Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani

Objective: Stress cardiomyopathy(SCM) occurs between 4-15% in aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage(aSAH). Predictors and prognostic implications of SCM in aSAH remains incompletely known. Methods: Adult patients between January 2006-December 2019 with diagnosis of aSAH and echocardiogram during same admission were identified from a prospectively maintained aSAH registry. Presence of SCM was confirmed using the echocardiographic criteria. Severity of aSAH was categorized using the modified Fisher(mFisher) and the World Federation of Neurological Scale(WFNS). Results: Among 570 aSAH patients during study period, 194 aSAH cases had echocardiography and 37(19%) of them had SCM. In comparison to aSAH without SCM, aSAH with SCM were mainly females(76% vs 62%; p= 0.12) and postmenopausal(57±12 vs 59±13 years; p= 0.39). Echocardiographic findings in Table . aSAH with SCM was associated with WFNS grade>3(68% vs 42%; p= 0.005) and mFisher grade>2(87% vs 81%; p= 0.39), intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH)(81% vs 64%; p= 0.04) and larger size of the ruptured aneurysm(8±5 vs 6±4; p= 0.04). Medical management, microsurgical clipping and endovascular coil embolization rates were similar in patients with and without SCM, yet patients with SCM had lower rates of disposition to home(8% vs 27%; p =0.02) and higher in-hospital mortality(41% vs 25%, p= 0.05). On multivariate analysis, ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms had 13-times higher odds for formation of SCM(OR 13.43 [1.22-147.8]; p= 0.02). Conclusion: aSAH with SCM predominantly occurred in postmenopausal females with larger aneurysms, and higher severity of bleeds. Ophthalmic artery aneurysms were associated with substantially increased risk of SCM after adjustment for aSAH severity. Despite similar treatment rates, SCM was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. These findings will require further confirmation in a larger subset of aSAH with SCM patients.

Background Intracranial aneurysms are reported in 6%–10% of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and routine intracranial aneurysm surveillance has been advocated by some. We assessed the prevalence and features of the most important patient‐outcome: aneurysmal sub‐arachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), as compared with controls without aSAH, and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) with aSAH. Methods and Results Adult patients with accurate diagnosis of aSAH and at least one echocardiogram between 2000 and 2019 were identified from a consecutive prospectively maintained registry of aSAH admissions. Controls without a diagnosis of SAH were age‐ and sex‐matched. BAV prevalence was confirmed echocardiographically. Severity of aSAH was categorized using modified Fisher and World Federation of Neurological Scale. Neurologic outcome was assessed using modified Rankin score. A total 488 aSAH cases and 990 controls were identified and BAV status was confirmed. Prevalence of BAV in patients with aSAH was 1.2% (6/488) versus 3.5% (35/990) in controls, P =0.01. BAV+aSAH were noted to be younger than TAV+aSAH (56±11 versus 68±14; P =0.03) with smaller aneurysms (5±2 versus 7±4; P =0.31). The severity of aSAH was lesser in BAV+aSAH than TAV (modified Fisher grade>2 50% versus 74%; P =0.19, World Federation of Neurological Scale grade>3 17% versus 36%; P =0.43). BAV+aSAH had less severe neurologic disability (modified Rankin score 3%–6 33% versus 49% in TAV; P =0.44) and comparable in‐hospital mortality rates ( P =0.93). BAV had lower odds for aSAH on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.23[CI 0.08–0.65]; P =0.01). Conclusions Prevalence of BAV was 3 times lower in the aSAH registry than in controls without aSAH. BAV+aSAH had clinically smaller aneurysms, clinically smaller bleeds, and better neurologic outcome as compared with TAV+aSAH, which needs to be confirmed in larger studies. These findings argue against routine surveillance for intracranial aneurysms in patients with BAV without aortic coarctation.

Abstract Background Intracranial aneurysm (IA) has been associated with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with prevalence of 6–10% which has led some to recommend routine surveillance for IA in BAV patients. Higher incidence of IA in BAV could signal towards systemic arteriopathy beyond the thoracic aorta. With CoA as an independent risk factor for IA formation, it is currently uncertain if the association between IA and BAV reflects the association of BAV and CoA, or the result of BAV-related systemic arterial changes. Purpose Despite this association, 2 small studies suggest no increased risk of the most important patient outcome: aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Our primary aim was identifying the prevalence of BAV in aSAH patients and compare it with that of a control group without aSAH. Secondary aims included neurologic outcomes of aSAH and anatomical characteristics of IA in BAV, and final disposition and outcome. Methods Patients (>18 years age) with an accurate diagnosis of aSAH and at least one echocardiogram in the system between January 2000-December 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained registry of aSAH admissions. Controls, without a diagnosis of SAH ever, were age- and gender-matched (1:2 cases:controls). BAV prevalence was echocardiographically-confirmed in all patients. Severity of aSAH was categorized using the modified Fisher (mFisher) and the World Federation of Neurological Scale (WFNS). Results A total of 488 aSAH cases and 990 controls were included in the final analysis with confirmed aortic valve status. The prevalence of BAV in aSAH patients was 1.2% (6/488) vs 3.5% (35/990) in controls, p=0.01. None of the aSAH cases were noted to have CoA, whereas 3 (0.3%; p=0.12) control patients had presence of both BAV and CoA. Within aSAH patients, BAV+aSAH were noted to be younger than tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)+aSAH (56±11 vs 68±14; p=0.03). Aneurysm size was smaller in the BAV+aSAH group (5±2 vs 7±4 in TAV+aSAH; p=0.31). The severity of the bleed was lesser in BAV+aSAH than TAV+aSAH (mFisher grade >2 50% vs 74%; p=0.19, WFNS grade >3 17% vs 36%; p=0.43) which is clinically significant. The BAV+aSAH group had higher disposition rate to home (67% vs 39%; p=0.21) with no difference in in-hospital mortality rates (17% vs 18%; p=0.93). BAV had lower odds on univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age/sex/body mass index (OR 0.33 [CI 0.14–0.81]; p=0.01, OR 0.23 [CI 0.08–0.65]; p=0.01) of presenting with aSAH. Conclusion Within a large prospective registry with accurate aSAH diagnoses, we found 3-times lower prevalence of echocardiographically-confirmed BAV as compared to non-aSAH controls. We observed 3-times higher prevalence of BAV in controls than among aSAH cases. In addition, size of intracranial aneurysms was clinically smaller in BAV patients, and the severity of SAH was significantly lesser in BAV from a clinical standpoint. Our findings argue against routine surveillance for IA in BAV patients without CoA. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Objective To compare the prevalence and patterns of anomalous coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Methods Retrospective review of consecutive patients with surgically excised BAV and TAV was performed from 1994 to 2015. Clinical notes, echocardiograms, coronary angiograms, CT angiographies, and pathology reports were reviewed. ACAOS included right coronary artery from the left cusp, left circumflex artery from the right cusp and left main or left anterior descending artery from the right cusp. Results 2371 (years 1994–2015) and 1679 (years 2009–2015) consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed BAV and TAV, respectively, and defined preoperative coronary anatomy were identified. A left dominant coronary circulation was present in 386 (18%) patients with BAV and 179 (11%) patients with TAV (p<0.001). ACAOS was identified in 43 (1.8%) patients with BAV and 15 (0.9%) patients with TAV, p=0.02. Among patients with BAV and ACAOS, the most common phenotype was right-left fusion (n=34, 79%) with present raphe (n=36, 84%), with no association between BAV phenotype and ACAOS type. On multivariate analysis, BAV status and size of the mid-ascending aorta were independently associated with ACAOS (OR 3.29; CI 1.26 to 8.6; p=0.02; OR 0.93; CI 0.87 to 0.98; p=0.01; respectively). Only two patients with ACAOS, one with BAV and one with TAV, had a perioperative coronary ischaemic event. Conclusions The prevalence of the potentially malignant ACAOS is significantly higher (threefold higher odds) in patients with BAV as compared with TAV, yet remains uncommon in absolute terms. Most patients with BAV and ACAOS had right-left cusp fusion and present raphe. Perioperative coronary events are rare in patients with ACAOS.

There are contrasting data on concomitant Impella device in cardiogenic shock patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) (ECPELLA). This study sought to compare early mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with ECPELLA in comparison to VA ECMO alone. We reviewed the published literature from 2000 to 2018 for randomized, cohort, case-control, and case series studies evaluating adult patients requiring VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock. Five retrospective observational studies, representing 425 patients, were included. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella strategy was used in 27% of the patients. Median age across studies varied between 51 and 63 years with 59–88% patients being male. Use of ECPELLA was associated with higher weaning from VA ECMO and bridging to permanent ventricular assist device or cardiac transplant in three and four studies, respectively. The studies showed moderate heterogeneity with possible publication bias. The two studies that accounted for differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups reported lower 30 day mortality with ECPELLA versus VA ECMO. The remaining three studies did not adjust for potential confounding and were at high risk for selection bias. In conclusion, ECPELLA is being increasingly used as a strategy in patients with cardiogenic shock. Additional large, high-quality studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes with ECPELLA.