with FDG‐PET, and global cortical PiB retention with PiB‐PET.ResultLower DaTQUANT z‐scores of putamen were observed in DLB patients compared to ADem patients (c‐statistic 0.896, p<0.001). Ioflupane‐SPECT showed higher c‐statistic in differentiating DLB from ADem than hippocampal volume on MRI (c‐statistic 0.718, p=0.034), CIS on FDG‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.003), or global cortical PiB retention on PiB‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.002), but some overlap between two diagnostic groups was still observed with the single imaging modality. Among these imaging modalities, ioflupane‐SPECT was the only modality correlated with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, while only PiB‐PET correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test score. Adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT enhanced c‐statistics (+MRI c‐statistic 0.931, p<0.001; +FDG‐PET c‐statistic 0.957, p=0.005; +PiB‐PET c‐statistic 0.955, p=0.007), and ioflupane‐SPECT in combination with both FDG‐PET and PiB‐PET showed the highest c‐statistic of 0.974 (p=0.043).ConclusionIoflupane‐SPECT is an excellent imaging modality to identify DLB by detecting striatonigral dopamine dysfunction which is strongly associated with motor impairment in DLB. Correlative neuroimaging with MRI, FDG‐PET, or PiB‐PET may add small incremental value in differentiation of DLB and ADem. Supported by NIH grants (AG016574, AG006786, AG015866, NS100620, AG062677), grant from GE Healthcare, the Mayo Clinic Dorothy and Harry T. Mangurian Jr. Lewy Body Dementia Program, the Deal Family Foundation, and the Little Family Foundation.

AbstractBackgroundNeuropathologic studies have demonstrated the importance of recognizing atypical patterns of neurofibrillary tangle pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Utilizing corticolimbic patterns to operationally classify neuropathologically‐diagnosed AD cases, we identified three subtypes: hippocampal sparing AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD (Murray 2011). While amyloid‐β plaque pathology does not differ across AD subtypes (Murray 2015), the frequency of co‐existing pathology does differ.MethodThe FLorida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) AD cohort was reviewed (Hanna Al‐Shaikh 2019). Co‐existing α‐synucleinopathies was examined, including Lewy body disease and the presence of amygdala predominant Lewy bodies which are often observed in the context of severe AD pathology. The severity of cerebrovascular disease was examined using the modified Kalaria score (Deramecourt 2012), which provides a score from 0‐10.ResultOut of 1361 AD cases, 175 (13%) were classified as hippocampal sparing AD, 1014 (74%) as typical AD, and 172 (13%) as limbic predominant AD. Limbic predominant AD cases were older at death (86 years) compared to typical AD (81 years) and hippocampal sparing AD (72 years) (p<0.001). A higher proportion of limbic predominant AD (26%) and typical AD (26%) had co‐existing Lewy body disease compared to hippocampal sparing AD (14%) (p=0.003). Amygdala predominant Lewy bodies were more frequently observed in limbic predominant AD (25%) compared to typical AD (17%) and hippocampal sparing AD (12%) (p=0.006). Limbic predominant AD has more severe cerebrovascular disease score (median=5, interquartile range 2‐6) compared to typical AD (4, 2‐6) and hippocampal sparing AD (4, 2‐5).ConclusionCorticolimbic patterns of neurofibrillary tangle pathology provide key insight into the neurobiology underlying clinical heterogeneity of AD. We observed a greater frequency of co‐existing pathologies in limbic predominant AD and typical AD. Future biomarker studies and efforts of targeted therapeutics should consider the effect of multiple comorbid pathologies. It will be of great interest to examine how these co‐existing pathologies influence clinical progression and heterogeneity of clinical presentations in Alzheimer’s disease patients.

AbstractBackgroundWe report a group of individuals presenting with a progressive dementia syndrome characterized by predominant dysfunction in core executive functions and positive biomarkers for Alzheimer’s pathophysiology.MethodIn this retrospective review, we report on 55 participants with a clinically defined progressive dysexecutive syndrome with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG) and AD biomarker positivity. A subset of these individuals enrolled in our ADRC were compared to other phenotypic variants of AD.ResultSixty‐two percent were female with a mean of 15.2 years of education. Mean age of symptom onset was 53.8 while mean age at diagnosis was 57.2 years. Multi‐domain cognitive impairment was evident in neuropsychological testing with executive dysfunction most consistently and severely affected. The frontal and/or parietal regions demonstrate clear hypometabolism on positron emission tomography in all cases. Genetic testing for autosomal dominant genes was negative in all 8 participants tested and at least one APOE ε4 allele was present in 14/26. EEG was abnormal in 14/17 cases. CSF and neuroimaging biomarkers (PIB‐PET and Tau‐PET) were consistent with Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology, although CSF p‐tau was normal in 24% of cases. In two participants that came to autopsy, the hippocampus was relatively spared compared to frontal and parietal cortex. Participants presenting with a progressive dysexecutive syndrome and evidence of AD pathology are labeled dAD. Comparing FDG in dAD relative to other AD phenotypes revealed unique areas of relatively greater hypometabolism in parieto‐frontal cortex and relative sparing of medial temporal (vs typical AD), visual (vs PCA), and left temporal (vs lvPPA) (Figure 1). Controlling for age did not alter patterns of regional differences. This demonstrates regional variability related to clinical phenotype not accountable by variation in age, duration, stage, or severity (Figure 2).ConclusionA progressive dysexecutive syndrome should be recognized as a distinct clinical phenotype. This clinical presentation can be due to Alzheimer’s disease but is not specific for any single etiology (non‐AD cases of progressive dysexecutive syndrome will be discussed). Prominent impairment of executive task performance, young‐age of onset, normal CSF p‐tau, and relative preservation of the hippocampus were commonly encountered in this case series of dAD.

AbstractBackgroundDigital pathology and machine learning (ML) workflows have paradigm shifting potential especially in the field of Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. However, many institutions/centers may not have access to these technologies. To provide benchmark data, a survey was developed and distributed to National Institutes of Health’s Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADCs) in the United States.MethodSurvey questions covered topics such as: infrastructure (i.e. type of digital slide scanners used), funding sources (i.e. how the scanner was funded), and data management/storage (i.e. size of digital files). After development, review, and approval by the ADC digital pathology working group, the survey was distributed via email to 35 past and current ADC directors and/or ADC neuropathology core leaders. Participation in the survey was completely voluntary and answers did not contain any personal data.ResultThe survey generated over a 90% response rate, and the majority of those who completed the survey were neuropathology core leaders; 81% stated their ADC had access to a digital slide scanner, most common brand being Aperio/Leica. One third of respondents stated there was a fee for service to utilize the scanner. For digital pathology and/or ML resources, 40% of respondents stated none are supported in any way by their ADC. To cover the purchase and operation of the scanner, 50% stated they had institutional support. Many were unsure of the approximate average scanned file size of digital images (37%) and total amount of storage space that files occupied (50%). Many (75%) were aware of other departments at their institution working with digital pathology and/or ML, but a similar percentage was unaware of multi‐university or industry partnerships.ConclusionThese results demonstrate many ADCs have access to a digital slide scanner and had institutional support to cover the purchase. However, further investigation is needed to understand hurdles and barriers for implementing both digital pathology and ML workflows aiding in standardized methods across ADCs.

AbstractBackgroundUsing an objective mathematical algorithm to assess corticolimbic involvement of neurofibrillary tangle pathology, we identified three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Typical AD brains were representative of the expected patterns of hippocampal and cortical involvement as outlined by Braak tangle stage. In contrast, we discovered an extreme phenotype that exists outside of the Braakian‐concept of neurofibrillary tangle patterns. Hippocampal sparing AD cases demonstrate unexpected sparing of the hippocampus relative to severely involved association cortices and limbic predominant AD cases demonstrate inundation of the hippocampus relative to mildly involved association cortices. Using these AD subtypes, our objective was to leverage our understanding of disease spectrum to uncover transcriptomic changes that underlie selective vulnerability of the hippocampus in AD.MethodWe performed RNA‐sequencing in 40 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (10 HpSp, 20 Typical and 10 Limbic) and 15 controls to uncover gene expression changes associated with phenotype differences allowing us to prioritize 44 genes for further exploration. Validation with NanoString and quantification with digital pathology were performed in an expanded cohort of 158 AD cases (36 HpSp, 79 Typical and 35 Limbic) and 32 controls. We quantified digital pathology measures of early tangle pathology (CP13), mature tangle pathology (Ab39), amyloid‐β (33.1.1). In addition, we measured cellular markers for microglia (CD68), endothelia (CD34), and astroglia (GFAP). Deep learning based prediction models were employed, which nominated the SLC38A2 gene as a predictor of AD.ResultThe SLC38A2 gene was originally prioritized in our RNA‐sequencing data based upon differential expression between controls and typical AD. We observed upregulation of SLC38A2 in all AD subtypes. RNA‐seq gene expression measures validated well with NanoString for SLC38A2 (R=0.97, p<0.001). Regression analysis identified early tangle (p=0.011) and late tangle measures (p=0.026) as significant predictors of gene expression, but not amyloid measures (p=0.74). Microgliosis approached significance (p=0.052), but with no contribution from endothelial cell burden (p=0.17) or astrogliosis (p=0.58). Age approached significance (p=0.06), but not sex (p=0.88) or APOE‐ε4 status (p=0.10).ConclusionOur data supports consideration of intra‐disease divergence with regard to case stratification and may reveal genes previously masked by heterogeneity of cohorts.

Abstract Introduction The cytoprotective PTEN‐induced kinase 1 (PINK1)‐parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PRKN) pathway selectively labels damaged mitochondria with phosphorylated ubiquitin (pS65‐Ub) for their autophagic removal (mitophagy). Because dysfunctions of mitochondria and degradation pathways are early features of Alzheimer's disease (AD), mitophagy impairments may contribute to the pathogenesis. Methods Morphology, levels, and distribution of the mitophagy tag pS65‐Ub were evaluated by biochemical analyses combined with tissue and single cell imaging in AD autopsy brain and in transgenic mouse models. Results Analyses revealed significant increases of pS65‐Ub levels in AD brain, which strongly correlated with granulovacuolar degeneration (GVD) and early phospho‐tau deposits, but were independent of amyloid beta pathology. Single cell analyses revealed predominant co‐localization of pS65‐Ub with mitochondria, GVD bodies, and/or lysosomes depending on the brain region analyzed. Discussion Our study highlights mitophagy alterations in AD that are associated with early tau pathology, and suggests that distinct mitochondrial, autophagic, and/or lysosomal failure may contribute to the selective vulnerability in disease.

ObjectiveTo examine associations between tau and amyloid β (Aβ) molecular positron emission tomography (PET) and both Alzheimer‐related pathology and 4‐repeat tau pathology in autopsy‐confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).MethodsTwenty‐four patients had [18F]‐flortaucipir–PET and died with FTLD (progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], n = 10; corticobasal degeneration [CBD], n = 10; FTLD‐TDP, n = 3; and Pick disease, n = 1). All but 1 had Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)‐PET. Braak staging, Aβ plaque and neurofibrillary tangle counts, and semiquantitative tau lesion scores were performed. Flortaucipir standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated in a temporal meta region of interest (meta‐ROI), entorhinal cortex and cortical/subcortical regions selected to match the tau lesion analysis. Global PiB SUVR was calculated. Autoradiography was performed in 1 PSP patient, with digital pathology used to quantify tau burden.ResultsNine cases (37.5%) had Aβ plaques. Global PiB SUVR correlated with Aβ plaque count, with 100% specificity and 50% sensitivity for diffuse plaques. Twenty‐one (87.5%) had Braak stages I to IV. Flortaucipir correlated with neurofibrillary tangle counts in entorhinal cortex, but entorhinal and meta‐ROI SUVRs were not elevated in Braak IV or primary age‐related tauopathy. Flortaucipir uptake patterns differed across FTLD pathologies and could separate PSP and CBD. Flortaucipir correlated with tau lesion score in red nucleus and midbrain tegmentum across patients, but not in cortical or basal ganglia regions. Autoradiography demonstrated minimal uptake of flortaucipir, although flortaucipir correlated with quantitative tau burden across regions.InterpretationMolecular PET shows expected correlations with Alzheimer‐related pathology but lacks sensitivity to detect mild Alzheimer pathology in FTLD. Regional flortaucipir uptake was able to separate CBD and PSP. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:1009–1022

AbstractIntroductionCerebrovascular pathologies including cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and blood‐brain barrier (BBB) dysregulation are prominent features in the majority of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases.MethodsWe performed neuropathologic and biochemical studies on a large, neuropathologically confirmed human AD cohort (N = 469). Amounts of endothelial tight junction proteins claudin‐5 (CLDN5) and occludin (OCLN), and major AD‐related molecules (amyloid beta [Aβ40], Aβ42, tau, p‐tau, and apolipoprotein E) in the temporal cortex were assessed by ELISA.ResultsHigher levels of soluble tau, insoluble p‐tau, and apolipoprotein E (apoE) were independently correlated with lower levels of endothelial tight junction proteins CLDN5 and OCLN in AD brains. Although high Aβ40 levels, APOE ε4, and male sex were predominantly associated with exacerbated CAA severity, those factors did not influence tight junction protein levels.DiscussionRefining the molecular mechanisms connecting tau, Aβ, and apoE with cerebrovascular pathologies is critical for greater understanding of AD pathogenesis and establishing effective therapeutic interventions for the disease.