Thiele, Elizabeth A.

Abstract Objective We analyzed the long‐term safety and effectiveness of fenfluramine (FFA) in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) in an open‐label extension (OLE) study after participating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or commencing FFA de novo as adults. Methods Patients with DS who participated in one of three RCTs or were 19 to 35 years of age and started FFA de novo were included. Key endpoints were: incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the safety population, and median percentage change in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) from the RCT baseline to end of study (EOS) in the modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT) population. Post hoc analyses compared effectiveness in patients on concomitant stiripentol (STP) vs those not taking STP, and assessed safety (TEAEs) and effectiveness (Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement [CGI‐I] scale ratings) in patients enrolled as adults. Results A total of 374 patients, including 45 adults, received ≥1 FFA dose. Median FFA exposure was 824 days (range, 7–1280). TEAEs occurring in ≥10% of patients were pyrexia, nasopharyngitis, decreased appetite, seizure, decreased blood glucose, diarrhea, abnormal echocardiography (only physiologic regurgitation), upper respiratory tract infection, influenza, vomiting, and ear infection; no valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension was observed over the OLE. In the mITT population ( n = 324), median percentage change in MCSF from baseline to EOS was −66.8% ( p < .001). The post hoc analyses of MCSF change from baseline to EOS in patients on concomitant STP ( n = 75) was −36.2% vs −71.6% in those not on concomitant STP ( n = 234) ( p < .0001). In adult patients, 29 of 41 (70.7%) and 29 of 42 patients (69.1%) demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement on CGI‐I at last visit as rated by caregivers and investigators, respectively. Significance Our OLE study of FFA in patients with DS confirmed previous positive findings and extended the exposure up to 3.5 years. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed and FFA demonstrated sustained and clinically meaningful reduction in MCSF.

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine areas of consensus among an international panel of experts for the clinical presentation and diagnosis of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM; formerly known as Jeavons syndrome) to improve a timely diagnosis.MethodsAn international steering committee was convened of physicians and patients/caregivers with expertise in EEM. This committee summarized the current literature and identified an international panel of experts (comprising 25 physicians and five patients/caregivers). This international expert panel participated in a modified Delphi process, including three rounds of surveys to determine areas of consensus for the diagnosis of EEM.ResultsThere was a strong consensus that EEM is a female predominant generalized epilepsy syndrome with onset between 3 and 12 years of age and that eyelid myoclonia must be present to make the diagnosis. There was a strong consensus that eyelid myoclonia may go unrecognized for years prior to an epilepsy diagnosis. There was consensus that generalized tonic–clonic and absence seizures are typically or occasionally seen in patients. There was a consensus that atonic or focal seizures should lead to the consideration of reclassification or alternate diagnoses. There was a strong consensus that electroencephalography is required, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is not required for diagnosis. There was a strong consensus to perform genetic testing (either epilepsy gene panel or whole exome sequencing) when one or a combination of factors was present: family history of epilepsy, intellectual disability, or drug‐resistant epilepsy.SignificanceThis international expert panel identified multiple areas of consensus regarding the presentation and evaluation of EEM. These areas of consensus may be used to inform clinical practice to shorten the time to the appropriate diagnosis.

AbstractObjectiveThere are limited data about the treatment and management of epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EEM). The objective of this study was to determine areas of consensus among an international panel of experts for the management of EEM (formerly known as Jeavons syndrome).MethodsAn international steering committee was convened of physicians and patients/caregivers with expertise in EEM. This committee summarized the current literature and identified an international panel of experts (comprising 25 physicians and five patients/caregivers). This panel participated in a modified Delphi process, including three rounds of surveys to determine areas of consensus for the treatment, other areas of management, and prognosis for EEM.ResultsThere was a strong consensus for valproic acid as the first‐line treatment, with levetiracetam or lamotrigine as preferable alternatives for women of childbearing age. There was a moderate consensus that ethosuximide and clobazam are also efficacious. There was a strong consensus to avoid sodium channel‐blocking medications, except for lamotrigine, as they may worsen seizure control. There was consensus that seizures typically persist into adulthood, with remission occurring in <50% of patients. There was less agreement about other areas of management, including dietary therapy, lens therapy, candidacy for driving, and outcome.SignificanceThis international expert panel identified multiple areas of consensus regarding the optimal management of EEM. These areas of consensus may inform clinical practice to improve the management of EEM. In addition, multiple areas with less agreement were identified, which highlight topics for further research.

Summary Ketogenic dietary therapies ( KDTs ) are established, effective nonpharmacologic treatments for intractable childhood epilepsy. For many years KDTs were implemented differently throughout the world due to lack of consistent protocols. In 2009, an expert consensus guideline for the management of children on KDT was published, focusing on topics of patient selection, pre‐ KDT counseling and evaluation, diet choice and attributes, implementation, supplementation, follow‐up, side events, and KDT discontinuation. It has been helpful in outlining a state‐of‐the‐art protocol, standardizing KDT for multicenter clinical trials, and identifying areas of controversy and uncertainty for future research. Now one decade later, the organizers and authors of this guideline present a revised version with additional authors, in order to include recent research, especially regarding other dietary treatments, clarifying indications for use, side effects during initiation and ongoing use, value of supplements, and methods of KDT discontinuation. In addition, authors completed a survey of their institution's practices, which was compared to responses from the original consensus survey, to show trends in management over the last 10 years.