Azam, Tariq U.

Abstract Background: Tumor surface PD-L1 (B7-H1) signals through T-cell surface receptor PD-1 to suppress antitumor immunity. PD-1 inhibitors like pembrolizumab block this pathway to prevent tumor escape from immunosurveillance. These PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors achieve objective response in 20-30% of patients with melanoma (1-3). As the majority of these patients are resistant to this treatment, there is a critical need to combat PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma. What is the mechanism of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma? Our group has reported that soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1, sB7-H1) is elevated in the serum of patients with PD-1 inhibitor-resistant melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (4). We have also shown that soluble PD-L1 is produced by cleavage from other tumor types and leads to apoptosis in CD8+ T-cells (5). The aim of this study is to confirm the source of sPD-L1 in human melanoma and its relation to outcomes. Methods: B7H1-expressing transgenic melanoma cells (Mel-B7H1) were treated with an array of protease inhibitors over 24 hours. Cells were then pelleted and supernatants were analyzed by ELISA for sPD-L1 (sB7-H1) production. Tumor serum samples were also analyzed by ELISA for sPD-L1 production.Tumor pathology slides from patients with melanoma (serum donors from the above study) were stained by immunohistochemistry with antibodies against proteases ADAM10 or ADAM17. Slides were visualized by microscopy for the presence of these antigens. Activated human CD8+ T-cells were cultured with recombinant human B7-H1 (PD-L1) protein, sPD-L1-rich, or sPD-L1-depleted supernatants from a tumor cell line in the presence of placebo or PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor antibodies. Cell survival was measured at 48 hours by flow cytometry.Results: ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X, ADAM17 inhibitor TAPI-0, and broad metalloprotease inhibitor TAPI-2 inhibited Mel-B7H1 production of sB7H1 (p<0.001, 0.095, and 0.001 respectively). Specific inhibitors of other metalloproteases did not significantly alter sB7H1 production. PD-L1 transcription levels were not significantly altered. Tumor pathology slides from patients with high serum sPD-L1 exhibited high ADAM10 and/or ADAM17 staining. Conversely, tumors from patients with low-sPD-L1levels tended to exhibit low ADAM10 and/or ADAM17 staining. Recombinant PD-L1 and PD-L1-rich supernatants induced cell death of CD8+ T-cells, whereas PBS control solution and PD-L1-depleted supernatants did not. Supraphysiologic doses of pembrolizumab decreased cell death in PD-L1-rich supernatant-treated CD8+ T-cells. Conclusions: Matrix metalloprotease inhibitors ADAM10 and ADAM17 mediate sPD-L1 production from melanoma cells. In samples from patients with melanoma, immunohistochemical staining of these proteases in tumor tissue correlates with serum sPD-L1 levels. As we have shown previously, sPD-L1 induces apoptosis of activated CD8+ T-cells, which may explain PD-1 inhibitor resistance in most patients with melanoma.We posit that sPD-L1 outcompetes PD-1 inhibitors to suppress tumor immunosurveillance. Our results suggest that the combination of ADAM10/17 inhibitor and PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor may overcome this mechanism of PD-1 resistance in melanoma and other cancers. Future studies will determine (A) how a combined ADAM10/17 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor may function in clinical use, (B) how tumor-derived sPD-L1 signals downstream to cause apoptosis in T-cells, and (C) whether surface ADAM10/17 predict surface PD-L1 staining in melanoma. References: 1. Ribas et al., Lancet Oncol 2015;16(8):908–18. 2. Hamid et al., Ann Oncol 2016;27:6. 3. Weber et al., Lancet Oncol 2015:16(4):375–84. 4. Dronca et al., J Clin Oncol 2017:35(15):11534. 5. Orme et al., AACR Adv Malig Lymphoma 2018. Citation Format: Jacob J. Orme, Khalid Jazieh, Susan Harrington, Matthew Ball, Tariq U. Azam, Xin (Cindy) Liu, Tiancheng Xie, Aaron Mansfield, Roxana S. Dronca, Haidong Dong. Tumor-associated ADAM10 and ADAM17 produce soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1, sB7-H1) and affect downstream tumor immunity – A resistance mechanism to PD-1 checkpoint blockade in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A210.

Abstract Background Early phase clinical trials evaluate the safety and efficacy of new treatments. The exclusion/inclusion criteria in these trials are usually rigorous and may exclude many patients seen in clinical practice. Our objective was to study the comorbidities limiting the participation of patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer in clinical trials. Materials and Methods We queried ClinicalTrials.gov on December 31, 2016. We reviewed the eligibility criteria of 1,103 trials. Logistic regression analyses were completed, and exclusion was studied as a binary variable. Results Out of 1,103 trials, 70 trials (6%) excluded patients >75 years of age, and 45% made no reference to age. Eighty-six percent of trials placed restrictions on patients with history of prior malignancies. Regarding central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, 416 trials (38%) excluded all patients with CNS metastasis, and 373 (34%) only allowed asymptomatic CNS metastasis. Regarding chronic viral infections, 347 trials (31%) excluded all patients with human immunodeficiency virus, and 228 trials (21%) excluded all patients with hepatitis B or C infection. On univariate analysis, chemotherapy trials were more likely to exclude patients with CNS metastasis and history of other malignancies than targeted therapy trials. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that industry-sponsored trials had higher odds of excluding patients with compromised liver function. Conclusion Many clinical trials excluded large segments of the population of patients with cancer. Frequent exclusion criteria included patients with CNS metastasis, history of prior malignancies, and chronic viral infections. The criteria for participation in some clinical trials may be overly restrictive and limit enrollment. Implications for Practice The results of this study revealed that most early phase clinic trials contain strict exclusion criteria, potentially excluding the patients who may be more likely to represent the population treated in clinical settings, leaving patients susceptible to unintended harm from inappropriate generalization of trial results. Careful liberalization of the inclusion/exclusion criteria in clinical trials will allow investigators to understand the benefits and drawbacks of the experimental drug for a broader population, and possibly improve recruitment of patients with cancer into clinical trials.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) occurs in all races, but the incidence in non-Hispanic black patients (NHBs) is two to three times higher than in non-Hispanic white patients (NHWs). We determined the representation of minorities and elderly patients in MM clinical trials. Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported in ClinicalTrials.gov from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed. Enrollment fraction (EF) was defined as the number of trial enrollees divided by the 2014 MM prevalence. Participation in MM clinical trials varied significantly across racial and ethnic groups; NHWs were more likely to be enrolled in clinical trials (EF 0.18%) than NHBs (EF 0.06%, p < .0001) and Hispanic patients (EF 0.04%, p < .0001). The median age of trial participants was 62 years, with 7,956 participants (66%) being less than 65 years of age. Collaborations between investigators, sponsors, and the community are necessary to increase access to clinical trials to our minority and elderly patients.