Back to Authors

Mutha, Pritesh

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-6097

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Citations 3

Lifestyle Medicine for the Prevention and Treatment of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
Subramanian, Sruthi Kapliyil, Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik , Bailey, Jennifer M. , Mutha, Pritesh , Bailey-Lundberg, Jennifer M , Thosani, Nirav C

Diagnostics | March 14, 2024 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 614

10.3390/diagnostics14060614 Get It

The incidence of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is on the upswing in the USA. These conditions often lead to higher healthcare costs due to the complex nature of diagnosis and the need for specialized medical interventions, surgical procedures, and prolonged medical management. The economic ramification encompasses direct healthcare expenses and indirect costs related to productivity losses, disability, and potential long-term care requirements. Increasing evidence underscores the importance of a healthy lifestyle in preventing and managing these conditions. Lifestyle medicine employs evidence-based interventions to promote health through six key pillars: embracing a whole-food, plant-predominant dietary pattern; regular physical activity; ensuring restorative sleep; managing stress effectively; removing harmful substances; and fostering positive social connections. This review provides a comprehensive overview of lifestyle interventions for managing and preventing the development of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
Diet and carcinogenesis of gastric cancer
Maddineni, Gautam , Xie, Jesse J. , Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik , Mutha, Pritesh

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology | September 27, 2022 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 588-591

10.1097/mog.0000000000000875 Get It

Purpose of review Several recent studies have corroborated a strong association between diet and gastric cancer risk; investigators have also identified dietary factors that protect against gastric cancer. This review summarizes the literature on this topic and guides future research directions. Recent findings High-salt intake disrupts the gastric mucosal defense barrier, promoting Helicobacter pylori colonization and penetration of other carcinogenic compounds. Processed foods, processed meats, red meat, alcohol, foods with high dietary fat, and dietary cholesterol increase the risk of gastric carcinogenesis. On the other hand, increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and a low-salt diet may offer a protective effect. Summary Despite decreases in gastric cancer incidence because of increased identification and treatment of H. pylori, gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide with a high mortality rate. This disturbing statistic highlights the importance of reducing and eliminating other risk factors for gastric cancer. There is a strong body of evidence that alcohol, processed foods, high salt intake, high fat intake, and foods with animal products (meats, eggs, and dairy) increase the risk of gastric cancer. A diet that is high in whole grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts and is low in salt may reduce the risk of gastric cancer.
Accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) compared to random biopsies during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus
Shah, Tilak , Lippman, Robert, Kohli, Divyanshoo R., Mutha, Pritesh , Solomon, Sanjeev , Zfass, Alvin M., Kohli, Divyanshoo

Endoscopy International Open | March 29, 2018 | Volume: 06 | Issue: 04 | Pages: E414-E420

10.1055/s-0043-124868 Get It

Abstract Background For surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE), the current standard of random 4-quadrant biopsies misses 10 – 50 % of esophageal neoplasms, and does not permit real-time decision-making. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) permits real-time in vivo histologic assessment of esophageal mucosa during upper endoscopy. Prospective studies comparing the accuracy of pCLE to 4-quadrant biopsies in routine clinical practice are lacking. Methods Consecutive patients with BE underwent high definition white light and narrow-band imaging followed by pCLE and targeted biopsy or mucosal resection. Four-quadrant biopsies were obtained during the same session. Baseline variables, real-time pCLE interpretation, and histology results were prospectively recorded. Blinded expert review of pCLE sequences and histology specimens was performed. A sample size of 64 patients was calculated a priori based on 3 % estimated prevalence of high grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. Results In total, 66 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of HGD or cancer was 4.55 %. Both real-time and blinded pCLE correctly identified all cases of cancer. For the primary outcome, real-time pCLE was 98 % specific but only 67 % sensitive for HGD/cancer compared to non-blinded pathologist interpretation. For HGD and cancer, inter-observer agreement was substantial between real-time and blinded endomicroscopists (kappa = 0.6). pCLE identified dysplasia in 75 % of cases where both blinded and unblinded pathology interpretation was low grade dysplasia. Conclusions pCLE demonstrates high specificity for detecting dysplasia and cancer, but lower sensitivity may limit its utility in routine BE surveillance. pCLE may have a role in confirming LGD in real-time before eradication therapy.