Strowd, Roy E.

2001 Background: Systemic treatments are limited for patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery and/or radiation. Loss of NF2and CDKN2A/Bare common in higher grade meningiomas and promote meningioma progression in preclinical models. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as part of Alliance umbrella trial A071401, a genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive meningiomas. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with grade 2/3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily until progressive disease. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR) by Macdonald criteria; the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. Twenty-four evaluable pts provided >85% power to detect a PFS6 >41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha =0.02). The threshold for promising results for PFS6 was 8+/24 pts. For RR, 24 evaluable pts provided >89% power to detect RR >20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha = 0.021). The threshold for promising results for RR was 3+/24 pts. Results: Of 83 pts screened while the abemaciclib arm was open between September 15, 2021 and October 3, 2022, 36 eligible pts received treatment. The mean number of treatment cycles administered was 7 and median follow-up since start of treatment was 11 months. The first 24 pts that met eligibility criteria and began treatment were considered evaluable for the primary endpoint analysis. Of the 24 pts evaluated, 58% were female and the median age was 62 years. The observed PFS6 rate was 54% (13/24 pts, 95% confidence interval 33-75%), thus the study met PFS6 endpoint. No objective responses were observed. Of the 36 pts who started treatment, eight had a grade 3 and two had a grade 4 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia (2), neutropenia (2), leukopenia (1), blurry vision (1), diarrhea (2), fatigue (2), ALT elevation (1), dehydration (1), hyperkalemia (1), hyponatremia (1), dizziness (1), acute kidney injury (1), and thromboembolic event (1). Grade 4 toxicities included ALT elevation (1), AST elevation (1) and vomiting (1). Conclusions: Abemaciclib was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6. The overall trial endpoint was met. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for the treatment of patients with progressive grade 2/3 meningiomas. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; UG1CA189867 (NRG Oncology); Eli Lilly; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT02523014 .

AbstractObjectiveWe published a list of “must‐know” routine EEG (rEEG) findings for trainees based on expert opinion. Here, we studied the accuracy and inter‐rater agreement (IRA) of these “must‐know” rEEG findings among international experts.MethodsA previously validated online rEEG examination was disseminated to EEG experts. It consisted of a survey and 30 multiple‐choice questions predicated on the previously published “must‐know” rEEG findings divided into four domains: normal, abnormal, normal variants, and artifacts. Questions contained de‐identified 10–20‐s epochs of EEG that were considered unequivocal examples by five EEG experts.ResultsThe examination was completed by 258 international EEG experts. Overall mean accuracy and IRA (AC1) were 81% and substantial (0.632), respectively. The domain‐specific mean accuracies and IRA were: 76%, moderate (0.558) (normal); 78%, moderate (0.575) (abnormal); 85%, substantial (0.678) (normal variants); 85%, substantial (0.740) (artifacts). Academic experts had a higher accuracy than private practice experts (82% vs. 77%; p = .035). Country‐specific overall mean accuracies and IRA were: 92%, almost perfect (0.836) (U.S.); 86%, substantial (0.762) (Brazil); 79%, substantial (0.646) (Italy); and 72%, moderate (0.496) (India). In conclusion, collective expert accuracy and IRA of “must‐know” rEEG findings are suboptimal and heterogeneous.SignificanceWe recommend the development and implementation of pragmatic, accessible, country‐specific ways to measure and improve the expert accuracy and IRA.

Abstract Histopathology is the gold standard for distinguishing tumor recurrence from treatment-induced necrosis but differentiating pseudoprogression from true recurrence is challenging in tumors with ambiguous morphological features. Prior research reported a 36% inter-rater agreement during suspected recurrence (Holdhoff et al., 2019). While serial radiographic and laboratory assessments are common, serial histopathological assessments are not. This study evaluated agreement and factors influencing assessment of active and inactive tumors through single and multiple time-point histopathological assessments. Patients who underwent initial and subsequent reoperation were identified, and their available histology slides were examined retrospectively. Four independent neuropathologists conducted two types of reviews: single time-point reviews using most recent biopsy/surgery slides, and multiple time-point reviews comparing images from initial and repeat biopsies taken 1-3 months apart. Neuropathologists completed a questionnaire assessing various tumor characteristics. Assignments were categorized as "active tumor," "treatment effect," or "unable to classify." 324 assessments were conducted (108 single time-point, 216 multiple time-point). Intraclass correlation coefficients for single vs. multiple time-point assessments were 0.72-0.93 for active tumors and 0.57-0.86 for inactive tumors. Pathologists' assessment of % inactive tumor was influenced by mitotic activity (p= 0.0028), cellularity (p< 0.0001), hyalinized vessels (p= 0.0019), and necrosis (p= 0.0046). Evaluation of % active tumor was influenced by hyalinized vessels (p= 0.0006), mitotic activity (p< 0.0001), cellularity (p< 0.0001), and microvascular proliferation (p= 0.0093), with the latter three factors specifically affecting final sign-out pathology. Serial histopathological assessment didn’t affect determination of % active or inactive tumor. No association between % inactive tumor and fibrinoid necrosis for single time-point (p= 0.34) but a strong negative association was seen for serial assessment (p= 0.0006). Inter-rater agreement was higher for identifying active tumors than inactive tumors in both case reviews. Changes in necrosis between tissue samples in single vs. multiple timepoint assessments influenced pathologists' assessment of % inactive tumor.

Abstract BACKGROUND Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class XPO1 inhibitor with potent antitumor activity via tumor suppressor protein nuclear localization and reactivation, oncoprotein translation suppression, and DNA repair inhibition. As a single agent, SEL has demonstrated adequate brain penetration and clinically relevant responses in glioblastoma. We seek to enhance the effect and benefit of SEL by priming with temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS We developed in vitro and in vivo studies to rationally design a phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the sequential combination of SEL+TMZ. Sequential treatment of U87 cells and intracranial mouse xenografts demonstrated superior DNA damage (ɣH2A.X, cleaved PARP) and overall survival compared to combination or single-agent therapy (HR 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07-0.84]; p = 0.01, log-rank). We used the top-scoring pair method to identify a 6 gene-pair RNAseq signature associated with response to SEL. RESULTS Based on preclinical findings, we developed and opened a multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial in October 2022. Eligibility includes histologically confirmed 1st recurrent MGMT promoter methylated glioblastoma. Primary objectives are safety and preliminary efficacy. Secondary objectives are overall response rate, efficacy, and prospective validation of a molecular signature of response. Phase I dose finding by IQ 3 + 3 (n = 12) involves TMZ 150mg/m2 on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle plus SEL on days 8 and 15. Phase II will involve randomization (n = 72) to the RP2D of SEL+TMZ versus monotherapy TMZ. Using proportional hazards regression, RHR 0.5 with p < 0.1 will demonstrate sufficient efficacy. We have enrolled 3 participants in dose level 1 (SEL 60mg) with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed. Additional preliminary results will be presented. CONCLUSION Preliminary results suggest that a sequential dosing regimen of SEL+TMZ is feasible and initial dose is well-tolerated and may minimize the cumulative toxicity of SEL. The trial is currently enrolling nationwide (NCI #10505, NCT05432804).

Abstract Treatment options for glioblastoma remain limited, particularly for those who are not eligible for traditional resection, whether due to lesion location or inability to tolerate open craniotomy. Maximal-safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide offers the best outcomes for patients. Unfortunately, not all tumors are amenable to conventional surgical resection at the time of diagnosis with only about 1/3 of patients able to receive a gross-total resection and 15-25% of patients receiving biopsy only, thus reducing their projected overall survival to 9 months. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive, cytoreductive tool, that has demonstrated safety as a surgical approach to treat primary brain tumors. METHODS Data from LAANTERN prospective multicenter registry (NCT02392078) was analyzed to determine clinical outcomes for patients with new and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma (N=89). Demographics, intraprocedural data, adverse events, KPS, health-economics, and survival data were prospectively collected then analyzed separately for newly diagnosed GBM (N=29) and recurrent GBM (N=60). RESULTS Median overall-survival was 9.73 months (95% CI: 5.16, 15.91) for newly diagnosed patients and median post-procedure survival was 8.97 (6.94, 12.36) months for recurrent patients. Median overall-survival for newly diagnosed patients receiving post-LITT chemoradiotherapy was 16.14 months (6.11, not reached). The median length of hospital stay was 50 hours and 80% of patients were discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS LITT offers an effective cytoreductive approach for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma. Importantly, its use in newly diagnosed patients who receive post-LITT chemoradiotherapy leads to a median OS similar to that of patients treated with conventional surgical resection. LITT remains an important alternative for patients with inoperable tumors or those not amenable to resection. Enrollment in LAANTERN is ongoing and these cohorts will be revisited as data continues to mature. Benefits beyond cytoreduction are also being actively explored.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immunotherapies targeting PD-1 in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have shown limited activity. We hypothesize combining therapies targeting immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies will improve survival. This nonrandomized, noncomparative Phase II study examines safety and efficacy of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and bevacizumab, with or without an IDO1 inhibitor (epacadostat), in patients with rGBM. METHODS This is an open-label Phase II study of two regimens. Regimen A examines retifanlimab (500mg IV Q4W) + bevacizumab (10mg/kg IV Q2W) + HFRT (3.5Gy/day x 10) in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. Regimen B adds epacadostat. Key inclusions include dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day and reirradiation candidacy. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) probability at 9 months (OS-9). An increase of OS-9 from 38% (bevacizumab alone) to 60% was considered clinically relevant and required 24 efficacy evaluable patients. RESULTS Regimen A accrual is complete; interim results are as follows: 26 rGBM enrolled, with 24 evaluable [median age 64.2 years (42.1-81.8); 29% female; 29% MGMT promotor methylated; 33.3% with multi-focal disease; median KPS 90 (70-100); median baseline dexamethasone 0 mg (0-4) and ALC 1,000 cells/µl (300-3,700)]. Patients received a median of 6 cycles as of May 2022 (2-24). Median follow-up is 16.0 months. Interim median PFS is 7.0 months (95%CI: 4.5~11.1) and median OS is 12.2 months (95%CI 7.1~18.0). Regimen A met primary endpoint with OS-9 of 67% (95%CI: 44~82%). Overall response rate is currently 58% (95%CI: 36.94~77.2%). There were five possible immune-related grade 3+ toxicities to date (n = 1 each colitis, vomiting, and seizure; n = 2 diarrhea). Regimen B is enrolling. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis suggests combination retifanlimab, HFRT, and bevacizumab in rGBM is generally well-tolerated, with encouraging OS and PFS at the time of submission. Correlative analysis is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting.