Lucas, Peter C.

TPS3644 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 1-27-2025): 647/1,912. NCT: 05174169. Support: U10 CA180868, -180822; -180888; UG1 CA189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

548 Background: TNBC is associated with higher risk of recurrence and poorer survival rates than other breast cancer subtypes. For node-positive TNBC or tumors larger than 0.5 cm, chemotherapy is generally recommended. For stage I TNBC, the benefit from chemotherapy, the optimal regimen, and whether to administer it in the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant setting remain controversial. Here, we report the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with stage I TNBC treated at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry data, we identified patients with stage I TNBC treated between 2010 and 2021. We used the pathologic tumor (T) category for patients treated with upfront surgery and the clinical T category for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to treatment groups, measured from the day of surgery. RFS was reported at a median follow-up of 3.9, 6.2, and 7.3 years for patients who received chemotherapy neoadjuvantly, adjuvantly, and surgery alone with no chemotherapy, respectively. Results: A total of 602 patients with Stage I TNBC were included, with a median age of 62 years. 290 (48%) underwent upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (pT1a: 2%, pT1b: 25%, pT1c: 74%), 127 (21%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (cT1a: 2%, cT1b: 11%, cT1c: 87%), and 185 (31%) underwent primary surgery without any chemotherapy (pT1mi/T1a: 33%, pT1b: 32%, pT1c: 35%). Most patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy received anthracycline/cyclophosphamide + taxane (70%), while most patients treated in the adjuvant setting received a non-anthracycline containing regimen (60%). The 5-year RFS was 96% (95% CI: 93-100%) for patients who received chemotherapy neoadjuvantly, 95% (95% CI: 92-98%) for those who received chemotherapy adjuvantly, and 85% (95% CI: 80-91%) for those treated with surgery alone and no chemotherapy ( P < 0.0001). 71 (56%) of the 127 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy achieved a pCR, with only 1 RFS event (at 14 months) in that group, compared to 4 RFS events among those not achieving pCR (at 12, 20, 28 and 75 months, respectively). Among patients not receiving chemotherapy (either adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly), the 5-year RFS rates were 94% for pT1mi/T1a, 92% for pT1b and 72% for pT1c (T1mi/a/b vs T1c, P = 0.009). Conclusions: In this large cohort of stage I TNBC, patients who received chemotherapy (adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly) had better 5-year RFS compared with those treated with locoregional therapy only. Among patients receiving chemotherapy, 5-year RFS was nearly identical regardless of whether chemotherapy was administered before or after surgery. Interestingly, patients undergoing upfront surgery were more likely to receive an anthracycline-sparing chemotherapy regimen.

Importance Use of modern neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens has markedly increased rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer, raising the question of whether surgical removal of the primary tumor is required for patients with pCR. For surgery to be omitted, one must be able to accurately predict pCR before surgery. Objective To investigate if adding post-NAC core needle biopsy of the tumor bed to trimodality imaging in patients who have clinical complete response (cCR) will predict pCR (resolution of both invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ) in 90% or more cases. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a phase 2, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients were enrolled from August 2017 to June 2019. This is the final analysis, which was completed in December 2023. The setting included academic and community hospital center members of NRG (ie, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group) in the US and Canada. Patients with operable (T1-T3, stage I-III) invasive ductal carcinoma who completed NAC and achieved cCR and radiological complete response (rCR) or near rCR by mammography (mass ≤1 cm and no malignant microcalcifications), ultrasound (mass ≤2 cm), and magnetic resonance imaging (no mass with rapid rise or washout kinetics). Interventions Patients underwent marker-directed stereotactic multiple-core needle biopsy of the tumor bed with marker placement before breast-conservation surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures End points were negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of the biopsy. Results A total of 105 patients were enrolled with 101 evaluable (mean [SD] age, 52.8 [10.5] years); 77 patients (76.2%) were younger than 60 years, and all breast cancer subtypes were represented with 32 (31.7%) triple-negative breast cancer, 21 (20.8%) hormone receptor–positive/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( ERBB2 ; formerly HER2 )–negative ( ERBB2 −) breast cancer, and 46 (45.5%) ERBB2 -positive ( ERBB2 +) breast cancer. In 101 evaluable patients, 36 had residual disease at surgery (pCR = 64%). With imaging criteria, NPV of the biopsy was 78.3% (95% CI, 67.9%-86.6%), and the sensitivity of the biopsy was 50% (95% CI, 32.9%-67.1%). In an exploratory subset analysis, the NPV in patients with ERBB2 + breast cancer was 90% (95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%). On retrospective central review, 62 of 101 enrolled patients met imaging eligibility criteria. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, NPV in these patients was 86.8% (95% CI, 74.7%-94.5%). Conclusions and Relevance These findings do not support breast conservation treatment without surgery based on the study criteria for cCR and rCR/near rCR by trimodality imaging and negative tumor-bed biopsy. Strict adherence to imaging criteria may be required to achieve acceptable predictive values. TRIAL Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03188393

Abstract Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 10-15% of all breast cancers, making it the most common special histological subtype of breast cancer. Initially, ILC is associated with a better response to adjuvant hormonal therapy compared to invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC). However, patients with ILC often experience a worse long-term outcome. Over 90% of ILCs are estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and do not express functional E-cadherin (CDH1). There are limited studies aimed at improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in ILC. Therefore, we set out to generate and characterize a syngeneic mouse cell line model that mimics the genetic loss of CDH1 seen in ILC. We created an ER+ ILC-like mammary cancer model using the syngeneic SSM3 cell line, derived from an ER+ mouse mammary tumor in STAT1-deficient mice. To mimic the hallmark feature of ILC, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to knock out Cdh1. In vitro assays were performed to evaluate the effects of Cdh1 knockout (KO) in both 2D and 3D environments, focusing on cell proliferation and estrogen sensitivity. These experiments demonstrated increased growth of Cdh1 KO SSM3 cells in both 2D and 3D environments, together with altered cell morphology and increased sensitivity to estrogen.For in vivo characterization, we focused on tumor growth and metastasis. SSM3 Scr and Cdh1 KO cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of mice. Initial findings revealed increased tumor growth in mice injected with SSM3 Cdh1 KO cells, while metastasis studies are ongoing. RNA-seq analysis of both SSM3 cells grown in vitro, and in vivo tumor tissues is ongoing and will help to identify distinctive gene expression changes in the Cdh1 KO model. We will also analyze changes in the TME, such as immune cells, ECM and fibroblasts. In summary, we have successfully generated an ER+ syngeneic ILC model, and we expect that growing the cells in vitro and in vivo represents a valuable tool for studying ILC and holds promise for advancing the development of targeted immunotherapies and endocrine therapies for this breast cancer subtype. Citation Format: Insa Thale, Dixcy J. John Mary, Sarah Wang, Lora Rigatti, Jagmohan Hooda, Peter Lucas, George C. Tseng, Adrian V. Lee, Steffi Oesterreich. In vitro and in vivo characterization of Cdh1 CRISPR knockout in syngeneic ER+ SSM3 mouse mammary tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3925.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the activated B cell–like subtype (ABC-DLBCL) is associated with particularly poor outcome. Many ABC-DLBCLs harbor gain-of-function mutations that cause inappropriate assembly of the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) signalosome, a cytoplasmic complex that drives downstream NF-κB signaling. MALT1 is the effector protein of the CBM signalosome such that its recruitment to the signalosome via interaction with BCL10 allows it to exert both protease and scaffolding activities that together synergize in driving NF-κB. Here, we demonstrate that a molecular groove located between two adjacent immunoglobulin-like domains within MALT1 represents a binding pocket for BCL10. Leveraging this discovery, we performed an in silico screen to identify small molecules that dock within this MALT1 groove and act as BCL10-MALT1 protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors. We report the identification of M1i-124 as a first-in-class compound that blocks BCL10-MALT1 interaction, abrogates MALT1 scaffolding and protease activities, promotes degradation of BCL10 and MALT1 proteins, and specifically targets ABC-DLBCLs characterized by dysregulated MALT1. Our findings demonstrate that small-molecule inhibitors of BCL10-MALT1 interaction can function as potent agents to block MALT1 signaling in selected lymphomas, and provide a road map for clinical development of a new class of precision-medicine therapeutics.

TPS311 Background: Approximately 45% of dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 (PD-1) pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF as well as between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models, and phase II data showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. Within the AtezoTRIBE 8-pt dMMR CRC subgroup treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, median PFS was not reached, with the first progression event at ~16 mos. Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD-1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastroesophageal and lung cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: This two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Key inclusion criteria have been simplified on recent amendments to better mirror clinical practice for pts receiving mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo: One cycle of FOLFOX or CAPOX, with or without bev (or biosimilar) prior to enrollment allowed, dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; pts with total bilirubin ≤4.0 x ULN; duration of therapy for up to two years for both arms; imaging frequency on post-treatment follow-up has been reduced; as has measurable disease per RECIST. Primary endpoint is PFS. Assuming the atezo monotherapy control arm has a 48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator, we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Harmonization of translational analyses is planned between GI004 (COMMIT) and A021502 (ATOMIC). Sample size has been modified with the accrual goal of 120 pts randomized between the two immunotherapy arms needed for study completion. Enrollment actively continues at U.S. sites. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 100/120. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228 .

TPS310 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 500/1,912. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

Abstract Safe delivery of mRNA to the brain will revolutionize the treatment of brain tumors. While lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are clinically most advanced non-viral delivery vehicles for therapeutic mRNA, LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to the brain remains challenging. We hypothesized that rationally designed LNPs based on extracellular vesicle mimicry would enable efficient delivery of RNA therapeutics to brain cells without undue toxicity. We engineered LNPs consisting of four components similar to the formulation used in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech): ionizable lipid, cholesterol, helper lipid and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid. We screened ten classes of helper lipids based on lipids enriched in extracellular vesicles to engineer biomimetic LNPs and tested their GFP mRNA delivery efficacy in SIM-A9 mouse microglia cell line. Several unique LNP formulations with potent delivery efficacy (&gt;90% cells transfected) and stable GFP expression kinetics (5 days) were identified. LNP formulations with high transfection efficacy were then tested in vivo for luciferase mRNA delivery via intrathecal injection in C57BL/6 mice. Luciferase expression in vivo confirmed widespread mRNA delivery in the brain. We then tested Cre recombinase mRNA delivery in Ai9 mouse to identify LNP-targeted cells via flow cytometry and histology. Flow cytometry and expansion microscopy confirmed Cre recombinase mRNA delivery to a variety of brain cells, including microglia (75-90%), neurons (31-40%), neural stem cells (39-62%), oligodendrocytes (70-90%), and astrocytes (44-76%). LNPs were further evaluated for Cas9 mRNA and CD81 sgRNA delivery in C57BL/6 mouse brains to assess brain-targeted gene editing. Sanger sequencing showed that CRISPR-Cas9 editing was successful in ~40% of cells in the mouse brain. In summary, we engineered extracellular vesicle-based LNP library that can deliver RNA therapeutics to a variety of brain cells in vivo. With further development, this technology could potentially enable genetic and epigenetic therapies targeting drivers of brain tumors.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM), one of the deadliest primary tumors of the central nervous system, is characterized by a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-associated macrophages and microglia (TAMs) are a dominant population of immune cells in the GBM TME and substantially contribute to immunosuppression, tumor progression, and treatment resistance. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying TAM behavior is crucial to the development of effective immuno-therapeutic strategies for treating GBM. The adaptor protein, Caspase Recruitment Domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9) is primarily expressed in myeloid cells and its activation triggers assembly of the CARD9-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complex, which then promotes activation of NF-κB and/or MAPK pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the CBM complex in the GBM TME and assess its potential as a therapeutic target. METHODS/RESULTS In silico analyses revealed that GBM tumors demonstrate increased CARD9 and MALT1 expression in comparison to non-tumor brain tissue, with CARD9 expressed only within the myeloid compartment. Using co-culture, scratch wound, and transwell assays, we found that GBM tumor cells induce macrophage M2 polarization and migration via a mechanism that is dependent on CARD9/MALT1 signaling within macrophages. scRNA-Seq and flow-cytometric analysis of orthotopic syngeneic immunocompetent GBM tumor models revealed that the GBM TME is dominated by macrophages. Disruption of MALT1 protease activity within the TME leads to reduced tumor infiltration by immunosuppressive TAMs, remodeling of TAMs toward an immunoreactive anti-tumor phenotype, and improved survival of GBM-bearing mice. Additionally, we found that tumor growth was abrogated when GBM-bearing mice were treated with either a MALT1-protease inhibitor or a CARD9 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that blockade of the CARD9-MALT1 signaling axis impairs GBM-induced macrophage recruitment and M2 polarization and inhibits tumor progression. These findings nominate the CARD9-MALT1 signaling axis as a new target for TAM-directed immunotherapy for the treatment of GBM.

Dysregulated actin cytoskeleton gives rise to aberrant cell motility and metastatic spread of tumor cells. This study evaluates the effect of overexpression of wild-type versus functional mutants of MRTF-A on migration and invasion of breast cancer (BC) cells. Our studies indicate that SRF's interaction is critical for MRTF-A-induced promotion of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional cell migration, while the SAP-domain function is important selectively for three-dimensional cell migration. Increased MRTF-A activity is associated with more effective membrane protrusion, a phenotype that is attributed predominantly to SRF's interaction with MRTF. We demonstrate formin-family protein mDia2 as an important mediator of MRTF-stimulated actin polymerization at the leading edge and cell migration. Multiplexed quantitative immunohistochemistry and transcriptome analyses of clinical BC specimens further demonstrate a positive correlation between nuclear localization of MRTF with malignant traits of cancer cells and enrichment of MRTF–SRF gene signature in pair-matched distant metastases versus primary tumors. In conclusion, this study establishes a novel mechanism of MRTF-dependent regulation of cell migration and provides evidence for the association between MRTF activity and increased malignancy in human BC, justifying future development of specific small molecule inhibitors of the MRTF-SRF transcriptional complex as potential therapeutic agents in BC.