Back to Authors

Mu, Brian H.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-735X

Mayo Clinic

American Hip Institute

Citations 3

The Correlation Between Arthroscopically Defined Acetabular Cartilage Defects and a Proposed Preoperative Delayed Gadolinium‐Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Index in Hips of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
Perets, Itay , Chaharbakhshi, Edwin O., Hartigan, David E. , Ortiz-Declet, Victor, Mu, Brian H. , Domb, Benjamin G.

Arthroscopy | April 2, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1202-1212

10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.023 Get It

Purpose To evaluate a delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index designed to predict focal acetabular articular cartilage damage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Methods The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent dGEMRIC and hip arthroscopy between April 2010 and August 2015 for FAI syndrome. The exclusion criteria were previous hip conditions, a Tönnis grade greater than 1, and a delay between magnetic resonance imaging and surgery greater than 180 days. The cutoff value for full‐thickness chondral damage was set to 350 milliseconds. The coronal anterolateral (CAL) index was designed to evaluate focal articular anterolateral chondral defects. We calculated the binary classification test of the CAL index for full‐thickness chondral damage, with arthroscopy as the gold standard. We calculated the correlation between the CAL index and the arthroscopically defined acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) and Outerbridge grades and tested for differences between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage. We repeated this analysis on the sagittal superior index, a combination of the sagittal anterior and posterior indices. Results A total of 195 hips (183 patients) were reviewed. The CAL index showed a sensitivity of 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32%‐76%), specificity of 81% (95% CI, 74%‐86%), positive predictive value of 27% (95% CI, 18%‐37%), and negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 90%‐96%). The CAL index showed a significant difference between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage per both ALAD and Outerbridge groups ( P < .0001). The CAL index was moderately inversely correlated with ALAD and Outerbridge grades (ρ = –0.403, P < .0001). The sagittal superior index was not significantly different between the groups and showed a weak correlation with focal defects. Conclusions The CAL index may play a role in ruling out full‐thickness articular cartilage defects in patients with FAI syndrome. In addition, it may help in differentiating between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage. Level of Evidence Level III, case‐control study.
Excision of Labral Amorphous Calcification as a Part of Hip Arthroscopy—Clinical Outcomes in a Matched‐Controlled Study
Perets, Itay , Hartigan, David E. , Walsh, John P. , Chen, Austin W., Mu, Brian H. , Domb, Benjamin G.

Arthroscopy | February 1, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1227-1233

10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.025 Get It

Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes, demographics, and radiographic findings for patients whose hip arthroscopies involved amorphous calcification (AC) excision and to compare them with a control group with no AC and with the general population regarding diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism. Methods Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy involving surgical excision of AC deposit in the anterosuperior labralcapsular recess between October 2008 and July 2014 were reviewed. Demographics, radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, and procedures were reviewed. Minimum follow‐up was 2 years and included visual analog scale for pain, patient satisfaction, and the following patient‐reported outcome scores: modified Harris hip score, hip outcomes score sport‐specific subscale, and nonarthritic hip score. These patients were matched (1:2 ratio) to patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with no AC using the following matching criteria: age at surgery ± 5 years, body mass index ± 5, gender, type of labral treatment, and type of capsular treatment. Results We reviewed 12 cases in 11 female patients. Mean latest follow‐up scores improved from 64.0 to 83.4 ( P = .003) for modified Harris hip score, from 57.6 to 80.6 ( P < .001) for nonarthritic hip score, from 35.4 to 62.7 ( P = .021) for hip outcomes score sport‐specific subscale, and from 6.4 to 2.8 ( P = .016) for visual analog scale. The survivorship rate was 91.7%, with one hip converting to total hip arthroplasty. Mean patient satisfaction was 8.4 ± 2.3. Six hips of the 12 (50%) had clock face localization of the AC. They were all between 11 and 12 with a mean of 12:30. Postoperative radiographic findings showed no subsequent AC in all 12 hips. No complications or revisions were reported. There were no significant differences between the AC group and the control group. Conclusions The treatment of AC as part of hip arthroscopy for labral tear and femoro‐acetabular impingement is safe and has favorable and similar outcomes compared with a control group at minimum 2‐year follow‐up. Female gender may be a risk factor for the development of AC. There is no strong evidence that AC should be debrided. Level of Evidence Level III, case control study.
Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sport in Competitive Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening Compared With a Matched Control Group Without Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening
Perets, Itay , Hartigan, David E. , Chaharbakhshi, Edwin O., Ashberg, Lyall , Mu, Brian H. , Domb, Benjamin G.

Arthroscopy | January 4, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 456-463

10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.292 Get It

Purpose To compare the minimum 2‐year outcomes and return to sports in competitive athletes after arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IFL) and treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) to competitive athletes treated for FAI who did not undergo IFL. Methods Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed between November 2009 and April 2014. Included patients were high school, collegiate, or professional athletes who underwent arthroscopic IFL, treatment for FAI, and preoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Non‐Arthritic Athletic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 16 years, Tönnis grade >1, microfracture, abductor pathology, and previous hip conditions. A subgroup of athletes were matched to athletes who did not undergo IFL by age ± 5 years, sex, and body mass index ± 5. Results There were 75 athletes eligible for inclusion, 60 (80.0%) of whom had minimum 2‐year follow‐up. All patient‐reported outcome (PRO) scores demonstrated significant improvements at latest follow‐up ( P < .001). Mean satisfaction was 7.9. No patients converted to arthroplasty. Painful snapping was resolved in 55 athletes (91.7%). Nine athletes (15.0%) had nonpainful snapping at follow‐up. Thirty‐nine (65%) returned to their sport. Forty (66.7%) maintained or improved their competitive abilities. There was one case (1.6%) of temporary postoperative numbness. There were no complaints of weakness in hip flexion. Forty‐one IFL athletes were matched to 41 controls. No differences were detected in demographics, follow‐up time, intraoperative findings, procedures, mean magnitudes of improvement, or return to sports. Conclusions In competitive athletes, IFL during hip arthroscopy is safe and demonstrates favorable improvements in PROs and VAS, high satisfaction, and high rate of symptom resolution at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Most patients were able to return to sports and maintain or improve their competitive levels. These results were similar to a control group of athletes not requiring IFL. Level of Evidence Level III, case‐control study.