Zhang, N

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Currently, no study has assessed the performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in evaluating tumor response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). This study aims to evaluate whether the accuracy of CESM is comparable to MRI in detection of residual breast cancer following NST. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of CESM cases at our institution between September 2014 and June 2016 identified patients who had both CESM and MRI pre- and post-NST with pathologic assessment after surgical management. Size of residual malignancy (if any) on post-neoadjuvant CESM and MRI was compared to surgical pathology (reference standard). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was documented and compared to Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score for confirmation. Bland-Altman plots were used to visualize the differences between CESM/MRI and pathologic tumor size. RESULTS: Forty female patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52.3 years (range 35-73). Type of NST included: 34 (85%) chemotherapy and 6 (15%) endocrine therapy. Histological analysis showed invasive ductal carcinoma in 38 (95%), the remaining cases consisted of one invasive lobular carcinoma, and one mixed invasive carcinoma. Mean tumor size after NST was 10.3 mm (range 0-75 mm) for CESM and 9.7 mm (range 0-60 mm) for MRI compared to 15.7 mm (range 0-100 mm) on final surgical pathology. Equivalence tests demonstrated that the mean tumor size measured by CESM or by MRI is equivalent to the mean tumor size measured by pathology within -1 and 1 cm range (p=0.0132 for CESM and p=0.0194 for MRI). Difference in Measurement Post-NST Compared to Pathology Path Tumor Size (mm)CESM Tumor Size (mm)MRI Tumor Size (mm)Mean (SD)15.7 (24.5)10.3 (18.9)9.7 (16.3)Difference Compared with Path (SD); P value -5.4 (12.6); 0.0132-6.0 (11.7); 0.0194 A complete radiologic response was seen in 25 CESM and 22 MRI cases which was confirmed by pathology in 17 and 14, respectively. Alternatively, CESM and MRI demonstrated residual disease in 15 patients and 18 patients respectively and this was confirmed on pathology in 15 and 15, respectively. Accuracy of CESM vs. MRIModalityResidual Disease by Pathology (N=23)Complete Response by Pathology (N=17)SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVResidual Disease by CESM (N=15)150Complete Response by CESM (N=25)81765.2%100%100%68%Residual Disease by MRI (N=18)153Complete Response by MRI (N=22)81465.2%82.4%83.3%63.6% All patients who achieved a pCR had an RCB score of 0 indicating no residual cancer in lymph nodes. Among patients with residual disease, their mean RCB score was 2.6 (range 0.8-4.18). CONCLUSION: In this study, CESM was comparable to MRI in assessing residual malignancy after completion of NST, thereby offering a potentially faster and less expensive alternative to MRI for monitoring treatment response in the neoadjuvant setting. Citation Format: Hilal T, Covington M, Sugi M, Zhang N, Pockaj B, Northfelt D, Ocal IT, Patel BK. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography is comparable to MRI in the assessment of residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant systemic therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-11.

Abstract Background: Mammography (digital 2D or digital 3D/tomosynthesis) is the cornerstone of current screening strategies for breast cancer, but new approaches are needed to further reduce the proportion of cancers diagnosed at advanced stages and more effectively identify those women in need of additional testing and biopsies. Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) shed from tumors, isolated from peripheral blood, and analyzed with ultra-deep and broad sequencing of cancer-associated genes, have great potential for early cancer detection. The ultimate goal is to develop blood cfNA cancer screening tests for use in conjunction with established risk factors and/or radiographic features for improved cancer detection. Development of these tests requires large, well-annotated cohorts of asymptomatic participants with adequate volumes of prediagnostic blood. The STRIVE Study cohort was recently established to train and validate cfNA-based tests for early detection of breast cancer. Eligibility criteria and trial design: The STRIVE Study is a new prospective, multi-ethnic mammography cohort that will recruit 120,000 subjects from 15+ US breast cancer screening centers (including Mayo Clinic and Sutter Health sites). Eligibility criteria require only that a participant has a scheduled routine screening mammogram at a participating center and has not received a biopsy prior to the research blood draw. Participants are recruited within 28 days of screening mammography (digital or tomosynthesis), consent electronically, provide blood samples, and complete an on-line risk factor questionnaire. Participants will be followed for all cancer diagnoses, cancer recurrences, and death for at least 5 years. Pertinent medical record information, imaging findings (including breast density), and follow-up data will be transferred electronically to a central database throughout the study period. Additional blood samples will be collected from participants with abnormal mammogram results, or who are diagnosed with cancer, to document and better understand the evolution of cfNA signals. Recruitment began in February 2017. Primary Aims: To train and validate a cfNA blood-based test to identify breast cancer overall in a cohort of women undergoing screening mammography. Statistical Methods: The study will be divided into a training phase (1/3 of participants) and an independent clinical validation phase (remaining 2/3 of participants). In the training phase, statistical machine learning techniques will be used to develop algorithms incorporating cfNA signals, clinical characteristics, or radiological features. In the validation phase, the prespecified locked algorithm developed from the training phase will be clinically validated in an independent group of women. Contact information for people with a specific interest in the trial: Additional details regarding the STRIVE Study are available on the ClinicalTrials.gov website (NCT03085888). For site-specific questions, please call 844-366-9738 for the Mayo Clinic and 1-855-578-7483 for Sutter Health. Citation Format: Liu MC, Cummings S, Vachon CM, Kerlikowske K, Couch FJ, Morris EA, Olson JE, Polley EC, Conners AL, Ellis RL, Patel B, Maimone IV S, Zhang N, Hamilton S, Clarke CA, Allen BA, Maddala T, Hartman A-R. Development of cell-free nucleic acid-based tests for early detection of breast cancer: The STRIVE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-01.