Konda, Bhavana

4020 Background: High grade (G3) GEPNENs are a rare and heterogeneous disease entity for which there is little prospective treatment data. EP chemotherapy is the treatment standard but this may not be appropriate for all G3 GEPNEN pts. CAPTEM has demonstrated activity in G3 GEPNENs and may be a promising alternative. EA2142 aimed to determine if CAPTEM was superior to EP in pts with G3 GEPNENs. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized (1:1) phase II trial for pts with a locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic well differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) or a poorly differentiated, non-small cell G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of suspected gastrointestinal origin and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Pathology must have demonstrated a Ki-67 of 20-100% or at least 10 mitoses/10 high powered field. Pts were randomized to receive capecitabine 750 mg/m2 orally every 12 hours on days 1-14 and temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally once daily on days 10-14 of a 28-day treatment cycle (Arm A) or etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 with either cisplatin 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle (Arm B). Restaging scans were performed every 8 weeks and toxicity monitored per CTCAEv4. Final statistical plan was to accrue 80 pts to detect a 67% improvement in progression free survival (PFS) (primary endpoint) with CAPTEM as compared to EP, 80% power and one-sided significance level of 0.10. A planned interim analysis for efficacy and futility was conducted. Results: A total of 67 pts were enrolled (Arm A, n=32; Arm B, n=35). Male 58%, African American 4%, Asian 3%. Mean age 61. Among 63 eligible pts, primary tumor site pancreatic 56%, non-pancreatic 43%. Poorly differentiated 57%, well differentiated 33%, unknown 10%. Mean Ki-67 48% (Arm A), 60% (Arm B). The study was closed prior to full accrual due to futility at 57.7% information time. In the interim analysis, among 62 eligible pts, PFS, overall survival and response rate with CAPTEM were 2.43 months (mos) (95% CI 2.04, 7.72), 12.6 mos, 9% respectively vs 5.36 mos (95% CI 2.14, 7.23), 13.6 mos and 10% with EP. Toxicity was evaluable in 57 pts with Grade (G) 3/4 events occurring in 29% of pts on Arm A, 66% of pts on Arm B. G3/4 events occurring in more than 5% of pts on Arm A—febrile neutropenia (n=2); abdominal pain (n=2); diarrhea (n=2); nausea (n=2); neutropenia (n=2); dehydration (n=2) and on Arm B—anemia (n=8); febrile neutropenia (n=2); fatigue (n=2); lymphopenia (n=2); neutropenia (n=12); thrombocytopenia (n=4); leukopenia (n=6). There was one G5 event on Arm A due to sepsis. Conclusions: CAPTEM does not appear to be superior to EP chemotherapy as front-line treatment for pts with G3 NENs but does demonstrate a more favorable toxicity profile. Studies assessing G3 NET independently of G3 NEC are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02595424.

6076 Background: HCC is a rare subtype of follicular cell thyroid cancer that has been poorly studied in the past. Recent genomic studies have shown the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is frequently altered in HCC. In addition, a phase II study of sorafenib (S) and everolimus (E) showed promising data in HCC. A study to evaluate this was initiated through Alliance and the International Thyroid Oncology Group. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized to either sorafenib and everolimus (SE) vs. sorafenib alone (S). Inclusion criteria included; (1) diagnosis of HCC (confirmed through central review), no prior S or E, refractory to radioactive iodine, progressive disease by RECIST over prior 14 months. Primary endpoint was a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between SE and S using a stratified 1-sided log-rank test with 0.20 significance level and a power of 80%. 28 events were needed at final analysis. Secondary endpoints consisted of overall survival (OS), confirmed response rate (RR), and adverse events. Results: 35 pts were randomized from 10/2014 to 9/2019, 34 of which were evaluable for analysis (17-SE; 17-S) because 1 patient cancelled prior to receiving treatment. Median age was 66.5 years and 74% were male. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0 (47%) and PS 1 (53%). 41% had prior systemic treatment for HCC. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between treatment arms. Median follow-up in 22 alive patients was 39.2 months (range: 15.1-64.9). Seven (21%) patients remain on treatment. PFS was significantly improved in the SE arm as compared to the S arm (HR=0.65 (95% CI: 0.26, 1.57); median PFS: SE=24.7 months (95% CI: 6.1-no upper), S=10.9 months (95% CI: 5.5-no upper); stratified 1-sided p=0.1662). OS was similar between the arms (2-sided p=0.4138). Confirmed response rate was similar between arms as well (SE: 18% (3 partial response (PR) vs. S: 24% (3 PR, 1 complete response)); Fisher’s exact p=1.00). Grade 3 adverse event (AE) rates (regardless of attribution) were similar between arms (SE: 77% vs. S: 77%; p=1.00). Each arm had 1 patient with at least one grade 4 AE (SE patient: cardiac arrest, tracheal obstruction, encephalopathy; S patient: mucositis oral) and no grade 5 AEs. Conclusions: PFS was improved with the addition of E to S in this small randomized multi-institutional phase II study done. Accrual was difficult, but these promising results suggest that this combination should be further studied. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Novartis/GSK; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02143726. Clinical trial information: NCT02143726.

6512 Background: Lenvatinib is an approved therapy for patients with RAIR DTC. While the overall response rate (ORR) is high, few patients achieve a complete response (CR) and most patients eventually have progressive disease (PD). Combination lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is being explored in many different cancers, and this combination has been approved for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Methods: Patients with RAIR DTC with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST v1.1) measurable PD (<14 months (mo) prior to registration) were enrolled in this single-arm multicenter phase II study. Patients were excluded if they had received previous VEGFR-directed multikinase therapy. The lenvatinib starting dose was 20 mg/day orally and pembrolizumab was 200mg IV every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was CR. ORR, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 were secondary endpoints. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years, and 53% of the patients were women. Seventy percent of patients had grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 10 percent had grade 4 AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common > grade 3 AEs were hypertension (47%), weight loss (13%), maculopapular rash (13%), leukopenia (7%), diarrhea (7%) and oral mucositis (7%). Twenty-one patients (70%) required lenvatinib dose reduction. Of 29 evaluable patients, 18 (62%) had a partial response (PR) and 10 (35%) had stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (ORR +SD) was 97%. Median time to tumor nadir was 7.4 mo (1.6-17.8 mo). Median PFS was not yet reached. The PFS at 12 months was 74%. Median time on therapy was 9.9 mo (3.2-18.9 mo). Fourteen patients are continuing therapy (7.6-18.9 mo). Six of these patients (43%) have not yet reached tumor size nadir. Three patients (10%) had > 80% target tumor shrinkage. Conclusions: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is reasonably tolerated in patients with RAIR DTC. To date, there have been no documented complete responses. Combination lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy has a high ORR in patients with RAIR DTC. Continuation of this study will help determine the depth and length of the responses. Clinical trial information: NCT02973997 .

e17580 Background: Cabozantinib is a small molecule multiple-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily targets MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). We evaluated the effect of cabozantinib on BTM in RAIR DTC. We also assessed the response of BM to cabozantinib using 18F Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET and radionuclide bone scans. Methods: This prospective analysis was performed as part of a multicenter International Thyroid Oncology Group phase II study of cabozantinibin patients with RAIR DTC who progressed on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (NCT01811212). BTM [serum C-telopeptide (CTx), osteocalcin, N-telopeptide (NTx), procollagen type 1 (Pc1) and urinary NTx] and NaF PET or Tc-MDP scans were done at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy. A paired t-test was used between baseline and week 8 BTM. Results: Primary study results were presented elsewhere (Shah, et al. 2015, International Thyroid Congress) showing a response rate of 36% with cabozantinib. Of 25 patients (pts) enrolled, 21 had BM, 10 of whom were on bone-modifying agents (BMA) prior to week 8. Only 2 pts had elevated BTM at baseline. In all pts who had paired BTM, there was a statistically significant decline in all BTM except NTx by week 8 (table). Pts not on BMA also had a significant decline in CTx (p 0.0003), urine NTx (p 0.0300), and Pc1 (p 0.0030) compared to baseline. 19 pts were evaluable for overall response and there was no correlation between BTM and response rate. 6/21 patients underwent paired NaF PET scans and 4/6 had minor reduction in lesion uptake at 8 weeks. Conclusions: Interestingly, most of our patients had normal baseline BTM despite BM. Cabozantinib was associated with a strikingly significant reduction in all BTM (even when BTM were within normal limits at baseline) except NTx by week 8. Minor decreases in bone lesion uptake was noted on NaF PET in 4/6 evaluable patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01811212. [Table: see text]