Back to Authors

Rasmussen, Todd E.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-4116

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 16

An Analysis of Malpractice Litigation of Vascular Surgeons in Cases Involving Aortic Pathologies
Sen, Indrani , Choudhry, Asad , Cherukuri, Sai Kiran, Mendes, Bernardo C. , Colglazier, Jill J. , Shuja, Fahad , Kalra, Manju , DeMartino, Randall R. , Rasmussen, Todd E.

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | December 20, 2022 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 350-356

10.1177/15385744221146389 Get It

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze malpractice claims for aortic pathologies and to assess if there has been a change in rate of malpractice lawsuits with evolution of endovascular therapy. Methods Malpractice lawsuits were individually screened and compiled from the Westlaw database from 2000 to 2017 through use of relevant search terms. Data were collected of allegations, diagnoses, and outcomes of each case and compared. Results 268 unique cases were included in this study, with aneurysms (54%, n = 145) and dissection (35%, n = 94) making up the majority. There was a defendant verdict in 53% (n = 141), plaintiff verdict in 24% (n = 65), and settlements in 23% (n = 62) of lawsuits. Litigation was higher in the Midwest and Northeast. There was a gradual decline in litigation overall, however endovascular case numbers remained constant. There was negligible difference in the primary allegation underlying the litigation for various aortic pathologies, time to litigation and award between open and endovascular procedures. Conclusion The proportion of litigation for clinical negligence in endovascular cases amongst all vascular surgical lawsuits is increasing. As novel methods of endovascular therapy emerge, it is imperative that physicians remain vigilant to legal considerations to minimize malpractice risk.
Use of MEDEVAC Resources in Austere Settings: Paget–Schroetter in the Deployed Environment
Huang, Michelle L, Gerling, Kimberely A, White, Joseph M., Koelling, Erin, O'Donnell, Mary Teresa , Rasmussen, Todd E.

Military Medicine | July 13, 2022 | Volume: 188 | Issue: 11-12 | Pages: 3683-3686

10.1093/milmed/usac194 Get It

ABSTRACT Medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) from a combat zone requires complex decision-making and coordination of assets. A MEDEVAC helicopter team transports not only battle-injured patients but also patients with urgent non-battle-related medical diagnoses from extremely remote locations and are at the mercy of terrain, weather, and enemy contact. The military represents a young population particularly susceptible to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) given the rigorous physical activity demands. Current literature supports immediate anticoagulation and surgical decompression within 14 days of diagnosis of vTOS to prevent long-term morbidity. Presented is a case of service member with vTOS presenting at an extremely remote military clinic who underwent a prompt evacuation ∼7,000 miles utilizing rotary-wing transport, followed by three to four more fixed-wing flights to a military treatment facility in the United States. Immediate recognition and ultrasound of this patient to confirm vTOS upon presentation and effective communication to non-medical military commanders and the receiving medical personnel at each Echelon was necessary to ensure an expedited evacuation. The surgeons treating this patient recommend prompt evacuation of deployed service members with suspected vTOS, venogram at the Role 3 if ultrasound is inconclusive, anticoagulation, and return to a Role 4 CONUS facility for definitive surgical management within 14 days. This case is an example of the efficiency of the military MEDEVAC system on a global scale, ensuring optimum medical care for all service members deployed.
Therapeutic Interventions and Outcomes in Civilian and Military Isolated Gunshot Wounds to the Head
Δημητριάδης, Δημήτριος , Owattanapanich, Natthida , Shackelford, Stacy , Roedel, Erik, Polk, Travis M. , Biswas, Subarna , Rasmussen, Todd, Benjamin, Elizabeth , Rasmussen, Todd E.

Annals of Surgery | July 4, 2022 | Volume: 278 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e131-e136

10.1097/sla.0000000000005496 Get It

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare therapeutic strategies and outcomes, following isolated gunshot wounds of the head, between military and civilian populations. Background: Recent military conflicts introduced new concepts in trauma care, including aggressive surgical intervention in severe head trauma. Methods: This was a cohort-matched study, using the civilian Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR), during the period 2013 to 2016. Included in the study were patients with isolated gunshots to the head. Exclusion criteria were dead on arrival, civilians transferred from other hospitals, and patients with major extracranial associated injuries (body area Abbreviated Injury Scale >3). Patients in the military database were propensity score–matched 1:3 with patients in the civilian database. Results: A total of 136 patients in the DoDTR database were matched for age, sex, year of injury, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale with 408 patients from TQIP. Utilization of blood products was significantly higher in the military population (P<0.001). In the military group, patients were significantly more likely to have intracranial pressure monitoring (17% vs 6%, P<0.001) and more likely to undergo craniotomy or craniectomy (34% vs 13%, P<0.001) than in the civilian group. Mortality in the military population was significantly lower (27% vs 38%, P=0.013). Conclusions: Military patients are more likely to receive blood products, have intracranial pressure monitoring and undergo craniectomy or craniotomy than their civilian counterparts after isolated head gunshot wounds. Mortality is significantly lower in the military population. Level of Evidence: Level III—therapeutic.
Impact of Ischemia Duration on Lower Limb Salvage in Combat Casualties
Perkins, Zane , Kersey, Alexander J., White, Joseph M., Lauria, Alexis L. , Propper, Brandon W., Tai, Nigel , Rasmussen, Todd E.

Annals of Surgery | June 27, 2022 | Volume: 276 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 532-538

10.1097/sla.0000000000005560 Get It

Introduction: The 6-hour threshold to revascularization of an ischemic limb is ubiquitous in the trauma literature, however, contemporary evidence suggests that this threshold should be less. This study aims to characterize the relationship between the duration of limb ischemia and successful limb salvage following lower extremity arterial trauma. Methods: This is a cohort study of the United States and UK military service members injured while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2013. Consecutive patients who sustained iliac, femoral, or popliteal artery injuries, and underwent surgery to attempt revascularization, were included. The association between limb outcome and the duration of limb ischemia was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: One hundred twenty-two patients (129 limbs) who sustained iliac (2.3%), femoral (56.6%), and popliteal (41.1%) arterial injuries were included. Overall, 87 limbs (67.4%) were successfully salvaged. The probability of limb salvage was 86.0% when ischemia was ≤1 hour; 68.3% when between 1 and 3 hours; 56.3% when between 3 and 6 hours; and 6.7% when >6 hours ( P <0.0001). Shock more than doubled the risk of failed limb salvage [hazard ratio=2.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–4.62)]. Conclusions: Limb salvage is critically dependent on the duration of ischemia with a 10% reduction in the probability of successful limb salvage for every hour delay to revascularization. The presence of shock significantly worsens this relationship. Military trauma systems should prioritize rapid hemorrhage control and early limb revascularization within 1 hour of injury.
The Human Acellular Vessel for Vascular Reconstruction or Bypass
Lauria, Alexis L. , Sen, Indrani , Rasmussen, Todd E.

JAMA Surgery | June 22, 2022 | Volume: 157 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 731

10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1214 Get It

Cardiovascular actions of ET-B activation in vivo and modulation by receptor antagonism
Jougasaki, Michihisa , Supaporn, Thanom, Hallett, John W., Brooks, David P. , Burnett, John C. , Rasmussen, Todd E.

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology | December 25, 2017 | Volume: 274 | Issue: 1 | Pages: R131-R138

10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.1.r131 Get It

The endothelin (ET)-B receptor subtype is expressed on vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells and participates in vasodilatation and vasoconstriction. Controversy exists regarding the role of the ET-B receptor as a mediator of systemic, pulmonary, and renal vasoconstriction in states of marked ET-1 activation. Moreover, the potential activation of endogenous ET-1 with secondary stimulation of the ET-A receptor in response to sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) remains unclear. This study was designed to assess the cardiovascular actions of ET-B activation with S6c in the presence and absence of selective ET-A antagonism with FR-139317 and dual ET-A/ET-B antagonism with SB-209670 in the anesthetized dog. Compared with time control ( n = 5), S6c increased from baseline systemic vascular resistance (SVR) [28 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 3 resistance units (RU), P < 0.05] and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (3.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 RU, P < 0.05) and decreased cardiac output (CO) (−1.7 ± 0.3 vs. −0.5 ± 0.1 l/min, P < 0.05), with no differences in renal vascular resistance in association with increases in plasma ET-1. S6c also decreased mixed venous oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]) (56 ± 6 vs. 76 ± 5%, P < 0.05). Selective ET-A receptor antagonism did not affect the actions of S6c, with the exception that ET-A receptor antagonism blocked the increase in SVR to high-dose S6c. Dual ET-A/ET-B receptor antagonism attenuated the increase from baseline in SVR (7 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 7 RU, P < 0.05) and PVR (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7 RU, P < 0.05) and decrease from baseline in CO (−0.9 ± 0.1 vs. −1.7 ± 0.3 l/min, P < 0.05) and[Formula: see text] (−7 ± 3 vs. −20 ± 3%, P < 0.05) observed with S6c alone. In summary, this study demonstrates an important role of ET-B receptor activation in vivo, which results in increases in plasma ET-1 and systemic and pulmonary vasoconstriction and reductions in CO and [Formula: see text]. This study also supports a modest role for the ET-A receptor in mediating the systemic vasoconstrictor response to high-dose S6c.