Rand, James A.

Eleven patients who were treated for talonavicular arthrosis with a talonavicular arthrodesis between 1961 and 1979 at the Mayo Clinic have been reviewed. Follow-up from surgery ranged from 2.5 to 21 years with a mean of 9.5 years. Clinical, radiographic, and gait analyses were obtained. All patients had satisfactory pain relief, but all noted difficulty in ambulating on irregular ground. Three patients had roentgenographic evidence of arthrosis affecting other tarsal joints that had not been involved before arthrodesis. Gait analysis revealed decreased terminal stance-phase plantarflexion and pronounced reduction of subtalar motion. Talonavicular arthrodesis does give predictable union and patient satisfaction but results in limitation of subtalar motion and loss of stance-phase plantarflexion.

Abstract Frequently, meniscal pathology accompanies degenerative changes affecting the articular surface of the knee. The attritional changes in the meniscus lead to fragmentation of the meniscus and a variety of tears, usually of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. A prospective study of the results of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the presence of at least Outerbridge Grade III chondromalacia of the accompanying joint surface was performed between 1980 and 1984. Eighty‐seven knees in 84 patients were studied. The mean age was 62 (29–84) years. The right knee was involved in 44 patients, and 47 were men. Preoperative radiographs demonstrated osteoarthritis in 53 patients. The medial meniscus was involved in 82, while the lateral meniscus was affected in nine knees. Four knees had involvement of both menisci. In 72 knees, the most frequent lesion was a tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. The most frequent configuration of the tears was a flap in 42. The morbidity was small with the use of ambulatory aids being 10 ± 13 (mean ± SD) days. Subsequent surgery was performed on six knees consisting of two total knee arthroplasties, two upper‐tibial osteotomies, one repeat arthroscopic meniscectomy, and one popliteal cyst excision. Two patients had poor results related to progression of their arthritis and one developed osteonecrosis. Five patients were unchanged from their preoperative status. Subchondral sclerosis or osteophytes on the preoperative radiographs correlated with 72% compared to 90% satisfactory results in the absence of these findings (p < 0.03). Complications consisted of superficial thrombophlebitis in three, hemarthrosis in one, and superficial infection in one patient. Arthroscopic meniscectomy is a valuable adjunct to the management of the older patient with early degenerative arthritis of the knee and symptomatic meniscus tears.

Abstract The use of high energy devices has been suggested for intra‐articular surgery. Experimental studies have been performed using the laser and electrocautery. However, clinical application has primarily been with the use of the electrocautery. Electrosurgery is currently being used for lateral retinacular release as well as meniscal surgery. Inadvertent damage to articular cartilage may occur, especially during meniscal resection. The objective of the current study is to assess the effect of the Concept electrocautery with the meniscal cutting electrode on fresh human articular cartilage. Twenty fresh tibial plateaus removed at the time of total knee arthroplasty were subjected to electrocautery currents ranging from 25 to 82.5 W. The articular cartilage was stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The extent of cartilage necrosis was quantitated as a percentage of the thickness of the articular cartilage. A dose response curve was developed. The extent of articular cartilage necrosis with the electrocautery setting of 20 (24.4 W) commonly used for meniscal resection resulted in only an 11.4%‐injury to the articular cartilage. At the manufacturer's recommended setting of 24 (27 W), a 16% depth of laceration of the articular cartilage may be anticipated. We conclude that the lowest current setting possible should be utilized for meniscal surgery and the risk of articular cartilage damage from inadvertent injury is not excessive.