Allan, John N.

ROR1 is a transmembrane receptor with tightly controlled expression during development. It is present on multiple tumor types but not on normal adult tissues. Hematological malignancies are often ROR1-positive, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Given its unique pattern of expression, ROR1 represents a tumor-specific therapeutic target. The anti-ROR1 antibody, UC-961, is ahumanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds with high affinity to a specific extracellular epitope of human ROR1 receptor and can block Wnt5a-induced ROR1 signaling. Nonclinical studies document that UC-961 does not react with normal adult human tissues and selectively binds to tumor cells. Because of the antibody high specificity, rapid internalization, and trafficking to lysosomes, UC-961 appears ideally suited to serve as the targeting moiety for an anti-ROR1 ADC. Accordingly, we have developed VLS-101, a UC-961-linker-monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) ADC that preserves the high-affinity binding and specificity of UC-961 and allows for ROR1-targeted intracellular release of MMAE. RS is an aggressive lymphoma, typically of DLBCL type, arising as transformation of CLL. Despite, progressive improvements in the therapy of CLL, very few effective treatment options exist for patients with RS. Using our recently established RS patient-derived xenografts (RS-PDXs), we explored the expression and signaling properties of ROR1 in RS and investigated the ex-vivo and in vivo effects of VLS-101. When assessed by flow cytometry (FACS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 3 of 4 RS-PDXs showed ROR1 positivity (2 highly positive: 99% and 80% of cells; 1 medium/low positive: 25% of cells by FACS). The extent of ROR1 expression correlated among the 3 assays methods and was consistent with ROR1 expression data reported for non-RS DLBCL samples. When engaged by its ligand Wnt-5a, ROR1 activated downstream targets, Rac1 and RhoA, and induced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NF-kB and Jnk in RS cells. When cells purified from RS-PDX tumor masses were exposed to VLS-101 ex-vivo, the drug induced time- and dose-dependent apoptosis, as shown by increases in annexin V/propidium iodide and by Caspase-3 and PARP cleavage. VLS-101 efficacy was then assessed in vivo in both subcutaneous and systemic RS-PDX models. When palpable masses had formed in subcutaneous models, mice were randomly assigned to vehicle or VLS-101, bi-weekly treated for 3 consecutive weeks, and then compared for tumor growth and survival. In the 3 ROR1-expressing RS-PDX models, VLS-101 caused highly significant disease regressions. Complete regressions were observed even in RS-PDXs without universal ROR1 expression, suggesting a MMAE bystander effect. After treatment discontinuation, VLS-101-treated animals showed no tumor regrowth for several months and had significantly extended survival. Data were confirmed in systemic ROR1-expressing RS models in which tumor cells were intravenously injected and allowed to engraft for ~14 days before starting treatment. VLS-101 was administered with the same schedule adopted for the subcutaneous model. VLS-101 eliminated RS cells in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and spleen, increasing survival in VLS-101-treated animals relative to controls (approximately 20-50 days, depending on the RS-PDX model). Of note, no in vivo VLS-101 efficacy was observed in the ROR1-negative RS-PDX, confirming the specificity of VLS-101 targeting. VLS-101 showed no adverse effects on animal well-being or body weight. Collectively, these results indicate that ROR1 is expressed on RS cells where it can transduce pro-survival signals and can be diagnostically evaluated for selective targeting. Nonclinical data document that the MMAE-containing ADC, VLS-101, can cause RS-PDX apoptosis in vitro and can safely and selectively induce complete tumor regressions in in vivo models of RS derived from patient tumors with heavy prior clinical treatment and variable levels of ROR1 expression. Building on these types of results, a Phase 1 clinical trial of VLS-101 (NCT03833180) is ongoing in patients with lymphoid cancers. Disclosures Vaisitti: VelosBio Inc.: Research Funding; Verastem Inc: Research Funding. Jessen:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Vo:VelosBio Inc: Employment. Ko:VelosBio Inc: Employment. Allan:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem Oncology, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy. Furman:Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Oncotracker: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Miller:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Lanutti:VelosBio Inc.: Employment. Deaglio:iTeos Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem Inc: Research Funding; VelosBio Inc.: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The drug used in this project is an anti-ROR1-toxin-conjugated antibody

Abstract Introduction REGN1979 is an anti-CD20 x anti-CD3 bispecific IgG4 antibody (Ab) modified to reduce Fc binding. Engaging both targets results in CD20-specific, local T-cell activation and cytotoxicity, a mechanism of action distinct from standard anti-CD20 Abs. We report updated promising efficacy results of a Phase 1 trial of REGN1979 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refactory (R/R) B-NHL previously treated with anti-CD20 Abs. Methods The primary objectives of the study are to determine safety, tolerability, and occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Other objectives include assessment of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics. Eligible pts with R/R NHL must have received at least 1 prior CD20-directed therapy. Treatment consists of 12 weekly doses of REGN1979 followed by every 2 week dosing for 12 doses for a total of 36 weeks. Guidelines are provided for management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and include steroids and/or tocilizumab at investigator discretion. Results As of June 1, 2018, 54 pts with B-NHL were treated with REGN1979 monotherapy: DLBCL (pt number [n]=30), FL (n=16), MCL (n=5), MZL (n=2), and WM (n=1). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 1-11); 41 pts were refractory to their last prior systemic therapy, 18 had bulky disease, and 6 had prior HSCT. Pts were treated with REGN1979 0.03-27 mg and received a median of 7 (range, 1-24) doses. Eight pts remain on treatment, 13 completed treatment, and 33 discontinued therapy prior to the planned 36 wks (majority [n=22] due to progressive disease [PD]). There have been no DLTs to date. The most common treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TR-TEAEs) included infusion-related reactions (IRR) or CRS; 26 pts experienced CRS (Grade 1-2, n=23; Grade 3, n=3) with a median duration of CRS of 2 (range 1-15) days. Six pts received tocilizumab. The severity of CRS symptoms declined through optimized pre-medication even with REGN1979 dose escalation. Other common Grade ≥3 TR-TEAEs were lymphocytopenia/ decreased lymphocyte count (n=8); neutropenia/ decreased neutrophil count (n=7); and thrombocytopenia/ decreased platelet count, hypotension, hypophosphatemia, and anemia (each n=3). Seventeen pts experienced a nervous system event including headache, dizziness, paraesthesia, dysgeusia, and peripheral neuropathy with no Grade ≥3 events; no neurologic event required termination of study drug. Seven pts died on study: PD (n=5), gastric perforation (n=1), and cardiac arrest (n=1). TEAEs leading to premature discontinuation of REGN1979 were Grade 3 fatigue (n=1), Grade 3 hemolysis (n=1), and Grade 2 pyrexia/Grade 2 tachycardia (n=1). Among 27 pts treated with REGN1979 ≥5 mg (dose associated with tumor killing in pre-clinical data), the overall response rate (ORR) was 55.6% (5 complete response [CR] and 10 partial response [PR]; Table/Figure). Responses were seen in 7/7 FL Grade 1-3a pts (5 CR, 2 PR), 6/15 DLBCL pts (all PR), 2/2 MCL pts (all PR). At 18 mg and 27 mg of REGN1979, 4 of 4 pts with DLBCL had best response of PR. Post data cut-off, 1 pt with a DLBCL best response of PR converted to CR. PK and pharmacodynamic assessments suggest that for pts treated with REGN1979 5-18 mg, best exposures in the first 3 weeks appear to linearly increase with dose. In pts treated with up to REGN1979 18 mg, a maximum mean Ctrough of 1.6 mcg/mL was observed in the first 3 weeks of weekly dosing. Studies of peripheral blood biomarkers demonstrated depletion of peripheral B lymphocytes, transient margination of circulating T-cells, and elevated circulating cytokines following REGN1979 dosing. Increased peak cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha) were observed in pts with CRS. Immunohistological analysis of malignant lymph node tissue demonstrated a decrease of CD20 expression in responding pts; among the responders, subsequent relapse was associated with either maintenance of CD20 expression or further CD20 loss, suggesting antigen-dependent and independent disease escape mechanisms. Conclusions REGN1979 displays efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in pts with R/R B-NHL. Most TR-TEAEs were IRR/CRS and have been well managed with supportive care. No significant neurological toxicity has been observed. At doses of 5-27 mg of REGN1979, the preliminary ORR was 100% in pts with FL Grade 1-3a and 40.0% in pts with DLBCL. This promising efficacy warrants further clinical investigation. Disclosures Bannerji: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc.: Consultancy. Arnason:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Advani:Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Other: Institutional Research Support; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Consultancy/Advisory role and Institutional Research Support; Pharmacyclics: Other: Institutional Research Support; Takeda: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role; Millenium: Other: Institutional Research Support; Gilead/Kite: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role; Infinity: Other: Institutional Research Support; Merck: Other: Institutional Research Support; Forty Seven, Inc: Other: Institutional Research Support; Cell Medica: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role; Agensys: Other: Institutional Research Support; Celgene: Other: Institutional Research Support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Consultancy/Advisory role, Institutional Research Support; Kura: Other: Institutional Research Support; Roche/Genentech: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role, Institutional Research Support; Kyowa: Other: Consulting/Advisory Role; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Institutional Research Support; Autolus: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role; AstraZeneca: Other: Consultancy/Advisory Role. Brown:Acerta / Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Loxo: Consultancy; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Invectys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Boehringer: Consultancy. Allan:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. O'Brien:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chavez:Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humanigen: Consultancy. Lowy:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Charnas:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternberg:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ambati:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adriaens:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ufkin:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yan:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navarro:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Gasparini:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jankovic:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fiaschi:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hamon:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thurston:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Topp:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding.

SummaryCD38 is expressed on Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) cells, but its role as a therapeutic target remains undefined. With recent approval of the anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab (Dara), we hypothesized that blocking CD38 would be lethal to WM cells.In vitroDara treatment of WM cells (including ibrutinib‐resistant lines) elicited antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody‐dependent cell phagocytosis (ADCP) and direct apoptosis.In vivo, Dara treatment was well tolerated and delayed tumour growth in RPCI‐WM1‐xenografted mice. CD38 is reported to augment B‐cell receptor (BCR) signalling; we noted that Dara significantly attenuated phosphorylated SYK, LYN, BTK, PLCγ2, ERK1/2, AKT, mTOR, and S6 levels, and this effect was augmented by cotreatment with ibrutinib. Indeed, WM cells, including ibrutinib‐resistant WM cell lines treated with the ibrutinib + Dara combination, showed significantly more cell death through ADCC, CDC, ADCP and apoptosis relative to single‐agent Dara or ibrutinib. In summary, we are the first to report thein vitroandin vivoanti‐WM activity of Dara. Furthermore, we show a close connection between BCR and CD38 signalling, which can be co‐targeted with ibrutinib + Dara to induce marked WM cell death, irrespective of acquired resistance to ibrutinib.

Abstract Richter syndrome represents the evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into an aggressive tumor, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The lack of in vitro and in vivo models has severely hampered drug testing in a disease that is poorly responsive to common chemoimmunotherapeutic combinations as well as to novel kinase inhibitors. Here we report for the first time the establishment and genomic characterization of two patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models of Richter syndrome, RS9737 and RS1316. Richter syndrome xenografts were genetically, morphologically, and phenotypically stable and similar to the corresponding primary tumor. RS9737 was characterized by biallelic inactivation of CDKN2A and TP53, monoallelic deletion of 11q23 (ATM), and mutations of BTK, KRAS, EGR2, and NOTCH1. RS1316 carried trisomy 12 and showed mutations in BTK, KRAS, MED12, and NOTCH2. RNA sequencing confirmed that in both cases >80% of the transcriptome was shared between primary tumor and PDX. In line with the mutational profile, pathway analyses revealed overactivation of the B-cell receptor, NFκB, and NOTCH pathways in both tumors, potentially providing novel tumor targets. In conclusion, these two novel models of Richter syndrome represent useful tools to study biology and response to therapies of this highly aggressive and still incurable tumor. Significance: Two patient-derived xenograft models of Richter syndrome represent the first ex vivo model to study biology of the disease and to test novel therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res; 78(13); 3413–20. ©2018 AACR.