Aslam, Nabeel

Measuring intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) has been proposed as a means to help maintain optimal ultrafiltration and prevent complications such as hernias, peritoneal leaks, and gastroesophageal reflux, which are linked with high IPP levels. The Durand method is a commonly accepted method for measuring IPP; however, it is cumbersome and not routinely used in clinics due to its complexity. Here we report the outcome of a pilot study that evaluated the agreement between IPP measured using an in-line pressure transducer and IPP measured using the Durand method during in-clinic automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) therapy. This was an exploratory, descriptive, early feasibility study conducted among patients with a diagnosis of kidney failure who were on APD therapy. IPP was continuously measured using an investigational device (x-MIP transducer) and at fixed timepoints using the Durand method. The study included 10 patients with a median age of 47.0 years and a median body mass index of 28.1 kg/m 2 . The study population was predominantly female, comprising 70% of the participants. The transducer IPP showed a moderate agreement with manual IPP, as most differences in measurements were within ±3 cmH 2 O. Overall, IPP did not correlate with fill-volume. However, when examined on a per-patient level, six patients showed stronger correlations ( ρ > 0.7) between IPP and fill-volume, while the remaining four patients had weaker correlations ( ρ < 0.5). No safety concerns were identified in the study. In summary, this study indicates that a transducer-based IPP measurement device could serve as an alternative to the Durand method.

Key Points This study demonstrates that peritoneal dialysis is a safe and feasible option for patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, even with high cystic organ volumes. Larger organ volumes, including height-adjusted cumulative kidney and liver volume, were not associated with increased peritoneal dialysis–related complications. Background Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most prevalent genetic kidney disorder and the fourth leading cause of kidney failure. Peritoneal dialysis (PD), preferred for its home-based convenience and cost-effectiveness, is often underutilized in ADPKD because of concerns over enlarged kidneys and heightened risk of complications. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the Mayo Clinic Polycystic Kidney Disease Database to evaluate individuals with ADPKD undergoing PD. We analyzed demographics, clinical parameters, and PD-related parameters. Complications were correlated with kidney and liver volumes derived from pre-kidney failure imaging. Results A total of 155 individuals with ADPKD on PD were included, of whom 45.1% were male. The mean age at PD initiation was 54.3±12.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 28.0±7.0 kg/m 2 . The median duration of PD was 24.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.7–43.1), with 21.9% transitioning to hemodialysis. The most common complications were abdominal hernias (30.3%) and peritonitis (23.9%), with a peritonitis rate of 0.11 episodes per patient-year. Imaging analyses performed on a subset of 50 patients showed a median height-adjusted total kidney liver volume of 2731.9 ml/m (IQR, 2102.5–3131.1) and a median height-adjusted total kidney volume of 1303.5 ml/m (IQR, 733.1–1829.4). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no differences in complications rates on the basis of height-adjusted total kidney liver volume or height-adjusted total kidney volume (above versus below median values) or body mass index categories. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that higher height-adjusted cumulative organ volume was associated with a lower risk of PD-related complications (hazard ratio=0.56, P = 0.026). Conclusions PD is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with ADPKD, with no increased risk of PD-related complications associated with larger height-adjusted cumulative organ volumes. Infectious complication rates in this cohort were within International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis guideline thresholds, further supporting the safety of PD in this population.

ObjectiveAvacopan, an activated complement factor 5 receptor antagonist, has been approved as adjunct therapy for severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Current evidence supports the management of AAV presenting with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) by administering glucocorticoids combined with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide in addition to supportive care. The role of avacopan in patients with DAH as a primary severe disease manifestation of AAV has not been well established. Furthermore, concerns remain regarding timely access to avacopan, the best glucocorticoid tapering regimen, and long‐term efficacy and safety of the drug. We sought to identify clinical features and outcomes of patients presenting with DAH secondary to AAV who received avacopan in addition to glucocorticoids and rituximab or cyclophosphamide.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients presenting with DAH as part of active severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at presentation and follow‐up.ResultsFifteen patients met inclusion criteria and were observed for a median time of 17 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 6–37 weeks) after initiation of avacopan. Patients were predominantly female and White, had never smoked, and were a median age of 66 years (IQR 52–72 years) at diagnosis. The majority had newly diagnosed severe AAV with renal involvement. Three patients progressed to respiratory failure. The timing of avacopan introduction and patterns of glucocorticoid tapers varied widely in this cohort. Two serious adverse events related to infection were observed, including one opportunistic infection leading to the patient's death, although neither was directly attributed to avacopan administration.ConclusionWe describe the clinical course of patients who presented with the severe AAV disease manifestation of DAH and received avacopan as adjunct therapy. Most patients achieved remission during follow‐up, and adverse events, including infection, were observed.

ABSTRACT Background and hypothesis The MENTOR trial (MEmbranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab) showed that rituximab was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission. However, the cost of rituximab may prohibit first-line use for some patients and health-care payers. Methods A Markov model was used to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of rituximab compared with cyclosporine for the treatment membranous nephropathy from the perspective of a health-care payer with a lifetime time horizon. The model was informed by data from the MENTOR trial where possible; additional parameters including cost and utility inputs were obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of reduced-cost biosimilar rituximab. Results Rituximab for the treatment of membranous nephropathy was cost effective (assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; in $US 2021) compared with cyclosporine, with an ICER of $8373/QALY over a lifetime time horizon. The incremental cost of rituximab therapy was $28 007 with an additional 3.34 QALYs compared with cyclosporine. Lower cost of rituximab biosimilars resulted in a more favorable ICER, and in some cases resulted in rituximab being dominant (lower cost and great benefit) compared to cyclosporine. Conclusions Despite the greater cost of rituximab, it may be a cost-effective option for the treatment of membranous nephropathy when compared with cyclosporine. The cost-effectiveness of rituximab is further improved with the use of less expensive biosimilars.