McBee, Nichol

Introduction: Functional outcome scales are commonly used in neurological clinical trials. Prior studies suggested that these scales may reflect symptomatic hemorrhage (SH), but their performance in detecting treatment effects has not been assessed in clinical trials of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM). And they have not been correlated with CCM bleeding as reflected by lesional iron content assessed by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that functional outcome measures would detect differences between treatment arms in a randomized clinical trial of hemorrhagic CCM, and reflect new SH or a ≥6% increase in mean lesional QSM reflective of CCM bleeding. Methods: Eighty adults with CCM-related SH in the prior 12 months of enrollment were randomized 1:1 to atorvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo for 2 years. Functional outcomes, including mRS, EQ-5D index, EQ-VAS, and PROMIS-29 domains, were collected at baseline, Year 1, and Year 2. Analyses were conducted in 63 participants (32 atorvastatin, 31 placebo) in the modified intention-to-treat trial cohort who had contributed at least one paired annual clinical and imaging assessment. Results: No significant differences were found between atorvastatin and placebo groups in any functional outcome measure across timepoints. Rates of functional decline and improvement were comparable, except for PROMIS Fatigue which improved more in the atorvastatin than placebo patients from baseline to Year 1 (p=0.019). Pooled analyses showed that several functional domains had strong specificity for identifying SH. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance decline from baseline to Year 2 was associated with SH (p=0.0045; specificity 92.3%, sensitivity 57.1%). A ≥10-point drop in EQ-VAS from baseline to Year 1 identified all SH cases during that interval (p=0.007; sensitivity 100%, specificity 83.6%). Functional decline had low sensitivity in detecting CCM bleeding on QSM, though specificity was high (>75%) across domains. Conclusions: Atorvastatin did not influence functional change over 2 years by any measure. PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and EQ-VAS demonstrated high specificity, and in the case of EQ-VAS also a high sensitivity for identifying SH. Functional outcomes across domains also had high specificity for occult bleeding in CCMs as measured by QSM. Poor sensitivity and consistent improvements over time demonstrate the limitations of functional outcome measures as endpoints of drug effects on CCM bleeding.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) virus-specific antibody levels that translate into recipient posttransfusion antibody levels sufficient to prevent disease progression are not defined. METHODS This secondary analysis correlated donor and recipient antibody levels to hospitalization risk among unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients within the outpatient, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared CCP to control plasma. The majority of COVID-19 CCP arm hospitalizations (15/17, 88%) occurred in this unvaccinated, seronegative subgroup. A functional cutoff to delineate recipient high versus low posttransfusion antibody levels was established by 2 methods: (i) analyzing virus neutralization–equivalent anti–Spike receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-S-RBD IgG) responses in donors or (ii) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 anti–S-RBD IgG antibody was volume diluted 21.3-fold into posttransfusion seronegative recipients from matched donor units. Virus-specific antibody delivered was approximately 1.2 mg. The high-antibody recipients transfused early (symptom onset within 5 days) had no hospitalizations. A CCP-recipient analysis for antibody thresholds correlated to reduced hospitalizations found a statistical significant association between early transfusion and high antibodies versus all other CCP recipients (or control plasma), with antibody cutoffs established by both methods-donor-based virus neutralization cutoffs in posttransfusion recipients (0/85 [0%] versus 15/276 [5.6%]; P = 0.03) or ROC-based cutoff (0/94 [0%] versus 15/267 [5.4%]; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION In unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients, early transfusion of plasma units in the upper 30% of study donors’ antibody levels reduced outpatient hospitalizations. High antibody level plasma units, given early, should be reserved for therapeutic use. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04373460. FUNDING Department of Defense (W911QY2090012); Defense Health Agency; Bloomberg Philanthropies; the State of Maryland; NIH (3R01AI152078-01S1, U24TR001609-S3, 1K23HL151826NIH); the Mental Wellness Foundation; the Moriah Fund; Octapharma; the Healthnetwork Foundation; the Shear Family Foundation; the NorthShore Research Institute; and the Rice Foundation.

Abstract Background Post-COVID conditions (PCC) are common, and risk factors include older age and female sex. While high interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein are associated with more severe disease, it is unclear whether other cytokines are associated with PCC. This study was performed to identify factors associated with PCC development. Methods The Convalescent Plasma to Limit SARS-CoV-2 Associated Complications (CSSC-004) trial was a double-blind, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to control plasma for the prevention of hospitalization among COVID-19 outpatients. Among 882 individuals participating in the trial with available biospecimens and symptom data, the association between early COVID-19 treatment, cytokine levels and PCC was evaluated. Cytokine and chemokine levels were assessed at baseline, day 14 and day 90 using a multiplexed sandwich immuosassay. Presence of any PCC symptom was assessed at day 90. Associations between COVID-19 treatment, cytokine levels and PCC were examined using multivariate logistic regression models. Results Baseline characteristics were similar by trial treatment group (Figure 1). At day 90, 292 (33.1%) participants had PCC. The most common symptoms were fatigue (14.5%), anosmia (14.5%), and ageusia (10.0%). Levels of most cytokines decreased over time (Figure 2). Six pro-inflammatory cytokines especially IL-6 were elevated at baseline among those with PCC (Figure 3). In multivariable analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.70[1.93-3.81]), age 50 or greater (AOR=1.32[1.17-1.50]), and elevated baseline IL-6 (AOR=1.59[1.02-2.47]) were associated with development of PCC, whereas race, obesity, vaccine status and diabetes were not. Those who received early CCP treatment (<5 days after symptom onset) compared to late CCP treatment had statistically significant lower odds of PCC (AOR=0.60 [0.38-0.95]). Conclusion This study showed high prevalence of PCC symptoms at day 90, particularly among those with higher baseline levels of IL-6 or who did not receive early CCP treatment. The potential utility of IL-6 modulation as a therapeutic intervention among individuals as higher risk for PCC should be studied. Disclosures Kelly Gebo, MD, MPH, Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Spark HealthCare: Advisor/Consultant Sonya L. Heath, MD, Pfizer: Data Monitoring Committee/DSMB Shmuel Shoham, MD, adagio: Advisor/Consultant|Adamis: Advisor/Consultant|ansun: Grant/Research Support|Avir Pharma: Honoraria|cidara: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Immunome: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Honoraria|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|zeteo: Grant/Research Support Judith S. Currier, M.D., MSc, Merck and Company: Advisor/Consultant|Merck and Company: Honoraria Moises A. Huaman, MD, MSc, AN2 Therapeutics Inc: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences Inc: Grant/Research Support|Insmed Inc: Grant/Research Support Jay S. Raval, MD, Sanofi Genzyme: Advisor/Consultant Arturo Casadevall, MD, PhD, Ortho Diagnostics: Speakers Bureau|Sabtherapeutics: Advisor/Consultant

Post-COVID conditions (PCCs) are common and have significant morbidity. Risk factors for PCC include advancing age, female sex, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Little is known about treatment, inflammation, and PCC. Among 882 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection participating in a randomized trial of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) vs control plasma with available biospecimens and symptom data, the association between early CCP treatment, cytokine levels, and PCC was evaluated. Cytokine and chemokine levels were assessed at baseline, day 14, and day 90 using a multiplexed sandwich immunoassay (Meso Scale Discovery). Presence of any self-reported PCC symptoms was assessed at day 90. Associations between CCP treatment, cytokine levels, and PCC were examined using multivariate logistic regression models. One third of the 882 participants had day 90 PCC symptoms, with fatigue (14.5%) and anosmia (14.5%) being most common. Cytokine levels decreased from baseline to day 90. In a multivariable analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.69 [1.93–3.81]), older age (AOR = 1.32 [1.17–1.50]), and elevated baseline levels of IL-6 (AOR = 1.59 [1.02–2.47]) were independently associated with development of PCC. Those who received early CCP treatment (≤5 days after symptom onset) compared to late CCP treatment had statistically significant lower odds of PCC. IMPORTANCE Approximately 20% of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 experienced long-term health effects, as defined PCC. However, it is unknown if there are any early biomarkers associated with PCC or whether early intervention treatments may decrease the risk of PCC. In a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, this study demonstrates that among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2, increased IL-6 at time of infection is associated with increased odds of PCC. In addition, among individuals treated early, within 5 days of symptom onset, with COVID-19 convalescent plasma, there was a trend for decreased odds of PCC after adjusting for other demographic and clinical characteristics. Future treatment studies should be considered to evaluate the effect of early treatment and anti-IL-6 therapies on PCC development.

AbstractBackgroundCOVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is an important therapeutic option for outpatients at high risk of hospitalization from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We assessed the safety of outpatient CCP transfusions administered during clinical trials.Study Design and MethodsWe analyzed data pertaining to transfusion‐related reactions from two randomized controlled trials in the U.S. that evaluated the efficacy of CCP versus control plasma in various ambulatory settings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess whether CCP was associated with transfusion reactions, after adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsThe combined study reported 79/1351 (5.9%) adverse events during the transfusion visit, with the majority 62/1351 (4.6%) characterized by mild, allergic‐type findings of urticaria, and/or pruritus consistent with minor allergic transfusion reactions; the other reported events were attributed to the patients' underlying disease, COVID‐19, or vasovagal in nature. We found no difference in the likelihood of allergic transfusion reactions between those receiving CCP versus control plasma (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.43–1.31). Risk of urticaria and/or pruritus increased with a pre‐existing diagnosis of asthma (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.16–4.67). We did not observe any CCP‐attributed antibody disease enhancement in participants with COVID‐19 or increased risk of infection. There were no life‐threatening severe transfusion reactions and no patients required hospitalization related to transfusion‐associated complications.DiscussionOutpatient plasma administration was safely performed for nearly 1400 participants. CCP is a safe therapeutic option for outpatients at risk of hospitalization from COVID‐19.

AbstractConvalescent plasma, collected from donors who have recovered from a pathogen of interest, has been used to treat infectious diseases, particularly in times of outbreak, when alternative therapies were unavailable. The COVID‐19 pandemic revived interest in the use of convalescent plasma. Large observational studies and clinical trials that were executed during the pandemic provided insight into how to use convalescent plasma, whereby high levels of antibodies against the pathogen of interest and administration early within the time course of the disease are critical for optimal therapeutic effect. Several studies have shown outpatient administration of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to be both safe and effective, preventing clinical progression in patients when administered within the first week of COVID‐19. The United States Food and Drug Administration expanded its emergency use authorization (EUA) to allow for the administration of CCP in an outpatient setting in December 2021, at least for immunocompromised patients or those on immunosuppressive therapy. Outpatient transfusion of CCP and infusion of monoclonal antibody therapies for a highly transmissible infectious disease introduces nuanced challenges related to infection prevention. Drawing on our experiences with the clinical and research use of CCP, we describe the logistical considerations and workflow spanning procurement of qualified products, infrastructure, staffing, transfusion, and associated management of adverse events. The purpose of this description is to facilitate the efforts of others intent on establishing outpatient transfusion programs for CCP and other antibody‐based therapies.

Background: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is one proposed mechanism leading to poor outcomes in patients with spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). We characterized occurrence and significance of intracranial hypertension in severe IVH requiring extraventricular drainage (EVD). Methods: Prospective analysis of ICP in the first 400 patients enrolled in the CLEAR III trial, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing EVD plus intraventricular recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) vs. EVD plus placebo for treatment of IVH in patients with obstructive IVH and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume <30cc. Maximum and minimum ICP was recorded every 4 hours in all patients until 7 days post randomization. ICP readings were analyzed at pre-defined thresholds and proportion of high ICP events compared by clinical/radiological variables. Impact on 30 day mortality was assessed. Results: of 17,593 ICP readings, maximum ICP ranged from -4 to 115 mm Hg (median, interquartile range; 11,8); 90.2% (15,861) were ≤ 20 mm Hg, 2.0% were >30, 0.5% were >40, and 0.2% were > 50 mm Hg. Proportion of threshold events > 20 and > 30 mm Hg were more frequent in patients with persistent closure of the lower ventricular system after day 3 (p=0.047 and p=0.04, respectively), but were not correlated with initial or end of treatment (72 hours after last dose of study agent) ICH or IVH volumes. ICP elevation > 20 mm Hg occurred during a required 1 hr EVD closure time after study agent injection in 507/3364 (15.1%) injections although early re-opening of EVDs occurred in only 3.9%. Shunting for hydrocephalus was required in 18% of patients over 1 yr follow-up and was not associated with high ICP events. Percentage of ICP readings per patient > 30 mmHg and ICH/IVH volumes were independent predictors of 30 day mortality after adjustment for other outcome predictors (p=0.01; p=0.04; p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: ICP is not frequently elevated during monitoring and drainage with an EVD in patients with severe IVH. ICP > 30 mm Hg predicts higher short-term mortality. Early opening of the lower ventricular system may reduce frequency of high ICP events. Injection of thrombolytics can be performed without additional ICP management in the majority of patients.

Background: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and inadequate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) are mechanisms causing poor outcomes in spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). We characterized intracranial hypertension in severe IVH requiring extraventricular drainage (EVD). Methods: Prospective analysis of ICP in all 500 patients enrolled in the CLEAR III trial, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing EVD + intraventricular recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) vs. EVD + placebo for treatment of obstructive IVH and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume <30cc. Maximum and minimum ICP/CPP were recorded every 4 hours until 7 days post randomization (rand), analyzed at pre-defined thresholds and compared by clinical and radiological variables. Results: of 23,406 ICP readings, maximum ICP ranged from 0-97 mmHg (median, IQR; 11,8); 90.7% (21,223) were ≤20mmHg, 1.8% >30, 0.5% >40, and 0.2% > 50mm Hg. Proportion of threshold events >20mmHg were more frequent with persistent closure of the lower ventricular system after day 3 (p=0.02), and was correlated with initial and end of treatment (72 hours post rand) ICH volumes (p=0.01, p=0.04, respectively). ICP elevation >20mmHg occurred during a required 1 hr EVD closure interval after 566/3712 (15.3%) study agent injections. Early re-opening of the EVD occurred in 3.9%. Shunting for hydrocephalus occurred in 18.6% over 1 year follow-up and was associated with % of high ICP events >20 and 30 mmHg (p=0.01 for both). After adjustment for ICH severity factors and IVH volume, % of ICP readings>20 mmHg was significantly associated with 30 and 180 day mortality (p=0.01; p=0.03 respectively), and borderline with modified Rankin Scale (mRS4-6) (p=0.09; p=0.11 respectively). Proportion of CPP readings <70mmHg was associated with day 30 poor mRS (p=0.02), with a weaker association for day 180 mRS (p=0.07). Conclusions: Elevated ICP and inadequate CPP are not infrequent during monitoring and EVD drainage in severe IVH and predict higher short and long-term mortality. Early opening of the lower ventricular system may reduce high ICP events. These results permit future correlation of ICP and CPP with treatment rendered (thrombolysis vs placebo), with upcoming unblinding of the trial.

Background: Patients with cerebral cavernous angiomas with symptomatic hemorrhage (CASH) have high risk of disability from recurrent bleeding. Candidate medications to prevent rebleeding in CASH lesions will require multisite clinical trials with standardized data collection. Objective: To report the prevalence and baseline cohort features in CASH patients and establish a research network infrastructure for trials. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study includes adults with radiologically verified CASH lesion within 1-year of consent. Exclusions include prior or planned surgical intervention, spinal location, or prior brain irradiation. Six sites enrolled patients into the screening and clinical assessment portion of the study starting July 2018. Patients also had the option to participate in the follow up biomarker validation at 4 sites. Baseline demographics, clinical and imaging information, and outcomes (mRS, PROMIS-29, NIHSS, and EuroQol-5D) were collected. Biomarker imaging included dynamic contrast enhanced quantitative perfusion (DCEQP) and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) that correlated with symptomatic bleeding. Descriptive statistics were performed and one-sample t-test was used to compare whether mean T-scores for PROMIS-29 domains differed significantly from a reference population. Results: As of May 2020, 849 CASH patients were screened of whom 110 (13%) were eligible and enrolled; 73 also enrolled into the biomarker validation study. Average age at enrollment was 46±16 years at a mean of 4.4 months after symptom onset; 53% were female, 41% were familial, and 43% of CASH lesions were brainstem location. At enrollment, 90% of the cohort had independent functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2 and NIHSS <5). Perceived health problems affecting QoL were reported in >30% (EuroQol-5D). CASH cases had significantly worse anxiety but better depression and social satisfaction scores compared to a general population (all P<0.01). Baseline DCEQP and QSM measures did not differ significantly across sites. Conclusion: We demonstrate feasibility of multisite recruitment of CASH patients and report prevalence of baseline features that will aid in design of clinical trials and inclusion of appropriate outcome measures.