Zahrieh, David M.

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with low overall survival rates and high molecular heterogeneity; therefore, few targeted therapies are available. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) is the most consistently identified TNBC subtype, but the clinical utility has yet to be established. Here, we constructed a novel genomic classifier, LAR-Sig, that distinguishes the LAR subtype from other TNBC subtypes and provide evidence that it is a clinically distinct disease. A meta-analysis of seven TNBC datasets (n = 1086 samples) from neoadjuvant clinical trials demonstrated that LAR patients have significantly reduced response (pCR) rates than non-LAR TNBC patients (odds ratio = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.33, 2.89). Moreover, deconvolution of the tumor microenvironment confirmed an enrichment of luminal epithelium corresponding with a decrease in basal and myoepithelium in LAR TNBC tumors. Increased immunosuppression in LAR patients may lead to a decreased presence of cycling T-cells and plasma cells. While, an increased presence of myofibroblast-like cancer-associated cells may impede drug delivery and treatment. In summary, the lower levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), reduced immune activity in the micro-environment, and lower pCR rates after NAC, suggest that new therapeutic strategies for the LAR TNBC subtype need to be developed.

6513 Background: Pt recruitment receives well-deserved attention, but pt retention is also important for trial interpretability and generalizability. We report on trends and predictive factors for withdrawal of pt consent, defined as pt cessation from trial participation for reasons not mandated in the protocol. Methods: Alliance phase II/III trials that enrolled pts during 2013 – 2019 were included. All pts had ≥2 years (yrs) of follow-up. Primary outcome was withdrawn consent (yes; no) within 2 yrs of enrollment. Pt factors included year of enrollment, age, race, ethnicity, and gender. Trial factors included randomization, use of placebo, and use of radiation. Univariable (Uni) and full multivariable (MV) logistic regression models (including all factors from Uni setting) with a Bonferroni p-value correction (p <.004 considered significant) were used. Results: Median age was 62 yrs, with 67% female, 82% White, 9% Black or African American, and 7% Hispanic. 52% of trials were phase II, 5% II/III and 43% III. Common (> 10%) trial categories included 22% experimental therapeutics or rare tumors, 12% gastrointestinal, 12% genitourinary, 12% neuro-oncology and 10% symptom intervention. 78% of trials were randomized, 22% placebo-controlled and 14% used radiation. 1060 (9%) pts withdrew consent within 2 yr of enrollment (range,5.7% -9.8%) during 2013-2019. In Uni models, all trial and pt factors significantly predicted pt withdrawal except age, race, and gender (See table). In MV models, pts of Hispanic origin, and >75 yrs were more likely to withdraw. Trials using radiation had less likelihood of pt withdrawal. Placebo-controlled randomized trials had higher likelihood of withdrawal. Conclusions: Both trial and pt factors contribute to higher rates of pt withdrawal from clinical trials. Understanding these factors will enable investigators to focus on pt education and optimization of trial design to improve pt retention and the overall clinical trial plan. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882 [Table: see text]

Importance Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at markedly increased risk for duodenal adenomas and cancer. Combination sulindac and erlotinib was previously shown to reduce duodenal polyp burden but was associated with a relatively high adverse event (AE) rate. Objective: To evaluate if a once weekly dosing schedule for erlotinib intervention improves the AE profile, while still providing efficacy with respect to reduced polyp burden, in participants with FAP. Design, setting and participants: Single-arm trial, enrolling 46 participants with FAP, conducted from October 2017 to September 2019 in eight academic cancer centres. Exposures Participants self-administered 350 mg of erlotinib by mouth, one time per week for 6 months. Main outcomes and measures: Duodenal polyp burden (sum of polyp diameters) was assessed in the proximal duodenum by esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed at baseline and 6 months, with mean per cent change defined as the primary efficacy outcome of interest. Rate of grade 2–3 AEs was evaluated as a co-primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included changes in total duodenal polyp count, along with changes in lower gastrointestinal (GI) polyp burden and count (for participants examined by optional lower endoscopy). Results Forty-six participants (mean age, 44.1 years (range, 18–68); women, 22 (48%)) were enrolled; 42 participants completed 6 months of intervention and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Duodenal polyp burden was significantly reduced after 6 months of weekly erlotinib intervention, with a mean per cent change of −29.6% (95% CI, −39.6% to −19.7%; p<0.0001). Similar results were observed in subgroup analyses defined by participants with advanced duodenal polyposis (Spigelman 3) at baseline (mean, −27%; 95% CI, −38.7% to −15.2%; p<0.0001). Post-intervention Spigelman stage was downstaged in 12% of the participants. Lower GI polyp number was also decreased after 6 months of intervention (median, −30.8%; IQR, −47.4% to 0.0%; p=0.0256). Grade 2 or 3 AEs were reported in 71.7% of subjects, with only two experiencing grade 3 toxicity at least possibly related to intervention. Conclusion In this single-arm, multi-centre trial of participants with FAP, erlotinib one time per week resulted in markedly lower duodenal polyp burden, and modestly reduced lower GI polyp burden, after 6 months of intervention. While AEs were still reported by nearly three-quarters of all participants, these events were generally lower grade and well-tolerated. These findings support further investigation of erlotinib as an effective, acceptable cancer preventive agent for FAP-associated GI polyposis. Trial registration number NCT02961374 .

Abstract Background: As the development and use of oral anticancer agents increases, it is critical to understand patient adherence to both standard and investigational agents. The open label, phase 3 multicenter PALLAS trial investigates whether adding 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone in patients (pts) with HR- positive, HR2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer. Pts were randomly assigned to either Palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, in a 28-day cycle) plus ongoing provider/patient-choice adjuvant ET (P+ET) versus ET alone. We examined patient-reported adherence to ET +/- P during the first two years of study treatment. Methods: Adherence outcomes were measured in English-speaking pts in the U.S., UK, Ireland and Australia, Spanish-speaking pts in Spain and Mexico, and German-speaking pts in Germany and Austria. Adherence measures included drug diaries completed at each cycle, pill counts (for P only) collected at each study visit, and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 item and the McHorney Adherence Estimator questionnaires completed at cycles 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 (22 months). Mean adherence for each cycle was defined as the average proportion of prescribed pills taken (via drug diary) across all patients who initiated that cycle. Persistence was defined as the duration of drug initiation to treatment cessation (via drug diary). Generalized estimating equations were used to model the “most adherent” pts on the Morisky (score = 5 vs score &lt;5) and “low risk” for adherence problems on the McHorney (score=0 vs score &gt;0) to compare the average difference between arms over time for ET, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables. Results: 81% (N=4688) of PALLAS pts were included in this analysis. Median persistence to ET was 23.6 months in P + ET (n=2169), 23.7 months in ET alone (2136) and 20.4 months for P (n=2194). The number of pts who initiated each cycle for ET declined over time and was similar between arms; the decline was more marked for P (Table 1). Mean adherence range as measured by drug diary was 98.2-99.3% for ET in P+ET and 98.0 - 99.4% in ET alone; and for P, ranged from 93.4 - 98.8%. The adherence and persistence results were nearly identical whether measured by drug diary or pill count for P. The observed percent “most adherent” for P measured by the Morisky scale ranged from 71.9% - 79.6% and the percent “low risk” for adherence problems measured by the McHorney scale, 64.0% - 73.4%. The percent of pts “most adherent” and “low risk” for adherence problems to ET was higher, on average over time, in the P+ET group compared to ET alone (75% vs 68%, p&lt;0.01; 75% vs 72%, p=.05, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported mean adherence for both P + ET and ET alone was strikingly high for pts who remained on therapy; persistence was also high with ET during the 2-year treatment period. Current analyses suggest that nonadherence to either P or ET was likely not a major contributor to the iDFS results seen in the overall PALLAS trial. These results illustrate the importance of measuring and monitoring patient adherence to oral study agents. Support: AFT, Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02513394) and EudraCT (2014-005181-30). https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Adherence and persistence in PALLAS over the 24 month treatment periodPalbocicilb + ETETPalbociclibETETTreatment cycleMean Adherence (SD)N*Mean Adherence (SD)NMean Adherence (SD)N193.4 (13.8)229098.7 (6.1)230999.0 (5.2)2343294.7 (13.3)218198.8 (6.4)220398.4 (7.1)2206397.4 (10.1)211298.7 (7.3)214298.8 (6.3)2168497.6 (10.2)203598.6 (7.8)211099.0 (5.7)2154597.6 (11.1)197598.3 (7.9)209398.1 (8.3)2148698.1 (8.7)189998.7 (6.6)203798.5 (8.2)2116798.1 (9.3)185599.0 (6.3)201298.6 (7.3)2102898.0 (9.1)181098.2 (8.2)199798.1 (8.2)2092998.4 (7.4)173399.0 (6.4)196298.8 (6.8)20511098.3 (8.6)171499.2 (4.9)194699.0 (5.5)20381198.3 (8.0)169198.5 (7.3)193798.2 (8.2)20311298.7 (6.2)161299.1 (5.3)191098.7 (7.5)19861398.5 (7.7)159698.9 (6.4)189398.8 (7.1)19691497.9 (9.3)157698.4 (7.3)188298.0 (9.1)19611598.5 (6.9)151499.2 (4.6)185499.0 (6.0)19281698.2 (8.7)148699.1 (4.6)183599.1 (5.7)19131798.1 (9.8)147998.3 (7.8)182698.5 (6.4)19031898.7 (6.8)141699.3 (4.1)176899.2 (5.3)18601998.7 (7.3)140899.3 (3.8)175699.4 (3.1)18482098.4 (8.9)139798.9 (5.3)174298.7 (5.8)18382198.5 (7.5)130199.0 (6.1)167698.8 (7.1)17842297.8 (9.7)124698.8 (6.2)164799.2 (5.7)17692398.1 (8.8)118098.2 (8.5)161998.4 (8.0)17552498.8 (7.2)108699.0 (6.3)146898.9 (7.1)16192598.8 (6.7)99699.2 (5.2)143298.8 (7.1)15892697.9 (11.2)84599.1 (5.7)140998.6 (8.8)1578ET=Endocrine therapy * Number of pts who initiated the treatment cycle. Citation Format: Eileen Shinn, David Zahrieh, Angela DeMichele, Nick Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Michelle Naughton, Georg Pfeiler, Karen Gelmon, Ingrid Mayer, Daniel Egle, Gabriele Zoppoli, Tiffany Traina, Miguel Martin Jiménez, Silvia Antolin Novoa, Tufia Haddad, Arlene Chan, Alistair Edward Ring, Antonio Wolff, Jose JuanPonce Lorenzo, Dhanusha Sabanathan, Hal Burstein, Zbigniew Ireneusz Nowecki, Gunda Pristauz-Telsnigg, Adam Brufsky, Meritxell Bellet-Ezquerra, Theodoros Foukakis, Yelena Novik, Gabor Rubovszky, Karoline Muehlbacher, Otto Metzger, Theodora Goulioti, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Dominik Hlauschek, Christian Fesl, Erica Mayer, Michael Gnant. Adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without Palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-01.

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important. Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Abstract Background: The importance of the antitumor immune response in TNBC is well established. TNBC with higher TILs are less likely to recur and more responsive to systemic therapy. Likewise, PD-L1+ TNBC are more likely to benefit from chemoimmunotherapy. However, TNBC is highly heterogeneous. Of the TNBC molecular subtypes, LAR TNBC is less sensitive to systemic therapy, has lower TILs and lower rates of PD-L1 positivity. The role of other immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is not well established. Here, we evaluated differentially expressed (DE) immune related proteins in the stromal and intratumoral compartments of LAR vs non-LAR TNBC tumors. Methods: We used the Nanostring GeoMX DSP platform to quantitate 58 proteins within spatially distinct intraepithelial, cytokeratin (CK)-positive tumor segments and adjacent CK-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments in 248 TNBC tumors included in a tissue microarray generated from a cohort of pts with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent breast surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy. A subset (n=111) underwent bulk tumor RNA sequencing and were classified as LAR or non-LAR TNBC. DE proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR&gt;2, p&lt;0.05). A targeted set of DE proteins was dichotomized at the 80th percentile. Results: Of 111 TNBC tumors, 17 (15%) were LAR and 94 (85%) non-LAR. Compared to non-LAR TNBC, pts with LAR TNBC were older (age ≥50: 82% vs 52%, p&lt;0.01), with tumors that were more often of apocrine histology (35% vs 0%, p &lt;0.01), grade 1-2 (24% vs 1%, p&lt;0.01), and had lower Ki67 (Ki67 ≤15: 24% vs 11%, p=0.06). Most tumors were T1-2 (94% vs 93%, p=0.82) and N0 (53% vs 62%, p=0.09), respectively. As expected, expression of most immune-related proteins was higher in the stromal vs the intratumoral compartment for both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. When focusing on the stromal compartment, expression of multiple immune related proteins was significantly lower in LAR compared to non-LAR TNBC, including the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 (log-2 fold change [log2FC]: 0.552, p=0.05), the macrophage marker CD14 (log2FC: 0.834, p=0.06), CD44 (lof2FC: 0.637, p=0.07), and the immune checkpoint proteins IDO1 (log2FC: 0.914, p=0.04), VISTA (log2FC: 0.471, p=0.07), ICOS (log2FC: 0.444, p=0.08), and STING (log2FC: 0.544, p=0.09). Proteins with expression levels too low for comparisons included PD-L1, LAG3, FOXP3 and BCL-2. When focusing on the intratumoral compartment, expression of most immune-related proteins was very low in both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. Like in the stromal compartment, CD45 expression was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.78, p=0.02). Expression of the immune checkpoint B7-H3 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.737, p=0.02), while expression of the T cell marker CD127 was higher (log2FC: -0.528, p=0.34). With regards to relevant non-immune markers, expression of Ki67 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.5498, p=0.05), consistent with the clinical assay. Conclusion: In this ultra high-plex spatial analysis, we provide first insights into the differential expression at the protein level of several targetable immune checkpoint molecules in LAR vs non-LAR TNBC. The lower expression of several immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is consistent with the hypothesis that LAR TNBC exhibits a “cold” immune microenvironment compared to other TNBC subtypes, potentially rendering itself less susceptible to immunotherapy-based strategies. These data support the need to consider TNBC molecular subtypes in future evaluations of immune-based therapeutic approaches. Funding: This work was supported by NIH grant P50CA116201 to RLF, JMC, KRK, FJC, DZ, JNI, and MPG; BCRF grant 19-161 to EAT and NCATS grant CTSA KL2 TR002379 to RLF. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH Citation Format: Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David M. Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Xue Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Jose C. Villasboas Bisneto, Fergus J. Couch, E. Aubrey Thompson, Matthew P. Goetz. Digital spatial profiling of immune-related proteins in luminal androgen receptor (LAR) vs non-LAR triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-01.

548 Background: sTILs are a well-established prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with operable TNBC receiving pre or postoperative systemic therapy. We1 and others2,3 have also shown that sTILs are prognostic in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we detail the outcomes of systemically untreated patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL score. We focused on the N0 subset as a group of patients who may be candidates for future prospective therapy de-escalation trials. Methods: From a clinically annotated cohort of 605 patients with centrally confirmed TNBC (ER/PR < 1% and HER2 negative) with long-term outcomes data, we identified 182 patients treated with locoregional therapy only (breast surgery +/- radiation therapy and no chemotherapy). The clinicopathological characteristics of this cohort have previously been published1. In this analysis, we report the 5- and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with N0 TNBC according to sTIL levels. IDFS and OS were defined as per the STEEP classification and estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparisons of the survival distributions between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. sTILs were assessed as a continuous parameter according to the International TIL Working Group guidelines. For comparisons of outcomes between groups, tumors were classified as lymphocyte-predominant TNBC (defined as containing ≥50% sTILs) vs non-lymphocyte-predominant ( < 50% sTILs). Results: Of 182 systemically untreated patients, 149 (82%) were N0 and most (78%) were post-menopausal. T stage distribution was T1: 68%, T2: 28%, T3/4: 4%. Among N0 patients, 31 (21%) had lymphocyte-predominant TNBC, and in this group the 5-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 96% (95% CI 89-100), while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 89% (95% CI 76-100) and 87% (95% CI 73-100), respectively. In contrast, outcomes for patients with non-lymphocyte predominant TNBC were significantly worse. For this group, 5-year iDFS and OS were 62% (95% CI 53-73) and 78% (95% CI 71-86) while the 10-year iDFS and OS were 45% (95% CI 36-58) and 66% (95% CI 68-76), respectively ( log-rank p = 0.02 for iDFS and log-rank p = 0.03 for OS). Conclusions: sTIL quantification identifies a subset of patients with early-stage N0 TNBC with an exceedingly good prognosis, even in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. These data provide support for the evaluation of sTILs as part of prospective investigation of systemic therapy de-escalation strategies in N0 TNBC. References:1Leon-Ferre et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat (2018) 167:89-99 2Park et al, Ann Oncol (2019) 12:1941-1949 3De Jong et al, ESMO 2020

Abstract Introduction: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have established prognostic and predictive significance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the roles of other immune cells in TNBC are less well-established. We performed high-plex quantitative spatial profiling in a cohort of early-stage TNBC to 1) apply spatial context to tumoral immune landscapes and 2) identify immune proteins associated with clinical outcomes, independently of TILs and other established prognostic clinicopathologic variables, in patients (pts) treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: The Mayo TNBC cohort comprises pts with centrally-verified, CTX-naive tumors resected from 1985-2012. Using a cohort-based TMA, with Nanostring GeoMX DSP, we quantitated 58 proteins within spatially-distinct intra-epithelial, cytokeratin-positive tumor segments and adjacent cytokeratin-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments. Differentially-expressed (DE) proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR&gt;2, p&lt; 0.05) and a target DE protein set was dichotomized (80th percentile). After adjusting for prognostic clinicopathologic variables, proteins associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS, defined as time from surgery to either local, regional, and distant recurrence, or death by any cause) were identified by performing variable selection using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) obtained from fitting all possible Cox proportional hazards regression models (performed separately for intra-epithelial/stromal segments, and in groups +/- adjuvant CTX. Results: From the TNBC TMA, DSP data (N=250 tumors) included 169 pts who received adjuvant CTX+ and 81 who did not (CTX-). Overall, 85/250 developed recurrent disease. In the CTX+ group, intra-epithelial tumor segments from pts without recurrent disease were enriched in 10 immune proteins, including CD8, markers involved in antigen presentation/dendritic cells (CD11c, CD40, HLA-DR) or NK cells (CD56) (FC: 1.4-2.1, p&lt;0.05); CD14 was increased in stroma (FC: 1.5, p&lt;0.05). In contrast, in the CTX- group, both the intra-epithelial tumor and stromal segments from pts without recurrences were enriched in immune proteins (N= 12 and 15 respectively; FC 1.6-5.5, p&lt; 0.05) most markedly CD40, IDO1 and HLA-DR (FC: 3.2-5.5, p&lt; 0.05). Overall, CD3, CD4, CD27, CD44, and ICOS among others were enriched only in the CTX- group; CD14 and CD56 were enriched only in the CTX+ group. Based on these spatial data, biologic function and DSP data from another set of TNBC (FinXX trial), CD11c, CD14, CD27, CD40, CD56, and IDO1 were selected for RFS analysis. After applying our model selection criterion and adjusting for pt age at surgery, tumor size, lymph node status, and sTILs, intra-epithelial CD56 was independently associated with improved RFS in the CTX+ group (HR: 0.31[0.12, 0.81]). In the CTX- group, intra-epithelial CD11c was independently associated with improved RFS (0.10 [0.01, 0.81]). Conclusion: In this early-stage TNBC cohort, spatially-distinct tumor immune landscapes were associated with RFS but differed according to receipt of CTX after surgical resection. In the patients who received CTX, the intra-epithelial compartment, rather than stromal compartment, was immune-enriched in pts without recurrences. Among a targeted protein set, intra-epithelial CD56 remained associated with improved outcomes, independent of sTILs and other clinicopathologic features. In the CTX- group, spatial landscapes were more balanced, and intra-epithelial CD11c was independently associated with improved outcomes. These data provide insight into the spatial context of intrinsic immune landscapes in TNBC, and identify candidate prognostic immune biomarkers which may inform therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Jodi M Carter, Saranya Chumsri, David W Hillman, David M Zahrieh, Yaohua Ma, Xue Wang, Jennifer M Kachergus, Judy C Boughey, Minetta C Liu, Krishna R Kalari, JC Villasboas, Roberto A Leon Ferre, Fergus J Couch, Matthew P Goetz, E. Aubrey Thompson. Intra-epithelial tumor immune landscapes are associated with clinical outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS16-01.