Elkind, Mitchell S.V.

Background: High blood pressure (BP), particularly in mid-life, increases the risk for late-life cognitive impairment and dementia (CID). The extent to which Blacks’ and Hispanics’ worse BP control starting in young adulthood contributes to their greater risk of CID compared to Whites is uncertain. Objective: To describe a pooled, multi-ethnic cohort created to determine the associations between BP levels over the life course and CID risk in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites. Methods: We pooled individual-level data from 35,473 adults (22.6% Blacks, 8.1% Hispanics, 67.3% Whites, 2% Other) with baseline age ≥18 and cognitive assessments across 6 longitudinal cohorts in the United States from 1971 to 2016: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC), Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA), Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), Framingham Offspring Study (FOS), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), and Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS). We harmonized cognitive tests across studies into 3 factors representing global cognitive performance, executive function, and memory using statistically appropriate confirmatory factor analysis. Mean (SD) follow up was 17.1 (10.9) years. Results: The mean (SD) baseline age was 54.3 (16.4) years and 19554 (55.1%) participants were female (Table). There were 3193 (9.0%) first incident strokes (2651 ischemic, 348 hemorrhagic, and 117 other or undetermined type) and 15147 (42.7%) deaths. The Table presents mean BPs at the first and last visits by cohort and the pooled sample. From the initial to the last assessment, mean global cognition decreased over time (p<0.001), as did mean executive function (p<0.001) and mean memory scores (p<0.001) in the pooled sample. Conclusion: This will be the first comprehensive, large investigation of the association of BP levels from young adulthood to late-life and CID risk in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Background and Purpose— Hemicraniectomy and Durotomy Upon Deterioration From Infarction-Related Swelling Trial (HeADDFIRST) was a randomized pilot study to obtain information necessary to design a Phase III trial to evaluate the benefit of surgical decompression for brain swelling from large supratentorial cerebral hemispheric infarction. Methods— All patients with stroke were screened for eligibility (age 18–75 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥18 with Item 1a<2 [responsive to minor stimulation], and CT demonstrating unilateral, complete middle cerebral artery territory infarction by specific imaging criteria). All enrolled patients were treated using a standardized medical treatment protocol. Those with both ≥4 mm of pineal shift and deterioration in level of arousal or ≥7.5 mm of anteroseptal shift within 96 hours of stroke onset were randomized to continued medical treatment only or medical treatment plus surgery. Death at 21 days was the primary outcome measure. Results— Among 4909 screened patients, only 66 (1.3%) patients were eligible for HeADDFIRST. Forty patients were enrolled, and 26 patients developed the requisite brain swelling for randomization. All who failed to meet randomization criteria were alive at 21 days. Mortality at 21 and 180 days was 40% (4/10) in the medical treatment only and 21% (3/14) and 36% (5/14) in the medical treatment plus surgery arms, respectively. Conclusions— HeADDFIRST randomization criteria effectively distinguished low from high risk of death from large supratentorial cerebral hemispheric infarction. Lower mortality in the medical treatment only group than in other published trials suggests a possible benefit to standardizing medical management. These results can inform the interpretation of recently completed European trials concerning patient selection and medical management. Clinical Trial Registration— This trial was not registered because enrollment began before July 1, 2005.

Background and Purpose— Women have poorer outcomes from stroke than men. Women also have risk factors that are unique, including pregnancy and hormone therapy. Hormone therapy for postmenopausal replacement increased the risk of ischemic stroke according to results of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trials. Based on the current understanding of the mechanisms of action of estrogen, the reasons for this increased risk are uncertain. One method to better understand the reasons for this increased risk is to re-evaluate estrogen’s role in the neurovascular unit, simplistically comprised of the neurons, glia, and endothelial cells, as well as the processes of inflammation, and hemostasis/thrombosis. Besides the role of estrogen there are many gaps of knowledge about issues specific to women and stroke. Summary of Review— A multidisciplinary workshop was held in August 2005 to summarize the current evidence for estrogen and, more generally, stroke in women, and to provide recommendations for future basic, preclinical, and clinical research studies. Conclusions— These studies may ultimately change the approach to stroke prevention and treatment in women.