Taylor, J. Andrew

Background: Autonomic dysfunction is common after spinal cord injury (SCI). There are currently limited tools to comprehensively characterize its deficits. While individual established autonomic tests have a long history and sound scientific background, translating these autonomic testing results to inform clinical understanding is a major barrier. Objectives: To assess a strategic battery of autonomic tests to characterize and act as a biomarker of autonomic regulation for individuals with SCI and to develop a novel graphical representation of these data to facilitate understanding of autonomic dysfunction after SCI. Methods: We outline a battery of six laboratory autonomic tests that were curated to collectively describe the ability of individuals with SCI to inhibit and recruit sympathetic activity through the injured spinal cord. Heart rate/blood pressure variability, bolus phenylephrine, hand and foot cold pressor, Valsalva maneuver, and bladder pressor are herein described. Incorporating normative control data for 30 uninjured individuals completing this testing battery, we further demonstrate the utility of a composite biomarker, comparing these control results to 11 individuals with SCI. Results: Results demonstrate strong normality of data with testing psychometrics, suggesting stable reproducibility with repeat testing. Even in this preliminary sample of individuals with SCI, clear differences begin to emerge compared to uninjured norms. This illustrates the ability of this collective testing battery to characterize autonomic regulation after SCI. To aid in clinical translation, we further present a graphical representation, an autonomic phenotype , which serves as a snapshot of how normal or abnormal sympathetic inhibition and recruitment of activation may be after SCI. Conclusion: Utilizing these autonomic phenotypes, three example cases of individuals with SCI highlight evidence of varied degrees of autonomically complete SCI. Together, this represents a key advancement in our understanding of autonomic function after SCI.

Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have significant dysfunction in cardiovascular autonomic regulation. While recent findings postulate that spinal cord stimulation improves autonomic regulation, limited scope of past methods have tested only above level sympathetic activation, leaving significant uncertainty. To identify whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation improves cardiovascular autonomic regulation, two pairs of well-matched individuals with and without high-thoracic, complete SCI were recruited. Baseline autonomic regulation was characterized with multiple tests of sympathoinhibition and above/below injury level sympathoexcitation. At three subsequent visits, testing was repeated with the addition sub-motor threshold transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation at three previously advocated frequencies. Uninjured controls demonstrated no autonomic deficits at baseline and had no changes with any frequency of stimulation. As expected, individuals with SCI had baseline autonomic dysfunction. In a frequency-dependent manner, spinal cord stimulation enhanced sympathoexcitatory responses, normalizing previously impaired Valsalva's maneuvers. However, stimulation exacerbated already impaired sympathoinhibitory responses, resulting in significantly greater mean arterial pressure increases with the same phenylephrine doses compared to baseline. Impaired sympathoexcitatory response below the level of injury were also further exacerbated with spinal cord stimulation. At baseline, neither individual with SCI demonstrated autonomic dysreflexia with the noxious foot cold pressor test; the addition of stimulation led to a dysreflexic response in every trial, with greater relative hypertension and bradycardia indicating no improvement in cardiovascular autonomic regulation. Collectively, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation demonstrates no improvements in autonomic regulation after SCI, and instead likely generates tonic sympathoexcitation which may lower the threshold for dangerous autonomic dysreflexia.

The occurrence of a sustained vasodilation and hypotension after acute, dynamic exercise suggests that exercise may alter arterial baroreflex mechanisms. Therefore, we assessed systemic hemodynamics, baroreflex regulation of heart rate, and cardiac vagal tone after 60 min of cycling at 60% peak oxygen consumption in 12 healthy, untrained men and women (ages 21-28 yr). We derived sigmoidal carotid-cardiac baroreflex relations by measurement of R-R interval changes induced by ramped, stepwise, R-wave-triggered changes in external neck pressure from 40 to -65 mmHg. We estimated tonic cardiac vagal control with power spectral analysis of R-R interval variability in the respiratory frequency band (0.2-0.3 Hz) during frequency- and tidal volume-controlled breathing. Both mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance were reduced postexercise [pressure: from 86 +/- 2 (mean +/- SE) to 81 +/- 2 mmHg; resistance: from 23 +/- 2 to 16 +/- 1 units; both P < 0.05]. Cardiac output was increased postexercise (from 3.9 +/- 0.3 to 5.5 +/- 0.5 l/min, P < 0.05). Both slope and range of the carotid-cardiac baroreflex relation were increased postexercise (slope: from 4.7 +/- 0.7 to 6.1 +/- 0.9 ms/mmHg; range: from 186 +/- 23 to 238 +/- 30 ms, P < 0.05). Respiratory R-R interval variability (cardiac vagal tone) was not changed at any time after exercise, whereas heart rate and plasma norepinephrine levels were elevated. Thus moderate-intensity, dynamic exercise increases heart rate and cardiac output, reduces peripheral vascular resistance, and augments baroreflex responsiveness. Our data suggest that augmented baroreflex heart rate gain restrains rather than contributes to postexercise hypotension, which appears to be mediated predominately by vasodilation.