Machulda, Mary M.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter (WM) changes are widely seen in the elderly due to aging and pathological processes and have significant impact on cognitive aging. It is critical to understand the heterogeneity and drivers (causes) of the longitudinal deterioration of WM microstructural integrity, especially in a population‐based sample, to provide mechanistic insights into cognitive and brain aging.MethodLeveraging longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, we assessed whether individuals clustered based on distinct longitudinal fractional anisotropy (FA) trajectories. A total of 533 subjects (487 cognitively unimpaired, 62 with mild cognitive impairment and 4 with dementia diagnosis) aged ≥ 60 years and with at least two DTI scans (125 subjects had at least 3 scans) were included. To identify clusters of individuals with common FA profiles over time, we applied an in‐house longitudinal Bayesian mixed‐effects clustering analysis framework to the imaging data. Age at MRI accounted for the longitudinal component of the model, while sex and APOE4 carrier status were used as fixed effects.ResultWe identified four distinct clusters (Figure 1). We found that most WM tracts decline with age across all clusters but brainstem and association fibers were least likely to decline with aging. APOE4 carriership and amyloid deposition did not differ between the clusters. We found a resilient cluster of individuals (34%) (cluster 1) with better baseline WM and systemic vascular health who had a slower rate of cognitive and WM integrity decline over time. These individuals had highest baseline commissural and association fibers. The resilient group was in contrast to an “at risk” cluster of individuals (16%) (cluster 2) who had lower baseline WM integrity and systemic health and declined the fastest in both WM health and cognition over timeConclusionLongitudinal clustering of WM tracts provided insights into the differential aging of WM in the population which may be unrelated to Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. Measuring overall WM health and vulnerable tracts in the elderly can be useful as biomarkers and aid in the identification of “at risk” groups for prevention of future cognitive decline.

AbstractBackgroundRecent evidence has implicated brain networks in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the phenotypic variability in AD, inter‐individual differences in tau PET uptake patterns, and dynamic nature of functional connectivity have been relatively neglected. In this talk, I will discuss our recent work linking measures of dynamic brain organization to spatially independent tau PET patterns defined in a phenotypically diverse cohort.MethodsWe identified all Mayo Clinic participants with concurrent amyloid PET (PiB), tau PET (AV1451) and task‐free fMRI (impaired participants were all Aβ+). We used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify spatially independent patterns of tau PET uptake. For the fMRI data, we used a Hidden‐Markov Model (HMM) design to identify distinct patterns of activity/connectivity (‘states’). The ICA and HMM parameters were used to project/segment an independent cohort (ADNI) and subsequent longitudinal timepoints for the Mayo cohort. Multilevel Bayesian regression models were fit in Stan to explore the association between phenotype, component load and brain state.ResultsThe optimal HMM model identified 10 brain states (Figure 1). The optimal ICA decomposition identified 42 tau PET components, of which 13 were potentially related to AD pathobiology (Figure 1). Component loads and brain state dwell time differed between diagnostic groups in both Mayo and ADNI cohorts. One state was much more likely to occur in AD in both cohorts (State 8). Cross‐sectionally, State 8 dwell time was associated with higher tau loads, while higher baseline dwell‐time was predictive of ∆tau in participants with at least 2 timepoints (Figure 2).ConclusionWe found links between dynamics of functional connectivity, tau deposition, and cognitive impairment across the AD spectrum using two different cohorts and longitudinal data. Specifically: 1) our method for characterizing tau PET uptake was able to capture the magnitude and spatial pattern of binding across diverse phenotypes; 2) Our data supports a role for dynamic brain connectivity in cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease; 3) Dynamic connectivity appears to be directly related to AD pathobiology as measured by tau PET. Incorporating the time‐varying nature of connectivity will be important in future studies of connectome‐based disease progression in AD.

AbstractBackgroundA previous study demonstrated that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217), compared to phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181), correlated more strongly with Tau PET and was better able to distinguish between AD and non‐AD neurodegenerative diseases. The aim of this study was to compare these two CSF tau markers for cognitive progression.MethodWe included 666 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 89 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Mayo Clinic Study on Aging community‐based participants (mean age of 71.6 years) with CSF amyloid and tau measurements. CSF amyloid‐beta 42 (Aβ42) was measured with automated electrochemiluminescence Elecsys immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics); a cut‐off of <1026 pg/ml was considered amyloid positive (A+). CSF pTau181 and pTau217 were measured with the Mesoscale discovery platform (MSD). Cutoffs of pTau181≥217 pg/ml and pTau217≥288 pg/ml were considered tau positive (T+). Cox proportional hazards models with time as the time scale were used to examine the relationship between the CSF markers and progression from CU to MCI and MCI to dementia. Covariates included age, sex, education, and APOE.ResultTau positivity (T+) based on pTau217 (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.45, 4.11) was a greater risk factor for incident MCI compared to pTau181 (HR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.19, 3.61). Among individuals who were A+T+, T+ based on pTau217 (HR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.66‐5.45) was a greater risk factor of incident MCI than pTau181 (2.80, 95% CI: 1.48, 5.31). Among the 89 MCI participants, T+ based on pTau217 was a much greater risk factor for dementia (HR = 4.92, 95% CI: 1.37, 17.61) than pTau181 (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.43‐5.55).ConclusionCSF pTau217 is a better marker of cognitive progression, especially from MCI to dementia, compared to CSF pTau181.

AbstractBackgroundWhile β‐amyloid and tau PET imaging are widely studied in cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), little is known about findings in aging multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. As aging is an essential factor in developing neurodegeneration in MS, β‐amyloid and tau biomarkers may be utilized to understand the influence of AD pathophysiology on cognitive aging in MS.MethodWe studied patients with MS (n=16) and controls (n=80) matched for age, sex and APOE ε4 status from the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent Pittsburgh compound‐B (PiB) PET imaging. Twelve of the 16 patients with MS and 60 matching controls also underwent flortaucipir (AV1451) tau PET. Cortical PiB and AV1451 standard uptake value ratios (SUVr) from previously determined AD signature regions and from the entire cortex were calculated for group comparisons and testing for associations with age.ResultAD signature PiB SUVr (p=0.044), total cortical PiB SUVr (p=0.048) and the frequency of abnormal PiB SUVrs (p=0.040) were lower in patients with MS than controls. Although AD signature and total cortical AV1451 SUVrs were not different between the groups, the frequency of abnormal AV1451 SUVrs was higher (p=0.041) in patients with MS than controls. The association of AD signature PiB SUVr with age was steeper in the controls compared to patients with MS (p=0.002). Similarly, the association of total cortical PiB SUVr with age was steeper in the controls compared to patients with MS (p=0.002). There was no difference in the association of AV1451 SUVr findings with age between the MS patients and controls (Figure 1). The AD signature PiB SUVr increased more with increasing AD signature AV1451 SUVr in controls than in patients with MS (p=0.03) (Figure 2).ConclusionIn patients with MS, cortical β‐amyloid deposition was lower than age‐matched controls, while cortical tau deposition was not different between the groups. This suggests that some aspect of MS pathobiology retards the accumulation of β‐amyloid, but not the accumulation of tau.

AbstractBackgroundMultiple imaging modalities have been individually shown to be useful in diagnosing Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). Reduced striatonigral uptake on ioflupane‐SPECT reflects striatonigral dopamine dysfunction observed in DLB, while other imaging modalities assess different aspects of DLB, which potentially work complementarily when used together. We assessed how well ioflupane‐SPECT differentiates DLB from Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia (ADem) and whether adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT would provide additional value.MethodIoflupane‐SPECT, MRI, FDG‐PET, and PiB‐PET were assessed on 35 DLB and 14 ADem patients (including 12 patients with eventual autopsy confirmation). Striatonigral dopamine transporter uptake was evaluated semi‐quantitatively with ioflupane‐SPECT using DaTQUANT software (GE Healthcare) to calculate z‐scores of putamen uptake. Hippocampal volume was calculated with structural MRI, cingulate island sign (CIS) ratio with FDG‐PET, and global cortical PiB retention with PiB‐PET.ResultLower DaTQUANT z‐scores of putamen were observed in DLB patients compared to ADem patients (c‐statistic 0.896, p<0.001). Ioflupane‐SPECT showed higher c‐statistic in differentiating DLB from ADem than hippocampal volume on MRI (c‐statistic 0.718, p=0.034), CIS on FDG‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.003), or global cortical PiB retention on PiB‐PET (c‐statistic 0.869, p=0.002), but some overlap between two diagnostic groups was still observed with the single imaging modality. Among these imaging modalities, ioflupane‐SPECT was the only modality correlated with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, while only PiB‐PET correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test score. Adding another imaging modality to ioflupane‐SPECT enhanced c‐statistics (+MRI c‐statistic 0.931, p<0.001; +FDG‐PET c‐statistic 0.957, p=0.005; +PiB‐PET c‐statistic 0.955, p=0.007), and ioflupane‐SPECT in combination with both FDG‐PET and PiB‐PET showed the highest c‐statistic of 0.974 (p=0.043).ConclusionIoflupane‐SPECT is an excellent imaging modality to identify DLB by detecting striatonigral dopamine dysfunction which is strongly associated with motor impairment in DLB. Correlative neuroimaging with MRI, FDG‐PET, or PiB‐PET may add small incremental value in differentiation of DLB and ADem. Supported by NIH grants (AG016574, AG006786, AG015866, NS100620, AG062677), grant from GE Healthcare, the Mayo Clinic Dorothy and Harry T. Mangurian Jr. Lewy Body Dementia Program, the Deal Family Foundation, and the Little Family Foundation.

AbstractBackgroundGiven that a proportion of mild cognitive impaired (MCI) individuals are amyloid negative and have cerebrovascular disease (CVD), there is a need for biomarkers that can complement AD biomarkers (amyloid and neurodegeneration) for the prediction of future cognitive decline in MCI. The aim of our study was to determine the utility of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as a CVD marker for prediction of future cognitive decline in individuals with MCI in conjunction with amyloidosis and neurodegeneration.MethodWe identified 132 MCI individuals ≥60 years old (55 % were amyloid positive and 59 % were male) from the population based sample of Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who had structural MRI, DTI, amyloid PET, and at least one clinical follow‐up after the imaging at the time of their clinical visit as MCI. All imaging scans were acquired and processed using in house developed protocols and pipelines. We used fractional anisotropy in the genu of corpus callosum (FAGCC), as a CVD marker, education/occupation score as a resilience variable, and global cognitive z‐score as the cognitive outcome. Using mixed effect models for cognitive decline, we evaluated three models to test the prognostic ability of (i) DTI marker alone, (ii) DTI marker and amyloid PET, (iii) DTI marker, amyloid PET, and neurodegeneration (cortical thickness). The final parsimonious models included the significant interactions of potential predictors with time, main effects nested within those interactions, and other significant main effects. Since the adjustment for conventional CVD measures like WMH was important to determine the utility DTI over traditional measures, we further assessed the value of FAGCC in conjunction with white matter hyper intensity (WMH).ResultWe found: i) FAGCC was associated with cognitive decline after adjusting for amyloid PET neurodegeneration (Figure 1 and Table 1) and ii) FAGCC was associated with cognitive decline even after controlling for WMH and WMH was no longer significant after accounting for FAGCC (Table 2).ConclusionDTI has significant utility for prediction of cognitive decline in MCI from population‐based samples and will provide complementary information to AD biomarkers.

AbstractBackgroundDementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of degenerative dementia but the evolution of the core clinical features of DLB has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study was to identify the temporal relationship between each core feature from the estimated onset of cognitive symptoms.MethodParticipants include 485 patients with probable DLB who were evaluated at the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center with neurologic and neurocognitive assessment. Each core clinical feature was compared using Kaplan‐Meier (KM) curves with the sentinel event representing age at which each core feature developed, or time from estimated cognitive onset.ResultThe sample was disproportionately male (76%). Patients were followed longitudinally, with 84% followed until death. Mean MMSE at the last evaluation was 18.3 ± 7.8. KM curves for age of onset and cumulative incidence for DLB core features as time from cognitive onset are provided. REM‐sleep behavior disorder (RBD) developed earliest and in 77% of our sample with a median KM survival estimate of 69 years (95% CI: 67.6–70.8). RBD was present in greater than 50% of patients at cognitive symptom onset. The median KM survival estimate for cognitive symptom onset was 70.2 years (95% CI: 69.3‐71.0). Parkinsonism developed in 89% with a median KM survival estimate of 73.7 years (95% CI: 72.7‐74.7). 76% had fluctuations with a similar median KM survival estimate of 74.6 years (95% CI: 73.7‐75.8). Visual hallucinations (VH) were present in 70% emerging at a median KM survival estimate of 80.2 years (95% CI: 79.5‐ 81.3). Cumulative incidence estimates for median time from cognitive onset to parkinsonism, fluctuations and VH were 2 years (95% CI: 2.0‐2.5), 2.3 years (95% CI: 2.0‐3.2) and 4.3 years (95% CI: 4.0‐4.8 years), respectively.ConclusionIn this DLB cohort, RBD was most likely to precede cognitive onset. The evolution of the other core features after cognitive onset was parkinsonism and fluctuations and then VH. While VH occur about 4 years after cognitive symptom onset, parkinsonism and fluctuations occur within the first 2 years.

AbstractBackgroundPractice effects can obscure interpretation of longitudinal cognitive performance. Reliable change indices (RCIs) provide data for determining a significant change, typically for a single repeat assessment, but multiple follow‐up visits are common clinically and in research cohorts. Further, regression‐based or linear mixed effects models improve prediction of future cognitive decline and have higher correlations with neuroimaging biomarkers than RCI approaches. We present norms for change for the Auditory Verbal Learning Tests (AVLT) with conditional normative z‐scores for up to 7 repeat assessments, and demonstrate application of this method to individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodNormative Sample: Robust conditional norms were derived from 1001 adults ages 50‐90 from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who completed the AVLT across 4‐8 visits approximately 15 months apart and remained cognitively unimpaired (CU) across all available visits. Linear mixed effects models were used to compute a conditional normative z‐score for AVLT 30‐minute recall and sum of trials. Models included adjustment for baseline performance, number of prior test exposures, demographic factors (age, sex, education), and interactions (baseline*time; sex*time). Test Sample: We used a preclinical AD sample with positive amyloid and tau imaging (n= 27 CU A+T+; Jack et al. 2017) expected to have a higher rate of intra‐individual cognitive decline relative to CU A‐T‐ individuals (n = 268) to compare mean performances of conditional normative z‐scores to typical age‐corrected Mayo’s Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS) norms. Participants had at least 1 and up to 4 follow‐up visits, with their most recent AT data used for classification.ResultAVLT performance based on typical norms did not differ across A+T+ and A‐T‐ groups. Specifically, across 2‐4 follow‐up visits, the typical norms mean z‐score was similar across groups (p=0.945; see Table 1). However, the conditional norms mean z‐score that accounts for practice effects and typical trajectories of AVLT performance was lower in the A+T+ relative to the A‐T‐ group for 30‐minute recall (p=0.055) and sum of trials (p=0.060).ConclusionConditional normative methods that account for practice effects are more sensitive to preclinical AD than typical norms, and show promise for identifying transitional cognitive decline.

AbstractBackgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are associated with the risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the association between NPS and global and domain‐specific cognitive trajectories among older adults free of dementia remains unclear.MethodWe conducted a longitudinal study derived from the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, including individuals aged ≥ 50 years who were free of dementia. Participants completed the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire at baseline and underwent neuropsychological testing assessing four cognitive domains (i.e., memory, language, attention, visuospatial skills) every 15 months. We calculated linear mixed‐effect models with random subject‐specific intercepts and slopes to examine the association between presence of twelve different NPS (i.e., delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, motor behavior, nighttime behavior, appetite) at baseline and trajectories for individual yearly change in global and domain‐specific cognitive z‐scores. The models were adjusted for age, sex, education, and whether or not this was the first time the cognitive battery had been administered.ResultThe sample included 5081 persons (51% males; 4439 cognitively unimpaired, 642 with MCI). The median [IQR] age was 74 [67, 81] years, and the median [IQR] education was 14 [12, 16] years. Regardless of NPS status, participants declined in cognition over time, on average. However, presence of NPS was significantly associated with an increased decline in cognition, i.e., the annualized change in global cognition z‐scores for participants with compared to without the given NPS ranged from ‐0.018 (p = 0.011) for irritability to ‐0.16 (p = 0.001) for hallucinations. These associations between NPS and annual decline in global cognition were significant for all NPS except euphoria and disinhibition. Similar results were seen for the individual cognitive domains, e.g., participants with depression, apathy and nighttime behavior had a greater longitudinal decline in all domain specific z‐scores, whereas presence of delusions and anxiety was associated with a more pronounced decline in language, attention and visuospatial skills.ConclusionNeuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with greater longitudinal decline of both global and domain‐specific cognitive functions in community‐dwelling older adults free of dementia. More research is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

AbstractBackgroundThe numeric clinical staging scheme described by the NIA‐AA workgroup proposes evidence of subtle decline on longitudinal cognitive testing as one option to define transitional cognitive decline for individuals in the Alzheimer’s continuum. Few studies have compared longitudinal and cross‐sectional definitions of subtle objective cognitive impairment (sOBJ). The study aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cross‐sectional sOBJ and longitudinal objective cognitive decline (ΔOBJ) for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on Cogstate One Card Learning (OCL) performance.MethodWe included Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants who were A+T+ by amyloid and tau PET assessment (n=32) and A‐T‐ (n=211); all had at least two follow‐up visits. sOBJ was defined as performance ≤ ‐1SD on OCL accuracy using age‐corrected normative data. ΔOBJ was measured using two different methods: (1) within subjects’ standard deviation (WSD) using a ≤ ‐1 z‐score for change to define decline based on Cogstate’s normative change data, and (2) extracted subject‐specific slopes from a linear mixed effects model (LME) which can be interpreted as approximate annual change; decline was defined as slope < 10%ile among a reference sample of CU participants aged 50‐65 at baseline (N=732).ResultssOBJ and ΔOBJ‐WSD both showed low sensitivity in detection of A+T+ (9.4% and 12.5%, respectively). Total AUC values did not differ significantly (p=.31) across sOBJ (AUC = .64, CI = .53‐.75) and ΔOBJ‐WSD (AUC = .53, CI = .42‐.65) methods. Sensitivity of the ΔOBJ‐LME method to predict A+T+ was improved (37.5%) when using a conventional cutoff of <10%ile slope and was further improved (56%) when using an optimal derived cutoff equivalent to <17%ile slope within the reference group. Like the sOBJ method, the ΔOBJ‐LME method differentiated groups better than chance (AUC = .69, CI = .58‐.80). Despite increased sensitivity, total AUC values were not significantly different across sOBJ and ΔOBJ‐LME methods (p=.34). However, total AUC of ΔOBJ‐LME was significantly better than ΔOBJ‐WSD (p=.03).ConclusionsΔOBJ may be more sensitive to preclinical AD than sOBJ and may serve as a helpful method for identifying at risk CU individuals if advanced statistical methods are used for defining change.