Back to Authors

Brooks, David P.

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6847-3291

Mayo Clinic

SmithKline Beecham, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Citations 1

Cardiovascular actions of ET-B activation in vivo and modulation by receptor antagonism
Jougasaki, Michihisa , Supaporn, Thanom, Hallett, John W., Brooks, David P. , Burnett, John C. , Rasmussen, Todd E.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology | December 25, 2017 | Volume: 274 | Issue: 1 | Pages: R131-R138

10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.1.r131 Get It

The endothelin (ET)-B receptor subtype is expressed on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells and participates in vasodilatation and vasoconstriction. Controversy exists regarding the role of the ET-B receptor as a mediator of systemic, pulmonary, and renal vasoconstriction in states of marked ET-1 activation. Moreover, the potential activation of endogenous ET-1 with secondary stimulation of the ET-A receptor in response to sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) remains unclear. This study was designed to assess the cardiovascular actions of ET-B activation with S6c in the presence and absence of selective ET-A antagonism with FR-139317 and dual ET-A/ET-B antagonism with SB-209670 in the anesthetized dog. Compared with time control ( n = 5), S6c increased from baseline systemic vascular resistance (SVR) [28 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 3 resistance units (RU), P < 0.05] and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 RU, P < 0.05) and decreased cardiac output (CO) (−1.7 ± 0.3 vs. −0.5 ± 0.1 l/min, P < 0.05), with no differences in renal vascular resistance in association with increases in plasma ET-1. S6c also decreased mixed venous oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]) (56 ± 6 vs. 76 ± 5%, P < 0.05). Selective ET-A receptor antagonism did not affect the actions of S6c, with the exception that ET-A receptor antagonism blocked the increase in SVR to high-dose S6c. Dual ET-A/ET-B receptor antagonism attenuated the increase from baseline in SVR (7 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 7 RU, P < 0.05) and PVR (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7 RU, P < 0.05) and decrease from baseline in CO (−0.9 ± 0.1 vs. −1.7 ± 0.3 l/min, P < 0.05) and[Formula: see text] (−7 ± 3 vs. −20 ± 3%, P < 0.05) observed with S6c alone. In summary, this study demonstrates an important role of ET-B receptor activation in vivo, which results in increases in plasma ET-1 and systemic and pulmonary vasoconstriction and reductions in CO and [Formula: see text]. This study also supports a modest role for the ET-A receptor in mediating the systemic vasoconstrictor response to high-dose S6c.