Wieruszewski, Patrick M.

Abstract Background Posaconazole immediate release (IR) suspension is the standard product for enteral feeding tube (EFT) administration but has erratic pharmacokinetic behaviour, often resulting in subtherapeutic concentrations. Limited evidence suggests that posaconazole oral delayed-release (DR) tablets may be crushed. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who received EFT administration of posaconazole IR suspension or crushed DR tablets between 2018 and 2024. Patients were eligible if they had at least one serum drug concentration drawn ≥5 days after posaconazole initiation. The primary outcome was attainment of therapeutic drug concentrations. Secondary outcomes included time to therapeutic serum concentration, adverse drug events, and frequency of occluded EFT. Results Of the included patients, 48 received IR suspension and 100 received DR tablets. Baseline characteristics and severity of illnesses were well balanced. Among IR suspension and crushed DR tablet recipients, 39% and 80% achieved therapeutic concentrations, respectively (P = 0.002). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, drug interactions, posaconazole indication and malabsorptive conditions, crushed DR tablets were significantly more likely than IR suspension to achieve therapeutic posaconazole concentrations within 30 days (HR 5.22, 95% CI 2.35–11.61). Occluded EFTs were more frequent among crushed DR tablet recipients (27% versus 10%, P = 0.022), while no differences were observed in the occurrence of hepatotoxicity or hypokalaemia. Conclusions With EFT administration, crushed posaconazole DR tablets were associated with a greater likelihood of achieving therapeutic concentrations compared with IR suspension. The optimal technique for administering crushed DR tablets to prevent EFT complications warrants investigation.

Refractory anaphylaxis is rare but carries high mortality, particularly when complicated by severe bronchospasm and respiratory failure. We present a 32-year-old individual with food-induced anaphylaxis and profound bronchospasm unresponsive to first- and second-line therapies, resulting in severe hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure despite mechanical ventilation. Peripheral venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) was emergently initiated, leading to rapid stabilization and full recovery. This case demonstrates the successful use of VV-ECMO as a life-saving bridge in anaphylaxis-induced respiratory failure. This is one of the few reported cases of successful use of VV-ECMO for refractory bronchospasm secondary to anaphylaxis.

Empirical evidence suggests direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) produce more favorable hemostatic outcomes than heparin in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), yet the exact mechanisms responsible are unknown. We systematically searched databases and registers for studies comparing DTIs to heparin in humans receiving ECMO. A total of 28 studies were identified, most of which (n = 25) used bivalirudin, while the rest (n = 3) used argatroban. In random-effects meta-analysis, DTIs achieved the therapeutic anticoagulation range faster (mean difference = −6.96 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −11.98 to −1.95, p = 0.006) and maintained the therapeutic range for a greater proportion of time (mean difference = 18.6%, 95% CI = 8.78–28.42, p < 0.001) than heparin. Subgroup analysis revealed these effects were similarly significant in adult patients and when bivalirudin was the DTI; however, they were not significant in pediatric patients or when argatroban was the DTI. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of the primary findings in only low-risk of bias studies and in only studies published as full papers. In summary, DTIs—specifically bivalirudin—were associated with faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and maintained the goal range for a greater percentage of time than heparin during ECMO support.

Abstract Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a syndrome that entails a rapid decline in kidney function with or without injury. The consequences of AKI among acutely ill patients are dire and lead to higher mortality, morbidity, and healthcare cost. To prevent AKI and its short and long‐term repercussions, understanding its pathophysiology is essential. Depending on the baseline kidney histology and function reserves, the number of kidney insults, and the intensity of each insult, the clinical presentation of AKI may differ. While many factors are capable of inducing renal injury, they can be categorized into a few processes. The three primary processes reported in the literature are hemodynamic changes, inflammatory reactions, and nephrotoxicity. The majority of patients with AKI will suffer from more than one during their development and/or progression of AKI. Moreover, the development of one usually leads to the instigation of another. Thus, the interactions and progression between these mechanisms may determine the severity and duration of the AKI. Other factors such as organ crosstalk and how our concurrent therapies interact with these mechanisms complicate the pathophysiology of the progression of the AKI even further. In this narrative review article, we describe these three main pathophysiological processes that lead to the development and progression of AKI. © 2022 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12: 3767–3780, 2022.