Back to Authors

Steinberg, Michael

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-2120

Mayo Clinic

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Citations 2

The Emerging Global Tobacco Treatment Workforce: Characteristics of Tobacco Treatment Specialists Trained in Council-Accredited Training Programs from 2017 to 2019
Sheffer, Christine E. , Al‐Zalabani, Abdulmohsen H. , Aubrey, Andrée, Bader, Rasha K. , Beltrez, Claribel, Bennett, Susan E., Carl, Ellen , Cranos, Caroline, Darville, Audrey , Greyber, Jennifer , Hawari, Feras , Hynes, V. Barbara, Kotsen, Chris , McConaha, Jamie L. , McCary, Heather, Meade, Crystal D , Messick, Cara, Morgan, Susan , Morris, Cindy W., Retzlaff, Jessica, Santis, Wendy, Short, Etta, Shumaker, Therese, Steinberg, Michael , Wendling, Ann, Al-Zalabani, Abdulmohsen , Bennett, Susan, Messick, Cara , Morris, Cindy W , Steinberg, Michael , Sheffer, Christine E , Karam‐Hage, Maher , Hutcheson, Tresza D. , Leone, Frank T. , Payne, Thomas J.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | March 2, 2021 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2416

10.3390/ijerph18052416 Get It

Tobacco use is projected to kill 1 billion people in the 21st century. Tobacco Use Disorder (TUD) is one of the most common substance use disorders in the world. Evidence-based treatment of TUD is effective, but treatment accessibility remains very low. A dearth of specially trained clinicians is a significant barrier to treatment accessibility, even within systems of care that implement brief intervention models. The treatment of TUD is becoming more complex and tailoring treatment to address new and traditional tobacco products is needed. The Council for Tobacco Treatment Training Programs (Council) is the accrediting body for Tobacco Treatment Specialist (TTS) training programs. Between 2016 and 2019, n = 7761 trainees completed Council-accredited TTS training programs. Trainees were primarily from North America (92.6%) and the Eastern Mediterranean (6.1%) and were trained via in-person group workshops in medical and academic settings. From 2016 to 2019, the number of Council-accredited training programs increased from 14 to 22 and annual number of trainees increased by 28.5%. Trainees have diverse professional backgrounds and work in diverse settings but were primarily White (69.1%) and female (78.7%) located in North America. Nearly two-thirds intended to implement tobacco treatment services in their setting; two-thirds had been providing tobacco treatment for 1 year or less; and 20% were sent to training by their employers. These findings suggest that the training programs are contributing to the development of a new workforce of TTSs as well as the development of new programmatic tobacco treatment services in diverse settings. Developing strategies to support attendance from demographically and geographically diverse professionals might increase the proportion of trainees from marginalized groups and regions of the world with significant tobacco-related inequities.
A Narrative Review of Intensive Group Tobacco Treatment: Clinical, Research, and US Policy Recommendations
Kotsen, Chris , Santorelli, Melissa L. , Bloom, Erika Litvin , Ripley‐Moffitt, Carol , Steinberg, Michael , Burke, Michael V. , Foulds, Jonathan , Steinberg, Michael , Goldstein, Adam O

Nicotine & Tobacco Research | August 15, 2018 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1580-1589

10.1093/ntr/nty162 Get It

AbstractIntroductionClinical practice guidelines recommend comprehensive treatment for tobacco dependence including pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions. Group counseling may deliver unique treatment aspects not available with other modalities. This manuscript provides a narrative review of group treatment outcomes from real-world practice settings and complements recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our primary goals were to determine whether group treatments delivered in these settings have yielded similar quit rates compared to individual treatment and to provide recommendations for best practices and policy.MethodsGroup treatment was defined as occurring in a clinical or workplace setting (ie, not provided as part of a research study), led by a professionally trained clinician, and offered weekly over several weeks. English language PubMed articles from January 2000 to July 2017 were searched to identify studies that included outcomes from both group and individual treatment offered in real-world settings. Additional data sources meeting our criteria were also included. Reports not using pharmacotherapy and research studies (eg, RCTs) were excluded. The primary outcome was short-term, carbon monoxide (CO)-validated point prevalence abstinence (4-week postquit date).ResultsThe review included data from 11 observational studies. In all cases, group treatment(s) had higher 4-week CO-validated quit rates (range: 35.5%–67.3%) than individual treatment(s) (range: 18.6%–53.3%).ConclusionsBest practice group treatments for tobacco dependence are generalizable from research to clinical settings and likely to be at least as effective as intensive individual treatment. The added advantages of efficiency and cost-effectiveness can be significant. Group treatment is feasible in various settings with good results.ImplicationsA major barrier to achieving high rates of tobacco abstinence is under-utilization of evidence-based treatment interventions. This review demonstrates the effectiveness and utility of group treatment for tobacco dependence. Based on the available data described in this narrative review in conjunction with existing RCT data, group treatment for tobacco dependence should be established and available in all behavioral health and medical settings. Group tobacco treatment is now one of the mandated reimbursable tobacco treatment formats within the US health care system, creating enormous opportunities for widespread clinical reach. Finally, comprehensive worksite group programs can further extend impact.