Back to Authors

Solbrig, Harold R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5928-3071

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 4

Clinical element models in the SHARPn consortium
Oniki, Thomas A., Zhuo, Ning, Beebe, Calvin E, Coyle, Joseph F., Parker, Craig G. , Solbrig, Harold R. , Marchant, Kyle, Kaggal, Vinod C. , Huff, Stanley M. , Chute, Christopher G. , Liu, Hongfang

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | November 15, 2015 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 248-256

10.1093/jamia/ocv134 Get It

Abstract Objective The objective of the Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Project area four (SHARPn) was to develop open-source tools that could be used for the normalization of electronic health record (EHR) data for secondary use—specifically, for high throughput phenotyping. We describe the role of Intermountain Healthcare’s Clinical Element Models ([CEMs] Intermountain Healthcare Health Services, Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah) as normalization “targets” within the project. Materials and Methods Intermountain’s CEMs were either repurposed or created for the SHARPn project. A CEM describes “valid” structure and semantics for a particular kind of clinical data. CEMs are expressed in a computable syntax that can be compiled into implementation artifacts. The modeling team and SHARPn colleagues agilely gathered requirements and developed and refined models. Results Twenty-eight “statement” models (analogous to “classes”) and numerous “component” CEMs and their associated terminology were repurposed or developed to satisfy SHARPn high throughput phenotyping requirements. Model (structural) mappings and terminology (semantic) mappings were also created. Source data instances were normalized to CEM-conformant data and stored in CEM instance databases. A model browser and request site were built to facilitate the development. Discussion The modeling efforts demonstrated the need to address context differences and granularity choices and highlighted the inevitability of iso-semantic models. The need for content expertise and “intelligent” content tooling was also underscored. We discuss scalability and sustainability expectations for a CEM-based approach and describe the place of CEMs relative to other current efforts. Conclusions The SHARPn effort demonstrated the normalization and secondary use of EHR data. CEMs proved capable of capturing data originating from a variety of sources within the normalization pipeline and serving as suitable normalization targets.
Shape expressions
Prud’hommeaux, Eric , Gayo, José Emilio Labra , Solbrig, Harold R.

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Semantic Systems | September 2, 2014 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 32-40

10.1145/2660517.2660523 Get It

Using semantic web technology to support ICD-11 textual definitions authoring
Jiang, Guoqian , Solbrig, Harold R. , Chute, Christopher G.

Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences | March 20, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 38-44

10.1145/2166896.2166910 Get It

National Center for Biomedical Ontology: Advancing Biomedicine through Structured Organization of Scientific Knowledge
Lewis, Suzanna , Mungall, Chris , Misra, Sima, Westerfield, Monte , Ashburner, Michael , Solbrig, Harold R. , Storey, Margaret‐Anne , Smith, Barry , Day-Richter, John, Noy, Natalya F., Musen, Mark A. , Rubin, Daniel L. , Sim, Ida , Chute, Christopher G. , Mungall, Christopher J

OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology | August 10, 2006 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 185-198

10.1089/omi.2006.10.185 Get It

The National Center for Biomedical Ontology is a consortium that comprises leading informaticians, biologists, clinicians, and ontologists, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap, to develop innovative technology and methods that allow scientists to record, manage, and disseminate biomedical information and knowledge in machine-processable form. The goals of the Center are (1) to help unify the divergent and isolated efforts in ontology development by promoting high quality open-source, standards-based tools to create, manage, and use ontologies, (2) to create new software tools so that scientists can use ontologies to annotate and analyze biomedical data, (3) to provide a national resource for the ongoing evaluation, integration, and evolution of biomedical ontologies and associated tools and theories in the context of driving biomedical projects (DBPs), and (4) to disseminate the tools and resources of the Center and to identify, evaluate, and communicate best practices of ontology development to the biomedical community. Through the research activities within the Center, collaborations with the DBPs, and interactions with the biomedical community, our goal is to help scientists to work more effectively in the e-science paradigm, enhancing experiment design, experiment execution, data analysis, information synthesis, hypothesis generation and testing, and understand human disease. This paper is part of the special issue of OMICS on data standards.