Eagon, J. Chris

The hypothesis was that orally moving pacesetter potentials distal to a site of jejunal transection and anastomosis would slow transit through jejunum containing them and that reoperation with excision of bowel containing these pacesetter potentials would restore transit to the control. In six conscious dogs with jejunal serosal electrodes for recording myoelectric activity and a jejunal perfusion/aspiration catheter for measuring transit, jejunal pacesetter potential frequency decreased distal to a midjejunal transection and anastomosis from 18.7 +/- 0.3 (SE) cycles/min (cpm) proximal to the site to 14.4 +/- 0.6 cpm distal to the site (P < 0.05). In addition, orally propagating pacesetter potentials occurred > 25% of the time in a 37 +/- 7 cm length of bowel distal to the site during fasting and after feeding. Transit through the segment with the orally moving pacesetter potentials was slowed during feeding (half time before and after transection, 7.7 +/- 1.1 and 13 +/- 2.0 min, respectively, P < 0.05). Resection of the segment with the abnormal pacesetter potentials shortened the length of bowel containing them to 24 +/- 2 cm (P > 0.05) and restored transit to the control. In conclusion, orally moving pacesetter potentials distal to a canine jejunal transection and anastomosis slowed transit through the segment of bowel containing them. Resection of the segment restored transit to the control.

Gastric pacing has been achieved in dogs and humans, but its effects on gastric motility and emptying have not been thoroughly explored. Seven dogs had bipolar electrodes placed 1 and 10 cm proximal to the pylorus for reverse and forward pacing and monopolar recording electrodes and strain gauges placed 3, 5, and 7 cm proximal to the pylorus. After recovery, myoelectrical and contractile activity and gastric emptying of a mixed meal (50 g 99mTc-labeled liver and 250 ml 111In-labeled 5% dextrose broth solution) were measured in each of three conditions: no pacing, reverse pacing, and forward pacing (frequency 0.5 cycles/min above intrinsic pacesetter potential frequency). Reverse pacing reversed the direction of > 90% of antral pacesetter potentials and peristaltic waves in six of seven dogs, prolonged the lag phase of solid emptying, prolonged the half emptying time of solids and liquids, and increased the antral motility index. Forward pacing entrained pacesetter potentials but had no consistent effect on emptying or antral contractions. In conclusion, reverse gastric pacing slows gastric emptying of digestible solids and liquids by reversing the direction of antral peristalsis and increasing the antral motility index, whereas forward pacing has no such effects.