Back to Authors

Trentman, TL

Mayo Clinic

Departments of Anaesthesiology

Citations 3

Response to Occipital Nerve Block is Not Useful in Predicting Efficacy of Occipital Nerve Stimulation
Schwedt, Todd J. , Dodick, DW, Trentman, TL, Zimmerman, R. S., Schwedt, Todd J

Cephalalgia | March 5, 2007 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 271-274

10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01251.x Get It

Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) may be effective for the treatment of headaches that are recalcitrant to medical therapy. The objective of this study was to determine if response to occipital nerve block (ONB) predicts response to ONS in patients with chronic, medically intractable headaches. We evaluated 15 patients who underwent placement of occipital nerve stimulators for the treatment of chronic headaches. Data were collected regarding analgesic response to ONB and to ONS. Nine of 15 patients were ONS responders (≥50% reduction in headache frequency or severity). Thirteen patients had ONB prior to stimulator implantation. Ten of 13 who had ONB had significant relief of head pain lasting at least 24 h, and three were ONB non-responders. Of the three ONB non-responders, two were ONS responders. Of the two patients who did not have ONB prior to ONS, one was an ONS responder and one was an ONS non-responder. In conclusion, analgesic response to ONB may not be predictive of the therapeutic effect from ONS in patients with medically refractory chronic headaches.
Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Headache—Long-Term Safety and Efficacy
Schwedt, Todd J. , Dodick, DW, Hentz, Joseph G. , Trentman, TL, Zimmerman, R. S., Schwedt, Todd J

Cephalalgia | January 26, 2007 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 153-157

10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01272.x Get It

The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for medically intractable headache. Electrical stimulation of large sensory afferents has an antinociceptive effect. Occipital nerve stimulation may be effective for the treatment of medically intractable headache. Retrospective analysis was performed of 15 patients with medically refractory headache who underwent implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator. Pre- and postimplant data regarding headache frequency, severity, disability, depression and post-stimulator complications were collected. Twelve patients were female and three male. Ages ranged from 21 to 52 years (mean 39 years). Eight patients had chronic migraine, three chronic cluster, two hemicrania continua and two had post-traumatic headache. Eight patients underwent bilateral and seven had unilateral lead placement. Patients were measured after 5-42 months (mean 19). All six mean headache measures improved significantly from baseline ( P < 0.03). Headache frequency per 90 days improved by 25 days from a baseline of 89 days; headache severity (0-10) improved 2.4 points from a baseline of 7.1 points; MIDAS disability improved 70 points from a baseline of 179 points; HIT-6 scores improved 11 points from a baseline of 71 points; BDI-II improved eight points from a baseline of 20 points; and the mean subjective percent change in pain was 52%. Most patients (60%) required lead revision within 1 year. One patient required generator revision. Occipital nerve stimulation may be effective in some patients with intractable headache. Surgical revisions may be commonly required. Safety and efficacy results from prospective, randomized, sham-controlled studies in patients with medically refractory headache are needed.
Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Cluster Headache and Hemicrania Continua: Pain Relief and Persistence of Autonomic Features
Schwedt, Todd J. , Dodick, DW, Trentman, TL, Zimmerman, R. S., Schwedt, Todd J

Cephalalgia | July 17, 2006 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1025-1027

10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01142.x Get It